Retinitis PigmentosaNCT01024803
Safety and Efficacy of Subretinal Implants for Partial Restoration of Vision in Blind Patients
A study testing Device name: "Retina Implant model Alpha". Surgical implantation of medical device into eye in people with Retinitis Pigmentosa and Retinal Degeneration, run by Retina Implant AG at 6 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Patients suffering from hereditary retinal degeneration receive a retinal implant to restore sight. Subretinal implant "ON" results in significant visual acuity improvement, when compared to "OFF" condition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 78 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Retinitis Pigmentosa, Retinal Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- Device name: "Retina Implant model Alpha". Surgical implantation of medical device into eye
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2009to Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 78 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hereditary retinal degeneration of the outer retinal layers i.e. photoreceptor rods \& cones.
- Pseudophakia
- Angiography shows retinal vessels adequately perfused, despite pathological RP condition.
- Age between 18 and 78 years.
- Blindness (at least monocular) i.e. visual functions not appropriate for localization of objects, self sustained navigation and orientation.
- Ability to read normal print in earlier life, optically corrected without magnifying glass.
- Willing and able to give written informed consent in accordance to EN ISO 14155 (section 6.7) and local legislation prior to participation in the study. Able to perform the study during the full time period of one year for Module-2.
Who cannot join
- Period of appropriate visual functions approx. 12 years / lifetime.
- Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) shows significant retina edema \&/or scar tissue within target region for implant.
- Retina detected as too thin to expect required rest-functionality of inner retina as shown via Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).
- Lack of inner-retinal function, as determined by Electrically Evoked Phosphenes (EEP).
- Heavy clumped pigmentation at posterior pole
- Any other ophthalmologic disease with relevant effect upon visual function (e.g. glaucoma, optic neuropathies, trauma, diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachment).
Show all 12Show fewer
- Amblyopia reported earlier in life on eye to be implanted
- Systemic diseases that might imply considerable risks with regard to the surgical interventions and anaesthesia (e.g. cardiovascular/ pulmonary diseases, severe metabolic diseases).
- Neurological and/or psychiatric diseases (e.g. M. Parkinson, epilepsy, depression).
- Hyperthyroidism or hypersensitivity to iodine
- Women who are pregnant or nursing, or women of childbearing potential who are not willing to use a medically acceptable means of birth control for the duration of the study, or women unwilling to perform a pregnancy test before entering the study.
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 30 days.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 3 countries.
6 sites in 3 countries
Germany3 sites
Helmut Sachs, MD, PD
Dresden, 01067
Johann Roider, MD, Prof.
Kiel, 24105
Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, MD, Prof.
Tübingen, 72076
United Kingdom2 sites
Timothy L Jackson, MB.ChB, PhD, FRCOphth
London, SE5 9RS
Robert MacLaren, MD, Prof., DPhil DipEd FRCOphth FRCS
Oxford, OX3 9DU
About this study
Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Subretinal Implants for Partial Restoration of Vision in Blind Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study Based on Randomized Intra-individual Implant Activation in Patients With Degenerative Retinal Diseases
Patients suffering from hereditary retinal degeneration receive a retinal implant to restore sight.
Subretinal implant "ON" results in significant visual acuity improvement, when compared to "OFF" condition.
- Conditions
- Retinitis Pigmentosa, Retinal Degeneration
- Being tested
- Device name: "Retina Implant model Alpha". Surgical implantation of medical device into eye
- Keywords
- Retina implant, Subretinal, Legal blindness, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Eye Diseases, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Retinitis, Retinal Degeneration, Eye Diseases, Hereditary, Retinal Diseases
- Medical subject headings
- Retinitis Pigmentosa, Retinal Degeneration, Blindness, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Eye Diseases, Retinitis, Eye Diseases, Hereditary, Retinal Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Device name: "Retina Implant model Alpha". Surgical implantation of medical device into eyeDevice
Also called retinal implant, bionic eye, artificial vision, artificial eye
Surgical implantation of medical device named "Retina Implant" into eye to restore vision partially.
