HypertensionCHiPNCT01020435
Chiropractic for Hypertension in Patients
A study testing Spinal Manipulation in people with Hypertension, run by Palmer College of Chiropractic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators propose a prospective randomized 2 arm parallel observer-blinded phase II clinical study comparing a distinct method of upper cervical chiropractic manipulation to a sham technique in 50 individuals with stage I hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP): 140-159 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- Spinal Manipulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to May 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 21 and < 75
- Documented Stage I Hypertension
Who cannot join
- Cardiovascular disorders (Angina pectoris, symptom of CHD; Hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease; Second or Third degree heart block without pacemaker; Stroke, MI, CV surgery within the past 12 months; Claudication, Aortic Coarctation)
- Defibrillator
- Autoimmune Arthropathies
- Pregnancy
- Unwillingness to stop other forms of manual therapy during study
- Unwillingness to sign ICD or preliminary consent
Show all 30Show fewer
- Intention to move from the area during the next 4 months
- Unwillingness to participate in any of the treatment groups
- Avg SBP<140 or >159mm Hg (AND) Avg DBP<90 or >99mm Hg
- Any single SBP > 160mm Hg or DBP> 100
- BMI > 40
- Prescription medications with increased risk for CVA
- Current use of anti-coagulant medication/blood thinners
- Active drug or alcohol addiction or abstinent < 1 year
- Psychiatric diagnosis that would limit patient compliance
- Serious concomitant medical illness
- Contraindication(s) to treatment
- Electrolyte abnormalities seen on lab test
- Renal Failure w/ creatinine >2.5mg/dL
- Abnormal Liver function tests
- Anemia with hematocrit < 30%
- Glucose in Urine
- Serum potassium <3.4 @ baseline
- S/S Renal artery stenosis
- Quebec Task Force Classification 4-9
- Self-reported Arnold Chiari malformation
- Spinal or paraspinal tumors
- Dx with disorder that exhibit spinal joint hypermobility (Marfan Syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Osteogenesis imperfecta)
- Unstable endocrine disorders
- Osteoporosis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Palmer College of Chirpractic
Davenport, Iowa, 52803
About this study
Official title: Upper Cervical Manipulation for Patients With Stage 1 Hypertension
The investigators propose a prospective randomized 2 arm parallel observer-blinded phase II clinical study comparing a distinct method of upper cervical chiropractic manipulation to a sham technique in 50 individuals with stage I hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP): 140-159 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure (DBP):90-99 mm Hg).
Read the detailed description
More than 50 million Americans suffer from hypertension, a disease with far-reaching public health impact causing or contributing to 7.1 million deaths yearly at an estimated annual incremental direct cost of $54 billion per year. Common treatments include antihypertensive medications and lifestyle modifications. While these treatments have been shown to be effective, only about 30% of hypertensive patients achieve blood pressure goals. Based on a recently published study (Bakris et al, 2007), one unique non-pharmaceutical approach may be a non-rotary type of upper cervical spinal manipulation to align the first cervical vertebra (atlas) performed by a doctor of chiropractic. We propose to conduct a similar study with a more commonly known chiropractic technique called Toggle Recoil. We propose a prospective randomized 2 arm parallel observer-blinded phase II clinical study comparing a distinct method of upper cervical chiropractic manipulation to a sham technique in 50 (25 in each group) individuals with Stage I hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP); 140-159 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP):90-99 mm Hg). Patients will be seen by doctors of chiropractic twice each week for 6 weeks and outcomes will be collected at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks after enrollment. The primary outcome measure will be change in SBP and the primary endpoint will be at the week 6 assessment.
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Being tested
- Spinal Manipulation, Sham Spinal Manipulation
- Keywords
- Hypertension
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal ManipulationOther
The procedure in its broadest definition describes the application of a load (force or displacement) to specific body tissues (usually vertebral joints) with therapeutic intent. The mechanical characteristics of SM can vary in terms of its duration and amplitude, (hence, the rate at which it is applied), as well as its anatomical location, choice of levers, direction of force application, and the vehicle used to apply the force (manually or mechanically assisted).
