AnemiaNCT01051323
An Observational Study of Mircera (Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta) in Patients With Renal Anemia
An observational study of Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
This observational study will investigate hemoglobin levels and Mircera (methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta) dose over time in patients with chronic kidney disease, and compare standards of care between centers. Data from each patient will be collected over 12 months of Mircera therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia
- What is being tested?
- methoxy polyethylene glycol-ep [Mircera]
- How many people
- 1,580 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Mar 2010to Feb 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: CKD patients treated with Mirecera at different medical centers
Who may be able to join
- adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- chronic kidney disease
- informed consent for data transmission
Who cannot join
- serious hematological or infectious disease
- acute bleeding in the 16 weeks preceding data collection
- participation in an interventional trial
- female patients: pregnancy or breast-feeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Non-interventional Study to Investigate Hemoglobin Levels and Dose Over Time in the Daily Use of Mircera for Renal Anemia in Larger Centers, and to Detect Differences Between Standard of Care in the Centers
This observational study will investigate hemoglobin levels and Mircera (methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta) dose over time in patients with chronic kidney disease, and compare standards of care between centers. Data from each patient will be collected over 12 months of Mircera therapy.
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Being tested
- methoxy polyethylene glycol-ep [Mircera]
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
methoxy polyethylene glycol-ep [Mircera]Drug
As prescribed by physician
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not described Receives: Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-ep [Mircera] |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hemoglobin Value Outside the Target Range
Mean hemoglobin was calculated from measurements taken during the Evaluation Period (Month 0 to Month 12). The target hemoglobin range was 10 to 13 gram/deciliter (g/dL). Percentage of participants with at least one hemoglobin value less than (<) 10 g/dL or greater than (>) 13 g/dL during the evaluation period by predialysis/hemodialysis is presented.
Measured: Month 0 to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Values Within Pre-defined Ranges During Evaluation Period by Dose Modification, Age, and Center Size
The percentage of participants with hemoglobin (Hb) values within the pre-defined ranges (10-12 g/dL, 11-12 g/dL, and 11-13 g/dL) during evaluation period (Month 0 to Month 12) by dose modification (yes or no), age (<65 years, greater than or equal to [>=] 65 years) and center size (>100 participants, less than or equal to [<=] 100 participants) is presented.
Measured: Month 0 to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Values Within Pre-defined Ranges During Month 6 to Month 12 by Dose Modification, Age, and Center Size
The percentage of participants with hemoglobin values within the pre-defined ranges (10-12 g/dL, 11-12 g/dL, and 11-13 g/dL) during Month 6 to Month 12 by dose modification (yes or no), age (<65 years, >=65 years) and center size (>100 participants, <=100 participants) is presented.
Measured: Month 6 to Month 12
Maximum Intra-Individual Fluctuation of Hemoglobin Values by Predialysis/Hemodialysis, Age, and Center Size
For characterization of intra-individual fluctuations, the maximum absolute differences were derived from study period specific individual mean values. Maximum intra-individual fluctuation of hemoglobin values by predialysis/hemodialysis, age (<65 years, >=65 years), and center size (>100 participants, <=100 participants) is presented. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Month 0 to Month 12
Serum Ferritin Values
Serum ferritin levels were measured as nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL). Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Serum Iron Values
Serum iron levels were measured as microgram/deciliter (mcg/dL). Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Transferrin Values
Transferrin levels were measured as milligram/deciliter (mg/dL). Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Transferrin Saturation Values
Transferrin saturation (TSAT) measured as a percentage, is a medical laboratory test. It is the ratio of serum iron and total iron-binding capacity, multiplied by 100. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Values
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Number of Physicians Satisfied With Treatment at Final Visit
Physicians were asked to rate their satisfaction with the methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta treatment at final visit. Physicians' responses were "very satisfied", "satisfied", "undecided", or "not satisfied". One physician could analyze multiple participants but for the purpose of analysis each physician was counted as one for each analyzed participants; hence, the number of physicians (as per this assessment) was equal to the number of participants analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Month 12 or early discontinuation
Number of Participants Who Continued Treatment With Methoxy Polyethyleneglycol-epoetin Beta After Study Completion
At final visit, physicians were asked to answer ("yes" or "no") the question, whether they would continue treatment with methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta treatment after study completion. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Month 12 or early discontinuation
Number of Participants With Reasons for Discontinuation of Methoxy Polyethyleneglycol-epoetin Beta Treatment After Study Completion
At final visit, physicians were asked to state the reasons in case of discontinuation of treatment with methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta. The same participant could have discontinued treatment due to multiple reasons. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Month 12 or early discontinuation
Number of Participants Who Switched to Other Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA)-Therapy
Number of participants who switched to other ESA therapies including Aranesp, Biopoin, Biosimilar, Erypo, and NeoRecormon is presented. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Month 12 or early discontinuation
Number of Participants Satisfied With Treatment at Final Visit
Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta treatment at final visit. Participants' responses were "very satisfied", "satisfied", "undecided", or "not satisfied". Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Month 12 or early discontinuation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Average Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta Dose
Average methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta dose per application is presented by study month. Mean values were taken when more than 1 application was documented for a participant during the time period considered. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Measured: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2010
- Primary completionFeb 2013
- Study completionFeb 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,580 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01051323
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML22714
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2010
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-interventional Study to Investigate Hemoglobin Levels and Dose Over Time in the Daily Use of Mircera for Renal Anemia in Larger Centers, and to Detect Differences Between Standard of Care in the Centers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01051323
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML22714
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,580 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2010
- Primary completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Dec 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This observational study will investigate hemoglobin levels and Mircera (methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta) dose over time in patients with chronic kidney disease, and compare standards of care between centers. Data from each patient will be collected over 12 months of Mircera therapy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-ep [Mircera] |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- CKD patients treated with Mirecera at different medical centers
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- chronic kidney disease
- informed consent for data transmission
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- serious hematological or infectious disease
- acute bleeding in the 16 weeks preceding data collection
- participation in an interventional trial
- female patients: pregnancy or breast-feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| methoxy polyethylene glycol-ep [Mircera]As prescribed by physician | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hemoglobin Value Outside the Target Range
Time frame: Month 0 to Month 12
Mean hemoglobin was calculated from measurements taken during the Evaluation Period (Month 0 to Month 12). The target hemoglobin range was 10 to 13 gram/deciliter (g/dL). Percentage of participants with at least one hemoglobin value less than (<) 10 g/dL or greater than (>) 13 g/dL during the evaluation period by predialysis/hemodialysis is presented.