Randomized intra-individual implant activation in patient under test conditions such as: FrACT, BaLM, BaGA, maze, ADL.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Activities of daily living and mobility significantly improve with implant-ON shown via activities of daily living tasks, recognition tasks, mobility, or a combination thereof.
Measured: every 3 months for a period of one year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Visual acuity/light-perception and/or object-recognition are significantly improved with implant-ON versus OFF as shown via: FrACT/BaLM/BaGA/VFQ-25 or a combination thereof.
Measured: every 3 months for a period of one year
Patient long term safety and stability of implant function
Measured: every 3 months for a period of one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2009
- Primary completionApr 2017
- Study completionApr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Retinitis PigmentosaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Retina Implant AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eberhart Zrenner, Prof. MD, Study chair, Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, GermanyKarl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Prof. MD, Principal investigator, University Eye Hospital Tuebingen, GermanyTimothy L Jackson, PhD FRCOphth, Principal investigator, King's College Hospital NHS TrustJános Németh, Prof. MD PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Ophthalmology Semmelweis University BudapestRobert E MacLaren, Prof. DPhil, Principal investigator, Department of Ophthalmology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UKJohann Roider, Prof. MD, Principal investigator, University Eye Hospital, Kiel, GermanyHelmut Sachs, PD, MD, Principal investigator, Eye Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01024803
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RI-MC-CT-2009
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Koitschev A, Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Braun A, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Sachs H, Peters T, Wilhelm B, Zrenner E, Besch D. Extraocular Surgical Approach for Placement of Subretinal Implants in Blind Patients: Lessons from Cochlear-Implants. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:842518. doi: 10.1155/2015/842518. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
PubMed 26783453Hafed ZM, Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Gekeler F, Zrenner E. Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant. Vision Res. 2016 Jan;118:119-31. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
PubMed 25906684Stingl K, Gekeler F, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Kogel A, Zrenner E, Gelisken F. Fluorescein angiographic findings in eyes of patients with a subretinal electronic implant. Curr Eye Res. 2013 May;38(5):588-96. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.767349. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
PubMed 23410193Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Braun A, Bruckmann A, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Hipp S, Hortdorfer G, Kernstock C, Koitschev A, Kusnyerik A, Sachs H, Schatz A, Stingl KT, Peters T, Wilhelm B, Zrenner E. Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 20;280(1757):20130077. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0077. Print 2013 Apr 22.
PubMed 23427175Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Chee CK, Cottriall CL, Gekeler F, Groppe M, Jackson TL, MacLaren RE, Koitschev A, Kusnyerik A, Neffendorf J, Nemeth J, Naeem MA, Peters T, Ramsden JD, Sachs H, Simpson A, Singh MS, Wilhelm B, Wong D, Zrenner E. Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS--Clinical trial interim report. Vision Res. 2015 Jun;111(Pt B):149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
PubMed 25812924Kitiratschky VB, Stingl K, Wilhelm B, Peters T, Besch D, Sachs H, Gekeler F, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E. Safety evaluation of "retina implant alpha IMS"--a prospective clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;253(3):381-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2797-x. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PubMed 25219982Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Gekeler F, Kusnyerik A, Sachs H, Zrenner E. Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 19;54(12):7658-65. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12835.
PubMed 24150759Stingl K, Schippert R, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Cottriall CL, Edwards TL, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Kiel K, Koitschev A, Kuhlewein L, MacLaren RE, Ramsden JD, Roider J, Rothermel A, Sachs H, Schroder GS, Tode J, Troelenberg N, Zrenner E. Interim Results of a Multicenter Trial with the New Electronic Subretinal Implant Alpha AMS in 15 Patients Blind from Inherited Retinal Degenerations. Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 23;11:445. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00445. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28878616Cehajic Kapetanovic J, Troelenberg N, Edwards TL, Xue K, Ramsden JD, Stett A, Zrenner E, MacLaren RE. Highest reported visual acuity after electronic retinal implantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;98(7):736-740. doi: 10.1111/aos.14443. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
PubMed 32343050Kuehlewein L, Troelenberg N, Stingl K, Schleehauf S, Kusnyerik A, Jackson TL, MacLaren RE, Chee C, Roider J, Wilhelm B, Gekeler F, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E, Stingl K. Changes in microchip position after implantation of a subretinal vision prosthesis in humans. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;97(6):e871-e876. doi: 10.1111/aos.14077. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
PubMed 30816625Rock T, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bramkamp M, Rock D. Influence of axial length on thickness measurements using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Oct 8;55(11):7494-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14043.