Sham Spinal ManipulationOther
Also called Sham
The sham assessment procedures will be the same as those in the high velocity treatment group. The sham intervention is identical to this treatment protocol except for the placement of the treating clinicians pisiform contact. The force and vector applied will be the same.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Manipulation High Velocity | Active comparator | This non-rotary upper cervical procedure uses an impulse thrust with a controlled depth (high velocity). The participant's head is supported by a specially designed cushion and the doctor usually approaches the participant from in front of his or her head to contact soft tissue over the atlas transverse process, posterior to the lateral mass or occasionally on the C2 lamina or spinous process, with the pisiform process of one hand. The thrust is delivered by a contraction of the triceps muscles of both arms, which straightens the arms and applies the thrust to the participant. Receives: Other: Spinal Manipulation |
| Sham Spinal Manipulation | Placebo comparator | The sham assessment procedures will be similar to the active group. It has been developed and validated by Vernon et al. Receives: Other: Sham Spinal Manipulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Unadjusted and Adjusted Changes From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Weeks 1, 3, 6
To estimate the effect size and variability of change in systolic (SBP) and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) over a six week treatment period to use in planning a full-scale randomized controlled trial and to assess the believability of the placebo manipulation.
The table shows the unadjusted and adjusted mean change in SBP and DBP from baseline to after Treatment 1 (Tx 1), 3 (Wk 3), and 6 (Wk 6) Weeks.
Adjusted values were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and respective baseline blood pressure.
Wk 3 and Wk 6 DBP were also adjusted for stage of blood pressure (prehypertension or Stage 1 hypertension).
Measured: Baseline after 1, 3, and 6 Weeks of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionApr 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Palmer College of Chiropractic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christine M Goertz, DC, PhD, Principal investigator, Palmer College of Chiropractic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01020435
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHiP
- Acronym
- CHiP
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 7 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Feasibility/pilot study
Publications
Mansholt BA, Vining RD, Long CR, Goertz CM. Inter-examiner reliability of the interpretation of paraspinal thermographic pattern analysis. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2015 Jun;59(2):157-64.
PubMed 26136608Hart JF. Effect of Spinal Manipulation of Upper Cervical Vertebrae on Blood Pressure: Results of a Pilot Sham-Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Oct;39(8):603. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Oct 13. No abstract available.
PubMed 27745887Goertz CM, Salsbury SA, Vining RD. Response to Letter to the Editor on "Effect of Spinal Manipulation of Upper Cervical Vertebrae on Blood Pressure: Results of a Pilot Sham-Controlled Trial". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Oct;39(8):603-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11. No abstract available.
PubMed 27742418Goertz CM, Salsbury SA, Vining RD, Long CR, Pohlman KA, Weeks WB, Lamas GA. Effect of Spinal Manipulation of Upper Cervical Vertebrae on Blood Pressure: Results of a Pilot Sham-Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Jun;39(5):369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 9.
PubMed 27157678
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Upper Cervical Manipulation for Patients With Stage 1 Hypertension
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01020435
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHiP / CHiP
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Keywords
- Hypertension
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Palmer College of ChiropracticUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Feb 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose a prospective randomized 2 arm parallel observer-blinded phase II clinical study comparing a distinct method of upper cervical chiropractic manipulation to a sham technique in 50 individuals with stage I hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP): 140-159 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure (DBP):90-99 mm Hg).
