Multiple MyelomaPhase 2IFM2009-02NCT01053949
IFM2009-02-Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Phase 2 Myeloma
A Phase 2 study testing Pomalidomide in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by University Hospital, Lille at 19 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapse and refractory MM patients who are progressive and did not achieve at least a partial response to bortezomib and lenalidomide. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Pomalidomide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Apr 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be able to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
- Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
- 18 years>=Age
- Life expectancy>6 months
- Patients must have Symptomatic and Progressive Myeloma following bortezomib and/or lenalidomide treatment, defined as detailed in protocol.
- Patients must have a clearly detectable and quantifiable monoclonal M-component value*
Show all 15Show fewer
- ECOG performance status score of 0,1,or 2
- Adequate bone marrow function,documented within 72 hours prior to treatment without transfusion or growth factor support,defined as*
- Wash out period of at least 2 weeks from previous antitumor therapy or any investigational treatment
- Able to take antithrombotic medicines such as Low molecular weight heparin or Aspirin 75mg
- Subjects affiliated with an appropriate social security system
- Agree to abstain from donating blood while taking study drug therapy and for one week following discontinuation of study drug therapy
- Agree not to share study medication with another person and to return all unused study drug to the investigator
- Female subjects of childbearing potential* must:Understand that the study medication is expected to have a teratogenic risk-Agree to use,and be able to comply with, effective contraception* without interruption,4 weeks before starting study drug,throughout the entire duration of study drug therapy (including dose interruptions) and for 4 weeks after the end of study drug therapy,even if she has amenorrhoea.This applies unless the subject commits to absolute and continued abstinence on a monthly basis-Understand that even if she has amenorrhea,she must follow all the advice on effective contraception-She understands the potential consequences of pregnancy and the need to rapidly consult if there is a risk of pregnancy-Agree to have a medically supervised pregnancy test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 mIU/mL on the day of the study visit or in the 3 days prior to the study visit once the subject has been on effective contraception for at least 4 weeks-Agree to have a medically supervised pregnancy test every 4 weeks including 4 weeks after the end of study treatment,except in the case of confirmed tubal sterilization. These pregnancy tests should be performed on the day of the study visit or in the 3 days prior to the study visit.This requirement also applies to women of childbearing potential who practice complete and continued abstinence
- Male subjects must:Agree to use condoms throughout study drug therapy,during any dose interruption and for one week after cessation of study therapy if their partner is of childbearing potential and has no contraception Agree not to donate semen during study drug therapy and for one week after end of study drug therapy
Who cannot join
- Any other uncontrolled medical condition or comorbidity that might interfere with subject's participation
- Pregnant or breast feeding females
- Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 15 days of screening.
- Known positive for HIV or infectious hepatitis,type A, B or C.
- Patients with non-secretory MM
- Prior history of malignancies, other than multiple myeloma, unless the patients has been free of the disease for >= 3 years.Exceptions include the following*
Show all 19Show fewer
- Prior local irradiation within two weeks before screening
- Evidence of central nervous system involvement
- Any>grade 2 toxicity unresolved
- Peripheral neuropathy>=Grade 2
- Known Hypersensitivity to Thalidomide,Lenalidomide or Dexamethasone
- Ongoing active infection,especially ongoing pneumonitis
- Ongoing Cardiac dysfunction
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with birth control requirements
- Unable to take antithrombotic medicines at study entry
- Unable to take corticotherapy at study entry
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Persons protected by a legal regime(guardianship,trusteeship)
- ()=described in protocol
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
France19 sites
CHRU-Hôpital Sud, avenue Laennec,
Amiens, 80054
Hématologie, Hôpital Avicenne
Bobigny, 93009
Hématologie, CHU, avenue G.Clemenceau
Caen, 14033
Hématologie Clinique, CHU, Hôpital d'Enfants
Dijon, 21000
Hématologie, CHRU, Hôpital A.Michallon
Grenoble, 38043
Service des Maladies du Sang, CHRU
Lille, 59037
Hôpital Edouard HERRIOT
Lyon, 69437
Hématologie, Institut Paoli Calmette
Marseille, 13273
Hématologie, CHRU, Hôpitaux de Brabois
Nancy, 54511
Maladies du Sang, CHRU, Hôtel Dieu
Nantes, 44035
Service Immuno-Hématologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis
Paris, 75475
Maladies du Sang, CHU - Hôpital St Antoine
Paris, 75571
Service des Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Haut-Levèque
Pessac, 33604
Service d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Hématologie Clinique, Hôpital Robert Debré, CHU Reims
Reims, 51092
Hôpital PONTCHAILLOU, CHU de RENNES
Rennes, 35033
Médecine Interne, CHRU, Hôpital Sud
Rennes, 35056
Hématologie, CHRU, Hôpital Purpan
Toulouse, 31059
Onco-Hématologie, CHRU- Hôpital Bretonneau
Tours, 37044
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter Randomized Open Label Phase II Study of Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapse and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Progressive and Did Not Achieve at Least a Partial Response to Bortezomib and Lenalidomide
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapse and refractory MM patients who are progressive and did not achieve at least a partial response to bortezomib and lenalidomide. This study will determine the efficacy and toxicity profile of 2 modalities of pomalidomide in patients with advanced myeloma, previously heavily treated characterized with adverse prognostic and that are in desperate need of novel therapeutics.