PubMed 25298411Kusnyerik A, Greppmaier U, Wilke R, Gekeler F, Wilhelm B, Sachs HG, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Klose U, Stingl K, Resch MD, Hekmat A, Bruckmann A, Karacs K, Nemeth J, Suveges I, Zrenner E. Positioning of electronic subretinal implants in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients through multimodal assessment of retinal structures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jun 20;53(7):3748-55. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9409.
PubMed 22562517
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy of Subretinal Implants for Partial Restoration of Vision in Blind Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study Based on Randomized Intra-individual Implant Activation in Patients With Degenerative Retinal Diseases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01024803
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RI-MC-CT-2009
- Conditions
- Retinitis Pigmentosa, Retinal Degeneration
- Keywords
- Retina implant, Subretinal, Legal blindness, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Eye Diseases, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Retinitis, Retinal Degeneration, Eye Diseases, Hereditary
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Retina Implant AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients suffering from hereditary retinal degeneration receive a retinal implant to restore sight.
Subretinal implant "ON" results in significant visual acuity improvement, when compared to "OFF" condition.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 78 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Hereditary retinal degeneration of the outer retinal layers i.e. photoreceptor rods \& cones.
- Pseudophakia
- Angiography shows retinal vessels adequately perfused, despite pathological RP condition.
- Age between 18 and 78 years.
- Blindness (at least monocular) i.e. visual functions not appropriate for localization of objects, self sustained navigation and orientation.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Period of appropriate visual functions approx. 12 years / lifetime.
- Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) shows significant retina edema \&/or scar tissue within target region for implant.
- Retina detected as too thin to expect required rest-functionality of inner retina as shown via Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).
- Lack of inner-retinal function, as determined by Electrically Evoked Phosphenes (EEP).
- Heavy clumped pigmentation at posterior pole
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Device name: "Retina Implant model Alpha". Surgical implantation of medical device into eyeAlso: retinal implant, bionic eye, artificial vision, artificial eyeSurgical implantation of medical device named "Retina Implant" into eye to restore vision partially. Randomized intra-individual implant activation in patient under test conditions such as: FrACT, BaLM, BaGA, maze, ADL. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Activities of daily living and mobility significantly improve with implant-ON shown via activities of daily living tasks, recognition tasks, mobility, or a combination thereof.
Time frame: every 3 months for a period of one year
2 secondary outcomes
Visual acuity/light-perception and/or object-recognition are significantly improved with implant-ON versus OFF as shown via: FrACT/BaLM/BaGA/VFQ-25 or a combination thereof.
Time frame: every 3 months for a period of one year
Patient long term safety and stability of implant function
Time frame: every 3 months for a period of one year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2018.
