CarcinomaPhase 3EVOLVE-1NCT01035229
Global Study Looking at the Combination of RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) and Placebo Plus BSC to Treat Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
A Phase 3 study testing Everolimus in people with Carcinoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 131 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare treatment with RAD001 plus best supportive care (BSC) to placebo plus BSC in patients with advanced HCC whose disease progressed while on or after sorafenib treatment or who are intolerant to sorafenib. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Everolimus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 546 participants
- Where
- 131 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to Oct 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Advanced liver cancer
- Prior systemic treatment with sorafenib for advanced HCC and for whom their disease progressed during or after sorafenib treatment, or were intolerant to sorafenib treatment. Specifically, this can be defined as:
- Documented radiological confirmation (radiology scans or report) of disease progression during or after sorafenib treatment
- Intolerance to sorafenib (at any dose and/or duration) is defined as documented sorafenib-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events that led to sorafenib discontinuation.
- NOTE:
- Sorafenib must be the last antineoplastic treatment before randomization
Show all 10Show fewer
- Prior local and/or hormonal therapy (e.g., tamoxifen) before sorafenib is allowed
- One systemic chemotherapy regimen for advanced HCC is allowed before sorafenib treatment
- ECOG performance status of ≤ 2
- Child-Pugh A
Who cannot join
- Active bleeding during the last 28 days
- Prior therapy with mTOR inhibitors
- Prior liver or other organ transplantation which mandates systemic immunosuppression
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
131 sites in 18 countries.
131 sites in 18 countries
United States19 sites
Texas Cancer Center - Abilene
Abilene, Texas, 79606
The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital Dept. of SKCC @ JHU
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287-0013
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network St. Luke's Cancer Network (2)
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Massachusetts General Hospital Dept. of Mass General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Methodist Charlton Cancer Center Methodist
Dallas, Texas, 75237
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DeptofSimmons Cancer Center(3)
Dallas, Texas, 75390-8527
Highlands Oncology Group Dept of Highlands Oncology Grp
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703
Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group CCCMG
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers RMCC - Denver-Midtown (4)
Greenwood Village, Colorado
Queen's Medical Center Queens Cancer Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Midwest Cancer Care Physicians Research Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
University of California San Diego - Moores Cancer Center SC - 3
La Jolla, California, 92093-0658
Northwest Cancer Specialists Rose Quarter Cancer Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210
VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System Dept. of VA Sierra Nevada HCS
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Blue Ridge Research Center at Roanoke Neurological Center Blue Ridge Cancer Care
Roanoke, Virginia, 24018
University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas / HOAST CCC of So. TX- San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
California Pacific Medical Center California Pacific Med
San Francisco, California, 94120-7999
University of Washington Cancer Care SC
Seattle, Washington, 98109-1023
France18 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Amiens, 80054
Novartis Investigative Site
Avignon, 84082
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, 33075
Novartis Investigative Site
Caen Cedex9, 14033
Novartis Investigative Site
Chambray-lès-Tours, 37170
Novartis Investigative Site
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Novartis Investigative Site
Clichy, 92110
Novartis Investigative Site
Dijon, 21079
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59037
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69317
Novartis Investigative Site
Marseille Cédex 5, 13385
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, 34298
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantes, 44093
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, 06202
Novartis Investigative Site
Reims, 51092
Novartis Investigative Site
Rouen, 76031
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42277
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, 67091
Japan18 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677
Novartis Investigative Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 810-8563
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 811-1395
Novartis Investigative Site
Gifu, Gifu, 500-8513
Novartis Investigative Site
Iizuka, Fukuoka, 820-8505
Novartis Investigative Site
Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, 920-8641
Novartis Investigative Site
Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577
Novartis Investigative Site
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556
Novartis Investigative Site
Matsuyama, Ehime, 791-0280
Novartis Investigative Site
Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464-8681
Novartis Investigative Site
Ōgaki, Gifu, 503-8502
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, Osaka, 537-8511
Novartis Investigative Site
Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511
Novartis Investigative Site
Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574
Novartis Investigative Site
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625
Novartis Investigative Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024
Italy14 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aviano, PN, 33081
Novartis Investigative Site
Benevento, BN, 82100
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, BO, 40138
Novartis Investigative Site
Foggia, FG, 71100
Novartis Investigative Site
Frattamaggiore, 80020
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20122
Novartis Investigative Site
Modena, MO, 41100
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80131
Novartis Investigative Site
Padova, PD, 35128
Novartis Investigative Site
