AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankylosing SpondylitisPhase 2ALIGNNCT01061723

Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAR153191 (REGN88) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

A Phase 2 study testing Sarilumab in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Sanofi at 80 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary objective: to evaluate the efficacy of Sarilumab in participants with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using the assessment in AS working group criteria (ASAS) 20% response criteria (ASAS20) Secondary objectives: to demonstrate that Sarilumab was effective on: assessment of higher level of response [ASAS 40%… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Ankylosing Spondylitis
What is being tested?
Sarilumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
301 participants
Where
80 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
Feb 2010to Jun 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of AS according to the New York modified criteria
  • Participants must had an adequate trial of at least 2 different Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) taken for at least 2 weeks in each case and, on a stable dose for ≥2 weeks or be intolerant to NSAIDs
  • Participants must had active AS for ≥3 months before screening and active disease must be present at screening and at baseline; Active AS being defined by:
  • Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score of ≥4 (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10)
  • Total back pain score ≥4 (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10)
  • Participants treated with corticosteroid must be on a stable dose for ≥2 weeks prior to baseline
  • Participants treated with the Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and methotrexate (MTX) must be on stable dose ≥12 weeks prior to baseline

Who cannot join

  • <18 years old or ≥75 years old
  • Complete fusion of the spine
  • Past history of non response to any anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors (TNFs) treatment or non response to any other biological treatment for AS
  • Any past or current treatment with anti-TNF's or any biological agent within 3 months prior to screening
  • Treatment with DMARDs except for hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and MTX
  • MTX >25 mg/week
Show all 12Show fewer
  • hydroxychloroquine >400 mg/day
  • Sulfasalazine >3 g/day
  • Treatment with oral prednisone or equivalent corticosteroids >10 mg/day within 6 weeks prior to screening
  • Use of intramuscular or intra-articular corticosteroids within the last 4 weeks before screening
  • Previous treatment with cyclosporine, azathioprine
  • The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

80 sites in 14 countries.

80 sites in 14 countries

United States26 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 840016

    Albany, New York, 12206

  • Investigational Site Number 840033

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • Investigational Site Number 840023

    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015

  • Investigational Site Number 840006

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35205

  • Investigational Site Number 840009

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Investigational Site Number 840015

    Boise, Idaho, 83702

  • Investigational Site Number 840034

    Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320

  • Investigational Site Number 840004

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Investigational Site Number 840014

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Investigational Site Number 840028

    Freehold, New Jersey, 07728

  • Investigational Site Number 840030

    Houston, Texas, 77034

  • Investigational Site Number 840018

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160-7321

  • Investigational Site Number 840008

    Lansing, Michigan, 48823

  • Investigational Site Number 840027

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Investigational Site Number 840001

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Investigational Site Number 840005

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109

  • Investigational Site Number 840032

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Investigational Site Number 840021

    Rock Island, Illinois, 61201

  • Investigational Site Number 840007

    San Diego, California, 92108

  • Investigational Site Number 840013

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Investigational Site Number 840002

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • Investigational Site Number 840036

    Syracuse, New York, 13210

  • Investigational Site Number 840010

    Toledo, Ohio, 43606

  • Investigational Site Number 840017

    Upland, California, 91786

  • Investigational Site Number 840003

    Wheaton, Maryland, 20902

  • Investigational Site Number 840029

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655

Other trials in United States

Canada10 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 124007

    London, N6A 4V2

  • Investigational Site Number 124004

    Montreal, H2L 1S6

  • Investigational Site Number 124008

    Newmarket, L3Y 3R7

  • Investigational Site Number 124003

    Pointe-Claire, H9R 3Z2

  • Investigational Site Number 124001

    Québec, G1V 4R4

  • Investigational Site Number 124006

    Saskatoon, S7K 0H6

  • Investigational Site Number 124005

    Toronto, M5T 2S8

  • Investigational Site Number 124009

    Trois-Rivières, G8Z 1Y2

  • Investigational Site Number 124002

    Vancouver, V5Z 1L7

  • Investigational Site Number 124010

    Vancouver, V5Z 3Y1

Other trials in Canada

Belgium5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 056003

    Brussels, 1020

  • Investigational Site Number 056005

    Genk, 3600

  • Investigational Site Number 056001

    Ghent, 9000

  • Investigational Site Number 056002

    Leuven, 3000

  • Investigational Site Number 056004

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

Czechia5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 203003

    Brno, 63800

  • Investigational Site Number 203005

    Hlučín, 74801

  • Investigational Site Number 203002

    Hradec Králové, 50005

  • Investigational Site Number 203001

    Prague, 12850

  • Investigational Site Number 203004

    Uherské Hradiště, 68601

Other trials in Czechia

Germany5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 276002

    Berlin, 12200

  • Investigational Site Number 276004

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Investigational Site Number 276003

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Investigational Site Number 276005

