Ventilator Acquired PneumoniaPhase 4NCT01042353
Direct E-test on Bronchoalveolar Lavage From Patients With Ventilator-acquired Pneumonia
A Phase 4 study testing E test and standard culture method in people with Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia, run by Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2 at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Background: Ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) is the most prevalent nosocomial infection in intensive care units (ICUs). Early microbiological diagnosis and initial administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy are associated with a better outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- E test and standard culture method
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- all patients with suspected VAP (defined by a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score ≥5) undergoing BAL will be eligible.
Who cannot join
- contraindications for BAL (PaO2/FIO2 <100, risk of bronchoscopy-related haemorrhagic complications), secondary exclusion of patients with negative cultures, defined by a threshold of bacteria <104 CFU/ml.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Rapid Bacterial Antibiograms Determined by Direct E-test on Bronchoalveolar Lavage From Patients With Ventilator-acquired Pneumonia: a Prospective Comparison With Standard Culture Methods
- Background: Ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) is the most prevalent nosocomial infection in intensive care units (ICUs). Early microbiological diagnosis and initial administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy are associated with a better outcome. Broad-spectrum antibiotics should therefore be administered initially. However, inconsiderate antibiotic use can increase the prevalence of multi-resistant bacteria.
- Purpose: A rapid antimicrobial susceptibility method is required to decrease the unnecessary use of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics. The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency of a rapid antibiogram, provided by E-test strips directly applied to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples and analysed at 24 h, to that obtained with standard methods of culture which provide a later result.
- Study design: This will be an open-label, prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with VAP, conducted in a medical ICU. In addition to standard culture methods, an E-test will be performed directly on BAL samples and analysed at 24 h. Each standard BAL culture will be used as a control for the E-test method.
- Primary outcome: The occurrence of major errors, defined as isolates determined to be susceptible by the E-test but resistant by standard culture methods.
- Secondary outcomes: The occurrence of minor errors (defined as isolates determined to be resistant by the E-test and susceptible by the standard method), and a comparison of two methods of seeding BAL samples on Mueller Hinton agar plates (swabbing method, flooding method).
- Eligibility criteria:
- Inclusion criteria: all patients with suspected VAP (defined by a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score ≥5) undergoing BAL will be eligible.
- Exclusion criteria: contraindications for BAL (PaO2/FIO2 <100, risk of bronchoscopy-related haemorrhagic complications), secondary exclusion of patients with negative cultures, defined by a threshold of bacteria <104 CFU/ml.
- Interventions:
BAL samples will be cultured by standard methods and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria to the usual antibiotics will be determined using standard procedures. At the time of BAL collection, a rapid antibiogram will be performed by placing E-test antibiotic strips (AB Biodisk) directly onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates seeded with the BAL specimen (both by flooding and swabbing). E-test strips will be impregnated with cefoxitin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin and amikacin. At 24 h, the E-test plates will be photographed and then examined separately by both a bacteriologist and a medical ICU physician following a consensus method. The final E-test results will be compared with the standard MIC cultures.
- Conditions
- Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia
- Being tested
- E test, standard culture method
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
E testProcedure or surgery
At the time of BAL collection, a rapid antibiogram will be performed by placing E-test antibiotic strips (AB Biodisk) directly onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates seeded with the BAL specimen (both by flooding and swabbing). E-test strips will be impregnated with cefoxitin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin and amikacin. At 24 h, the E-test plates will be photographed and then examined separately by both a bacteriologist and a medical ICU physician following a consensus method. The final E-test results will be compared with the standard MIC cultures.
standard culture methodProcedure or surgery
BAL samples will be cultured by standard methods and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria to the usual antibiotics will be determined using standard procedures
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| E test | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: E test |
| standard culture method | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: standard culture method |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The occurrence of major errors, defined as isolates determined to be susceptible by the E-test but resistant by standard culture methods.
Secondary outcomes (1)
The occurrence of minor errors (defined as isolates determined to be resistant by the E-test and susceptible by the standard method), and a comparison of two methods of seeding BAL samples on Mueller Hinton agar plates (swabbing method, flooding method).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jan 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ventilator Acquired PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- alexandre Boyer, MD, Principal investigator, Université Bordeaux 2
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01042353
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHU BDX réa med
- Status last verified
- Jan 2010
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2010
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Boyer A, Medrano J, Mzali F, Balick-Weber CC, Bessede E, Picard W, Clouzeau B, Bebear CM, Vargas F, Hilbert G, Rogues AM, Gruson D. Direct testing of bronchoalveolar lavages from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;73(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
PubMed 22483191
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rapid Bacterial Antibiograms Determined by Direct E-test on Bronchoalveolar Lavage From Patients With Ventilator-acquired Pneumonia: a Prospective Comparison With Standard Culture Methods
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01042353
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHU BDX réa med
- Conditions
- Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2University, hospital or other
- First posted
- 5 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Background: Ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) is the most prevalent nosocomial infection in intensive care units (ICUs). Early microbiological diagnosis and initial administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy are associated with a better outcome. Broad-spectrum antibiotics should therefore be administered initially. However, inconsiderate antibiotic use can increase the prevalence of multi-resistant bacteria.
