NeuropathyPhase 3NCT01049217
Pregabalin Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy
A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin in people with Neuropathy, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 63 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin compared to placebo in reducing neuropathic pain associated with HIV neuropathy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- pregabalin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 377 participants
- Where
- 63 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to May 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women, ages of 18 or greater
- Documented evidence of HIV-1 infection
- Documented diagnosis of HIV-associated Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy (DSP) with subjective sensory symptom of pain
- Pain starts in the feet
Who cannot join
- Subject has untreated vitamin B12 deficiency (serum B12 level <200 pg/ml) or if treated B12 deficiency -treatment is less than 6 months of B12 supplementation (injection or intranasal B12) prior to screening
- Diabetes mellitus requiring regular medical treatment (other than diet and exercise) or HbA1C >6.9
- Subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain that is not associated with HIV infection; including subjects with conditions such as: Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN), Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), familial neuropathies; compression related neuropathy, radicular pain, other infection related neuropathies (eg, leprosy); neuropathy related to: metabolic abnormalities; nutritional factors; vascular insults; inflammation; autoimmune disease; and malignancy
Trial locations and contacts
63 sites in 9 countries.
63 sites in 9 countries
United States25 sites
AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Midtown Neurology, PC
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312
Neuroscience Consultants, LLC.
Aventura, Florida, 33180
South Florida Medical Research
Aventura, Florida, 33180
University of Texas Physicians
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Amelia Court HIV Research Clinic
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Neurology Specialists of Decatur Research Center
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
AIDS Research Alliance of America
Los Angeles, California, 90015
Anthony Mills, MD, Inc.
Los Angeles, California, 90069
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA c/o NNAB
Los Angeles, California, 90095
The Kinder Medical Group
Miami, Florida, 33133
Wohlfeiler, Piperato & Associates, LLC
Miami Beach, Florida, 33139
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029
Providence Clinical Research
North Hollywood, California, 91606
Desert Medical Group, Inc. dba Desert Oasis Healthcare Medical Group
Palm Springs, California, 92262
Southwest Center for HIV/AIDS
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
SW Center for HIV/AIDS
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Arizona Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305
Meridien Research
Tampa, Florida, 33606
University of Toledo Medical Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43614
University of Toledo
Toledo, Ohio, 43614
South Africa18 sites
Worthwhile Clinical Trials
Benoni, Gauteng, 1500
University of Cape Town
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925
Synapta Clinical Research Centre
Durban, 4001
Border Diabetic Centre
East London, Eastern Cape, 5200
Innovir Institute
Gauteng, 2047
Toga Laboratory
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 1610
Drs Essack and Mitha
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2113
University of Witwatersrand-Clinical HIV Research Unit (CHRU)
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2193
Dr J. Reddy's Surgery
KwaDukuza, KwaZulu-Natal, 4450
Mzansi Ethical Research Centre
Middelburg, 1050
Be Part Yoluntu Centre
Paarl, 7626
Paarl Research Center
Paarl, 7646
MediSynergy
Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, 6065
Synexus SA Stanza Bopape Clinical Research Centre
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0122
Clinical Research Unit, University of Pretoria
Pretoria, 0002
Pretoria West Hospital
Pretoria West, Gauteng, 0117
Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, The Palliative Care Centre
Soweto, Gauteng, 1808
Department of Neurology
Tygerberg, 7505
India6 sites
Infectious Disease Clinic
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 009
YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 113
Mahavir Hospital and Research Centre
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 004
Surakshaka Multispeciality Hospital
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 072
Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400026
Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre
Pune, Maharashtra, 411 004
Colombia4 sites
Asistencia Cientifica de Alta Complejidad
Bogota, Cundinamarca, 0000
Centro Instituto de Investigaciones Fundación Universitaria Sanitas
Bogota, Cundinamarca
Riesgo de Fractura S.A
Bogotá, Cundinamarca, 0000
Instituto Colombiano para el Avance de la Medicina- Santander S.A.S. - ICAMEDIC Santander S.A.S
Bucaramanga, Santander Department, 0000
Puerto Rico3 sites
Ponce School of Medicine-CAIMED Center
Ponce, PR, 00716
Ponce School of Medicine - Practice Group
Ponce, PR, 00732-7004
Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium
Rio Piedras, PR, 00935
Peru2 sites
Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo
Lima, L 01
Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen
Lima, L 13
Poland2 sites
Katedra Chorob Zakaznych i Hepatologii UMK w Toruniu CM w Bydgoszczy
Bydgoszcz, 85-030
Oddzial Diagnostyki i Terapii AIDS
Chorzów, 41-500
Thailand2 sites
South East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii
Bangkok, 10330
Neurology unit, Department of Medicine,
Bangkok, 10400
Dominican Republic1 site
Instituto Dominicano de Estudios Virológicos - IDEV
Santo Domingo
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial Of Pregabalin Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy (Pregabalin A0081244)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin compared to placebo in reducing neuropathic pain associated with HIV neuropathy.