    Hamburg, 22081

  • Investigational Site Number 276001

    Herne, 44652

Other trials in Germany

Poland5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 616002

    Bialystok, 15-354

  • Investigational Site Number 616001

    Krakow, 30-510

  • Investigational Site Number 616004

    Lublin, 20-607

  • Investigational Site Number 616005

    Torun, 87-100

  • Investigational Site Number 616003

    Warsaw, 02-637

Other trials in Poland

Australia4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 036003

    Hobart, 7001

  • Investigational Site Number 036001

    Malvern East, 3145

  • Investigational Site Number 036004

    Shenton Park, 6008

  • Investigational Site Number 036002

    Woolloongabba, 4102

Other trials in Australia

France4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 250001

    Besançon, 25030

  • Investigational Site Number 250005

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Investigational Site Number 250002

    Créteil, 94010

  • Investigational Site Number 250003

    Paris, 75014

Other trials in France

Hungary4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 348001

    Budapest, 1023

  • Investigational Site Number 348003

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Investigational Site Number 348005

    Sátoraljaújhely, 3980

  • Investigational Site Number 348004

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

Spain4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 724004

    A Coruña, 15006

  • Investigational Site Number 724005

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Investigational Site Number 724002

    Madrid, 28007

  • Investigational Site Number 724001

    Seville, 41008

Other trials in Spain

Austria2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 040001

    Graz, 8036

  • Investigational Site Number 040002

    Vienna, 1100

Other trials in Austria

Lithuania2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 440001

    Kaunas, LT-50009

  • Investigational Site Number 440002

    Vilnius, LT-08661

Other trials in Lithuania

Netherlands2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 528001

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

  • Investigational Site Number 528002

    Nijmegen, 6525 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 792002

    Ankara, 06100

  • Investigational Site Number 792001

    Izmir, 35340

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Double Blind-placebo Controlled Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAR153191 in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)

Primary objective:

  • to evaluate the efficacy of Sarilumab in participants with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using the assessment in AS working group criteria (ASAS) 20% response criteria (ASAS20)

Secondary objectives:

  • to demonstrate that Sarilumab was effective on:
  • assessment of higher level of response [ASAS 40% response criteria (ASAS40)]
  • partial remission
  • disease activity
  • range of motion
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the spine
  • to assess the safety and tolerability of Sarilumab in participants with AS as well as the pharmacokinetic profile of Sarilumab in participants with AS
Read the detailed description

The duration of participation in this study for each participant was approximately 22 weeks; including up to 4 weeks screening period, 12-weeks double-blind treatment period and 6-weeks safety follow-up period.

Being tested
Sarilumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Spondylitis, Ankylosing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SarilumabDrug

    Also called SAR153191, REGN88

    Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection

    Route of administration: Subcutaneous

  • PlaceboDrug

    Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection

    Route of administration: Subcutaneous

Study groups in NCT01061723
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo (for sarilumab) weekly (qw) for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Sarilumab 100 mg q2wExperimentalSarilumab 100 mg Subcutaneous (SC) injection alternating with placebo every other week (q2w) for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab; Drug: Placebo
Sarilumab 150 mg q2wExperimentalSarilumab 150 mg SC injection alternating with placebo q2w for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab; Drug: Placebo
Sarilumab 100 mg qwExperimentalSarilumab 100 mg SC injection qw for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab
Sarilumab 200 mg q2wExperimentalSarilumab 200 mg SC injection alternating with placebo q2w for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab; Drug: Placebo
Sarilumab 150 mg qwExperimentalSarilumab 150 mg SC injection qw for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 20% Response According to the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS20) at Week 12

    Clinical response to treatment for ASAS20 was assessed according to ASAS20 criteria. Treatment response for ASAS20 was defined as an improvement by a decrease of ≥20% and ≥1unit on a 0 (no pain) - 10 (most severe pain) numerical rating scale (NRS) in at least 3 of the 4 ASAS improvement criteria (ASAS-IC) domains: assessment of physical function (measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]), back pain (0-10 NRS), participant global assessment (0-10 NRS) and inflammation (measured as the mean of the last 2 Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] questions) and no worsening (increase in score) of ≥20% and ≥1 unit on a 0-10 NRS in the remaining 4th domain.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 12 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 40% Response According to the Assessment in AS Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS40) at Week 12

    Clinical response to treatment for ASAS40 was assessed according to ASAS40 criteria. Treatment response for ASAS40 was defined as an improvement by a decrease of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a 0 (no pain)-10 (most severe pain) NRS in at least 3 of the 4 ASAS-IC domains (participant global assessment, back pain, physical function and inflammation) and no worsening (increase in score) at all in the remaining 4th domain.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission According to the Assessment in AS Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS) at Week 12

    Participants were classified as having achieved ASAS partial remission if they had a value ≤ 2 units on a 0 -10 NRS in each of the 4 domains: (participant global assessment, back pain, physical function and inflammation) of the ASAS-IC.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

