AzTrials
AzTrials

Pigment Dispersion SyndromeNCT01053416

Pigment Dispersion Syndrome: Natural History and Possible Protective Effect of a YAG Laser Iridotomy

A study testing Yag laser iridotomy in people with Pigment Dispersion Syndrome, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

STUDY AIMS 1. To determine the 10-year conversion rate from pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS) to pigmentary glaucoma (PG) 2. To evaluate the possible protective effect of a Yag-laser iridotomy Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Pigment Dispersion Syndrome
What is being tested?
Yag laser iridotomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jan 1993to Dec 2003
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Krukenberg spindle
  • Slit-like mid peripheral iris defect
  • Pigment in > 270° of AC angle

Who cannot join

  • IOP > 18 mmHg
  • PEX (full mydriasis)
  • w/w field defect (Octopus G1 program)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Sezione Di Oftalmologia, Universita' Di Parma

    Parma, 43100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: 10-year Follow up of Patients With Pigment Dispersion Syndrome: Risk Factors for Conversion to Pigmentary Glaucoma and Potential Protective Effect of a Yag-laser Iridotomy in High Risk Eye

STUDY AIMS

  1. To determine the 10-year conversion rate from pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS) to pigmentary glaucoma (PG)
  2. To evaluate the possible protective effect of a Yag-laser iridotomy
Read the detailed description

1154 workers in the Parma area will be screened for eligibility to long-term use of video-monitors. Those referred to the Glaucoma Clinic for suspected PDS will be enrolled in the study.

In a prospective study on the natural history of PDS and PG, Richter et al. (Arch Ophtal 104:211-5, 1986) found an association between "active pigment dispersion" and elevated IOP. Therefore, in order to evaluate the "stability" of the pigment, a phenylephrine test will be performed following the method reported by Epstein et al (1978) AJO 85:43-50. The test will be performed by one investigator (SAG)and was considered positive if > "grade 1+" (i.e. at least 10 particles in a single light beam). Eyes showing a positive test will be considered as "high-risk" for conversion to PG.

Yag laser iridotomy will be performed in patients showing both eyes at high risk. One eye only (randomly chosen) will be treated. the fellow eye will be left untreated and considered as internal control.

Low risk eyes will be followed without any intervention.

Being tested
Yag laser iridotomy
Keywords
glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma, laser iridotomy
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma-Related Pigment Dispersion Syndrome, Glaucoma, Glaucoma, Open-Angle

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Yag laser iridotomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called iridectomy

    the procedure will be performed by using a Yag laser. Single spot, 1 mJ power, beam aimed to an existing iris crypt

Study groups in NCT01053416
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
observationNo interventionNot described
Yag laser iridotomyExperimentalthe enrolled eyes will undergo an iridotomy performed by using a Yag-laser
Receives: Procedure: Yag laser iridotomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. > 5 mmHg IOP increase vs baseline (average 2 highest readings, 8 am - 6 pm phasing, 6 readings)

    Measured: 10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1993
  3. Primary completionApr 2003
  4. Study completionDec 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01053416
Sponsor's protocol ID
PARMAPIGMO
Status last verified
Jan 2003
First submitted
20 Jan 2010
Last updated
22 Jan 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gandolfi SA, Ungaro N, Tardini MG, Ghirardini S, Carta A, Mora P. A 10-year follow-up to determine the effect of YAG laser iridotomy on the natural history of pigment dispersion syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;132(12):1433-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3291.

    PubMed 25188224

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Yag laser iridotomy in people with Pigment Dispersion Syndrome, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

> 5 mmHg IOP increase vs baseline (average 2 highest readings, 8 am - 6 pm phasing, 6 readings) (time frame: 10 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01053416, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in