HIV/AIDSPhase 4NCT01025830
Triomune Bioequivalence With Innovators
A Phase 4 study testing Triomune and Zerit/Epivir/Viramune in people with HIV/AIDS, run by Makerere University at 1 site in Uganda.
Trial summary
The null hypothesis is that there is a difference in the the relative rate and extent of absorption into the systemic circulation of Triomune and brand-name Stavudine/Lamivudine/Nevirapine in HIV-infected Africans and the alternative hypothesis is that there is no difference in the the relative rate and extent of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV/AIDS
- What is being tested?
- Triomune and Zerit/Epivir/Viramune
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUganda
- Study dates
- Feb 2006to Mar 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-infected men and non-pregnant women;
- On Triomune for at least 4 weeks;
- 18 years or greater;
- Residing within 15km of Kampala city center
Who cannot join
- Unable to sign or understand informed consent
- Concurrent medication known to interact with any of the components of Triomune
- Patients with active TB, malabsorption, nausea, emesis, abdominal discomfort, chronic diarrhoea, documented active clinically relevant hepatitis;
- Patients expected to change their drug regimen or dosage during the study
- Those planning to move out of Kampala in the next two months;
- Hemoglobin <7.0 mmol/l (men) or <6.5 mmol/l (women);
- Alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >5 times the upper limit of normal;
- Serum creatinine > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Steady State Bioequivalence of Generic and Innovator Formulations of Stavudine, Lamivudine, and Nevirapine in HIV-infected Ugandan Adults
The null hypothesis is that there is a difference in the the relative rate and extent of absorption into the systemic circulation of Triomune and brand-name Stavudine/Lamivudine/Nevirapine in HIV-infected Africans and the alternative hypothesis is that there is no difference in the the relative rate and extent of absorption into the systemic circulation of Triomune and brand-name Stavudine/Lamivudine/Nevirapine in HIV-infected Africans. This is a non-inferiority study.
Read the detailed description
Generic antiretroviral therapy is the mainstay of HIV treatment in resource-limited settings, yet there is little evidence confirming the bioequivalence of generic and brand name formulations. We compared the steady-state pharmacokinetics of Lamivudine, Stavudine and Nevirapine in HIV-infected subjects who were receiving a generic formulation (Triomune®) or the corresponding brand formulations (Epivir®, Zerit®, and Viramune®). An open-label, randomized, crossover study was carried out in 18 HIV-infected Ugandan subjects stabilized on Triomune-40. Subjects received Lamivudine (150 mg), Stavudine (40 mg), and Nevirapine (200 mg) in either the generic or brand formulation twice a day for 30 days, before switching to the other formulation. At the end of each treatment period, blood samples were collected over 12 h for pharmacokinetic analysis. The main outcome measures were the mean AUC0-12h and Cmax. Bioequivalence was defined as a geometric mean ratio between the generic and brand-name within the 90% confidence interval of 0.8-1.25.
- Conditions
- HIV/AIDS
- Being tested
- Triomune, Zerit/Epivir/Viramune
- Keywords
- HIV;Bioequivalence;Triomune
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TriomuneDrug
Also called Stavudine, Lamivudine, Nevirapine
Stavudine (40mg) Lamivudine (150mg) Nevirapine (200mg)All twice a day
Zerit/Epivir/ViramuneDrug
Also called Stavudine, Lamivudine, Nevirapine
Stavudine (40mg) Lamivudine (150mg) and Nevirapine (200mg) All taken twice daily.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Generic | Experimental | generic fixed dose combination of Stavudine, Lamivudine and Nevirapine (Triomune) Receives: Drug: Triomune |
| Brand | Active comparator | 3 separate single pills of Zerit (Stavudine)Epivir (Lamivudine) Viramune (Nevirapine) Receives: Drug: Zerit/Epivir/Viramune |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve(AUC)
Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve for each drug, log transformed
Measured: Assessed at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 and 12 hr post-dosing
Secondary outcomes (1)
Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug
Maximum concentration of drug in plasma that was attained post dosing
Measured: Assessed at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 and 12 hr post-dosing
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2006
- Primary completionJun 2006
- Study completionMar 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV/AIDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Makerere University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco
- Investigators
- Jayne Tusiime, B Pharm, MSc, Principal investigator, Makerere UniversityDavid R Bangsberg, MD,MPH, Study chair, Harvard University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01025830
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BETr
- Status last verified
- Dec 2009
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Byakika-Tusiime J, Chinn LW, Oyugi JH, Obua C, Bangsberg DR, Kroetz DL. Steady state bioequivalence of generic and innovator formulations of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine in HIV-infected Ugandan adults. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003981. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
PubMed 19096711
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Steady State Bioequivalence of Generic and Innovator Formulations of Stavudine, Lamivudine, and Nevirapine in HIV-infected Ugandan Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01025830
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BETr
- Conditions
- HIV/AIDS
- Keywords
- HIV;Bioequivalence;Triomune
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Makerere UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco
- Study start
- Feb 2006
- Primary completion
- Jun 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Dec 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The null hypothesis is that there is a difference in the the relative rate and extent of absorption into the systemic circulation of Triomune and brand-name Stavudine/Lamivudine/Nevirapine in HIV-infected Africans and the alternative hypothesis is that there is no difference in the the relative rate and extent of absorption into the systemic circulation of Triomune and brand-name Stavudine/Lamivudine/Nevirapine in HIV-infected Africans. This is a non-inferiority study.