Read the detailed description
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease that is characterized by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. The median overall survival for patients with MM is approximately 4-5 years. Despite front line treatment approaches, the disease eventually relapses. The recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of bortezomib (2003) and combination lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (2006) therapies for the treatment of previously treated MM has provided effective therapeutic options that give patients with relapsed or refractory MM the prospect for a prolongation of overall and progression-free survival times. However, MM remains an incurable disease. A clear unmet medical need still exists for additional novel therapeutic options for the treatment of previously treated MM.
Pomalidomide belongs to the IMiDs class of compounds which thalidomide is the parent compound and lenalidomide the most recently approved agent. It is derived from thalidomide and shares a number of the beneficial pharmacologic properties with thalidomide. The efficacy of thalidomide has been limited by adverse effects. This toxicity profile seems dose and duration-related, spurring the development of IMiDs, which have the potential of improved potency and reduced toxicity. By modifying the thalidomide structure through the addition of an amino group at the 4 position of the phthaloyl ring to generate pomalidomide, a compound that is up to 50000 times more potent at inhibiting TNF-alpha than thalidomide was formed.
Recently, preliminary efficacy and safety data from an ongoing phase 2 study, led by Martha Lacy, et al, at Mayo Clinic, were presented at the XII International Myeloma Workshop in Washington DC (01 March 2009). The study highlighted a 63 % objective response and a 5% complete response in patients taking pomalidomide (2 mg daily on days 1-28 of a 28-day cycle) plus dexamethasone (40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each cycle) including patients with lenalidomide resistant refractory multiple myeloma. The results also showed that the treatment was well tolerated. Based on the encouraging data of this study, a phase 1/2b multi-center, randomized, open-label, dose escalation study (dose level from 2 mg to 5 mg daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle)is conducted to determine the MTD of pomalidomide. This ongoing study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral pomalidomide alone, and in combination with dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. The first results obtained in this study demonstrated that the maximum tolerated dose of pomalidomide was 4 mg once per day and highlighted that pomalidomide has significant efficacy in MM and can be safely administered to myeloma patients. Moreover, there are an increasing number of patients who are refractory or did not respond significantly or experienced significant toxicity to either bortezomib or lenalidomide.
Based on these studies, we hypothesized that these patients might benefit from the combination of pomalidomide and dexamethasone. We have therefore designed a multicenter phase 2 randomized open labelled study to determine response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapse and refractory MM patients who are progressive and did not achieve at least a partial response to bortezomib and lenalidomide. This study will determine the efficacy and toxicity profile of 2 modalities of pomalidomide in patients with advanced myeloma, previously heavily treated characterized with adverse prognostic and that are in desperate need of novel therapeutics. This study will be conducted in accordance with "good clinical practice" (GCP) and all applicable regulatory requirements, including, where applicable, the 2008 version of the Declaration of Helsinki.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Pomalidomide
- Keywords
- Multiple myeloma, dexamethasone, pomalidomide, response, safety
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PomalidomideDrug
Also called Actimid, CC-4047
Pomalidomide 4 mg continuous daily oral route on 21 days per 28 days cycle. The proposed dose of dexamethasone is considered standard, 40mg/day once a week.