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Values Within Pre-defined Ranges During Evaluation Period by Dose Modification, Age, and Center Size
Time frame: Month 0 to Month 12
The percentage of participants with hemoglobin (Hb) values within the pre-defined ranges (10-12 g/dL, 11-12 g/dL, and 11-13 g/dL) during evaluation period (Month 0 to Month 12) by dose modification (yes or no), age (<65 years, greater than or equal to [>=] 65 years) and center size (>100 participants, less than or equal to [<=] 100 participants) is presented.
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Values Within Pre-defined Ranges During Month 6 to Month 12 by Dose Modification, Age, and Center Size
Time frame: Month 6 to Month 12
The percentage of participants with hemoglobin values within the pre-defined ranges (10-12 g/dL, 11-12 g/dL, and 11-13 g/dL) during Month 6 to Month 12 by dose modification (yes or no), age (<65 years, >=65 years) and center size (>100 participants, <=100 participants) is presented.
Maximum Intra-Individual Fluctuation of Hemoglobin Values by Predialysis/Hemodialysis, Age, and Center Size
Time frame: Month 0 to Month 12
For characterization of intra-individual fluctuations, the maximum absolute differences were derived from study period specific individual mean values. Maximum intra-individual fluctuation of hemoglobin values by predialysis/hemodialysis, age (<65 years, >=65 years), and center size (>100 participants, <=100 participants) is presented. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Serum Ferritin Values
Time frame: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Serum ferritin levels were measured as nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL). Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Serum Iron Values
Time frame: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Serum iron levels were measured as microgram/deciliter (mcg/dL). Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Transferrin Values
Time frame: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Transferrin levels were measured as milligram/deciliter (mg/dL). Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Transferrin Saturation Values
Time frame: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Transferrin saturation (TSAT) measured as a percentage, is a medical laboratory test. It is the ratio of serum iron and total iron-binding capacity, multiplied by 100. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Values
Time frame: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Number of Physicians Satisfied With Treatment at Final Visit
Time frame: Month 12 or early discontinuation
Physicians were asked to rate their satisfaction with the methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta treatment at final visit. Physicians' responses were "very satisfied", "satisfied", "undecided", or "not satisfied". One physician could analyze multiple participants but for the purpose of analysis each physician was counted as one for each analyzed participants; hence, the number of physicians (as per this assessment) was equal to the number of participants analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Number of Participants Who Continued Treatment With Methoxy Polyethyleneglycol-epoetin Beta After Study Completion
Time frame: Month 12 or early discontinuation
At final visit, physicians were asked to answer ("yes" or "no") the question, whether they would continue treatment with methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta treatment after study completion. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Number of Participants With Reasons for Discontinuation of Methoxy Polyethyleneglycol-epoetin Beta Treatment After Study Completion
Time frame: Month 12 or early discontinuation
At final visit, physicians were asked to state the reasons in case of discontinuation of treatment with methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta. The same participant could have discontinued treatment due to multiple reasons. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Number of Participants Who Switched to Other Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA)-Therapy
Time frame: Month 12 or early discontinuation
Number of participants who switched to other ESA therapies including Aranesp, Biopoin, Biosimilar, Erypo, and NeoRecormon is presented. Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
Number of Participants Satisfied With Treatment at Final Visit
Time frame: Month 12 or early discontinuation
Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with methoxy polyethyleneglycol-epoetin beta treatment at final visit. Participants' responses were "very satisfied", "satisfied", "undecided", or "not satisfied". Data for this outcome measure was reported for overall participants.
1 secondary outcome
Average Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta Dose
Time frame: Months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Dec 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hemoglobin Value Outside the Target Range (time frame: Month 0 to Month 12). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2015.