Peritoneal Dessication Damage and InflammationWARMISTNCT01027455
Warm Humid Gas Insufflation for Appendix Removal by Minimally Invasive Surgery Warm Humid Insufflation for Appendix Removal by Minimally Invasive Surgery Trial (WARMIST)
A study testing Fisher and Paykel Insuflow (MR 860) Surgical Humidification Device and Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in people with Peritoneal Dessication Damage and Inflammation and Peri-operative Hypothermia, run by University of Auckland, New Zealand at 1 site in New Zealand.
Trial summary
In laparoscopic (key-hole) surgery, the use of cold dry carbon dioxide gas to inflate the abdominal cavity for the creation a clear operating field, results in damage to the cavity lining, known as the peritoneum. This has been associated with negative effects on post-operative recovery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 14 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Peritoneal Dessication Damage and Inflammation, Peri-operative Hypothermia
- What is being tested?
- Fisher and Paykel Insuflow (MR 860) Surgical Humidification Device and Laparoscopic Appendicectomy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 190 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNew Zealand
- Study dates
- Mar 2010to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 14 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Healthy volunteers aged 8-14 years presenting to Starship Children's Hospital (Auckland, New Zealand) within the study period diagnosed clinically with acute appendicitis requiring diagnostic laparoscopy +/- appendicectomy.
Who cannot join
- Consent to participate in study not obtained, partial or total blindness, unable to speak and read sufficient English, presence of any abdominal prostheses, diagnosis of mental retardation, developmental delay, neuromuscular impairment, attention-deficit disorder, chronic pain, or psychiatric illness, immunosuppression, allergy to morphine, and history of previous abdominal surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
New Zealand1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Starship Children's Hospital
Auckland
James KM Hamill, MBChB, FRACS, +64 9 3797440 ext. 6381, jamesh@adhb.govt.nz
Tzu-Chieh Wendy - Yu, MBChB, + 64 9 276 0076, wendells9@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Warm Humidified Insufflation for Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Children: a Randomised Controlled Trial
In laparoscopic (key-hole) surgery, the use of cold dry carbon dioxide gas to inflate the abdominal cavity for the creation a clear operating field, results in damage to the cavity lining, known as the peritoneum. This has been associated with negative effects on post-operative recovery. Adult studies using warm humidified insufflation gas have indicated possible decreased post-operative pain, reduced narcotic analgesia requirements, decreased fogging of the laparoscopic camera lens, and reduced time to return to normal activities. Cold dry gas during laparoscopic surgery also has potential to cause abnormal decrease in body core temperature (hypothermia). This has been established by trials in adult humans and animal models. The WARMIST study aims to investigate for whether warm humid gas insuflation during laparoscopic removal of the appendix in children reduces intraoperative temperature variations, post-operative pain (indicated by morphine usage and pain scores), length of hospital stay and degree of camera lens fogging, and speed post-operative recovery compared to using cold dry gas insufflation.
Read the detailed description
Study Aim/Question:
Does warm humidified carbon dioxide gas compared to cold dry gas for abdominal cavity insufflation during laparoscopic appendectomy in children reduce variations in intraoperative core body temperature, reduce post-operative pain, and improve post-operative recovery?
The Aim of this study is to investigate whether differences exist in the following outcomes:
- Intraoperative temperature variation;
- Need for post-operative opiate analgesia (primary outcome of the study);
- Post-operative pain scores;
- Length of hospital stay;
- Post-operative return to normal daily activities;
- Fogging of laparoscope lens; when warm humidified rather than cold dry gas is used for intra-abdominal insufflation during laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children.
Study Sample Size and Power Calculations:
From a retrospective audit of 43 children who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy at Starship Children's Hospital in 2006, 70% required opiate-based analgesia for pain relief during some stage of their admission. To detect a 30% reduction from 70% (i.e. 49% of the exposure group will require opiates) with power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05 using 2 tailed Fisher's exact test, 95 participants will be needed per arm of the trial.
Study Participants:
- Inclusion criteria:
Children aged 8-14 years presenting to Starship Children's Hospital within the study period diagnosed clinically with acute appendicitis requiring diagnostic laparoscopy +/- appendicectomy.
