PneumoniaNCT01041209
Bacterial Pneumonia Score (BPS) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Community Acquired Pneumonia
A study testing Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use and Enforced Guidelines in people with Pneumonia, run by Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 60 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use and Enforced Guidelines
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- Mar 2010to Mar 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 60 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children aged 3-60 months assisted as outpatients for non severe community acquired pneumonia.
Who cannot join
- Wheezing
- Severe pneumonia
- Pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease
- Antibiotic use in the previous two weeks
- Hospitalization for any reason in the previous two weeks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Argentina1 site
Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., C1270AAN
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Community Acquired Pneumonia on Reducing Antibiotic Use as Compared to Standard Care Practice (Current Guidelines for CAP)
The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP).
Read the detailed description
Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality in children. Despite more than 50% of pneumonias are due to viruses, because it is difficult to rule out bacterial etiology, initial management of pneumonia in children usually includes antibiotics, often unnecessary. In 2006 was designed and validated a clinical prediction rule (BPS: Bacterial Pneumonia Score) which accurately identifies hospitalized children's risk of bacterial pneumonia. However, BPS efficacy on guiding therapeutic decision in children with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) has not been yet assessed.
Aim: The aim of this study is to test if BPS guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP) Design: This is a randomized, controlled, blinded trial, to assess antibiotics use regarding two methods for initial management of children aged 3-60 months with non severe community acquired pneumonia. Children will be randomly allocate to be managed according to BPS or currently enforced guidelines. Use of antibiotics (%) and clinical outcome of both groups will be compared.
Setting: Tertiary children hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Patients: Consecutive children aged 3-60 months assisted for non severe community acquired pneumonia as outpatients. Patients with wheezing, severe pneumonia, pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease, or antibiotic use or hospitalization in the previous two weeks will be excluded.
Endpoints:
Primary: Use of antibiotics in each group (proportion) Secondary: Treatment failure (proportion) in each group Endpoints will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days by a blinded investigator.
Intervention: Patients with CAP will be randomized (1:1) to BPS versus enforced guidelines. In the BPS group antibiotics will be indicated in patients with a BPS ≥ 4 points, while in the control group antibiotics will be indicated according to current guidelines.
Variables and measurement: Antibiotic use will be defined as initial use of any antibiotic, immediately after diagnosis. Treatment failure will be defined as persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm. after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.
Study hypothesis: BPS antibiotic use guidance will reduce at least 20% antibiotic use, as compared to standard care practice.
Analyses: These will be done based on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol principle. With an assumed 20% less use of antibiotics in the intervention group, a maximum of 5% losses to follow-up, a confidence of 5% and power of 90%, the total sample size is 60. This will allow detecting a difference in clinical outcome of 28%. Proportion will be compared by Chi square test.
Interim monitoring: Regular review of serious adverse events, quality and integrity of the study by an independent data safety and monitoring board. Safety interim analysis after 50% of the patients recruited.
Significance: Due to the high prevalence of CAP in children, this study will offer the potential for a substantial reduction in health costs and antibiotics resistance.
- Conditions
- Pneumonia
- Being tested
- Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use, Enforced Guidelines
- Keywords
- Pneumonia, Children
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic useBehavioural
In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.
Enforced GuidelinesBehavioural
In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | Experimental | BPS guidance Receives: Behavioral: Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use |
| Guideline | Active comparator | Enforced guidelines Receives: Behavioral: Enforced Guidelines |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Use of Antibiotics in Each Group
The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics was compared between both groups (BPS vs Guidelines).
Measured: At baseline
Secondary outcomes (1)
Treatment Failure in Each Group
Treatment failure was defined as: Persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.
Proportion of patients with treatment failure was compared between both groups (BPS vs Guideline).
Measured: 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days from baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2010
- Primary completionFeb 2012
- Study completionMar 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fernando A Torres, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01041209
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HGNPE-186
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 30 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 28 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Moreno L, Krishnan JA, Duran P, Ferrero F. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Apr;41(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20364.
PubMed 16493666Ferrero F, Torres F, Noguerol E, Gonzalez N, Lonegro L, Chiolo MJ, Ossorio MF, Benguigui Y. [Evaluation of two standardized methods for chest radiographs interpretation in children with pneumonia]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2008 Dec;106(6):510-4. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752008000600007. Spanish.
