AzTrials
AzTrials

FractureNCT01046747

Pre-drilling or Self Drilling External Fixation Pins

A study testing Placement of external fixation pins in people with Fracture and Dislocation, run by Temple University at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hypothesis There is no difference in the incidence of pin tract infection and pin loosening in case of lower extremity external fixators when self-drilling schanz pins are used with or without pre-drilling. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 89 years
Conditions the study is for
Fracture, Dislocation
What is being tested?
Placement of external fixation pins
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2009to Aug 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 89 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-89
  • Fluency in spoken/ written English/ Spanish (consent form in Spanish will be needed)
  • Lower extremity fracture/ dislocation treated with an external fixator

Who cannot join

  • Prisoners
  • Patients unable to give informed consent
  • Patients who require that pins be placed without skin coverage at the pin site
  • Patients receiving Ilizarov or other circular external fixators with transfixing wires.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

John R Fowler, MD contact

215-707-4545

fowler@temple.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Temple University Hospital

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140

    John R Fowler, MD, 215-707-4545

    John R Fowler, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pre-drilling Pilot Holes for Self-drilling Schanz Pins: Does it Reduce the Incidence of Pin Tract Infection and Pin Loosening?

Hypothesis

There is no difference in the incidence of pin tract infection and pin loosening in case of lower extremity external fixators when self-drilling schanz pins are used with or without pre-drilling.

Read more

Primary Objective

The primary objective is to determine whether pre-drilling holes for external fixation pin insertion is superior to not pre-drilling holes for external fixation pin insertion in regards to the incidence of pin tract infection and pin loosening.

Secondary Objective

If any difference is found between the two techniques then, we will quantify and qualify those differences. The incidence of pin site infection and pin loosening in general will be determined and will also be stratified for site and size of pin. An attempt to identify risk factors for pin site infection will be made by observing the effect of secondary prognostic factors like mode of injury, diabetes, smoking, compartment syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, neurovascular injury. Interobserver reliability of the grading system for pin infection will also be determined.

Read the detailed description

Background

The application of external fixation is a commonly performed emergency procedure in orthopaedics for temporary stabilization as well as definitive treatment of fractures. External fixation requires that metal pins be placed into the bone on either side of the fracture. The pins are then connected to an external frame, thus stabilizing the fracture. There is debate over the optimal technique for the insertion of these pins in regards to the need to pre-drill a pilot hole prior to pin insertion.

The technology behind external fixation has evolved greatly over the past thirty years. The original external fixation pins, "Shanz pins," were essentially metal rods with threads and a trocar point. A pilot hole was needed because these pins did not have the capability to create their own hole or path in the bone. Recent advances have lead to the creation of self-drilling/self-tapping pins, which have decreased the number of steps necessary to place the pins and thereby decreased operative time. The external fixators are usually placed as a temporary measure to allow for improvement of soft tissue condition before definitive open reduction and internal fixation. Since many external fixation devices are placed in patients who are critically ill, decreasing operative time is very important.

While saving operative time is essential it is also important that the device serves its purpose without leading to complications in the short term. The major complications related to external fixation are pin site infection and pin loosening. The literature is clear that high temperatures created during pin insertion leads to bone necrosis surrounding the pin, increased infection, and increased rates of loosening. It is unclear if the new generation self-drilling pins create the same amount of necrosis as the older generation of pins. Lab studies have shown increased temperatures with direct drilling with these pins as compared to pin insertion after drilling pilot holes with dedicated drill bits. It is unclear if this increased temperature results in increased rate of loosening or pin site infection in clinical practice.

A thorough literature search has revealed no randomized controlled studies to support the use of these pins without drilling pilot holes before insertion. The current standard of care is undefined and left to surgeon preference. Our study aims to provide guidelines for schanz pin insertion for external fixator application, which may help to reduce the number of pin tract infections suffered by patients and improve outcomes.

Study Design and Treatment Plan

This will be a prospective, randomized, within-subject, single-blind trial to be conducted at Temple University Hospital. Patients who are determined to require an external fixation procedure of the lower extremities due to fracture or dislocation will be considered for enrollment according to the above inclusion criteria. Standard of care for treatment of their fractures will be provided. Once patients have provided informed consent for enrollment in the study, their pins will be randomized in a paired design according to a computer generated randomization schedule. There will be two types of pins, pre-drilled and non pre-drilled. A standard external fixation device requires two pins on each side of the fracture. Each pair of pins will have one each of pre-drilled and not pre-drilled pins, according to the randomization schedule. Therefore, each patient will have two pre-drilled pins and two pins inserted without pre-drilling. Some surgeons may prefer three pins on each side of the fracture/dislocation that is to be immobilized. We will have a randomization protocol for these situations as well.

