AzTrials
AzTrials

NeuropathyPhase 3NCT01049217

Pregabalin Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy

A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin in people with Neuropathy, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 63 sites in 9 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin compared to placebo in reducing neuropathic pain associated with HIV neuropathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neuropathy
What is being tested?
pregabalin
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
377 participants
Where
63 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
Apr 2010to May 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women, ages of 18 or greater
  • Documented evidence of HIV-1 infection
  • Documented diagnosis of HIV-associated Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy (DSP) with subjective sensory symptom of pain
  • Pain starts in the feet

Who cannot join

  • Subject has untreated vitamin B12 deficiency (serum B12 level <200 pg/ml) or if treated B12 deficiency -treatment is less than 6 months of B12 supplementation (injection or intranasal B12) prior to screening
  • Diabetes mellitus requiring regular medical treatment (other than diet and exercise) or HbA1C >6.9
  • Subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain that is not associated with HIV infection; including subjects with conditions such as: Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN), Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), familial neuropathies; compression related neuropathy, radicular pain, other infection related neuropathies (eg, leprosy); neuropathy related to: metabolic abnormalities; nutritional factors; vascular insults; inflammation; autoimmune disease; and malignancy

Trial locations and contacts

63 sites in 9 countries.

63 sites in 9 countries

United States25 sites
  • AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308

  • Midtown Neurology, PC

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30312

  • Neuroscience Consultants, LLC.

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • South Florida Medical Research

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • University of Texas Physicians

    Bellaire, Texas, 77401

  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Amelia Court HIV Research Clinic

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Neurology Specialists of Decatur Research Center

    Decatur, Georgia, 30033

  • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • AIDS Research Alliance of America

    Los Angeles, California, 90015

  • Anthony Mills, MD, Inc.

    Los Angeles, California, 90069

  • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA c/o NNAB

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • The Kinder Medical Group

    Miami, Florida, 33133

  • Wohlfeiler, Piperato & Associates, LLC

    Miami Beach, Florida, 33139

  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Providence Clinical Research

    North Hollywood, California, 91606

  • Desert Medical Group, Inc. dba Desert Oasis Healthcare Medical Group

    Palm Springs, California, 92262

  • Southwest Center for HIV/AIDS

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • SW Center for HIV/AIDS

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • Arizona Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85023

  • University of California San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Stanford University Medical Center

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • Meridien Research

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • University of Toledo Medical Center

    Toledo, Ohio, 43614

  • University of Toledo

    Toledo, Ohio, 43614

Other trials in United States

South Africa18 sites
  • Worthwhile Clinical Trials

    Benoni, Gauteng, 1500

  • University of Cape Town

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925

  • Synapta Clinical Research Centre

    Durban, 4001

  • Border Diabetic Centre

    East London, Eastern Cape, 5200

  • Innovir Institute

    Gauteng, 2047

  • Toga Laboratory

    Johannesburg, Gauteng, 1610

  • Drs Essack and Mitha

    Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2113

  • University of Witwatersrand-Clinical HIV Research Unit (CHRU)

    Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2193

  • Dr J. Reddy's Surgery

    KwaDukuza, KwaZulu-Natal, 4450

  • Mzansi Ethical Research Centre

    Middelburg, 1050

  • Be Part Yoluntu Centre

    Paarl, 7626

  • Paarl Research Center

    Paarl, 7646

  • MediSynergy

    Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, 6065

  • Synexus SA Stanza Bopape Clinical Research Centre

    Pretoria, Gauteng, 0122

  • Clinical Research Unit, University of Pretoria

    Pretoria, 0002

  • Pretoria West Hospital

    Pretoria West, Gauteng, 0117

  • Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, The Palliative Care Centre

    Soweto, Gauteng, 1808

  • Department of Neurology

    Tygerberg, 7505

Other trials in South Africa

India6 sites
  • Infectious Disease Clinic

    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 009

  • YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education

    Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 113

  • Mahavir Hospital and Research Centre

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 004

  • Surakshaka Multispeciality Hospital

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 072

  • Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400026

  • Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre

    Pune, Maharashtra, 411 004

Other trials in India

Colombia4 sites
  • Asistencia Cientifica de Alta Complejidad

    Bogota, Cundinamarca, 0000

  • Centro Instituto de Investigaciones Fundación Universitaria Sanitas

    Bogota, Cundinamarca

  • Riesgo de Fractura S.A

    Bogotá, Cundinamarca, 0000

  • Instituto Colombiano para el Avance de la Medicina- Santander S.A.S. - ICAMEDIC Santander S.A.S

    Bucaramanga, Santander Department, 0000

Other trials in Colombia

Puerto Rico3 sites
  • Ponce School of Medicine-CAIMED Center

    Ponce, PR, 00716

  • Ponce School of Medicine - Practice Group

    Ponce, PR, 00732-7004

  • Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium

    Rio Piedras, PR, 00935

Other trials in Puerto Rico

Peru2 sites
  • Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo

    Lima, L 01

  • Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen

    Lima, L 13

Other trials in Peru

Poland2 sites
  • Katedra Chorob Zakaznych i Hepatologii UMK w Toruniu CM w Bydgoszczy

    Bydgoszcz, 85-030

  • Oddzial Diagnostyki i Terapii AIDS

    Chorzów, 41-500

Other trials in Poland

Thailand2 sites
  • South East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii

    Bangkok, 10330

  • Neurology unit, Department of Medicine,

    Bangkok, 10400

Other trials in Thailand

Dominican Republic1 site
  • Instituto Dominicano de Estudios Virológicos - IDEV

    Santo Domingo

Other trials in Dominican Republic

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial Of Pregabalin Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy (Pregabalin A0081244)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin compared to placebo in reducing neuropathic pain associated with HIV neuropathy.

