AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastric CancerPhase 3NCT01041404

ToGA Study - A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab) in Combination With Chemotherapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With HER2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Trastuzumab, Fluorouracil and Cisplatin in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 142 sites in 24 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This parallel, randomized, open-label, multi-centre study will evaluate the effect on overall survival of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in combination with a chemotherapy compared to the chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gastric Cancer
What is being tested?
Trastuzumab, Fluorouracil and Cisplatin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
584 participants
Where
142 sitesin 24 countries
Study dates
Sep 2005to Jun 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients >=18 years of age
  • Inoperable locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic cancer of the stomach or gastro-esophageal junction
  • Adenocarcinoma
  • HER2-positive tumors

Who cannot join

  • Previous chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease
  • Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome
  • History of cardiac disease
  • Dyspnoea at rest, due to complications of advanced malignancy or other disease, or patients who require supportive oxygen therapy

Trial locations and contacts

142 sites in 24 countries.

142 sites in 24 countries

China16 sites
  • Study site

    Beijing, 100021

  • Study site

    Beijing, 100036

  • Study site

    Beijing, 100071

  • Study site

    Beijing, 100853

  • Study site

    Guangdong, 510515

  • Study site

    Guangzhou, 510060

  • Study site

    Jiangsu, 210009

  • Study site

    Nanjing, 210002

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200003

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200025

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200032

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200080

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200092

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200433

  • Study site

    Suzhou, 215006

  • Study site

    Wuhan, 430030

Other trials in China

Japan16 sites
  • Study site

    Aichi, 464-8681

  • Study site

    Chiba, 277-8577

  • Study site

    Ehime, 791-0280

  • Study site

    Fukuoka, 812-8582

  • Study site

    Hyōgo, 650-0017

  • Study site

    Nagano, 384-0392

  • Study site

    Osaka, 569-8686

  • Study site

    Osaka, 589-8511

  • Study site

    Saitama, 350-1298

  • Study site

    Saitama, 362-0806

  • Study site

    Shizuoka, 411-8777

  • Study site

    Tochigi, 320-0834

  • Study site

    Tokyo, 113-8677

  • Study site

    Tokyo, 135-8550

  • Study site

    Tokyo, 135-8577

  • Study site

    Yamagata, 990-8520

Other trials in Japan

Russia15 sites
  • Study site

    Chelyabinsk, 454 087

  • Study site

    Ivanovo, 153040

  • Study site

    Kazan', 420029

  • Study site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Study site

    Moscow, 117837

  • Study site

    Moscow, 125284

  • Study site

    Moscow, 129128

  • Study site

    Ryazan, 390011

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg, 195067

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • Study site

    Samara, 443031

  • Study site

    Ufa, 450054

  • Study site

    Yaroslavl, 150054

  • Study site

    Yekaterinburg, 620905

Other trials in Russia

South Korea11 sites
  • Study site

    Buchun, 420-021

  • Study site

    Bundang City, 463-802

  • Study site

    Daegu, 702-210

  • Study site

    Goyang-si, 410-769

  • Study site

    Pusan, 602-715

  • Study site

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Study site

    Seoul, 120-752

  • Study site

    Seoul, 135-170

  • Study site

    Seoul, 135-720

  • Study site

    Seoul, 138-736

  • Study site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

Portugal9 sites
  • Study site

    Braga, 4700

  • Study site

    Coimbra, 3000-075

  • Study site

    Faro, 8000

  • Study site

    Guimarães, 4810-055

  • Study site

    Lisbon, 1099-023

  • Study site

    Lisbon, 1649-035

  • Study site

    Porto, 4099-001

  • Study site

    Porto, 4200-072

  • Study site

    Porto, 4200-319

Other trials in Portugal

France8 sites
  • Study site

    Brest, 29609

  • Study site

    Caen, 14076

  • Study site

    Colmar, 68024

  • Study site

    Lille, 59020

  • Study site

    Marseille, 13273

  • Study site

    Reims, 51092

  • Study site

    Rouen, 76031

  • Study site

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

United Kingdom8 sites
  • Study site

    Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • Study site

    Denbigh, LL18 5UJ

  • Study site

    Dundee, DD1 9SY

  • Study site

    Glasgow, G12 0YN

  • Study site

    Manchester, M2O 4BX

  • Study site

    Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH63 4JY

  • Study site

    Weston-super-Mare, BS23 4TQ

  • Study site

    Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Spain7 sites
  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Study site