PomalidomideDrug
Also called Actimid, CC-4047
Pomalidomide 4 mg continuous daily oral route on 28 days of a 28 days cycle The proposed dose of dexamethasone is considered standard, 40mg/day once a week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Drug on 21 days per 28 days cycle | Active comparator | Pomalidomide 4 mg continuous daily oral route on 21 days per 28 days cycle. The proposed dose of dexamethasone is considered standard, 40mg/day once a week. |
| Drug on 28 days per 28 days cycle | Active comparator | Pomalidomide 4 mg continuous daily oral route on 28 days of a 28 days cycle The proposed dose of dexamethasone is considered standard, 40mg/day once a week. Receives: Drug: Pomalidomide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To determine Response rate to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in MM patients who are progressive and did not achieve at least a partial response to bortezomib and lenalidomide
Measured: 30 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
To determine response and safety profile of 2 dose-regimens of pomalidomide
Measured: 30 months
To determine Safety of pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Measured: 30 months
To determine Time to response and Response duration of pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Measured: 30 months
To determine Time to disease progression to pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Measured: 30 months
Overall Survival of pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Measured: 30 months
To determine response in both arms with regards to cytogenetic of the bone marrow tumor plasma cells
Measured: 30 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionApr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, LilleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Lille
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Celgene
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bruno ROYER, MD PhD, Principal investigator, CHRU-Hôpital Sud d'Amiens-AMIENSPhilippe RODON, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier de Blois -BLOISSabine BRECHIGNAC, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Avicenne-Bobigny- PARISGerard MARIT, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Haut-Levèque de Pessac-BORDEAUXChristian BERTHOU, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Service d'Hématologie Clinique, CHU Morvan, BRESTMargaret MACRO, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hématologie, CHU, CAENDenis CAILLOT, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hématologie Clinique, CHU, Hôpital d'Enfants, DIJONBrigitte PEGOURIE, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hématologie, CHRU, Hôpital A.Michallon, GRENOBLE
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01053949
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009_28/0924
- Other IDs
- 2009-013319-36, 2009
- Acronym
- IFM2009-02
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2010
- Last updated
- 14 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Leleu X, Attal M, Arnulf B, Moreau P, Traulle C, Marit G, Mathiot C, Petillon MO, Macro M, Roussel M, Pegourie B, Kolb B, Stoppa AM, Hennache B, Brechignac S, Meuleman N, Thielemans B, Garderet L, Royer B, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Decaux O, Escoffre-Barbe M, Michallet M, Caillot D, Fermand JP, Avet-Loiseau H, Facon T; Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is active and well tolerated in bortezomib and lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma: Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 2009-02. Blood. 2013 Mar 14;121(11):1968-75. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-452375. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
PubMed 23319574
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter Randomized Open Label Phase II Study of Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapse and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Progressive and Did Not Achieve at Least a Partial Response to Bortezomib and Lenalidomide
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01053949
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IFM2009-02 / 2009_28/0924
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Multiple myeloma, dexamethasone, pomalidomide, response, safety
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, LilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Celgene
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapse and refractory MM patients who are progressive and did not achieve at least a partial response to bortezomib and lenalidomide. This study will determine the efficacy and toxicity profile of 2 modalities of pomalidomide in patients with advanced myeloma, previously heavily treated characterized with adverse prognostic and that are in desperate need of novel therapeutics.
Detailed description
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease that is characterized by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. The median overall survival for patients with MM is approximately 4-5 years. Despite front line treatment approaches, the disease eventually relapses. The recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of bortezomib (2003) and combination lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (2006) therapies for the treatment of previously treated MM has provided effective therapeutic options that give patients with relapsed or refractory MM the prospect for a prolongation of overall and progression-free survival times. However, MM remains an incurable disease. A clear unmet medical need still exists for additional novel therapeutic options for the treatment of previously treated MM.
Pomalidomide belongs to the IMiDs class of compounds which thalidomide is the parent compound and lenalidomide the most recently approved agent. It is derived from thalidomide and shares a number of the beneficial pharmacologic properties with thalidomide. The efficacy of thalidomide has been limited by adverse effects. This toxicity profile seems dose and duration-related, spurring the development of IMiDs, which have the potential of improved potency and reduced toxicity. By modifying the thalidomide structure through the addition of an amino group at the 4 position of the phthaloyl ring to generate pomalidomide, a compound that is up to 50000 times more potent at inhibiting TNF-alpha than thalidomide was formed.