Palermo, PA, 90127
Novartis Investigative Site
Pavia, PV, 27100
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00128
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00168
Novartis Investigative Site
Rozzano, MI, 20089
Germany11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45147
Novartis Investigative Site
Esslingen am Neckar, 73730
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, 60590
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, D-37075
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 20246
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, 30625
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04103
Novartis Investigative Site
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68305
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 81377
Novartis Investigative Site
Würzburg, 97080
Taiwan7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Linkou District, 33305
Novartis Investigative Site
Liouying Township
Novartis Investigative Site
Niaosong Township, Taiwan, 83301
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
Novartis Investigative Site
Tainan, Taiwan, 70403
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, 10048
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, 112
China6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100039
Novartis Investigative Site
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, 510060
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310016
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002
Novartis Investigative Site
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032
Spain6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, Andalusia, 14004
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28034
Novartis Investigative Site
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Novartis Investigative Site
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208
Australia5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Novartis Investigative Site
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
Novartis Investigative Site
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Novartis Investigative Site
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Belgium4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1070
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1200
Novartis Investigative Site
Edegem, 2650
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Canada4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 1P1
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Hungary4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, H-1122
Novartis Investigative Site
Debrecen, 4032
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, H-6720
Novartis Investigative Site
Szombathely, 9700
South Korea4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 03080
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 03722
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 05505
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 06351
Austria3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Graz, 8036
Novartis Investigative Site
Innsbruck, A-6020
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, 1090
Greece3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, GR, 124 62
Novartis Investigative Site
Larissa, GR, 411 10
Novartis Investigative Site
Thessaloniki, Greece, 57001
Israel2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Petah Tikva, 49100
Novartis Investigative Site
Ramat Gan, 5266202
Thailand2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10400
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10700
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus (RAD001) in Adult Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Failure of Sorafenib Treatment - The EVOLVE-1 Study
The purpose of this study is to compare treatment with RAD001 plus best supportive care (BSC) to placebo plus BSC in patients with advanced HCC whose disease progressed while on or after sorafenib treatment or who are intolerant to sorafenib.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Everolimus, Everolimus Placebo, Best Supportive Care (BSC)
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, randomized trial, medical treatment, RAD001, placebo, Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EverolimusDrug
Also called RAD001
Everolimus (labeled as RAD001) was formulated as tablets of 2.5 mg strength and blisterpacked in units of 10 tablets.
Everolimus PlaceboDrug
Everolimus Placebo matched to the everolimus 2.5 mg tablet strength was blister-packed in units of 10 tablets. Matching placebo tablets were formulated to be indistinguishable from the everolimus tablets. Everolimus placebo was taken as a daily oral dose of 7.5 mg and was defined as the control drug.
Best Supportive Care (BSC)Other
BSC was defined as drug or non-drug therapies, nutritional support, physical therapy or anything that the Investigator believed to be in the patient's best interest, but excluding other antineoplastic treatments. BSC administered to the patient throughout the study was to be reported on the Concomitant Medication/Significant Non-Drug Therapy electronic case report from (eCRF). Permitted BSC treatments during the study included, but were not limited to, the following: Pain medication to allow the patient to be as comfortable as possible, Bisphosphonates for bone metastases, Localized radiotherapy, for the treatment of pre-existing, painful bone metastases, Nutritional support or appetite stimulants (i.e. megestrol) as recommended by the Investigator, Oxygen therapy and blood products or transfusions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus + Best Supportice Care (BSC) | Experimental | Patients were assigned to the Everolimus + BSC arm in a ratio of 2:1 over the Placebo arm. Everolimus was taken as a daily oral dose of 7.5 mg and was defined as the investigational drug. In addition to taking Everolimus, all patients also received BSC as per normal local practice. Receives: Drug: Everolimus; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC) |
| Placebo + Best Supportive Care | Placebo comparator | Placebo Everolimus was taken as a daily oral dose of 7.5 mg and was defined as the control drug. In addition to taking Placeb Everolimus, all patients also received BSC as per normal local practice. Receives: Drug: Everolimus Placebo; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. The comparison of OS between the 2 arms was done using a stratified log-rank test at one-sided 2.5% level of significance.