  3. Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12

    ASDAS consists of five components: (Total back pain assessed by BASDAI question 2 on a 0 [no pain] - 10 [most severe pain] NRS, participant global of disease activity on a 0 [none] - 10 [severe] NRS, peripheral pain/swelling assessed by BASDAI question 3 on a 0 [none] - 10 [most severe pain] NRS, duration of morning stiffness assessed by BASDAI question 6 on a NRS from 0 [0 hour] - 10 [2 or more hours] and hs-CRP in mg/L). ASDAS score was calculated as follows: 0.121 x total back pain + 0.110 x participant global of disease activity + 0.073 x peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 x duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 x ln(CRP + 1). The scores were categorized as: inactive disease (< 1.3), moderate (1.3 - < 2.1), high (2.1 - 3.5) and very high disease activity (> 3.5).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

  4. Change From Baseline in BASDAI Score at Week 12

    BASDAI comprises of a 0 (no pain) -10 (very severe pain) NRS, used to answer 6 questions (Q) related to symptoms of AS (fatigue/tiredness, neck, back or hip pain, pain / swelling in joints, discomfort in tender areas, morning stiffness duration and morning stiffness severity). The BASDAI total score was calculated by computing the mean of Q5 and Q6 and adding it to the sum of Q1 to Q4. This score was then divided by 5. BASDAI total score=Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+[Q5+Q6/2]/5. The total BASDAI score ranges from 0=none to 10=severe, where lower score indicated less disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

  5. Change From Baseline in Range of Motion Assessed by the Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 12

    The range of motion was measured by the BASMI (11-point scale) including chest expansion in cm. It composed of 5 clinical measurements associated with a score: tragus to wall distance, modified schober's test, lateral spinal flexion, intermalleolar distance and cervical rotation. BASMI score was calculated by dividing the total of the score by 5, and the score ranges from 0-10. Higher BASMI score indicates more severe limitation of movement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

  6. Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Score of the Spine Assessed by the Berlin Modification of the AS Spine MRI-active (ASspiMRI-a) Score at Week 12

    ASspiMRI-a scoring system was used on all MRIs to score the level of the disease. MRIs were obtained using 1.0 or 1.5 Tesla scanners and phased array coils. Sagittal images of the upper (C2 to T10) and lower (T8 to S1) spine were used using both T1 weighted spin echo and fat saturated Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequences. Each vertebral body unit was given an activity score based on the amount of bone marrow edema or erosion. Both T1 and STIR sequences were analyzed for change. Total spine ASspiMRI-a score in the Berlin modification range from 0 to 69 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. A negative value in total spine ASspiMRI-a score change from baseline indicates an improvement from baseline. The higher the negative value the higher the reduction of inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 5/6 Improvement Criteria at Week 12

    ASAS 5/6 responder had an improvement of 20% in 5 of 6 domains (physical function, back pain, participant global assessment, inflammation, spinal mobility and acute phase reactants) of ASAS-IC without deterioration in the 6th domain. Spinal mobility was assessed by the mean of the 5 BASMI scores on the 11-point scale (score ranges from 0-10) and the hs-CRP for the acute phase reactant.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

  8. Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Week 12

    The difference between maximal inspiration and expiration to the nearest 0.1 cm was recorded. The best of 2 tries were recorded.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

  9. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Index at Week 12

    44 swollen joints were examined including sternal, clavicular, elbow, shoulder, wrist, knee, metacarpophalangian, interphalangian, metatarpophalangian and metatarsophalangeal joints.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

  10. Change From Baseline in Hs-CRP at Week 12

    Participant's blood samples were collected at screening, baseline before dosing and at every visit to evaluate the level of hs-CRP. The hs-CRP is a protein marker in the blood associated with inflammation with higher values indicating a greater degree of inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

  11. Change From Baseline in ASAS Individual Components at Week 12

    ASAS consists of 4 individual components: Participant global assessment to assess the disease activity over the last week on a 0 (no pain) - 10 (severe pain) NRS; back pain which consist of the mean of the nocturnal back pain and the total back pain at every visit on a 0 (no pain) - 10 (most severe pain) NRS; inflammation measured as the mean of the last 2 BASDAI questions (intensity and duration of morning stiffness) and physical function measured as mean of 10 scores of BASFI at every visit on 0 (easy) -10 (impossible) NRS. Lower score corresponds to a better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2011
  4. Study completionJun 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
301 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01061723
Sponsor's protocol ID
DRI11073
Other IDs
2009-016068-35, 2009
Acronym
ALIGN
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
2 Feb 2010
Last updated
8 Aug 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Sieper J, Braun J, Kay J, Badalamenti S, Radin AR, Jiao L, Fiore S, Momtahen T, Yancopoulos GD, Stahl N, Inman RD. Sarilumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: results of a Phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ALIGN). Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):1051-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204963. Epub 2014 Feb 18.

    PubMed 24550171

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Sarilumab in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Sanofi at 80 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 80 sites in United States, Canada, Belgium, Czechia, Germany and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 20% Response According to the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS20) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01061723, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in