AzTrials
AzTrials

Prophilaxis of Acute Rejection in Patients Receiving a Renal AllograftPhase 4MAXIMIZANCT01056822

Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess Whether Treatment With Mycophenolate Sodium (MPS) Allows Higher Dose Optimization Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Leading to a Dose Reduction of Tacrolimus. Maximiza Study.

A Phase 4 study testing 1 and 2 in people with Prophilaxis of Acute Rejection in Patients Receiving a Renal Allograft, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 19 sites in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess Whether Treatment With Mycophenolate sodium (MPS) Allows Higher Dose Optimization Versus Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) Leading to a Dose Reduction of Tacrolimus. Maximiza Study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
1 and 2
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
89 participants
Where
19 sitesSpain
Study dates
May 2010to Apr 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Renal transplant recipients ≥ 1 year and ≤ 5 years prior1 to inclusion in the study.
  • Patients who were receiving an immunosuppressive regimen including MMF ≤1000 mg/day and ≥ 250 mg/day 4 and Prograf®1 or Advagraf®6 (levels ≥7 ng/ml).
  • Patients who had been receiving the current maintenance immunosuppressive regimen with stable doses of MMF for at least the past 3 months.2
  • Patients included must have had Prograf® or Advagraf® levels ≥ 7ng/ml4 for at least one month prior to inclusion in the trial.2
  • Patients with low immunological risk, in the investigator's opinion.
  • Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate based on the MDRD formula of > 30 ml/min x 1.73 m2.1
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients over 18 years of age.1
  • Patients who were able to understand the study information and give written informed consent.
  • Patients who were able to meet all study requirements, including completing questionnaires and attending study visits.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with GI symptoms known or assumed not to be caused by mycophenolic acid (MPA) treatment (e.g. oral bisphosphonate-induced infectious diarrhoea).
  • Patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Diabetic patients.
  • Acute rejection < 1 month prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Patients with leukopenia (< 3500 cells/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (< 100,000 cells/mm3).
  • Women of childbearing potential who were planning to become pregnant, were pregnant and/or breastfeeding, or who did not wish to use effective contraception [hormonal contraceptives (implantation, patches, oral) and double-barrier methods (any double combination of: IUD, male or female condoms with spermicidal gel, diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, cervical cap)].
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Presence of psychiatric illness (such as schizophrenia, major depression) that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with study requirements.
  • Patients who were undergoing surgery for an acute condition or who were hospitalised.
  • Any other medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion based on blood counts or chart review, could interfere with completion of the study, including but not limited to visual problems or cognitive impairment.
  • Patients who were receiving or had received any investigational medicinal product during the 30 days prior to inclusion in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

Spain19 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    A Coruña, Galicia, 15006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Alicante, Valencia, 03010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barakaldo, Basque Country, 48903

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08025

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Granada, Andalusia, 18014

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28040

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, Madrid

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07014

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31080

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 38320

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Santander, Cantabria, 39008

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toledo, Castille-La Mancha, 45004

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Valencia, Valencia, 46017

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Valladolid, Castille and León, 47011

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess Whether Treatment With Mycophenolate sodium (MPS) Allows Higher Dose Optimization Versus Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) Leading to a Dose Reduction of Tacrolimus. Maximiza Study.

Being tested
1, 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 1Drug

    Continue with same dose of MMF as patient was taking before randomisation

  • 2Drug

    Increase MPS by 180mg every 12h based on investigator's judgement up to a maximum of 720 mg of MPS every 12 hours

Study groups in NCT01056822
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorMycophenolate mofetil
Receives: Drug: 1
2ExperimentalMiycophenolate sodium
Receives: Drug: 2

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Achieving at Least Two Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Dose Steps Higher and Reducing Tacrolimus Dose at the End of the Study

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  2. Number of Participants That Achieved One Dose Step Higher With Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) or Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), According to the Treatment Group Assigned at the End of the Study (Final Visit) Compared to Baseline Dose

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  3. Participants With Reduction in Tacrolimus or Tacrolimus Extended Release Levels at the End of the Study (Final Visit) Compared to Baseline Dose.

