Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornPhase 4NCT01042600
Randomized Controlled Trial of Surfactant Delivery Via Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Versus Endotracheal Intubation
A Phase 4 study testing Endotracheal tube insertion and Laryngeal mask airway insertion in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Albany Medical College at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal CPAP, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway(inserted after pre-medication for pain), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 48 hours
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
- What is being tested?
- Endotracheal tube insertion and Laryngeal mask airway insertion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 61 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2009to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 48 hours
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Mild-to-moderate RDS
- Postnatal age 4 to 48 hours
- Gestational age 29 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks
- Treated with nasal CPAP ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 88-95%
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Weight < 1000 g
- Airway anomalies
- Pulmonary air leaks
- Craniofacial or cardiothoracic malformations
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Rescue Surfactant for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Newborns: Comparing Efficacy of Delivery Via Laryngeal Mask Airway to Delivery by Endotracheal Intubation
In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal CPAP, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway(inserted after pre-medication for pain), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The intent is to remove the airways and return babies to nasal CPAP, after surfactant is given. The primary outcome measure is the rate of failure of initial surfactant therapy. Standardized failure criteria are reached: a) early, if the baby is unable to be placed back on CPAP (needs mechanical ventilation) or, b) late, if the baby requires retreatment with surfactant within 8 hours or more than 2 doses of surfactant.
The objective of this protocol is to reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA, while achieving comparable efficacy of surfactant treatment.
The hypothesis is that surfactant treatment through an LMA will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared with standard surfactant treatment following sedation and endotracheal intubation.
Read the detailed description
Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) due to deficiency of lung surfactant is common in preterm newborns. Early treatment with surfactant improves oxygenation, reduces the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation, decreases the incidence of pulmonary air leaks and chronic lung disease and it also reduces mortality in extremely premature newborns. Optimal treatment of RDS includes surfactant therapy and avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation by using nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). The current standard method of surfactant delivery requires tracheal intubation and at least brief positive-pressure ventilation. Tracheal intubation causes pain and leads to vagal-mediated physiologic instability in neonates; therefore, premedication with morphine and atropine is routinely practiced in our setting. However, premedication with morphine often increases respiratory depression, requiring sustained mechanical ventilation. The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is a commercially available, less invasive artificial airway that does not need to be inserted into the trachea; it is FDA-approved for use in neonates, and preliminary data suggest that it can be used for surfactant administration.
The main objective of this study protocol is reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with mild to moderate RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA. A second objective is to compare the efficacy of surfactant administered via LMA versus endotracheal tube (ETT) in decreasing the severity of RDS. Additionally, we will evaluate the safety of surfactant administration via LMA.
The primary hypothesis is that surfactant treatment via the LMA approach will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared with standard surfactant as administered to the ETT group.
This randomized controlled trial will include babies with mild-to-moderate RDS, between 4 to 48 hours of age, with gestational age 29 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks, treated with NCPAP ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 88-95%, and informed consent. Exclusion criteria are weight < 1000 g, airway anomalies, pulmonary air leaks, and craniofacial and cardiothoracic malformations.
After informed consent is obtained, babies are randomly assigned (from sealed, opaque, consecutively numbered envelopes), to the "ETT" or "LMA". The "ETT" group is managed according to our current practice of surfactant therapy (endotracheal intubation following premedication with atropine + morphine), whereas the "LMA" group will be pre-medicated with atropine before LMA insertion for surfactant administration.
Both groups will receive Infasurf (3mL/kg) instilled in 2 aliquots via their respective airway, followed by PPV for at least 5 minutes. The artificial airway will be removed and the patient returned to NCPAP by 15 minutes, if spontaneous respirations are adequate. Indications for surfactant re-dosing and mechanical ventilation will be equivalent for both groups.
Babies will continue or initiate assisted ventilation via ETT if any of the following occurs:
- Persistent apnea;
- Severe retractions;
- Inability to wean FiO2 < 60%
Criteria for re-dosing with surfactant:
- Within 8 hours after first dose of surfactant (early re-dosing):
- FiO2 20% higher than the baseline FiO2, after excluding other obvious causes of respiratory insufficiency such as pneumothorax. If early re-dosing of surfactant is needed in patients of either group, the dose will be administered via ETT (i.e., LMA patients will be intubated, and will receive the dose of surfactant via ETT)
- Beyond 8 hours of the first dose of surfactant (late re-dosing):
- FiO2 is ≥ 60%, or;
- FiO2is ≥ 30% associated with worsening clinical signs of RDS.
If late re-dosing is needed in patients of the LMA group, use of the LMA is permitted for the second dose. In the ETT group, all doses are given via the ETT.
Primary Outcome Measures:
Rate of failure of early surfactant rescue therapy in the 2 groups, using the following criteria to differentiate early from late failure:
- Criteria for early failure (within 1 hour):
- The need of mechanical ventilation within 1 hour of surfactant therapy.