- Background: PubMed 26783453Koitschev A, Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Braun A, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Sachs H, Peters T, Wilhelm B, Zrenner E, Besch D. Extraocular Surgical Approach for Placement of Subretinal Implants in Blind Patients: Lessons from Cochlear-Implants. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:842518. doi: 10.1155/2015/842518. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
- Background: PubMed 25906684Hafed ZM, Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Gekeler F, Zrenner E. Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant. Vision Res. 2016 Jan;118:119-31. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 23410193Stingl K, Gekeler F, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Kogel A, Zrenner E, Gelisken F. Fluorescein angiographic findings in eyes of patients with a subretinal electronic implant. Curr Eye Res. 2013 May;38(5):588-96. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.767349. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 23427175Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Braun A, Bruckmann A, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Hipp S, Hortdorfer G, Kernstock C, Koitschev A, Kusnyerik A, Sachs H, Schatz A, Stingl KT, Peters T, Wilhelm B, Zrenner E. Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 20;280(1757):20130077. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0077. Print 2013 Apr 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 25812924Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Chee CK, Cottriall CL, Gekeler F, Groppe M, Jackson TL, MacLaren RE, Koitschev A, Kusnyerik A, Neffendorf J, Nemeth J, Naeem MA, Peters T, Ramsden JD, Sachs H, Simpson A, Singh MS, Wilhelm B, Wong D, Zrenner E. Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS--Clinical trial interim report. Vision Res. 2015 Jun;111(Pt B):149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 25219982Kitiratschky VB, Stingl K, Wilhelm B, Peters T, Besch D, Sachs H, Gekeler F, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E. Safety evaluation of "retina implant alpha IMS"--a prospective clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;253(3):381-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2797-x. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 24150759Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Gekeler F, Kusnyerik A, Sachs H, Zrenner E. Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 19;54(12):7658-65. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12835.
- Results publication: PubMed 28878616Stingl K, Schippert R, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Cottriall CL, Edwards TL, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Kiel K, Koitschev A, Kuhlewein L, MacLaren RE, Ramsden JD, Roider J, Rothermel A, Sachs H, Schroder GS, Tode J, Troelenberg N, Zrenner E. Interim Results of a Multicenter Trial with the New Electronic Subretinal Implant Alpha AMS in 15 Patients Blind from Inherited Retinal Degenerations. Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 23;11:445. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00445. eCollection 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32343050Cehajic Kapetanovic J, Troelenberg N, Edwards TL, Xue K, Ramsden JD, Stett A, Zrenner E, MacLaren RE. Highest reported visual acuity after electronic retinal implantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;98(7):736-740. doi: 10.1111/aos.14443. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30816625Kuehlewein L, Troelenberg N, Stingl K, Schleehauf S, Kusnyerik A, Jackson TL, MacLaren RE, Chee C, Roider J, Wilhelm B, Gekeler F, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E, Stingl K. Changes in microchip position after implantation of a subretinal vision prosthesis in humans. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;97(6):e871-e876. doi: 10.1111/aos.14077. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25298411Rock T, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bramkamp M, Rock D. Influence of axial length on thickness measurements using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Oct 8;55(11):7494-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14043.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22562517Kusnyerik A, Greppmaier U, Wilke R, Gekeler F, Wilhelm B, Sachs HG, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Klose U, Stingl K, Resch MD, Hekmat A, Bruckmann A, Karacs K, Nemeth J, Suveges I, Zrenner E. Positioning of electronic subretinal implants in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients through multimodal assessment of retinal structures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jun 20;53(7):3748-55. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9409.
Related trials for Retinitis Pigmentosa
RecruitingObservational study
Rod and Cone Mediated Function in Retinal Disease
Retinal Degeneration, Retinitis Pigmentosa
RecruitingObservational study
Cell Collection to Study Eye Diseases
Retinal Disease, AMD
Recruiting
Brain Stimulation Effects on Orientation and Mobility Skills in Adults With Vision Impairment
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Rod Cone Dystrophy
RecruitingObservational study
Universal Rare Gene Study: A Registry and Natural History Study of Retinal Dystrophies Associated With Rare Disease-Causing Genetic Variants
Inherited Retinal Degeneration, Retinitis Pigmentosa
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Rate of Progression in EYS Related Retinal Degeneration
Retinitis Pigmentosa, Eye Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eberhart Zrenner, Prof. MD study chair
Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Germany
Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Prof. MD principal investigator
University Eye Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
Timothy L Jackson, PhD FRCOphth principal investigator
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
6 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Device name: "Retina Implant model Alpha". Surgical implantation of medical device into eye in people with Retinitis Pigmentosa and Retinal Degeneration, run by Retina Implant AG at 6 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Germany, United Kingdom, Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Activities of daily living and mobility significantly improve with implant-ON shown via activities of daily living tasks, recognition tasks, mobility, or a combination thereof. (time frame: every 3 months for a period of one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01024803, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2018.