Read the detailed description
Based on DMC interim efficacy analysis results indicating a low probability for success the study was terminated on April 2, 2012; the termination was unrelated to any safety findings that could impact patient health.
- Conditions
- Neuropathy
- Being tested
- pregabalin, placebo
- Keywords
- neuropathy, pain, HIV-1, HIV Infections
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pregabalinDrug
Pregabalin 75 mg-300mg twice daily during the course of the study.
placeboDrug
Subjects may be assigned to placebo during this study. The study duration is approximately 19 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active drug | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: pregabalin |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method, modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF).
Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Secondary outcomes (21)
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category is reported.
Measured: Week 16
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
The CGIC scale measures a physician's global impression of a participant's clinical condition at final visit in terms of change relative to the start of treatment (CGIC). At final visit, the participants CGIC will be categorized into a three point scale as: improvement: CGI response of very much improved, much improved or minimally improved; no change: CGI response of no change; worsening: CGI response of very much worse, much worse or minimally worse. Number of participants in each category is reported.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how HIV neuropathy pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Weekly current pain score was defined as the mean of the daily current pain diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated current ("right now") HIV neuropathy pain an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
BPI-sf:5-item self-administered questionnaire to assess severity,impact of pain on daily functions. Pain Severity Index (PSI):average of Question 1-4 each measured severity of pain over past 24-hours on 11-point scale (0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain). Pain Interference Index (PII):average of 7 pain interference items of Question 5 that measured level of interference of pain on daily function on 11-point scale (0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes). For PSI, PII range:0-10 higher score=higher pain/interference. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors and 2 temporal items. Results reported for the 10 descriptors (burning, squeezing, pressure, electric shocks, stabbing, light touching of area, pressure of area, cold of area, pins and needles, tingling) quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) scale. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors, and 2 temporal items. Results reported for categorical change in temporal items assessed on 5-point scale for duration of spontaneous pain (1=continuously, 2=8-12 hours [hrs], 3=4-7 hrs, 4=1-3 hrs, 5=less than 1 hr), numbers of pain attacks (1=more than 20, 2=11-20 attacks, 3=6-10 attacks, 4=1-5 attacks, 5=no attack). Change data categorized as worsened (negative change), unchanged (no change), and improved (positive change). Endpoint=last observation as per imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (subscales: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. The relevant subscales and total score were transformed to 0-1, higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Total Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)
Total sleep time is the number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening and MIS is the number of minutes spent awake after sleep onset to final awakening. TST and MIS were determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)
SFI is a measure to quantify sleep restlessness. SFI calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. SFI determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.
Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Sleep Efficiency
Sleep efficiency is the time spent asleep divided by total time between sleep onset and sleep end, multiplied by 100. Sleep efficiency was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Total Activity Counts
Activity counts are the units of motion. It is equal to the sum of peak accelerations each second during the epoch (60 seconds). Total activity counts per day is the sum of the activity counts for each epoch (60 seconds) during the "day" (non sleep period). A total activity count was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Percentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level
Percentage of time above sedentary level is number of epochs (60 seconds) with greater than (>) 200 activity counts per minute divided by total number of epochs during the "day" (non sleep period) multiplied by 100. This was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep
MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.
Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social (So) functioning (Fn), physical and emotional role (role-physical [R-P], role-emotional [R-E]) limitations, bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (Vit), mental health (MnH). Two summary scores include Physical Component (Ph C) and Mental Component (Mn C). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores. Score range for domain scores and summary scores: 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which specific health problem (SHP) affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Number of participants who responded "Yes/No" to Question 1: Are you currently employed (working for pay)? are reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16, 17
Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 2 and 3 assesses absenteeism as: Hours of work missed in past 7 days due to leg/foot pain or other reason, respectively. Question 4 assesses presenteeism as: Hours of work performed in past 7 days. A participant who had responded 'no' to question 1 regarding employment status reported hours of work and as this was a self-reported questionnaire the source data were included.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16, 17
Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 5 and 6 assesses: How much leg/foot pain affect productivity and daily activity, respectively in past 7 days? on 11-point scale, where 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16, 17
Diagnostic Neuropathy Assessment
Measured: Screening
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NeuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 377 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01049217
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A0081244
- Status last verified
- Aug 2013
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2010
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Simpson DM, Rice AS, Emir B, Landen J, Semel D, Chew ML, Sporn J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and open-label extension study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with human immunodeficiency virus neuropathy. Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
PubMed 24907403
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial Of Pregabalin Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy (Pregabalin A0081244)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01049217
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A0081244
- Conditions
- Neuropathy
- Keywords
- neuropathy, pain, HIV-1, HIV Infections
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
- Enrolment
- 377 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jul 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin compared to placebo in reducing neuropathic pain associated with HIV neuropathy.
Detailed description
Based on DMC interim efficacy analysis results indicating a low probability for success the study was terminated on April 2, 2012; the termination was unrelated to any safety findings that could impact patient health.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active drug | Experimental | Drug: pregabalin |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Men and women, ages of 18 or greater
- Documented evidence of HIV-1 infection
- Documented diagnosis of HIV-associated Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy (DSP) with subjective sensory symptom of pain
- Pain starts in the feet
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject has untreated vitamin B12 deficiency (serum B12 level <200 pg/ml) or if treated B12 deficiency -treatment is less than 6 months of B12 supplementation (injection or intranasal B12) prior to screening
- Diabetes mellitus requiring regular medical treatment (other than diet and exercise) or HbA1C >6.9
- Subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain that is not associated with HIV infection; including subjects with conditions such as: Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN), Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), familial neuropathies; compression related neuropathy, radicular pain, other infection related neuropathies (eg, leprosy); neuropathy related to: metabolic abnormalities; nutritional factors; vascular insults; inflammation; autoimmune disease; and malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pregabalinPregabalin 75 mg-300mg twice daily during the course of the study. | Drug | Active drug |
| placeboSubjects may be assigned to placebo during this study. The study duration is approximately 19 weeks. | Drug | Control |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method, modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF).
21 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: Week 16
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Total Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)
Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)
Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Sleep Efficiency
Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Total Activity Counts
Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Percentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level
Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep
Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)
Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17
Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17
Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17
Diagnostic Neuropathy Assessment
Time frame: Screening
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24907403Simpson DM, Rice AS, Emir B, Landen J, Semel D, Chew ML, Sporn J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and open-label extension study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with human immunodeficiency virus neuropathy. Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Neuropathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
RecruitingPhase 2
Zanubritnib and Anti-MAG Neuropathy
Anti-MAG IgM-associated Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
Active, not recruiting
The AIUR Trial: Surgical Gloves to Prevent Peripheral Neuropathy
Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
63 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin in people with Neuropathy, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 63 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 63 sites in United States, South Africa, India, Colombia, Puerto Rico and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16) (time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01049217, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2021.