    Girona, 17007

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28041

  • Study site

    Valencia, 41014

  • Study site

    Valencia, 46009

Other trials in Spain

Australia6 sites
  • Study site

    Adelaide, 5011

  • Study site

    Kurralta Park, 5037

  • Study site

    Melbourne, 3128

  • Study site

    Milton, 4064

  • Study site

    Perth, 6008

  • Study site

    Sydney, 2217

Other trials in Australia

Italy6 sites
  • Study site

    Ancona, 60121

  • Study site

    Florence, 50139

  • Study site

    Naples, 80131

  • Study site

    Parma, 43100

  • Study site

    Roma, 00168

  • Study site

    Udine, 33100

Other trials in Italy

Germany5 sites
  • Study site

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Study site

    Mainz, 55101

  • Study site

    München, 81675

  • Study site

    Trier, 54290

  • Study site

    Witten, 58455

Other trials in Germany

Mexico5 sites
  • Study site

    Guadalajara, 44280

  • Study site

    Mérida, 97500

  • Study site

    Mexico City, 06760

  • Study site

    Mexico City, 14000

  • Study site

    Monterrey, 64020

Other trials in Mexico

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • Study site

    Istanbul, 34300

  • Study site

    Istanbul

  • Study site

    Izmir, 35100

  • Study site

    Izmir, 35340

  • Study site

    Shhiye, Ankara, 06100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Brazil4 sites
  • Study site

    Barretos, 14784-400

  • Study site

    Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050

  • Study site

    São Paulo, 04023-900

  • Study site

    São Paulo, 05403-010

Other trials in Brazil

India4 sites
  • Study site

    Hyderabad, 500 033

  • Study site

    Kochi, 682304

  • Study site

    Mumbai, 400026

  • Study site

    New Delhi, 110 029

Other trials in India

Peru3 sites
  • Study site

    Callao

  • Study site

    Lima, 11

  • Study site

    Lima, 18

Other trials in Peru

South Africa3 sites
  • Study site

    Cape Town, 1925

  • Study site

    Cape Town, 7506

  • Study site

    Durban, 4091

Other trials in South Africa

Taiwan3 sites
  • Study site

    Changhua, 500

  • Study site

    Kaohsiung City, 807

  • Study site

    Taipei, 00112

Other trials in Taiwan

Costa Rica2 sites
  • Study site

    San José, 10103

  • Study site

    San José

Other trials in Costa Rica

Denmark2 sites
  • Study site

    Herlev, 2730

  • Study site

    Odense, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Belgium1 site
  • Study site

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Finland1 site
  • Study site

    Tampere, 33520

Other trials in Finland

Guatemala1 site
  • Study site

    Guatemala City, 01015

Other trials in Guatemala

Panama1 site
  • Study site

    Panama City

Other trials in Panama

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of First-line Herceptin in Combination With a Fluoropyrimidine and Cisplatin Versus Chemotherapy Alone on Overall Survival in Patients With HER2-positive Advanced Gastric Cancer

This parallel, randomized, open-label, multi-centre study will evaluate the effect on overall survival of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in combination with a chemotherapy compared to the chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) will be administered as intravenous infusion of 6 mg/kg (loading dose 8 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. The chemotherapy consists of a combination of 6 cycles of fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks), or capecitabine (Xeloda, 1000 mg/m2 po twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin) will continue until disease progression. The target sample size is 300-600 patients.

Conditions
Gastric Cancer
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TrastuzumabDrug

    Also called Herceptin

    Initial loading dose 8 mg/kg i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v. infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression

  • FluorouracilDrug

    Also called 5-FU

    800 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles

  • CisplatinDrug

    80 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles

  • CapecitabineDrug

    Also called Xeloda

    1000 mg/m2 p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles

Study groups in NCT01041404
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, CisplatinExperimentalParticipants received an initial loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) trastuzumab i.v. on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks until disease progression; 800 mg/m2 fluorouracil i.v. on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.
Receives: Drug: Trastuzumab; Drug: Fluorouracil; Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Capecitabine
Fluoropyrimidine, CisplatinActive comparatorParticipants received 800 milligrams per square meter (mg/m2) fluorouracil intravenous (i.v.) on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine orally (p.o.) twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.
Receives: Drug: Fluorouracil; Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Capecitabine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.

    Measured: Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  2. Overall Survival - Time to Event

    The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of an OS event. Participants were censored at the last date tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.

    Measured: BL, Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or date of death, whichever occurs first. For target lesions (TL), PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of one or more lesions. For non-target lesions (NTL), PD was defined as an unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.

    Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  2. Progression-Free Survival - Time to Event

    The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of a PFS event. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.

    Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  3. Time to Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an Event

    TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization and the date of the first occurrence of PD. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor assessment, the last date in the study drug log, or the last date of follow-up.

    Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  4. Time to Progression - Time to Event

    The median time, in months, from the date of randomized to the date of a TTP event. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor assessment, the last date in the study drug log, or the last date of follow-up.

    Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  5. Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

    For TLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD. For NTLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels.

    Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  6. Duration of Response - Percentage of Participants With an Event

    Duration of response was defined for responders as the time from the date on which the CR or PR was first recorded to the date on which PD is first noted. Participants were censored on the date of death, the date of last tumor measurement, the last date in study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.

    Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  7. Duration of Response

    The median time, in months, of the duration of response. Participants were censored at the date of death, the date of last tumor measurement, the last date in study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.

    Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  8. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

    Clinical benefit was defined as stable disease (SD), CR, or PR for 6 weeks or longer as determined by RECIST. For TLs, SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment had started. For NTLs, SD was defined as a persistence of one or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above the normal limits.

    Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  9. European Organisation For the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ C-30) Questionnaire Scores

    EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score equals (=) better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.

    Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  10. EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (QLQ STO22) Questionnaire Scores

    The QLQ-STO22 is a gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire. There are 22 questions concerning disease, treatment related symptoms, side effects, dysphagia, nutritional aspects, and questions about the emotional problems of gastric cancer (dysphagia, pain, reflux, eating restrictions, anxiety, dry mouth, body image, and hair loss). The questions are grouped into five scales and 4 single items which are related to the symptoms of the disease. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 1 question was a yes or no answer). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.

    Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  11. Pain Intensity Scores as Assessed By Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The participant assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement.

    Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  12. Percentage of Participants With a Change in Analgesic Medication During the Study

    Analgesic medications were recorded throughout the study until disease progression.

    Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  13. Body Weight (Kilograms [kg]) at BL

    Measured: BL

  14. Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Body Weight by Percentage Change in Weight

    Change in body weight was categorized as an increase of greater than (>)5 percent (%), no change (plus or minus [±]5%), decrease of >5-10%, or a decrease of >10% from BL to the end of study. Time windows were applied in order to assign visits to weight measurements, and the lowest post-screening value recorded was used for the analysis. The percentage change in weight from screening was summarized over time.

    Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis

  15. Steady State Trastuzumab Area Under the Concentration (AUC)

    Individual steady state predicted exposure, as assessed by median AUC (measured as mg multiplied by [*] day per liter [L]) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion. Individual steady state AUC was calculated using all available PK samples from all timepoints.

    Measured: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106

  16. Trastuzumab Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin)

    Median Cmin (measured as milligrams per liter [mg/L]) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.

    Measured: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106

  17. Trastuzumab Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)

    Median Cmax (measured as mg/L) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.

    Measured: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2005
  3. Primary completionJun 2010
  4. Study completionJun 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
584 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01041404
Sponsor's protocol ID
BO18255
Status last verified
Oct 2014
First submitted
29 Dec 2009
Last updated
5 Nov 2014

Publications

  • Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, Feng-Yi F, Xu JM, Lee KW, Jiao SC, Chong JL, Lopez-Sanchez RI, Price T, Gladkov O, Stoss O, Hill J, Ng V, Lehle M, Thomas M, Kiermaier A, Ruschoff J. HER2 screening data from ToGA: targeting HER2 in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):476-84. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0402-y. Epub 2014 Jul 20.

    PubMed 25038874
  • Satoh T, Bang YJ, Gotovkin EA, Hamamoto Y, Kang YK, Moiseyenko VM, Ohtsu A, Van Cutsem E, Al-Sakaff N, Urspruch A, Hill J, Weber HA, Chung HC; ToGA Trial Investigators. Quality of life in the trastuzumab for gastric cancer trial. Oncologist. 2014 Jul;19(7):712-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0058. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

    PubMed 24951609
  • Satoh T, Omuro Y, Sasaki Y, Hamamoto Y, Boku N, Tamura T, Ohtsu A. Pharmacokinetic analysis of capecitabine and cisplatin in combination with trastuzumab in Japanese patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Apr;69(4):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1783-9. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

    PubMed 22116464
  • Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Ruschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

    PubMed 20728210

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Trastuzumab, Fluorouracil and Cisplatin in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 142 sites in 24 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 142 sites in China, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Portugal and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Nov 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event (time frame: Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01041404, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in