Measured: When 454 OS events were observed
Secondary outcomes (6)
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented radiologic confirmation of disease progression. Since the study did not meet the primary objective, TTP was not formally tested.
Measured: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events- Estimate of 1 year for each patient
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR is defined as the proportion of participants with a best objective response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST. The BOR was the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression. CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters; SD is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD. PD is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline.
Measured: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events- Estimate of 1 year for each patient
Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG Performance Score (PS) Score
Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) were assessed by time to definitive performance status deterioration by at least one category on the ECOG scale. Deterioration was considered definitive if no improvement in the ECOG PS was observed at a subsequent measurement. ECOG PS: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work; 2=Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead
Measured: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events- Estimate of 1 year for each patient.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
The primary quality of life endpoint was the time to definitive 5% deterioration from baseline in the global health status/quality of life scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Definitive deterioration by at least 5% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 5% compared to baseline, with no later observed increase above this threshold. The EORTC quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) is an integrated system for assessing the healthrelated quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Measured: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events - Estimate of 1 year for each patient.
Pharmacokinetics Assessments - Cmin
Cmin is the pre-dose blood concentration at steady-state (ng/mL). Pre-dose (Cmin) blood samples were collected from all patients in both arms at Visit 3. Steady-state for the Cmin sample was defined as continuous administration of the same dose in the last 4 days prior to the collection of the Cmin sample. Steady-state for the 5 mg every other day regimen was defined as the state when the 5 mg dose was taken 2 days and 4 days before sampling. PK samples were only drawn at visit 3, and only analyzed for patients receiving everolimus at steady state (if patients had received the dose the previous 4 days). In addition summary statistics were only done for each everolimus dose when 3 samples were available. Only valid pre-dose (Cmin) everolimus samples were included in the analysis.
Measured: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events - Estimate of 1 year for each patient.
Pharmacokinetics Assessments - Cmax
Cmax is the maximum (peak) blood drug concentration after dose administration (ng/mL) calculated as the maximum of C1h and C2h. C1h was 1 hour post-dose blood concentration (ng/mL) and C2h was 2 hour post-dose blood concentration (ng/mL). C1h and C2h post-dose samples were collected from all patients in both arms at Visit 3. Steady-state for the C1h and C2h samples was defined as continuous administration of the same dose in the previous 4 days and the day on which the C1h and C2h samples were collected. Steady-state for the 5 mg every other day regimen was defined as the state when the 5 mg dose was taken 2 days and 4 days before sampling. PK samples were only drawn at visit 3, and only analyzed for patients receiving everolimus at steady state (if patients had received the dose the previous 4 days). In addition summary statistics were only done for each everolimus dose when 3 samples were available. Only valid C1h and C2h everolimus samples were included in the analysis.
Measured: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events- Estimate of 1 year for each patient.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionOct 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 546 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01035229
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRAD001O2301
- Other IDs
- 2009-010196-25, 2009
- Acronym
- EVOLVE-1
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Zhu AX, Chen D, He W, Kanai M, Voi M, Chen LT, Daniele B, Furuse J, Kang YK, Poon RT, Vogel A, Chiang DY. Integrative biomarker analyses indicate etiological variations in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2016 Aug;65(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
PubMed 27130844Zhu AX, Kudo M, Assenat E, Cattan S, Kang YK, Lim HY, Poon RT, Blanc JF, Vogel A, Chen CL, Dorval E, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Santoro A, Daniele B, Furuse J, Jappe A, Perraud K, Anak O, Sellami DB, Chen LT. Effect of everolimus on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of sorafenib: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Jul 2;312(1):57-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7189.