- Exclusion criteria:
Consent to participate in study not obtained, partial or total blindness, unable to speak and read sufficient English, presence of any abdominal prostheses, diagnosis of mental retardation, developmental delay, neuro-muscular impairment, attention-deficit disorder, chronic pain, or psychiatric illness, immunosuppression, allergy to morphine, and history of previous abdominal surgery.
Study Design:
This is a Randomised-Controlled Trial involving 190 children aged between 8-14 years presenting to Starship Children's Hospital with clinical signs of acute appendicitis. After recruitment, study participants will be randomised to either the intervention group (warm humidified gas insufflation) or control group (cool dry gas insufflation) before undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy as part of the surgical management of acute appendicitis. The insufflation device used will the the Fisher and Paykel Insuflow MR 860. Other intraoperative variables will be controlled or standardised.
A computer-generated random sequence will be employed to randomise study participants. Group allocations will be placed in sealed opaque envelopes and these will be opened in sequence for consecutive participants. Allocations will be concealed until completion of data collection. To ensure double-blinding (blinding of investigators, operating surgeons, members of the clinical team, study participants and family), circulating theatre nurses who have no direct involvement in the care of participants will be unblinded and control the switches to the insufflation device. Upon opening an allocation envelope, they will set the Insuflow device on warm humidified or cold dry gas insufflation and place a specially designed cover over the device before transferring the device into the operating theatre. This cover will be placed over the insufflation device for the duration of the operation to blind other theatre personnel. At the end of the operation, the insufflation device will be switched off and removed from theatre by circulating theatre nurses with the cover intact. It will be disassembled in the theatre preparation room, out of sight.
The following data will be measured/collected intraoperatively:
- Core body temperature measured every 10 minutes from a nasogastric temperature probe, placed after anaesthetic induction;
- Severity of laparoscopic camera lens fogging: Surgeon's rating of the severity of camera fogging (scale of 1 to 10 - 10 representing worst degree of fogging);
- Surgeon's rating of the operation's technical difficulty (scale of 1 to 10 - 10 representing most difficult);
- Total volume of CO2 gas used for pneumoperitoneum creation and maintenance;
- Duration of operation;
- Total amount of analgesia and anti-emetics given intraoperatively;
- Pathological appearance of appendix and degree of peritoneal faecal/pus contamination if appendix perforation is present;
- Temperature and volume of intravenous fluids administered and any peritoneal irrigation fluids used.
A standard perioperative care protocol will be used to ensure all study patients receive the same standard of care, reducing risk of performance bias. The protocol will cover perioperative use of antibiotics, measures to prevent infections including wound infections, post-operative oral feeding and mobilisation, criteria for discharge, etc.
Post-operative opioid-sparing analgesia medication (paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents) will be standardised for all study participants in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and on the surgical ward. The route of administration will depend on the degree of nausea and vomiting, with both oral and per rectal preparations available.
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 will be used to measure pain and to ascertain requirements for additional nurse-controlled analgesia. All opiate-based analgesia required in the first 12 hours post-operatively will be administered intravenously to minimize variations in gastrointestinal absorption and effects of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
The following outcomes will be measured and recorded post-operatively:
- Tympanic body temperature at 10-minute intervals for the duration of stay in PACU
- Presence of shivering in PACU
- Post-operative pain scores at rest and with movement, measured using 10-point pictorial Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)at the following times: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, and 48 hours from end of operation.
- Total Nurse-controlled Opioid Analgesia required, both oral and parenteral, converted to Mean Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD) units of parenteral morphine, in the first 12, 24 and 48 hours post-operatively and during the entire hospital stay. The need for opioid analgesia and the total quantity required for the total duration of hospital stay will be the primary outcome for this study. The opiate-based analgesia available for this study are: oral morphine, IV morphine, and IV fentanyl.
- Severity of post-operative nausea, number of vomiting episodes and total amount of anti-emetic medications required.
- Total length of laparoscopic port site wounds, measured in millimetres during the first dressing change
- Length of hospital stay (days)
- Post-operative return of normal activities is measured using a Day-10 Post-operative Recovery Questionnaire given to participants and family at the time of discharge from hospital. Participants are asked to complete this questionnaire the morning of Day 10 after their operation and post it back to the investigators in a pre-paid envelope provided. The Questionnaire is adapted from the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0. The Principle Investigator will remind participants with a phone call one to two days before the Questionnaire has to be completed.