Recently, preliminary efficacy and safety data from an ongoing phase 2 study, led by Martha Lacy, et al, at Mayo Clinic, were presented at the XII International Myeloma Workshop in Washington DC (01 March 2009). The study highlighted a 63 % objective response and a 5% complete response in patients taking pomalidomide (2 mg daily on days 1-28 of a 28-day cycle) plus dexamethasone (40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each cycle) including patients with lenalidomide resistant refractory multiple myeloma. The results also showed that the treatment was well tolerated. Based on the encouraging data of this study, a phase 1/2b multi-center, randomized, open-label, dose escalation study (dose level from 2 mg to 5 mg daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle)is conducted to determine the MTD of pomalidomide. This ongoing study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral pomalidomide alone, and in combination with dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. The first results obtained in this study demonstrated that the maximum tolerated dose of pomalidomide was 4 mg once per day and highlighted that pomalidomide has significant efficacy in MM and can be safely administered to myeloma patients. Moreover, there are an increasing number of patients who are refractory or did not respond significantly or experienced significant toxicity to either bortezomib or lenalidomide.
Based on these studies, we hypothesized that these patients might benefit from the combination of pomalidomide and dexamethasone. We have therefore designed a multicenter phase 2 randomized open labelled study to determine response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapse and refractory MM patients who are progressive and did not achieve at least a partial response to bortezomib and lenalidomide. This study will determine the efficacy and toxicity profile of 2 modalities of pomalidomide in patients with advanced myeloma, previously heavily treated characterized with adverse prognostic and that are in desperate need of novel therapeutics. This study will be conducted in accordance with "good clinical practice" (GCP) and all applicable regulatory requirements, including, where applicable, the 2008 version of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Drug on 21 days per 28 days cycle | Active comparator | –Pomalidomide 4 mg continuous daily oral route on 21 days per 28 days cycle. The proposed dose of dexamethasone is considered standard, 40mg/day once a week. |
| Drug on 28 days per 28 days cycle | Active comparator | Drug: PomalidomidePomalidomide 4 mg continuous daily oral route on 28 days of a 28 days cycle The proposed dose of dexamethasone is considered standard, 40mg/day once a week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Must be able to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
- Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
- 18 years>=Age
- Life expectancy>6 months
- Patients must have Symptomatic and Progressive Myeloma following bortezomib and/or lenalidomide treatment, defined as detailed in protocol.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Any other uncontrolled medical condition or comorbidity that might interfere with subject's participation
- Pregnant or breast feeding females
- Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 15 days of screening.
- Known positive for HIV or infectious hepatitis,type A, B or C.
- Patients with non-secretory MM
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PomalidomideAlso: Actimid, CC-4047Pomalidomide 4 mg continuous daily oral route on 21 days per 28 days cycle. The proposed dose of dexamethasone is considered standard, 40mg/day once a week. | Drug | – |
| PomalidomideAlso: Actimid, CC-4047Pomalidomide 4 mg continuous daily oral route on 28 days of a 28 days cycle The proposed dose of dexamethasone is considered standard, 40mg/day once a week. | Drug | Drug on 28 days per 28 days cycle |
Primary outcome
To determine Response rate to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in MM patients who are progressive and did not achieve at least a partial response to bortezomib and lenalidomide
Time frame: 30 months
6 secondary outcomes
To determine response and safety profile of 2 dose-regimens of pomalidomide
Time frame: 30 months
To determine Safety of pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Time frame: 30 months
To determine Time to response and Response duration of pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Time frame: 30 months
To determine Time to disease progression to pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Time frame: 30 months
Overall Survival of pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Time frame: 30 months
To determine response in both arms with regards to cytogenetic of the bone marrow tumor plasma cells
Time frame: 30 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 23319574Leleu X, Attal M, Arnulf B, Moreau P, Traulle C, Marit G, Mathiot C, Petillon MO, Macro M, Roussel M, Pegourie B, Kolb B, Stoppa AM, Hennache B, Brechignac S, Meuleman N, Thielemans B, Garderet L, Royer B, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Decaux O, Escoffre-Barbe M, Michallet M, Caillot D, Fermand JP, Avet-Loiseau H, Facon T; Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is active and well tolerated in bortezomib and lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma: Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 2009-02. Blood. 2013 Mar 14;121(11):1968-75. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-452375. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bruno ROYER, MD PhD principal investigator
CHRU-Hôpital Sud d'Amiens-AMIENS
Philippe RODON, MD PhD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier de Blois -BLOIS
Sabine BRECHIGNAC, MD PhD principal investigator
Hôpital Avicenne-Bobigny- PARIS
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Pomalidomide in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by University Hospital, Lille at 19 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To determine Response rate to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in MM patients who are progressive and did not achieve at least a partial response to bortezomib and lenalidomide (time frame: 30 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01053949, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.