AzTrials
AzTrials

Adenocarcinoma of the RectumPhase 2NCT01037049

Optimum Timing for Surgery After Pre-operative Radiotherapy 6 vs 12 Weeks

A Phase 2 study testing Patients who have surgery at 12 weeks after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy in people with Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum and Adenocarcinoma, run by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust at 23 sites in 4 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to determine whether greater rectal cancer downstaging and regression occurs when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy/chemotherapy compared to 6 weeks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Patients who have surgery at 12 weeks after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
237 participants
Where
23 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
16 Oct 2009to 8 Dec 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged > 18
  • Informed written consent
  • Histological confirmation of adenocarcinoma of rectum
  • Undergoing pre-operative radiotherapy/ chemotherapy
  • Completion of pre-operative treatment

Who cannot join

  • Aged < 18
  • Absence of pre-operative RT/CT
  • Medical/ psychiatric conditions that compromise the patients ability to give informed consent
  • Contra-indications to MRI, i.e. hip prothesis, cardiac pacemaker

Trial locations and contacts

23 sites in 4 countries.

23 sites in 4 countries

United Kingdom20 sites
  • Royal United Hospital NHS Trust

    Bath, BA1 3NG

  • Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

    Birmingham, B18 7QH

  • Epsom and St Helier's Hospitals NHS Trust

    Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 1AA

  • St Richard's Hospital

    Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 6SE

  • Essex County Hospital

    Colchester, Essex, CO3 3NB

  • Croydon University Hospital

    Croydon, CR7 7YE

  • Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 2JY

  • County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust (University Hospital of North Durham)

    Durham, County Durham, DH1 5TW

  • Medway NHS Foundation Trust

    Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY

  • James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR31 6LA

  • North West London Hospitals NHS Trust (Northwick Park Hospital)

    Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ

  • Hinchingbrooke Hospital

    Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE29 6NT

  • St Bartholomew's Hospital

    London, EC1A 7BE

  • St George's Healthcare NHS Trust

    London, SW17 0QT

  • Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

    Manchester, M8 5RB

  • Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    Poole, Dorset, BH15 2JB

  • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (Queen Alexandra Hospital)

    Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO6 3LY

  • North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Trust (University Hospital of North Tees)

    Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham, TS24 9AH

  • Royal Marsden NHS Trust

    Sutton, SM2 5PT

  • Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust (Pinderfields Hospital)

    Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF1 4DG

Other trials in United Kingdom

Brazil1 site
  • Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz

    São Paulo, 01323-903

Other trials in Brazil

Canada1 site
  • Jewish General Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

Other trials in Canada

Cyprus1 site
  • Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre

    Nicosia

Other trials in Cyprus

About this study

Official title: Is Greater Downstaging and Tumour Regression Observed When Surgery is Delayed to 12 Weeks After Completion of Chemoradiotherapy vs 6 Weeks?

The aim of this study is to determine whether greater rectal cancer downstaging and regression occurs when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy/chemotherapy compared to 6 weeks.

Hypothesis: Greater downstaging and tumour regression is observed when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of CRT compared to 6 weeks.

Being tested
Patients who have surgery at 12 weeks after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy
Keywords
Rectal Cancer, 6vs12, 6 vs 12, Cancer, CRM, Circumferential Resection Margin, Quality of Life, MRI, Radiology, Abdominoperineal Excision, Anterior Resection, Surgery, Pathology, Radiotherapy
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Carcinoma, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Neoplasms by Histologic Type, Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Patients who have surgery at 12 weeks after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapyOther

Study groups in NCT01037049
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1No interventionPatients who have surgery at 6 weeks after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy
Group 2ExperimentalPatients who have surgery at 12 weeks after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy
Receives: Other: Patients who have surgery at 12 weeks after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary endpoint will be the difference in the proportion of patients in each arm, downstaged according to T stage [on MRI].

    Measured: 6-12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Tumour response using SUV measurements [PET/CT], N downstaging and Tumour Regression Grade downstaging [on MRI].

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Difference in proportion of patients in each arm undergoing sphincter saving surgery.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Morbidity, 30 day mortality and CRM (circumferential resection margin) positivity.

    Measured: 3 months

  4. An analysis will also be undertaken using multivariate and linear regression analysis to evaluate the association of ypT and ypN stage as a potential independent predictors of SUV (max) baseline and after radiotherapy (pre-surgery) in the two arms.

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Local and distant recurrence rates.

    Measured: 5 years

  6. Radiotherapy related toxicity rates.

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Dec 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Oct 2009
  3. Primary completion8 Dec 2014
  4. Study completion8 Dec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
237 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01037049
Sponsor's protocol ID
CCR3227
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
18 Dec 2009
Last updated
17 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Patients who have surgery at 12 weeks after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy in people with Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum and Adenocarcinoma, run by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust at 23 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 23 sites in United Kingdom, Brazil, Canada, Cyprus. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary endpoint will be the difference in the proportion of patients in each arm, downstaged according to T stage [on MRI]. (time frame: 6-12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in