All operative and disease-related complications (minor and major) during hospital stay or reported at the follow-up outpatient clinic will also be recorded. Standard internationally-recognized definitions of operative complications will be used.
Statistical Analysis of Data:
Intervention and Control groups will be compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and appropriate non-paired parametric or non-parametric statistical tests for continuous variables, depending of the normality of the data. Statistical significance will be set at 2-tailed P value <.05.
Subgroup analysis of the uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis groups will be undertaken.
- Being tested
- Fisher and Paykel Insuflow (MR 860) Surgical Humidification Device, Laparoscopic Appendicectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fisher and Paykel Insuflow (MR 860) Surgical Humidification DeviceDevice
Humidified warm carbon dioxide gas insufflation during laparosopic procedure
Laparoscopic AppendicectomyProcedure or surgery
Dry and Cold carbon dioxide gas insufflation
Laparoscopic AppendicectomyProcedure or surgery
Humidified warm carbon dioxide gas insufflation during laparosopic procedure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Cold | Placebo comparator | Dry (0% relative humidity) and cold (20 degrees Celsius - Room Temperature) carbon dioxide gas intraperitoneal insufflation for laparoscopic appendicectomy Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic Appendicectomy |
| Humidification | Experimental | Humidified (98% relative humidity) and warm (37 degrees Celsius) carbon dioxide gas intraperitoneal insufflation for laparoscopic appendicectomy Receives: Device: Fisher and Paykel Insuflow (MR 860) Surgical Humidification Device; Procedure: Laparoscopic Appendicectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative Morphine equivalent analgesia use
Measured: PACU, Post-operative 12 hours, Post-operative 24 hours, Post-operative 48 hours, Duration of hospital stay
Peri-operative Core Body Temperature Variation
Measured: Intra-operative, Duration of stay in PACU
Secondary outcomes (5)
Pain scores measured by Visual Analogue Scale
Measured: Pre-operative baseline and Post-operative 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48 hours
Post-operative Return to Normal Daily Activities
Measured: Post-operative Day 10 Recovery Questionnaire
Severity of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting as indicated by Antiemetic use
Measured: Post-operative Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3
Peri-operative Complications (operative and disease-related)
Measured: Up to 6 weeks post-operatively
Severity of Laparoscopic Camera Lens Fogging
Measured: Intra-operative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2010
- Primary completionMar 2011 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peritoneal Dessication Damage and InflammationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Auckland, New Zealand
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Auckland District Health Board
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01027455
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WARMIST
- Acronym
- WARMIST
- Status last verified
- Oct 2009
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Yu TC, Hamill JK, Liley A, Hill AG. Warm, humidified carbon dioxide gas insufflation for laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):44-53. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825f0721.
PubMed 22824858
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Warm Humidified Insufflation for Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Children: a Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01027455
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WARMIST / WARMIST
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Auckland, New ZealandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Auckland District Health Board
- Study start
- Mar 2010
- Primary completion
- Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In laparoscopic (key-hole) surgery, the use of cold dry carbon dioxide gas to inflate the abdominal cavity for the creation a clear operating field, results in damage to the cavity lining, known as the peritoneum. This has been associated with negative effects on post-operative recovery. Adult studies using warm humidified insufflation gas have indicated possible decreased post-operative pain, reduced narcotic analgesia requirements, decreased fogging of the laparoscopic camera lens, and reduced time to return to normal activities. Cold dry gas during laparoscopic surgery also has potential to cause abnormal decrease in body core temperature (hypothermia). This has been established by trials in adult humans and animal models. The WARMIST study aims to investigate for whether warm humid gas insuflation during laparoscopic removal of the appendix in children reduces intraoperative temperature variations, post-operative pain (indicated by morphine usage and pain scores), length of hospital stay and degree of camera lens fogging, and speed post-operative recovery compared to using cold dry gas insufflation.
Detailed description
Study Aim/Question:
Does warm humidified carbon dioxide gas compared to cold dry gas for abdominal cavity insufflation during laparoscopic appendectomy in children reduce variations in intraoperative core body temperature, reduce post-operative pain, and improve post-operative recovery?
The Aim of this study is to investigate whether differences exist in the following outcomes:
- Intraoperative temperature variation;
- Need for post-operative opiate analgesia (primary outcome of the study);
- Post-operative pain scores;
- Length of hospital stay;
- Post-operative return to normal daily activities;
- Fogging of laparoscope lens; when warm humidified rather than cold dry gas is used for intra-abdominal insufflation during laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children.