- Use of Narcan to avoid mechanical ventilation after surfactant therapy.
- Criteria for late failure (beyond 1 hour):
- Sustained FiO2 > 0.60 to maintain target SpO2
- Second dose of surfactant within 8 hours after the first dose.
- More than 2 doses of surfactant.
Babies will have FiO2 adjusted to maintain SpO2 88-95%, per current practice. Other aspects of weaning ventilatory support will be managed by clinicians' preference.
- Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
- Being tested
- Endotracheal tube insertion, Laryngeal mask airway insertion
- Keywords
- Respiratory distress syndrome, Surfactant, Tracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway, Newborn
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endotracheal tube insertionDevice
Endotracheal tube insertion after premedication with atropine (0.02 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg)
Laryngeal mask airway insertionDevice
Also called LMA North America
Laryngeal mask airway insertion after premedication with atropine (0.02 mg/kg)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Endotracheal intubation | Active comparator | Endotracheal tube insertion for surfactant administration, following morphine and atropine pre-medication Receives: Device: Endotracheal tube insertion |
| Laryngeal mask airway | Experimental | Laryngeal mask airway insertion for surfactant administration, following atropine pre-medication Receives: Device: Laryngeal mask airway insertion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Failure of Surfactant Therapy, Either Early (Need for Mechanical Ventilation Within 1 Hour), or Late (FiO2 > 0.60 to Maintain Target SpO2, or Second Dose of Surfactant Within 8 Hours, or Needing More Than 2 Doses of Surfactant).
Measured: 96 hours
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of Surfactant Doses
Mean number of surfactant doses
Measured: 96 hr
Days on Assisted Ventilation
Days on any respiratory support
Measured: 2 months
Days on Supplemental Oxygen
Measured: 2 months
Rate of Pneumothorax
Measured: 96 hrs
Rate of BPD (O2 Dependence at the Later of 28 Days of Age or 36 Weeks Postmenstrual Age)
Measured: 2 months
Complications During Insertion of LMA
LMA insertion complications (e.g. trauma, failure of insertion)
Measured: 96 hrs
Mortality Rate
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2009
- Primary completionSep 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Albany Medical College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ONY, LMA North America, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Joaquim M.B. Pinheiro, Albany Medical College
- Investigators
- Joaquim M Pinheiro, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Albany Medical CollegeQuerube Santana, MD, Principal investigator, Albany Medical College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01042600
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2599
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2010
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rescue Surfactant for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Newborns: Comparing Efficacy of Delivery Via Laryngeal Mask Airway to Delivery by Endotracheal Intubation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01042600
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2599
- Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
- Keywords
- Respiratory distress syndrome, Surfactant, Tracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway, Newborn
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Albany Medical CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ONY, LMA North America, Inc.
- Study start
- Dec 2009
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Jul 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal CPAP, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway(inserted after pre-medication for pain), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The intent is to remove the airways and return babies to nasal CPAP, after surfactant is given. The primary outcome measure is the rate of failure of initial surfactant therapy. Standardized failure criteria are reached: a) early, if the baby is unable to be placed back on CPAP (needs mechanical ventilation) or, b) late, if the baby requires retreatment with surfactant within 8 hours or more than 2 doses of surfactant.
The objective of this protocol is to reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA, while achieving comparable efficacy of surfactant treatment.
The hypothesis is that surfactant treatment through an LMA will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared with standard surfactant treatment following sedation and endotracheal intubation.
Detailed description
Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) due to deficiency of lung surfactant is common in preterm newborns. Early treatment with surfactant improves oxygenation, reduces the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation, decreases the incidence of pulmonary air leaks and chronic lung disease and it also reduces mortality in extremely premature newborns. Optimal treatment of RDS includes surfactant therapy and avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation by using nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). The current standard method of surfactant delivery requires tracheal intubation and at least brief positive-pressure ventilation. Tracheal intubation causes pain and leads to vagal-mediated physiologic instability in neonates; therefore, premedication with morphine and atropine is routinely practiced in our setting. However, premedication with morphine often increases respiratory depression, requiring sustained mechanical ventilation. The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is a commercially available, less invasive artificial airway that does not need to be inserted into the trachea; it is FDA-approved for use in neonates, and preliminary data suggest that it can be used for surfactant administration.
The main objective of this study protocol is reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with mild to moderate RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA. A second objective is to compare the efficacy of surfactant administered via LMA versus endotracheal tube (ETT) in decreasing the severity of RDS. Additionally, we will evaluate the safety of surfactant administration via LMA.
The primary hypothesis is that surfactant treatment via the LMA approach will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared with standard surfactant as administered to the ETT group.
