AzTrials
AzTrials

PneumoniaNCT01041209

Bacterial Pneumonia Score (BPS) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Community Acquired Pneumonia

A study testing Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use and Enforced Guidelines in people with Pneumonia, run by Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde at 1 site in Argentina.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 60 months
Conditions the study is for
Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use and Enforced Guidelines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteArgentina
Study dates
Mar 2010to Mar 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 60 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children aged 3-60 months assisted as outpatients for non severe community acquired pneumonia.

Who cannot join

  • Wheezing
  • Severe pneumonia
  • Pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease
  • Antibiotic use in the previous two weeks
  • Hospitalization for any reason in the previous two weeks

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Argentina1 site
  • Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde

    Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., C1270AAN

Other trials in Argentina

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Community Acquired Pneumonia on Reducing Antibiotic Use as Compared to Standard Care Practice (Current Guidelines for CAP)

The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP).

Read the detailed description

Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality in children. Despite more than 50% of pneumonias are due to viruses, because it is difficult to rule out bacterial etiology, initial management of pneumonia in children usually includes antibiotics, often unnecessary. In 2006 was designed and validated a clinical prediction rule (BPS: Bacterial Pneumonia Score) which accurately identifies hospitalized children's risk of bacterial pneumonia. However, BPS efficacy on guiding therapeutic decision in children with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) has not been yet assessed.

Aim: The aim of this study is to test if BPS guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP) Design: This is a randomized, controlled, blinded trial, to assess antibiotics use regarding two methods for initial management of children aged 3-60 months with non severe community acquired pneumonia. Children will be randomly allocate to be managed according to BPS or currently enforced guidelines. Use of antibiotics (%) and clinical outcome of both groups will be compared.

Setting: Tertiary children hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Patients: Consecutive children aged 3-60 months assisted for non severe community acquired pneumonia as outpatients. Patients with wheezing, severe pneumonia, pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease, or antibiotic use or hospitalization in the previous two weeks will be excluded.

Endpoints:

Primary: Use of antibiotics in each group (proportion) Secondary: Treatment failure (proportion) in each group Endpoints will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days by a blinded investigator.

Intervention: Patients with CAP will be randomized (1:1) to BPS versus enforced guidelines. In the BPS group antibiotics will be indicated in patients with a BPS ≥ 4 points, while in the control group antibiotics will be indicated according to current guidelines.

Variables and measurement: Antibiotic use will be defined as initial use of any antibiotic, immediately after diagnosis. Treatment failure will be defined as persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm. after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.

Study hypothesis: BPS antibiotic use guidance will reduce at least 20% antibiotic use, as compared to standard care practice.

Analyses: These will be done based on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol principle. With an assumed 20% less use of antibiotics in the intervention group, a maximum of 5% losses to follow-up, a confidence of 5% and power of 90%, the total sample size is 60. This will allow detecting a difference in clinical outcome of 28%. Proportion will be compared by Chi square test.

Interim monitoring: Regular review of serious adverse events, quality and integrity of the study by an independent data safety and monitoring board. Safety interim analysis after 50% of the patients recruited.

Significance: Due to the high prevalence of CAP in children, this study will offer the potential for a substantial reduction in health costs and antibiotics resistance.

Conditions
Pneumonia
Being tested
Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use, Enforced Guidelines
Keywords
Pneumonia, Children
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic useBehavioural

    In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.

  • Enforced GuidelinesBehavioural

    In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.

Study groups in NCT01041209
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BPSExperimentalBPS guidance
Receives: Behavioral: Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use
GuidelineActive comparatorEnforced guidelines
Receives: Behavioral: Enforced Guidelines

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Use of Antibiotics in Each Group

    The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics was compared between both groups (BPS vs Guidelines).

    Measured: At baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Treatment Failure in Each Group

    Treatment failure was defined as: Persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.

    Proportion of patients with treatment failure was compared between both groups (BPS vs Guideline).

    Measured: 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days from baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionFeb 2012
  4. Study completionMar 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01041209
Sponsor's protocol ID
HGNPE-186
Status last verified
Jun 2013
First submitted
30 Dec 2009
Last updated
28 Dec 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Moreno L, Krishnan JA, Duran P, Ferrero F. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Apr;41(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20364.

    PubMed 16493666
  • Ferrero F, Torres F, Noguerol E, Gonzalez N, Lonegro L, Chiolo MJ, Ossorio MF, Benguigui Y. [Evaluation of two standardized methods for chest radiographs interpretation in children with pneumonia]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2008 Dec;106(6):510-4. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752008000600007. Spanish.

    PubMed 19107303
  • Torres FA, Pasarelli I, Cutri A, Ossorio MF, Ferrero F. Impact assessment of a decision rule for using antibiotics in pneumonia: a randomized trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jul;49(7):701-6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22849. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

    PubMed 24039234

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use and Enforced Guidelines in people with Pneumonia, run by Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde at 1 site in Argentina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Sep 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Use of Antibiotics in Each Group (time frame: At baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01041209, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in