Study Sample Size and Power Calculations:
From a retrospective audit of 43 children who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy at Starship Children's Hospital in 2006, 70% required opiate-based analgesia for pain relief during some stage of their admission. To detect a 30% reduction from 70% (i.e. 49% of the exposure group will require opiates) with power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05 using 2 tailed Fisher's exact test, 95 participants will be needed per arm of the trial.
Study Participants:
- Inclusion criteria:
Children aged 8-14 years presenting to Starship Children's Hospital within the study period diagnosed clinically with acute appendicitis requiring diagnostic laparoscopy +/- appendicectomy.
- Exclusion criteria:
Consent to participate in study not obtained, partial or total blindness, unable to speak and read sufficient English, presence of any abdominal prostheses, diagnosis of mental retardation, developmental delay, neuro-muscular impairment, attention-deficit disorder, chronic pain, or psychiatric illness, immunosuppression, allergy to morphine, and history of previous abdominal surgery.
Study Design:
This is a Randomised-Controlled Trial involving 190 children aged between 8-14 years presenting to Starship Children's Hospital with clinical signs of acute appendicitis. After recruitment, study participants will be randomised to either the intervention group (warm humidified gas insufflation) or control group (cool dry gas insufflation) before undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy as part of the surgical management of acute appendicitis. The insufflation device used will the the Fisher and Paykel Insuflow MR 860. Other intraoperative variables will be controlled or standardised.
A computer-generated random sequence will be employed to randomise study participants. Group allocations will be placed in sealed opaque envelopes and these will be opened in sequence for consecutive participants. Allocations will be concealed until completion of data collection. To ensure double-blinding (blinding of investigators, operating surgeons, members of the clinical team, study participants and family), circulating theatre nurses who have no direct involvement in the care of participants will be unblinded and control the switches to the insufflation device. Upon opening an allocation envelope, they will set the Insuflow device on warm humidified or cold dry gas insufflation and place a specially designed cover over the device before transferring the device into the operating theatre. This cover will be placed over the insufflation device for the duration of the operation to blind other theatre personnel. At the end of the operation, the insufflation device will be switched off and removed from theatre by circulating theatre nurses with the cover intact. It will be disassembled in the theatre preparation room, out of sight.
The following data will be measured/collected intraoperatively:
- Core body temperature measured every 10 minutes from a nasogastric temperature probe, placed after anaesthetic induction;
- Severity of laparoscopic camera lens fogging: Surgeon's rating of the severity of camera fogging (scale of 1 to 10 - 10 representing worst degree of fogging);
- Surgeon's rating of the operation's technical difficulty (scale of 1 to 10 - 10 representing most difficult);
- Total volume of CO2 gas used for pneumoperitoneum creation and maintenance;
- Duration of operation;
- Total amount of analgesia and anti-emetics given intraoperatively;
- Pathological appearance of appendix and degree of peritoneal faecal/pus contamination if appendix perforation is present;
- Temperature and volume of intravenous fluids administered and any peritoneal irrigation fluids used.
A standard perioperative care protocol will be used to ensure all study patients receive the same standard of care, reducing risk of performance bias. The protocol will cover perioperative use of antibiotics, measures to prevent infections including wound infections, post-operative oral feeding and mobilisation, criteria for discharge, etc.
Post-operative opioid-sparing analgesia medication (paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents) will be standardised for all study participants in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and on the surgical ward. The route of administration will depend on the degree of nausea and vomiting, with both oral and per rectal preparations available.
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 will be used to measure pain and to ascertain requirements for additional nurse-controlled analgesia. All opiate-based analgesia required in the first 12 hours post-operatively will be administered intravenously to minimize variations in gastrointestinal absorption and effects of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
The following outcomes will be measured and recorded post-operatively:
- Tympanic body temperature at 10-minute intervals for the duration of stay in PACU
- Presence of shivering in PACU
- Post-operative pain scores at rest and with movement, measured using 10-point pictorial Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)at the following times: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, and 48 hours from end of operation.