This randomized controlled trial will include babies with mild-to-moderate RDS, between 4 to 48 hours of age, with gestational age 29 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks, treated with NCPAP ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 88-95%, and informed consent. Exclusion criteria are weight < 1000 g, airway anomalies, pulmonary air leaks, and craniofacial and cardiothoracic malformations.
After informed consent is obtained, babies are randomly assigned (from sealed, opaque, consecutively numbered envelopes), to the "ETT" or "LMA". The "ETT" group is managed according to our current practice of surfactant therapy (endotracheal intubation following premedication with atropine + morphine), whereas the "LMA" group will be pre-medicated with atropine before LMA insertion for surfactant administration.
Both groups will receive Infasurf (3mL/kg) instilled in 2 aliquots via their respective airway, followed by PPV for at least 5 minutes. The artificial airway will be removed and the patient returned to NCPAP by 15 minutes, if spontaneous respirations are adequate. Indications for surfactant re-dosing and mechanical ventilation will be equivalent for both groups.
Babies will continue or initiate assisted ventilation via ETT if any of the following occurs:
- Persistent apnea;
- Severe retractions;
- Inability to wean FiO2 < 60%
Criteria for re-dosing with surfactant:
- Within 8 hours after first dose of surfactant (early re-dosing):
- FiO2 20% higher than the baseline FiO2, after excluding other obvious causes of respiratory insufficiency such as pneumothorax. If early re-dosing of surfactant is needed in patients of either group, the dose will be administered via ETT (i.e., LMA patients will be intubated, and will receive the dose of surfactant via ETT)
- Beyond 8 hours of the first dose of surfactant (late re-dosing):
- FiO2 is ≥ 60%, or;
- FiO2is ≥ 30% associated with worsening clinical signs of RDS.
If late re-dosing is needed in patients of the LMA group, use of the LMA is permitted for the second dose. In the ETT group, all doses are given via the ETT.
Primary Outcome Measures:
Rate of failure of early surfactant rescue therapy in the 2 groups, using the following criteria to differentiate early from late failure:
- Criteria for early failure (within 1 hour):
- The need of mechanical ventilation within 1 hour of surfactant therapy.
- Use of Narcan to avoid mechanical ventilation after surfactant therapy.
- Criteria for late failure (beyond 1 hour):
- Sustained FiO2 > 0.60 to maintain target SpO2
- Second dose of surfactant within 8 hours after the first dose.
- More than 2 doses of surfactant.
Babies will have FiO2 adjusted to maintain SpO2 88-95%, per current practice. Other aspects of weaning ventilatory support will be managed by clinicians' preference.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Endotracheal intubation | Active comparator | Device: Endotracheal tube insertionEndotracheal tube insertion for surfactant administration, following morphine and atropine pre-medication |
| Laryngeal mask airway | Experimental | Device: Laryngeal mask airway insertionLaryngeal mask airway insertion for surfactant administration, following atropine pre-medication |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 48 hours
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Mild-to-moderate RDS
- Postnatal age 4 to 48 hours
- Gestational age 29 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks
- Treated with nasal CPAP ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 88-95%
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Weight < 1000 g
- Airway anomalies
- Pulmonary air leaks
- Craniofacial or cardiothoracic malformations
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endotracheal tube insertionEndotracheal tube insertion after premedication with atropine (0.02 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) | Device | Endotracheal intubation |
| Laryngeal mask airway insertionAlso: LMA North AmericaLaryngeal mask airway insertion after premedication with atropine (0.02 mg/kg) | Device | Laryngeal mask airway |
Primary outcome
Rate of Failure of Surfactant Therapy, Either Early (Need for Mechanical Ventilation Within 1 Hour), or Late (FiO2 > 0.60 to Maintain Target SpO2, or Second Dose of Surfactant Within 8 Hours, or Needing More Than 2 Doses of Surfactant).
Time frame: 96 hours
7 secondary outcomes
Number of Surfactant Doses
Time frame: 96 hr
Days on Assisted Ventilation
Time frame: 2 months
Days on Supplemental Oxygen
Time frame: 2 months
Rate of Pneumothorax
Time frame: 96 hrs
Rate of BPD (O2 Dependence at the Later of 28 Days of Age or 36 Weeks Postmenstrual Age)
Time frame: 2 months
Complications During Insertion of LMA
Time frame: 96 hrs
Mortality Rate
Time frame: 2 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joaquim M Pinheiro, MD, MPH principal investigator
Albany Medical College
Querube Santana, MD principal investigator
Albany Medical College
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Endotracheal tube insertion and Laryngeal mask airway insertion in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Albany Medical College at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Failure of Surfactant Therapy, Either Early (Need for Mechanical Ventilation Within 1 Hour), or Late (FiO2 > 0.60 to Maintain Target SpO2, or Second Dose of Surfactant Within 8 Hours, or Needing More Than 2 Doses of Surfactant). (time frame: 96 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2019.