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  4. Mean Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Doses at the End of the Study (Final Visit) Compared to Baseline Dose.

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Change in Renal Function Measured Using Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance (CrCl)

    Measured: Visit 1 (30 days +/-4), visit 2 (90 days +/- 15), visit 3 (150 days +/- 15), visit 4 (210 days +/- 15), visit 5 (365 days +/- 15)

  2. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Using Abbreviated MDRD

    Calculated GFR (MDRD formula): GFR [mL/min/1.73m2] = 186.3*(C-1.154)*(A-0.203)*G*R where C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL], A is age [years], G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1

    Measured: Visit 1 (30 days +/-4), visit 2 (90 days +/- 15), visit 3 (150 days +/- 15), visit 4 (210 days +/- 15), visit 5 (365 days +/- 15)

  3. Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Item Score

    The GSRS is a 15-item instrument design to assess the symptoms associated to gastrointestinal disorders. It has 5 subscales (reflux, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and indigestion) with scores rating from 1 to 7 (with a higher score representing more gastrointestinal symptoms)

    Measured: Visit 1 (30 days +/-4), visit 2 (90 days +/- 15), visit 3 (150 days +/- 15), visit 4 (210 days +/- 15), visit 5 (365 days +/- 15)

  4. Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Subscale Score

    The GSRS is a 15-item instrument design to assess the symptoms associated to gastrointestinal disorders. It has 5 subscales (reflux, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and indigestion) with scores rating from 1 to 7 (with a higher score representing more gastrointestinal symptoms)

    Measured: Visit 1 (30 days +/-4), visit 2 (90 days +/- 15), visit 3 (150 days +/- 15), visit 4 (210 days +/- 15), visit 5 (365 days +/- 15)

  5. Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Impact of Gastrointestinal Symptoms on Quality Of Life (SIGIT)-QoL Questionnaire. Total Score.

    The SIGIT-QoL scale is a 17 items instrument, the score of each item ranges from 0 (always) to 4 (never). The scale score is obtained by adding the scores of the 17 items. Therefore, the total score ranges from 0 to 68 points. Higher score means, less impairment of Health Related QoL of the patient and vice versa, the lower the score, the greater severity of symptoms and worse perceived by the patient

    Measured: Visit 1 (30 days +/-4), visit 2 (90 days +/- 15), visit 3 (150 days +/- 15), visit 4 (210 days +/- 15), visit 5 (365 days +/- 15)

  6. Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score From Baseline to Visit 2 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the UGT1A9 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The GSRS is a 15-item instrument design to assess the symptoms associated to gastrointestinal disorders. It has 5 subscales (reflux, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and indigestion) with scores rating from 1 to 7 (with a higher score representing more gastrointestinal symptoms)

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  7. Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score From Baseline to Visit 4 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the UGT1A9 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The GSRS is a 15-item instrument design to assess the symptoms associated to gastrointestinal disorders. It has 5 subscales (reflux, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and indigestion) with scores rating from 1 to 7 (with a higher score representing more gastrointestinal symptoms)

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  8. Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score From Baseline to Visit 5 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the UGT1A9 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The GSRS is a 15-item instrument design to assess the symptoms associated to gastrointestinal disorders. It has 5 subscales (reflux, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and indigestion) with scores rating from 1 to 7 (with a higher score representing more gastrointestinal symptoms)

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  9. Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score From Baseline to Visit 2 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MRP2 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The GSRS is a 15-item instrument design to assess the symptoms associated to gastrointestinal disorders. It has 5 subscales (reflux, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and indigestion) with scores rating from 1 to 7 (with a higher score representing more gastrointestinal symptoms)

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  10. Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score From Baseline to Visit 4 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MRP2 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The GSRS is a 15-item instrument design to assess the symptoms associated to gastrointestinal disorders. It has 5 subscales (reflux, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and indigestion) with scores rating from 1 to 7 (with a higher score representing more gastrointestinal symptoms)

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  11. Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score From Baseline to Visit 5 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MRP2 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The GSRS is a 15-item instrument design to assess the symptoms associated to gastrointestinal disorders. It has 5 subscales (reflux, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and indigestion) with scores rating from 1 to 7 (with a higher score representing more gastrointestinal symptoms)

