AzTrials
AzTrials

Autonomic DysfunctionNCT01059370

Autonomic Dysreflexia in Spinal Cord Injury

A study testing bowel emptying in people with Autonomic Dysfunction and Spinal Cord Injured, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Autonomic dysreflexia in high spinal cord-injured can be initiated by a full bladder or bowel, or when trying to empty either. This randomised study aims at evaluating whether irrigation procedure or digital stimulation or evacuation of the rectum is less provocative of autonomic dysreflexia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Autonomic Dysfunction, Spinal Cord Injured
What is being tested?
bowel emptying
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Dec 2009to Mar 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • People with a spinal cord injury above th6 and with symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia.
  • At least one year post injury.
  • 18 years or older.
  • Informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Usage of prophylactic anti-autonomic dysreflexia medication.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • People who is not able to follow the sudy protocol.
  • No former major surgery in the abdomen or pelvic region.
  • No former radiotherapy in the pelvic region.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Aarhus University Hospital

    Aarhus, 8000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Autonom Dysrefleksi Ved Rygmarvsskade

Autonomic dysreflexia in high spinal cord-injured can be initiated by a full bladder or bowel, or when trying to empty either. This randomised study aims at evaluating whether irrigation procedure or digital stimulation or evacuation of the rectum is less provocative of autonomic dysreflexia. Participants have their bowels emptied on different days, in the morning fasting. Bladder filling with sterile saline water is evaluated on a third day as a control.

Being tested
bowel emptying
Keywords
Autonomic dysfunction, Spinal cord injured, Neurogenic bowel, Neurogenic bladder
Medical subject headings
Primary Dysautonomias, Neurogenic Bowel, Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • bowel emptyingProcedure or surgery

    Also called Peristeen, Finometer Pro

    Bowel is emptied using Peristeen® irrigation system one day, by digital stimulation another trial day or filling the bladder with saline water on a third trial day. BP is measured by Finometer Pro®, respiration frequency by BIOPACK and skin conductivity measured by Biopack and nor-epinephrine and epinephrine are measured in plasma three times during each examination.

Study groups in NCT01059370
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Autonomic dysrefleksiaExperimentalAutonomic dysreflexia in SCI when emptying bowels or filling bladder
Receives: Procedure: bowel emptying

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intervention induces 25 % raise in BP compared to baseline measurements.

    Measured: Outcome are monitored all through bowel or bladder-procedure at each of three study-days, and compaire to measurements at baseline.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionNov 2011
  4. Study completionMar 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01059370
Sponsor's protocol ID
2009-0112
Status last verified
Oct 2012
First submitted
19 Jan 2010
Last updated
16 Oct 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing bowel emptying in people with Autonomic Dysfunction and Spinal Cord Injured, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intervention induces 25 % raise in BP compared to baseline measurements. (time frame: Outcome are monitored all through bowel or bladder-procedure at each of three study-days, and compaire to measurements at baseline.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in