AzTrials
AzTrials

Full Thickness Skin DefectsNCT01033604

Glyaderm + Split Thickness Skin Graft Versus Split Thickness Skin Graft Alone in Full Thickness Skin Defects

A study testing Glyaderm and split skin graft and Split skin graft alone. in people with Full Thickness Skin Defects, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The application of Glyaderm for skin restoration intends to provide a more stable wound closure with enhanced pliability and function of the skin and a more favourable scar. The dermal substitute would be affordable for widespread application in full thickness skin defects and burns. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Full Thickness Skin Defects
What is being tested?
Glyaderm and split skin graft and Split skin graft alone.
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Sep 2007to Dec 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All burn wounds with flux values measured by Laser Doppler Imaging, corresponding with an expected healing time longer than 28 days. Dark blue color on the palette of the LDI software with flux values below 200
  • All clearly full thickness burns on clinical assessment done by two plastic surgeons and thereafter treated with Flammacerium®.
  • Wounds treated with a hydrocolloid paste prior to LDI and with low flux values < 200
  • All assessments are done during first days before final decision at day three
  • Possibility to follow the complete treatment schedule until final graft take and subsequently wound healing and finally participation on complete follow-up schedule
  • Informed consent has been obtained
  • TBSA Full Thickness Burn < 40%

Who cannot join

  • All burn wounds with flux values measured by Laser Doppler Imaging, corresponding with faster healing times ( flux values >200 )
  • TBSA >40 %
  • Not following the complete treatment schedule or missing some evaluations during the follow-up period
  • Patient has any condition(s) that seriously compromises the patient's ability to complete this study.
  • Patient has participated in another study utilizing an investigational drug within the previous 30 days
  • Patient has one or more medical condition(s), diabetes, including renal, hepatic, hematologic, neurologic, or immune disease that in the opinion of the investigator would make the patient an inappropriate candidate for this study
  • Patients wish to decline from the study
  • No informed consent before start of the trial

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospital Ghent

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Clinical Application of a Novel Dermal Substitute Based on Glycerol Preserved Allograft: GLYADERM

The application of Glyaderm for skin restoration intends to provide a more stable wound closure with enhanced pliability and function of the skin and a more favourable scar. The dermal substitute would be affordable for widespread application in full thickness skin defects and burns.

Patients with burn wounds or large full thickness wounds will be evaluated before enrollment. All burn wounds that are not clearly full thickness on clinical assessment will be treated during the first 48 hours with a hydrocolloid paste and covered with a paraffin gauze dressing. This hydrocolloid paste combined with paraffin gauze will ensure maintenance of a moist wound environment for the first 48 hours prior to assessment by LDI and randomization. This is the standard treatment for all burns admitted to the Ghent Burn Centre.

Wounds will be photographed on a daily basis. In order to obtain an optimal preparation for LDI, the burn wounds will be meticulously debrided during dressing changes. LDI is most reliable between 48-72 hours. Patients whose burn wounds meet the inclusion criteria, i.e. full thickness burns with LDI values < 200 will be randomized to receive either GLYADERM and split skin graft versus split skin graft alone.

Being tested
Glyaderm and split skin graft, Split skin graft alone.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Glyaderm and split skin graftProcedure or surgery

    Full thickness defects treated with Glyaderm and split skin graft.

  • Split skin graft alone.Procedure or surgery

    Full thickness defects treated with split skin graft alone.

Study groups in NCT01033604
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Glyaderm and split skin graftExperimentalFull thickness defects treated with Glyaderm and split skin graft.
Receives: Procedure: Glyaderm and split skin graft
Split skin graft aloneActive comparatorFull thickness defects treated with split skin graft alone.
Receives: Procedure: Split skin graft alone.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of healing time and percentage of autograft survival

    Measured: After one week

  2. Comparison in bacterial control in full thickness defects

    Measured: On day 3,5 an 7 post application of Glyaderm

  3. To assess the monitoring of dermal substitute ingrowth with Laser Doppler Imaging

    Measured: On day 3, 5 and 7 post application of Glyaderm

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. To evaluate the functional and cosmetic outcome of skin restoration of full thickness defects treated with Glyaderm and split skin graft versus split skin graft alone

    Measured: 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months post wound closure

  2. Cost-effectiveness and Health related quality of life (i.e. cost utility analysis)

    Measured: 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months post wound closure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2007
  3. Primary completionFeb 2012
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01033604
Sponsor's protocol ID
2007/033
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
15 Dec 2009
Last updated
5 Dec 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • De Decker I, Hoeksema H, Verbelen J, De Coninck P, Speeckaert M, De Schepper S, Blondeel P, Pirayesh A, Monstrey S, Claes KEY. A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm(R) as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial. Burns Trauma. 2023 May 2;11:tkad015. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad015. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37143955

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Glyaderm and split skin graft and Split skin graft alone. in people with Full Thickness Skin Defects, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of healing time and percentage of autograft survival (time frame: After one week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01033604, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in