AzTrials
AzTrials

DelusionsMCTNCT01029067

Metacognitive Training in Schizophrenia

A study testing Metacognitive training and Cognitive Remediation in people with Delusions and Schizophrenia, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Over a period of 4 weeks, metacognitive training for schizophrenia patients (MCT), delivered both in a group and individually, is compared to cognitive remediation (CogPack training). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Delusions, Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
Metacognitive training and Cognitive Remediation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Sep 2009to Dec 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • schizophrenia spectrum disorder

Who cannot join

  • intellectual disability (IQ < 70)
  • unable to provide informed consent
  • hostility on PANSS > 4
  • suspiciousness on PANSS > 5

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf

    Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20246

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Metacognitive Training (MCT) Compared With Cognitive Remediation (CR) in Schizophrenia: a Randomized Controlled Study Over 4 Weeks

Over a period of 4 weeks, metacognitive training for schizophrenia patients (MCT), delivered both in a group and individually, is compared to cognitive remediation (CogPack training). Blind to treatment assignment, both groups are assessed before intervention and four weeks later with the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), the Psychosis Rating Scales (PSYRATS) and cognitive tests. Delusion severity serves as the primary endpoint. It is assumed that MCT will improve delusion severity to a greater extent than CR in the course of 4 weeks taking medication into account.

Read the detailed description

Metacognitive training for schizophrenia patients (MCT) is a manualized group intervention that can be obtained cost-free online. MCT seeks to sharpen the awareness of schizophrenia spectrum patients on cognitive biases (e.g. jumping to conclusions) contributing to delusion formation and maintenance and conveys cognitive strategies to counter these. The present trial combines group MCT with an individualized cognitive-behavioral oriented approach entitled MCT+. Patients with schizophrenia are randomly allocated to either metacognitive treatment (MCT) or cognitive remediation (CogPack training). Blind to treatment assignment, both groups are assessed prior to intervention and four weeks later with the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), the Psychosis Rating Scales (PSYRATS) and cognitive tasks. Delusion scores derived from the PANSS and PSYRATS serve as main outcome parameters. We also explore if MCT improves jumping to conclusions with a probabilistic reasoning task. To make results as generalizable as possible to a typical inpatient population, broad inclusion criteria are chosen. Patients are only excluded if age is < 18 and > 65 years and diagnoses do not meet criteria of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

Being tested
Metacognitive training, Cognitive Remediation
Keywords
schizophrenia, delusion, paranoia, psychosis
Medical subject headings
Delusions, Schizophrenia, Paranoid Disorders, Psychotic Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Metacognitive trainingBehavioural

    Group (8 sessions) and individualized metacognitive training (9 sessions), delivered by psychologists versus cognitive remediation (8 sessions) delivered by either psychologists or psychology students at an advanced master level

  • Cognitive RemediationBehavioural

    Group (8 sessions) and individualized metacognitive training (9 sessions), delivered by psychologists versus cognitive remediation (8 sessions) delivered by either psychologists or psychology students at an advanced master level

Study groups in NCT01029067
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cognitive RemediationActive comparatorComputerized cognitive remediation (CogPack training). A fixed series is administered, which covers a wide range of neuropsychological exercises involving memory, reasoning, selective attention and psychomotor speed. The difficulty level for each patient is adapted automatically depending on to the subject's performance on prior exercises. At the end of each session, the patient receives individual feedback on his or her performance. To match with group MCT, eight sessions are administered. Each session lasts approximately 45-60 minutes.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Remediation
Metacognitive TrainingExperimentalThe group metacognitive training program (MCT) is fully documented (Moritz, Woodward, \& Metacognition Study Group, 2007; VanHam Campus Press) and can be obtained in more than 15 languages cost-free via the following link: www.uke.de/mkt. The group program is delivered to groups of 3-10 patients by trained psychologists addressing delusion-related metacognitive biases (e.g., jumping to conclusions). The eight modules are presented via a video projector using pdf-converted Power-Point slides. Each group session lasts approximately 45-60 minutes. Individualized MCT (MCT+) follows group sessions and accords to the general guidelines for cognitive-behavioral therapy. For each patient, 8 one-to-one sessions were carried in addition to one session relating to the medical history.
Receives: Behavioral: Metacognitive training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. delusion severity as assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS); sum of item scores p1, p5, p6 and g9

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionDec 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01029067
Sponsor's protocol ID
MCT
Acronym
MCT
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
5 Dec 2009
Last updated
3 Mar 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Metacognitive training and Cognitive Remediation in people with Delusions and Schizophrenia, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

delusion severity as assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS); sum of item scores p1, p5, p6 and g9 (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in