- Total Nurse-controlled Opioid Analgesia required, both oral and parenteral, converted to Mean Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD) units of parenteral morphine, in the first 12, 24 and 48 hours post-operatively and during the entire hospital stay. The need for opioid analgesia and the total quantity required for the total duration of hospital stay will be the primary outcome for this study. The opiate-based analgesia available for this study are: oral morphine, IV morphine, and IV fentanyl.
- Severity of post-operative nausea, number of vomiting episodes and total amount of anti-emetic medications required.
- Total length of laparoscopic port site wounds, measured in millimetres during the first dressing change
- Length of hospital stay (days)
- Post-operative return of normal activities is measured using a Day-10 Post-operative Recovery Questionnaire given to participants and family at the time of discharge from hospital. Participants are asked to complete this questionnaire the morning of Day 10 after their operation and post it back to the investigators in a pre-paid envelope provided. The Questionnaire is adapted from the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0. The Principle Investigator will remind participants with a phone call one to two days before the Questionnaire has to be completed.
All operative and disease-related complications (minor and major) during hospital stay or reported at the follow-up outpatient clinic will also be recorded. Standard internationally-recognized definitions of operative complications will be used.
Statistical Analysis of Data:
Intervention and Control groups will be compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and appropriate non-paired parametric or non-parametric statistical tests for continuous variables, depending of the normality of the data. Statistical significance will be set at 2-tailed P value <.05.
Subgroup analysis of the uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis groups will be undertaken.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Cold | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Laparoscopic AppendicectomyDry (0% relative humidity) and cold (20 degrees Celsius - Room Temperature) carbon dioxide gas intraperitoneal insufflation for laparoscopic appendicectomy |
| Humidification | Experimental | Device: Fisher and Paykel Insuflow (MR 860) Surgical Humidification Device, Procedure: Laparoscopic AppendicectomyHumidified (98% relative humidity) and warm (37 degrees Celsius) carbon dioxide gas intraperitoneal insufflation for laparoscopic appendicectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Healthy volunteers aged 8-14 years presenting to Starship Children's Hospital (Auckland, New Zealand) within the study period diagnosed clinically with acute appendicitis requiring diagnostic laparoscopy +/- appendicectomy.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Consent to participate in study not obtained, partial or total blindness, unable to speak and read sufficient English, presence of any abdominal prostheses, diagnosis of mental retardation, developmental delay, neuromuscular impairment, attention-deficit disorder, chronic pain, or psychiatric illness, immunosuppression, allergy to morphine, and history of previous abdominal surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fisher and Paykel Insuflow (MR 860) Surgical Humidification DeviceHumidified warm carbon dioxide gas insufflation during laparosopic procedure | Device | Humidification |
| Laparoscopic AppendicectomyDry and Cold carbon dioxide gas insufflation | Procedure or surgery | Dry Cold |
| Laparoscopic AppendicectomyHumidified warm carbon dioxide gas insufflation during laparosopic procedure | Procedure or surgery | Humidification |
Primary outcome
Post-operative Morphine equivalent analgesia use
Time frame: PACU, Post-operative 12 hours, Post-operative 24 hours, Post-operative 48 hours, Duration of hospital stay
Peri-operative Core Body Temperature Variation
Time frame: Intra-operative, Duration of stay in PACU
5 secondary outcomes
Pain scores measured by Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: Pre-operative baseline and Post-operative 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48 hours
Post-operative Return to Normal Daily Activities
Time frame: Post-operative Day 10 Recovery Questionnaire
Severity of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting as indicated by Antiemetic use
Time frame: Post-operative Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3
Peri-operative Complications (operative and disease-related)
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks post-operatively
Severity of Laparoscopic Camera Lens Fogging
Time frame: Intra-operative
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22824858Yu TC, Hamill JK, Liley A, Hill AG. Warm, humidified carbon dioxide gas insufflation for laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):44-53. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825f0721.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fisher and Paykel Insuflow (MR 860) Surgical Humidification Device and Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in people with Peritoneal Dessication Damage and Inflammation and Peri-operative Hypothermia, run by University of Auckland, New Zealand at 1 site in New Zealand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in New Zealand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact James KM Hamilll, MBChB, FRACS (+64 9 3797440 ext. 6381, jamesh@adhb.govt.nz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative Morphine equivalent analgesia use (time frame: PACU, Post-operative 12 hours, Post-operative 24 hours, Post-operative 48 hours, Duration of hospital stay). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01027455, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2010.