Read the detailed description

Based on DMC interim efficacy analysis results indicating a low probability for success the study was terminated on April 2, 2012; the termination was unrelated to any safety findings that could impact patient health.

Conditions
Neuropathy
Being tested
pregabalin, placebo
Keywords
neuropathy, pain, HIV-1, HIV Infections
Medical subject headings
Pain, HIV Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pregabalinDrug

    Pregabalin 75 mg-300mg twice daily during the course of the study.

  • placeboDrug

    Subjects may be assigned to placebo during this study. The study duration is approximately 19 weeks.

Study groups in NCT01049217
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active drugExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: pregabalin
ControlPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method, modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF).

    Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category is reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

    The CGIC scale measures a physician's global impression of a participant's clinical condition at final visit in terms of change relative to the start of treatment (CGIC). At final visit, the participants CGIC will be categorized into a three point scale as: improvement: CGI response of very much improved, much improved or minimally improved; no change: CGI response of no change; worsening: CGI response of very much worse, much worse or minimally worse. Number of participants in each category is reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how HIV neuropathy pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  4. Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    Weekly current pain score was defined as the mean of the daily current pain diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated current ("right now") HIV neuropathy pain an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  5. Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    BPI-sf:5-item self-administered questionnaire to assess severity,impact of pain on daily functions. Pain Severity Index (PSI):average of Question 1-4 each measured severity of pain over past 24-hours on 11-point scale (0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain). Pain Interference Index (PII):average of 7 pain interference items of Question 5 that measured level of interference of pain on daily function on 11-point scale (0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes). For PSI, PII range:0-10 higher score=higher pain/interference. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  6. Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors and 2 temporal items. Results reported for the 10 descriptors (burning, squeezing, pressure, electric shocks, stabbing, light touching of area, pressure of area, cold of area, pins and needles, tingling) quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) scale. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  7. Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors, and 2 temporal items. Results reported for categorical change in temporal items assessed on 5-point scale for duration of spontaneous pain (1=continuously, 2=8-12 hours [hrs], 3=4-7 hrs, 4=1-3 hrs, 5=less than 1 hr), numbers of pain attacks (1=more than 20, 2=11-20 attacks, 3=6-10 attacks, 4=1-5 attacks, 5=no attack). Change data categorized as worsened (negative change), unchanged (no change), and improved (positive change). Endpoint=last observation as per imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  8. Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (subscales: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. The relevant subscales and total score were transformed to 0-1, higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  9. Total Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)

    Total sleep time is the number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening and MIS is the number of minutes spent awake after sleep onset to final awakening. TST and MIS were determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  10. Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)

    SFI is a measure to quantify sleep restlessness. SFI calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. SFI determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  11. Sleep Efficiency

    Sleep efficiency is the time spent asleep divided by total time between sleep onset and sleep end, multiplied by 100. Sleep efficiency was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  12. Total Activity Counts

    Activity counts are the units of motion. It is equal to the sum of peak accelerations each second during the epoch (60 seconds). Total activity counts per day is the sum of the activity counts for each epoch (60 seconds) during the "day" (non sleep period). A total activity count was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  13. Percentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level

    Percentage of time above sedentary level is number of epochs (60 seconds) with greater than (>) 200 activity counts per minute divided by total number of epochs during the "day" (non sleep period) multiplied by 100. This was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  14. Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  15. Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep

    MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  16. Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

    Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  17. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social (So) functioning (Fn), physical and emotional role (role-physical [R-P], role-emotional [R-E]) limitations, bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (Vit), mental health (MnH). Two summary scores include Physical Component (Ph C) and Mental Component (Mn C). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores. Score range for domain scores and summary scores: 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

    Measured: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

  18. Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which specific health problem (SHP) affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Number of participants who responded "Yes/No" to Question 1: Are you currently employed (working for pay)? are reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16, 17

  19. Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 2 and 3 assesses absenteeism as: Hours of work missed in past 7 days due to leg/foot pain or other reason, respectively. Question 4 assesses presenteeism as: Hours of work performed in past 7 days. A participant who had responded 'no' to question 1 regarding employment status reported hours of work and as this was a self-reported questionnaire the source data were included.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16, 17

  20. Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 5 and 6 assesses: How much leg/foot pain affect productivity and daily activity, respectively in past 7 days? on 11-point scale, where 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16, 17

  21. Diagnostic Neuropathy Assessment

    Measured: Screening

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionMay 2012

Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
377 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01049217
Sponsor's protocol ID
A0081244
Status last verified
Aug 2013
First submitted
13 Jan 2010
Last updated
28 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Simpson DM, Rice AS, Emir B, Landen J, Semel D, Chew ML, Sporn J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and open-label extension study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with human immunodeficiency virus neuropathy. Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

    PubMed 24907403

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin in people with Neuropathy, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 63 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 63 sites in United States, South Africa, India, Colombia, Puerto Rico and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16) (time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01049217, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in