AzTrials
AzTrials

Neurogenic Detrusor OveractivityNCT01043848

Treatment of Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity: Early Versus Late Pudendal Nerve Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Patients

A study testing external electric pudendal nerve stimulation in people with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity and Spinal Cord Injury, run by Ulrich Mehnert at 3 sites in 2 countries.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Although a small group, special attention has to be given to lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunctions in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients, as they also suffer under a loss of motor-sensory function and autonomic regulation next to the severe deficiencies in bladder and bowel control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
What is being tested?
external electric pudendal nerve stimulation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
3 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Dec 2009to Oct 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Single event traumatic or ischemic Para- or Tetraplegia
  • Complete SCI (ASIA A)
  • Lesion level between C4 and Th10
  • Performance of study treatment and assessments possible according to the study time schedule
  • Patient capable and willing of giving written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Nontraumatic Para- or Tetraplegia (i.e. disc herniation, tumor, AV- Malformation, myelitis) exkl. single event ischemic incidences
  • Pre- known dementia or severe reduction of intelligence, leading to reduced capabilities of cooperation or giving consent
  • Peripheral Nerve lesions below the level of lesion (i.e. pudendal nerve impairment, cauda equina syndrome, pre- known Polyneuropathy)
  • Severe craniocerebral injury
  • Previous or planned intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin
  • Previous or planned surgical therapy for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (e.g. bladder augmentation, Mitrofanoff, sphincter prothesis, sacral neuromodulation, deafferentation, sphincterotomy)

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 2 countries.

3 sites in 2 countries

Switzerland2 sites
  • Schweizerisches Paraplegikerzentrum Nottwil

    Nottwil, Canton of Lucerne, 6207

  • Balgrist University Hospital

    Zurich, 8008

Other trials in Switzerland

Spain1 site
  • Guttmann Institute

    Badalona, Barcelona, 08916

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Therapeutic Effects of Early and Late Onset Peripheral Pudendal Neurostimulation on Bladder Function and Autonomic Neuroplasticity in SCI - a Controlled European Multicenter Study

Background: Although a small group, special attention has to be given to lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunctions in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients, as they also suffer under a loss of motor-sensory function and autonomic regulation next to the severe deficiencies in bladder and bowel control. Autonomic dysregulation linked with LUT dysfunction can cause autonomic dysreflexia with life threatening increases in blood pressure and there is still no concept for an early rehabilitation of bladder function after SCI.

Hypothesis: We assume that inadequate reorganization of nerve fibres in SCI is a reason for spastic bladder dysfunction and vegetative dysregulation and that this can be positively influenced by early neuromodulation. We hypothesized that bladder dysfunction as well as autonomic dysreflexia will be positively affected.

Read more

Specific aims: Evaluation, if external pudendal nerve stimulation (EPS) can positively influence LUT rehabilitation in SCI patients and if early initiation of stimulation is more effective compared to late initiation (after spinal shock).

Experimental design: Prospective multicentre study in 36 SCI patients (24 treatment subjects, 12 control subjects). EPS will be started either within 10 days after SCI (early stim group) or after cessation of spinal shock (late stim group). Effects on spastic bladder function and autonomic disinhibition will be assessed by urodynamics, vegetative tests, and by electrophysiological techniques.

Expected value: If early EPS is effective and complete SCI patients benefit from this intervention; and if early onset of EPS has better and longer lasting effects than late onset stimulation, the findings will be of utmost relevance not only for bladder function but also to alleviate adverse phenomena such as autonomic dysreflexia. Neurostimulation may bear the opportunity to early reshape maladaptive neuroplasticity. This would be proof of an effective modulation and promotion of neuroplasticity, thus opening up new treatment options in the field of paraplegiology.

Being tested
external electric pudendal nerve stimulation
Keywords
neurogenic detrusor overactivity, neuromodulation, spinal cord injury, pudendal nerve stimulation, videocystometry, neurophysiology, neuroplasticity
Medical subject headings
Spinal Cord Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • external electric pudendal nerve stimulationProcedure or surgery

    Also called contic+, tic Medizintechnik GmbH, 46286 Dorsten, Germany

    intervention timing: twice daily for 20 minutes during 3 consecutive months.

    intervention procedure: electrodes will be placed around the penile shaft (in males) or clips will be directly placed on the clitoris (in females).

    intervention device: contic+

    stimulation parameters: 10 Hz, 200μs pulse width, 10mA (or less, if too uncomfortable).

Study groups in NCT01043848
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early pudendal stimulationExperimentalSubjects in this arm will start with the intervention within 2 weeks after SCI
Receives: Procedure: external electric pudendal nerve stimulation
Late pudendal stimulationExperimentalSubjects in this arm will start with the intervention 12 weeks after SCI
Receives: Procedure: external electric pudendal nerve stimulation
ControlNo interventionSubjects in this arm will be treated according to standard therapy but will receive no pudendal stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Videocystometry

    Measured: week 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 after SCI

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Neurophysiological measurements (NCV, BCR, SSR)

    Measured: week 2, 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 after SCI

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2012
  4. Study completionOct 2012

Why it stopped: Poor patient recruitment, necessary number of patients could not be included within the required time frame

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01043848
Sponsor's protocol ID
EMSCI-NU-2/09
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
6 Jan 2010
Last updated
23 Jul 2019
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing external electric pudendal nerve stimulation in people with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity and Spinal Cord Injury, run by Ulrich Mehnert at 3 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Switzerland, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Videocystometry (time frame: week 4, 12, 26, 38, 52 after SCI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in