The computer generated randomization algorithm will be placed in a secure location in sealed opaque envelopes. The operating surgeon will open the envelope prior to pin insertion and follow the randomization schedule as prescribed in the envelope.

A standard technique will be followed. IV antibiotics will be administered within 60 minutes of the starting skin incision. Pin insertion will be done by standard techniques. This involves a 1 cm incision, and blunt dissection. 4.0 mm (calcaneal or metatarsal), 5.0 mm (tibia) or 6.0 mm (femur) pins will be inserted by one of two techniques: (1) self drilling pins are inserted with a power drill directly into the bone; (2) a standard twist drill bit is utilized with a power drill to create a pilot hole, followed by insertion of the self-drilling pin by power drill.

Soft tissue relaxation incisions are made according to standard technique after external fixation assembly, as needed. The pin care protocol will consist of daily pin site cleaning using dilute hydrogen peroxide and dry dressings. Patients with suspected pin site infection will be treated with Keflex 500mg po q 6hr. Patients with an allergy to Keflex will receive Clindamycin 300mg po q 6hr.

Being tested
Placement of external fixation pins
Keywords
external fixation, pin tract infection, self drilling
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone, Joint Dislocations

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Placement of external fixation pinsProcedure or surgery

    The fractures will be treated according to standard of care. If the external fixation is to be used as a staging procedure, then this will be removed and an internal fixation procedure will be performed. The pin sites will be checked daily according to standard of care. All individuals involved in the examination of the pin sites will receive a standardized training in the grading of pin tract infection and loosening. Each pin site will be graded individually by three persons to evaluate internal accuracy of our grading. Pin tract infections will be first graded as yes or no, and then graded according to the Modified Joglekar Classification (Grade 0-4, Grade 0: no erythema, no drainage; Grade 1: erythema, no drainage OR no erythema with serous drainage; Grade 2: erythema, serous drainage; Grade 3: erythema, purulent drainage; Grade 4: gross pin loosening). Pin loosening will be evaluated at the time of pin removal and graded as either yes or no.

Study groups in NCT01046747
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pre-drillActive comparatorThese pins will be pre-drilled
Receives: Procedure: Placement of external fixation pins
No pre-drillActive comparatorthese pins will not be pre-drilled, but will rely on the self drilling function of the pin for insertion
Receives: Procedure: Placement of external fixation pins

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pin tract infection

    Measured: until pins are removed

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionAug 2011 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01046747
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB - 12415 Pin Study
Status last verified
Aug 2009
First submitted
8 Jan 2010
Last updated
12 Jan 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Abouzgia MB, Symington JM. Effect of drill speed on bone temperature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Oct;25(5):394-9. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(06)80040-8.

    PubMed 8961026
  • Antoci V, Ono CM, Antoci V Jr, Raney EM. Pin-tract infection during limb lengthening using external fixation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008 Sep;37(9):E150-4.

    PubMed 18982187
  • Bachus KN, Rondina MT, Hutchinson DT. The effects of drilling force on cortical temperatures and their duration: an in vitro study. Med Eng Phys. 2000 Dec;22(10):685-91. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(01)00016-9.

    PubMed 11334754
  • Bonfield W, Li CH. The temperature dependence of the deformation of bone. J Biomech. 1968 Dec;1(4):323-9. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(68)90026-2. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16329435
  • Moroni A, Faldini C, Marchetti S, Manca M, Consoli V, Giannini S. Improvement of the bone-pin interface strength in osteoporotic bone with use of hydroxyapatite-coated tapered external-fixation pins. A prospective, randomized clinical study of wrist fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 May;83(5):717-21. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200105000-00010.

    PubMed 11379741
  • Seitz WH Jr, Froimson AI, Brooks DB, Postak P, Polando G, Greenwald AS. External fixator pin insertion techniques: biomechanical analysis and clinical relevance. J Hand Surg Am. 1991 May;16(3):560-3. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(91)90033-8.

    PubMed 1861045
  • Ziran BH, Smith WR, Anglen JO, Tornetta P 3rd. External fixation: how to make it work. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1620-32. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00425. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17606806

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Placement of external fixation pins in people with Fracture and Dislocation, run by Temple University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact John R Fowler, MD (215-707-4545, fowler@temple.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pin tract infection (time frame: until pins are removed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01046747, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2010.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in