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  12. Change in SIGIT-QoL Score From Baseline to Visit 2 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of SNP in the UGT1A9 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The SIGIT-QoL scale is a 17 items instrument, the score of each item ranges from 0 (always) to 4 (never). The scale score is obtained by adding the scores of the 17 items. Therefore, the total score ranges from 0 to 68 points. Higher score means, less impairment of Health Related QoL of the patient and vice versa, the lower the score, the greater severity of symptoms and worse perceived by the patient

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  13. Change in SIGIT-QoL Score From Baseline to Visit 4 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of SNP in the UGT1A9 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The SIGIT-QoL scale is a 17 items instrument, the score of each item ranges from 0 (always) to 4 (never). The scale score is obtained by adding the scores of the 17 items. Therefore, the total score ranges from 0 to 68 points. Higher score means, less impairment of Health Related QoL of the patient and vice versa, the lower the score, the greater severity of symptoms and worse perceived by the patient

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  14. Change in SIGIT-QoL Score From Baseline to Visit 5 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of SNP in the UGT1A9 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The SIGIT-QoL scale is a 17 items instrument, the score of each item ranges from 0 (always) to 4 (never). The scale score is obtained by adding the scores of the 17 items. Therefore, the total score ranges from 0 to 68 points. Higher score means, less impairment of Health Related QoL of the patient and vice versa, the lower the score, the greater severity of symptoms and worse perceived by the patient

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  15. Change in SIGIT-QoL Score From Baseline to Visit 2 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of SNP in the MRP2 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. SIGIT-QoL scale is a 17 items instrument, the score of each item ranges from 0 (always) to 4 (never). The scale score is obtained by adding the scores of the 17 items. Therefore, the total score ranges from 0 to 68 points. Higher score means, less impairment of Health Related QoL of the patient and vice versa, the lower the score, the greater severity of symptoms and worse perceived by the patient

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  16. Change in SIGIT-QoL Score From Baseline to Visit 4 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of SNP in the MRP2 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The SIGIT-QoL scale is a 17 items instrument, the score of each item ranges from 0 (always) to 4 (never). The scale score is obtained by adding the scores of the 17 items. Therefore, the total score ranges from 0 to 68 points. Higher score means, less impairment of Health Related QoL of the patient and vice versa, the lower the score, the greater severity of symptoms and worse perceived by the patient

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  17. Change in SIGIT-QoL Score From Baseline to Visit 5 Stratified on the Basis of the Presence or Absence of SNP in the MRP2 Gene for the ITT Population

    Sub-study primary endpoint. The SIGIT-QoL scale is a 17 items instrument, the score of each item ranges from 0 (always) to 4 (never). The scale score is obtained by adding the scores of the 17 items. Therefore, the total score ranges from 0 to 68 points. Higher score means, less impairment of Health Related QoL of the patient and vice versa, the lower the score, the greater severity of symptoms and worse perceived by the patient

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  18. Duration of Exposure to the Study Medicinal Product, Mycophenolate Sodium Descriptive Statistics. Safety Population Per Treatment Group

    Exposure to study drug (MPS). Data presented only for safety population on the study treatment arm (not applicable for MMF arm)

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  19. Dose of the Study Medicinal Product Mycophenolate Sodium (MPS)

    Safety population per visit and per treatment group

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

  20. Dose of the Study Medicinal Product Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)

    Safety population per visit and per treatment group (missings not included)

    Measured: at 12 months from baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2010
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionApr 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
89 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01056822
Sponsor's protocol ID
CERL080AES08
Other IDs
2009-014562-26, 2009
Acronym
MAXIMIZA
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
25 Jan 2010
Last updated
3 Dec 2014
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing 1 and 2 in people with Prophilaxis of Acute Rejection in Patients Receiving a Renal Allograft, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 19 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Achieving at Least Two Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Dose Steps Higher and Reducing Tacrolimus Dose at the End of the Study (time frame: at 12 months from baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in