PubMed 25058218
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus (RAD001) in Adult Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Failure of Sorafenib Treatment - The EVOLVE-1 Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01035229
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EVOLVE-1 / CRAD001O2301
- Conditions
- Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, randomized trial, medical treatment, RAD001, placebo, Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 546 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Oct 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare treatment with RAD001 plus best supportive care (BSC) to placebo plus BSC in patients with advanced HCC whose disease progressed while on or after sorafenib treatment or who are intolerant to sorafenib.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus + Best Supportice Care (BSC) | Experimental | Drug: Everolimus, Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)Patients were assigned to the Everolimus + BSC arm in a ratio of 2:1 over the Placebo arm. Everolimus was taken as a daily oral dose of 7.5 mg and was defined as the investigational drug. In addition to taking Everolimus, all patients also received BSC as per normal local practice. |
| Placebo + Best Supportive Care | Placebo comparator | Drug: Everolimus Placebo, Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)Placebo Everolimus was taken as a daily oral dose of 7.5 mg and was defined as the control drug. In addition to taking Placeb Everolimus, all patients also received BSC as per normal local practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Advanced liver cancer
- Prior systemic treatment with sorafenib for advanced HCC and for whom their disease progressed during or after sorafenib treatment, or were intolerant to sorafenib treatment. Specifically, this can be defined as:
- Sorafenib must be the last antineoplastic treatment before randomization
- Prior local and/or hormonal therapy (e.g., tamoxifen) before sorafenib is allowed
- One systemic chemotherapy regimen for advanced HCC is allowed before sorafenib treatment
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Active bleeding during the last 28 days
- Prior therapy with mTOR inhibitors
- Prior liver or other organ transplantation which mandates systemic immunosuppression
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EverolimusAlso: RAD001Everolimus (labeled as RAD001) was formulated as tablets of 2.5 mg strength and blisterpacked in units of 10 tablets. | Drug | Everolimus + Best Supportice Care (BSC) |
| Everolimus PlaceboEverolimus Placebo matched to the everolimus 2.5 mg tablet strength was blister-packed in units of 10 tablets. Matching placebo tablets were formulated to be indistinguishable from the everolimus tablets. Everolimus placebo was taken as a daily oral dose of 7.5 mg and was defined as the control drug. | Drug | Placebo + Best Supportive Care |
| Best Supportive Care (BSC)BSC was defined as drug or non-drug therapies, nutritional support, physical therapy or anything that the Investigator believed to be in the patient's best interest, but excluding other antineoplastic treatments. BSC administered to the patient throughout the study was to be reported on the Concomitant Medication/Significant Non-Drug Therapy electronic case report from (eCRF). Permitted BSC treatments during the study included, but were not limited to, the following: Pain medication to allow the patient to be as comfortable as possible, Bisphosphonates for bone metastases, Localized radiotherapy, for the treatment of pre-existing, painful bone metastases, Nutritional support or appetite stimulants (i.e. megestrol) as recommended by the Investigator, Oxygen therapy and blood products or transfusions | Other | Everolimus + Best Supportice Care (BSC), Placebo + Best Supportive Care |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: When 454 OS events were observed
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. The comparison of OS between the 2 arms was done using a stratified log-rank test at one-sided 2.5% level of significance.
6 secondary outcomes
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
Time frame: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events- Estimate of 1 year for each patient
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time frame: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events- Estimate of 1 year for each patient
Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG Performance Score (PS) Score
Time frame: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events- Estimate of 1 year for each patient.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Time frame: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events - Estimate of 1 year for each patient.
Pharmacokinetics Assessments - Cmin
Time frame: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events - Estimate of 1 year for each patient.
Pharmacokinetics Assessments - Cmax
Time frame: Until all patients have disease progression or leave study due to intolerable adverse events- Estimate of 1 year for each patient.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27130844Zhu AX, Chen D, He W, Kanai M, Voi M, Chen LT, Daniele B, Furuse J, Kang YK, Poon RT, Vogel A, Chiang DY. Integrative biomarker analyses indicate etiological variations in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2016 Aug;65(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25058218Zhu AX, Kudo M, Assenat E, Cattan S, Kang YK, Lim HY, Poon RT, Blanc JF, Vogel A, Chen CL, Dorval E, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Santoro A, Daniele B, Furuse J, Jappe A, Perraud K, Anak O, Sellami DB, Chen LT. Effect of everolimus on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of sorafenib: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Jul 2;312(1):57-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7189.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
131 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Everolimus in people with Carcinoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 131 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 131 sites in United States, France, Japan, Italy, Germany and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) (time frame: When 454 OS events were observed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01035229, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2016.