AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatic EncephalopathyPhase 4NCT01041755

Efficacy of L-Ornithine L-Aspartate in Acute Hepatic Encephalopathy.

A Phase 4 study testing L-ornithine-L-aspartate and Lactose in people with Hepatic Encephalopathy, run by Centro Regional para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Digestivas at 1 site in Mexico.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hepatic encephalopathy is caused by the effects on the brain of substances that under normal circumstances are efficiently metabolized in the liver. The hyperammonemia is the main factor responsible for the development of hepatic encephalopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Hepatic Encephalopathy
What is being tested?
L-ornithine-L-aspartate and Lactose
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
Nov 2009to Jun 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with cirrhosis of any etiology, diagnosed by ultrasound,clinical and / or histologic criteria
  • Patients over 18 years and under 75
  • Patients with hepatic encephalopathy grade 3-4 according to the criteria of West Haven
  • Patients with hyperammonemia >10 µmol/l

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of neurological or psychiatric illness
  • Use of drugs affecting the central nervous system
  • Withdrawal Syndrome
  • Anorectal disease that interferes with the administration of enemas

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mexico1 site
  • Hospital Universitario "José Eleuterio González"

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: The Infusion of L-Ornithine L-aspart is as Effective as Nonabsorbable Disaccharides in the Management of Acute Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Hepatic encephalopathy is caused by the effects on the brain of substances that under normal circumstances are efficiently metabolized in the liver. The hyperammonemia is the main factor responsible for the development of hepatic encephalopathy. In patients with cirrhosis, the reduction in hepatocellular function and generation of portosystemic shunts contribute to increase serum ammonium. The current therapeutic approaches, are aimed at reducing blood ammonium levels.

Administration of the non-absorbable disaccharides, have become standard treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.There are no adequate clinical trials comparing the efficacy of L-Ornithine-L-Aspartate (LOLA) infusion against lactose enemas in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy.

Read the detailed description

The main impact of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis is not related to costs, but its association with decreased survival and quality of life and should therefore clearly established the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions used in this disorder.

At the end of the nineteenth century to the ammonium was identified as the main agent responsible for the development of the syndrome of hepatic encephalopathy. Since then, reduced nitrogen compounds from the intestine are considered the main therapeutic measure. On this conceptual base, nonabsorbable disaccharides are the first line therapy in hepatic encephalopathy.

Current knowledge indicates that other organs such as muscle, brain and kidney are involved in the generation of ammonium, which has set the pace for the development of new treatments, able to act systemically in metabolism and elimination of ammonia . L-ornithine L-aspartate (LOLA) lowers ammonium concentrations in animal and humans models with hyperammonemia. There are no adequate clinical trials comparing the efficacy of LOLA infusion against lactose enemas in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy.

Being tested
L-ornithine-L-aspartate, Lactose
Keywords
Encephalopathy, Cirrhosis
Medical subject headings
Hepatic Encephalopathy, Brain Diseases, Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • L-ornithine-L-aspartateDrug

    Also called LOLA

    1. Intravenous infusion of 20 g L-ornithine-L-aspartate (4 ampules of 10 mL each) in 250 mL sodium chloride solution administered daily in 4 hours for 3 consecutive days, plus the placebo b) Water enemas, 1000 mL of water and given as retention enema every 12 hours for 3 consecutive days.
  • LactoseDrug

    1. 20% Lactose enemas, 200 g Lactose diluted with 700 mL of water and given as retention enema every 12 hours for 3 consecutive days, plus intravenous placebo b)250 mL sodium chloride solution, infusion for 4 hours for 3 consecutive days.
Study groups in NCT01041755
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intravenous infusion of L- Ornithine L- AspartateExperimentala) 20 g L-ornithine-L-aspartate
Receives: Drug: L-ornithine-L-aspartate
Lactose enemasActive comparatorb) 20% Lactose enemas
Receives: Drug: Lactose

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement of at least one grade in mental state based on the West Haven Criteria

    Improvement was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The mental state was scored from trivial lack of awareness to deep coma from grade 1 to grade 4.

    Measured: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Improvement of at least one grade in mental state assessed by the Glasgow Coma Scale

    Improvement was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The Glasgow Coma Scale assesses three aspects of responsiveness: eye-opening, motor, and verbal responses. The eye-opening was quantified from 1 to 4 points, the motor response from 1 to 6 points and the verbal response from 1 to 5 points.

    Measured: 72 hours

  2. Improvement of at least one grade in mental state assessed by the Clinical Hepatic Encephalopathy Staging Scale (CHESS)

    Improvement was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The CHESS scale has 9 dichotomous questions that assess mental state, intellectual function, behavior, verbal and motor response and orientation. It was quantified from 0 to 9 points.

    Measured: 72 hours

  3. Improvement of asterixis grade

    Improvement was assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. Asterixis was graded as follows: Grade 0 = without flapping motion, Grade 1 ≤ 5 flaps per minute, Grade 2 = 6 to 10 flaps per minute, Grade 3 = 11 to 20 flaps per minute and Grade 4, continuous flap or patient in coma unable to maintain wrist dorsiflexion. Asterixis grade was evaluated at 0. 24, 48 and 72 hours.

    Measured: 72 hours

  4. Improvement in electroencephalographic tracing grade

    Improvement was assessed at 0 and 72 hours. EEG tracing was graduated from 0 to 4: Grade 0 = normal alpha rhythm, Grade 1 =7 to 8 cycles per second, Grade 2= 5 to 6 cycles per second, Grade 3 = 3 to 4.5 cycles per second and Grade 4 < than 3 cycles per second or delta rhythm. EEG was assessed at 0 and 72 hours.

    Measured: 72 hours

  5. Improvement in serum ammonia

    Ammonia determination was performed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours.

    Measured: 72 hours

  6. Improvement in Number connection tests

    The mental state of the patients included in the study did not allow them to perform the number connection test, therefore, they were all assigned to the worst score (Grade 4)

    Measured: 72 hours

  7. Improvement in Portosystemic Encephalopathy Index.

    Improvement was assessed at 0 and 72 hours. The PSE Index was calculated by multiplying the grade of mental state by a factor of 3; and the grades of asterixis, number connection tests, serum ammonia and EEG were multiplied times a factor of 1. The results were divided by the maximal possible PSE sum.

    Measured: 72 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2009
  3. Primary completionJun 2011
  4. Study completionJun 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01041755
Sponsor's protocol ID
MI09-002
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
31 Dec 2009
Last updated
10 May 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing L-ornithine-L-aspartate and Lactose in people with Hepatic Encephalopathy, run by Centro Regional para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Digestivas at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement of at least one grade in mental state based on the West Haven Criteria (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in