Detailed description
More than 50 million Americans suffer from hypertension, a disease with far-reaching public health impact causing or contributing to 7.1 million deaths yearly at an estimated annual incremental direct cost of $54 billion per year. Common treatments include antihypertensive medications and lifestyle modifications. While these treatments have been shown to be effective, only about 30% of hypertensive patients achieve blood pressure goals. Based on a recently published study (Bakris et al, 2007), one unique non-pharmaceutical approach may be a non-rotary type of upper cervical spinal manipulation to align the first cervical vertebra (atlas) performed by a doctor of chiropractic. We propose to conduct a similar study with a more commonly known chiropractic technique called Toggle Recoil. We propose a prospective randomized 2 arm parallel observer-blinded phase II clinical study comparing a distinct method of upper cervical chiropractic manipulation to a sham technique in 50 (25 in each group) individuals with Stage I hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP); 140-159 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP):90-99 mm Hg). Patients will be seen by doctors of chiropractic twice each week for 6 weeks and outcomes will be collected at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks after enrollment. The primary outcome measure will be change in SBP and the primary endpoint will be at the week 6 assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Manipulation High Velocity | Active comparator | Other: Spinal ManipulationThis non-rotary upper cervical procedure uses an impulse thrust with a controlled depth (high velocity). The participant's head is supported by a specially designed cushion and the doctor usually approaches the participant from in front of his or her head to contact soft tissue over the atlas transverse process, posterior to the lateral mass or occasionally on the C2 lamina or spinous process, with the pisiform process of one hand. The thrust is delivered by a contraction of the triceps muscles of both arms, which straightens the arms and applies the thrust to the participant. |
| Sham Spinal Manipulation | Placebo comparator | Other: Sham Spinal ManipulationThe sham assessment procedures will be similar to the active group. It has been developed and validated by Vernon et al. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age > 21 and < 75
- Documented Stage I Hypertension
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Cardiovascular disorders (Angina pectoris, symptom of CHD; Hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease; Second or Third degree heart block without pacemaker; Stroke, MI, CV surgery within the past 12 months; Claudication, Aortic Coarctation)
- Defibrillator
- Autoimmune Arthropathies
- Pregnancy
- Unwillingness to stop other forms of manual therapy during study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal ManipulationThe procedure in its broadest definition describes the application of a load (force or displacement) to specific body tissues (usually vertebral joints) with therapeutic intent. The mechanical characteristics of SM can vary in terms of its duration and amplitude, (hence, the rate at which it is applied), as well as its anatomical location, choice of levers, direction of force application, and the vehicle used to apply the force (manually or mechanically assisted). | Other | Spinal Manipulation High Velocity |
| Sham Spinal ManipulationAlso: ShamThe sham assessment procedures will be the same as those in the high velocity treatment group. The sham intervention is identical to this treatment protocol except for the placement of the treating clinicians pisiform contact. The force and vector applied will be the same. | Other | Sham Spinal Manipulation |
Primary outcome
Unadjusted and Adjusted Changes From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Weeks 1, 3, 6
Time frame: Baseline after 1, 3, and 6 Weeks of treatment
To estimate the effect size and variability of change in systolic (SBP) and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) over a six week treatment period to use in planning a full-scale randomized controlled trial and to assess the believability of the placebo manipulation. The table shows the unadjusted and adjusted mean change in SBP and DBP from baseline to after Treatment 1 (Tx 1), 3 (Wk 3), and 6 (Wk 6) Weeks. Adjusted values were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and respective baseline blood pressure. Wk 3 and Wk 6 DBP were also adjusted for stage of blood pressure (prehypertension or Stage 1 hypertension).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Feb 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 26136608Mansholt BA, Vining RD, Long CR, Goertz CM. Inter-examiner reliability of the interpretation of paraspinal thermographic pattern analysis. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2015 Jun;59(2):157-64.
- Background: PubMed 27745887Hart JF. Effect of Spinal Manipulation of Upper Cervical Vertebrae on Blood Pressure: Results of a Pilot Sham-Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Oct;39(8):603. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Oct 13. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27742418Goertz CM, Salsbury SA, Vining RD. Response to Letter to the Editor on "Effect of Spinal Manipulation of Upper Cervical Vertebrae on Blood Pressure: Results of a Pilot Sham-Controlled Trial". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Oct;39(8):603-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 27157678Goertz CM, Salsbury SA, Vining RD, Long CR, Pohlman KA, Weeks WB, Lamas GA. Effect of Spinal Manipulation of Upper Cervical Vertebrae on Blood Pressure: Results of a Pilot Sham-Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Jun;39(5):369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 9.
- Inter-examiner reliability of the interpretation of paraspinal thermographic pattern analysisLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Feasibility/pilot study
Related trials for Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
PAUL® Glaucoma Implant Safety and Effectiveness Study
Refractory Glaucoma
RecruitingObservational study
Asthma and Primary Arterial Hypertension: an Inflammatory Link?
Asthma Bronchial
RecruitingObservational study
Clevidipine for the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
RecruitingPhase 1/2
HS235 Study in Overweight and Obese Participants With Combined Pre and Post-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Pulmonary Hypertension, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
Dry Weight Reduction Intervention Via Extra Ultrafiltration
Fluid Accumulation, Blood Pressure Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christine M Goertz, DC, PhD principal investigator
Palmer College of Chiropractic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal Manipulation in people with Hypertension, run by Palmer College of Chiropractic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Unadjusted and Adjusted Changes From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Weeks 1, 3, 6 (time frame: Baseline after 1, 3, and 6 Weeks of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01020435, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2018.