Detailed description
Generic antiretroviral therapy is the mainstay of HIV treatment in resource-limited settings, yet there is little evidence confirming the bioequivalence of generic and brand name formulations. We compared the steady-state pharmacokinetics of Lamivudine, Stavudine and Nevirapine in HIV-infected subjects who were receiving a generic formulation (Triomune®) or the corresponding brand formulations (Epivir®, Zerit®, and Viramune®). An open-label, randomized, crossover study was carried out in 18 HIV-infected Ugandan subjects stabilized on Triomune-40. Subjects received Lamivudine (150 mg), Stavudine (40 mg), and Nevirapine (200 mg) in either the generic or brand formulation twice a day for 30 days, before switching to the other formulation. At the end of each treatment period, blood samples were collected over 12 h for pharmacokinetic analysis. The main outcome measures were the mean AUC0-12h and Cmax. Bioequivalence was defined as a geometric mean ratio between the generic and brand-name within the 90% confidence interval of 0.8-1.25.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Generic | Experimental | Drug: Triomunegeneric fixed dose combination of Stavudine, Lamivudine and Nevirapine (Triomune) |
| Brand | Active comparator | Drug: Zerit/Epivir/Viramune3 separate single pills of Zerit (Stavudine)Epivir (Lamivudine) Viramune (Nevirapine) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- HIV-infected men and non-pregnant women;
- On Triomune for at least 4 weeks;
- 18 years or greater;
- Residing within 15km of Kampala city center
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Unable to sign or understand informed consent
- Concurrent medication known to interact with any of the components of Triomune
- Patients with active TB, malabsorption, nausea, emesis, abdominal discomfort, chronic diarrhoea, documented active clinically relevant hepatitis;
- Patients expected to change their drug regimen or dosage during the study
- Those planning to move out of Kampala in the next two months;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TriomuneAlso: Stavudine, Lamivudine, NevirapineStavudine (40mg) Lamivudine (150mg) Nevirapine (200mg)All twice a day | Drug | Generic |
| Zerit/Epivir/ViramuneAlso: Stavudine, Lamivudine, NevirapineStavudine (40mg) Lamivudine (150mg) and Nevirapine (200mg) All taken twice daily. | Drug | Brand |
Primary outcome
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve(AUC)
Time frame: Assessed at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 and 12 hr post-dosing
Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve for each drug, log transformed
1 secondary outcome
Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug
Time frame: Assessed at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 and 12 hr post-dosing
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 19096711Byakika-Tusiime J, Chinn LW, Oyugi JH, Obua C, Bangsberg DR, Kroetz DL. Steady state bioequivalence of generic and innovator formulations of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine in HIV-infected Ugandan adults. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003981. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
Related trials for HIV/AIDS
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
A Study of Daratumumab and Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Plasmablastic Lymphoma
Plasmablastic Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage I Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruiting
Suubi4PrEP: Improving PrEP Access and Adherence Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Uganda
HIV Prevention
Not yet recruiting
Bwelela Easy Study
HIV, HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus
RecruitingPhase 1
AMC 120, Glofitamab Plus Chemoimmunotherapy in Newly Diagnosed HIV-Associated Large B-Cell Lymphoma (The "Glofit-RCHOP Study")
AIDS-Related Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jayne Tusiime, B Pharm, MSc principal investigator
Makerere University
David R Bangsberg, MD,MPH study chair
Harvard University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Triomune and Zerit/Epivir/Viramune in people with HIV/AIDS, run by Makerere University at 1 site in Uganda.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Dec 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve(AUC) (time frame: Assessed at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 and 12 hr post-dosing). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01025830, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2010.