- Purpose: A rapid antimicrobial susceptibility method is required to decrease the unnecessary use of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics. The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency of a rapid antibiogram, provided by E-test strips directly applied to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples and analysed at 24 h, to that obtained with standard methods of culture which provide a later result.
- Study design: This will be an open-label, prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with VAP, conducted in a medical ICU. In addition to standard culture methods, an E-test will be performed directly on BAL samples and analysed at 24 h. Each standard BAL culture will be used as a control for the E-test method.
- Primary outcome: The occurrence of major errors, defined as isolates determined to be susceptible by the E-test but resistant by standard culture methods.
- Secondary outcomes: The occurrence of minor errors (defined as isolates determined to be resistant by the E-test and susceptible by the standard method), and a comparison of two methods of seeding BAL samples on Mueller Hinton agar plates (swabbing method, flooding method).
- Eligibility criteria:
- Inclusion criteria: all patients with suspected VAP (defined by a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score ≥5) undergoing BAL will be eligible.
- Exclusion criteria: contraindications for BAL (PaO2/FIO2 <100, risk of bronchoscopy-related haemorrhagic complications), secondary exclusion of patients with negative cultures, defined by a threshold of bacteria <104 CFU/ml.
- Interventions:
BAL samples will be cultured by standard methods and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria to the usual antibiotics will be determined using standard procedures. At the time of BAL collection, a rapid antibiogram will be performed by placing E-test antibiotic strips (AB Biodisk) directly onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates seeded with the BAL specimen (both by flooding and swabbing). E-test strips will be impregnated with cefoxitin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin and amikacin. At 24 h, the E-test plates will be photographed and then examined separately by both a bacteriologist and a medical ICU physician following a consensus method. The final E-test results will be compared with the standard MIC cultures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| E test | Experimental | Procedure: E test |
| standard culture method | Active comparator | Procedure: standard culture method |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all patients with suspected VAP (defined by a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score ≥5) undergoing BAL will be eligible.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- contraindications for BAL (PaO2/FIO2 <100, risk of bronchoscopy-related haemorrhagic complications), secondary exclusion of patients with negative cultures, defined by a threshold of bacteria <104 CFU/ml.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| E testAt the time of BAL collection, a rapid antibiogram will be performed by placing E-test antibiotic strips (AB Biodisk) directly onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates seeded with the BAL specimen (both by flooding and swabbing). E-test strips will be impregnated with cefoxitin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin and amikacin. At 24 h, the E-test plates will be photographed and then examined separately by both a bacteriologist and a medical ICU physician following a consensus method. The final E-test results will be compared with the standard MIC cultures. | Procedure or surgery | E test |
| standard culture methodBAL samples will be cultured by standard methods and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria to the usual antibiotics will be determined using standard procedures | Procedure or surgery | standard culture method |
Primary outcome
The occurrence of major errors, defined as isolates determined to be susceptible by the E-test but resistant by standard culture methods.
1 secondary outcome
The occurrence of minor errors (defined as isolates determined to be resistant by the E-test and susceptible by the standard method), and a comparison of two methods of seeding BAL samples on Mueller Hinton agar plates (swabbing method, flooding method).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22483191Boyer A, Medrano J, Mzali F, Balick-Weber CC, Bessede E, Picard W, Clouzeau B, Bebear CM, Vargas F, Hilbert G, Rogues AM, Gruson D. Direct testing of bronchoalveolar lavages from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;73(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
Related trials for Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Traditional Chinese Medicine in Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pneumonia
Multi Drug Resistant Infections, Pneumnia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Identification of Pathogens in Children With Respiratory Tract Infection by Mechanical Ventilation Using mNGS
VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
RecruitingPhase 4
EaRly impAct theraPy With Ceftazidime-avibactam Via rapID Diagnostics
Blood Stream Infections, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Cefepime-Zidebactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam With or Without Colistin for Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP), Ventilator Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (VABP)
Recruiting
Immediate Versus Substantiated Antibiotic Therapy in Suspected Non-Severe Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
alexandre Boyer, MD principal investigator
Université Bordeaux 2
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing E test and standard culture method in people with Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia, run by Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2 at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The occurrence of major errors, defined as isolates determined to be susceptible by the E-test but resistant by standard culture methods.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01042353, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2010.