PubMed 19107303Torres FA, Pasarelli I, Cutri A, Ossorio MF, Ferrero F. Impact assessment of a decision rule for using antibiotics in pneumonia: a randomized trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jul;49(7):701-6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22849. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
PubMed 24039234
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Community Acquired Pneumonia on Reducing Antibiotic Use as Compared to Standard Care Practice (Current Guidelines for CAP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01041209
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HGNPE-186
- Conditions
- Pneumonia
- Keywords
- Pneumonia, Children
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital General de Niños Pedro de ElizaldeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2010
- Primary completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Sep 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP).
Detailed description
Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality in children. Despite more than 50% of pneumonias are due to viruses, because it is difficult to rule out bacterial etiology, initial management of pneumonia in children usually includes antibiotics, often unnecessary. In 2006 was designed and validated a clinical prediction rule (BPS: Bacterial Pneumonia Score) which accurately identifies hospitalized children's risk of bacterial pneumonia. However, BPS efficacy on guiding therapeutic decision in children with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) has not been yet assessed.
Aim: The aim of this study is to test if BPS guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP) Design: This is a randomized, controlled, blinded trial, to assess antibiotics use regarding two methods for initial management of children aged 3-60 months with non severe community acquired pneumonia. Children will be randomly allocate to be managed according to BPS or currently enforced guidelines. Use of antibiotics (%) and clinical outcome of both groups will be compared.
Setting: Tertiary children hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Patients: Consecutive children aged 3-60 months assisted for non severe community acquired pneumonia as outpatients. Patients with wheezing, severe pneumonia, pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease, or antibiotic use or hospitalization in the previous two weeks will be excluded.
Endpoints:
Primary: Use of antibiotics in each group (proportion) Secondary: Treatment failure (proportion) in each group Endpoints will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days by a blinded investigator.
Intervention: Patients with CAP will be randomized (1:1) to BPS versus enforced guidelines. In the BPS group antibiotics will be indicated in patients with a BPS ≥ 4 points, while in the control group antibiotics will be indicated according to current guidelines.
Variables and measurement: Antibiotic use will be defined as initial use of any antibiotic, immediately after diagnosis. Treatment failure will be defined as persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm. after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.
Study hypothesis: BPS antibiotic use guidance will reduce at least 20% antibiotic use, as compared to standard care practice.
Analyses: These will be done based on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol principle. With an assumed 20% less use of antibiotics in the intervention group, a maximum of 5% losses to follow-up, a confidence of 5% and power of 90%, the total sample size is 60. This will allow detecting a difference in clinical outcome of 28%. Proportion will be compared by Chi square test.
Interim monitoring: Regular review of serious adverse events, quality and integrity of the study by an independent data safety and monitoring board. Safety interim analysis after 50% of the patients recruited.
Significance: Due to the high prevalence of CAP in children, this study will offer the potential for a substantial reduction in health costs and antibiotics resistance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | Experimental | Behavioral: Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic useBPS guidance |
| Guideline | Active comparator | Behavioral: Enforced GuidelinesEnforced guidelines |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 60 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children aged 3-60 months assisted as outpatients for non severe community acquired pneumonia.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Wheezing
- Severe pneumonia
- Pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease
- Antibiotic use in the previous two weeks
- Hospitalization for any reason in the previous two weeks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic useIn this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline. | Behavioural | BPS |
| Enforced GuidelinesIn this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline. | Behavioural | Guideline |
Primary outcome
Use of Antibiotics in Each Group
Time frame: At baseline
The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics was compared between both groups (BPS vs Guidelines).
1 secondary outcome
Treatment Failure in Each Group
Time frame: 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days from baseline
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Dec 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16493666Moreno L, Krishnan JA, Duran P, Ferrero F. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Apr;41(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20364.
- Background: PubMed 19107303Ferrero F, Torres F, Noguerol E, Gonzalez N, Lonegro L, Chiolo MJ, Ossorio MF, Benguigui Y. [Evaluation of two standardized methods for chest radiographs interpretation in children with pneumonia]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2008 Dec;106(6):510-4. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752008000600007. Spanish.
- Results publication: PubMed 24039234Torres FA, Pasarelli I, Cutri A, Ossorio MF, Ferrero F. Impact assessment of a decision rule for using antibiotics in pneumonia: a randomized trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jul;49(7):701-6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22849. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
Related trials for Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruiting
Expanded Diagnostic Strategy in Older Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Infection
Acute Respiratory Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fernando A Torres, MD principal investigator
Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use and Enforced Guidelines in people with Pneumonia, run by Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Sep 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Use of Antibiotics in Each Group (time frame: At baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01041209, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2016.