Ankylosing SpondylitisPhase 2ALIGNNCT01061723
Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAR153191 (REGN88) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
A Phase 2 study testing Sarilumab in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Sanofi at 80 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
Primary objective: to evaluate the efficacy of Sarilumab in participants with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using the assessment in AS working group criteria (ASAS) 20% response criteria (ASAS20) Secondary objectives: to demonstrate that Sarilumab was effective on: assessment of higher level of response [ASAS 40%… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- What is being tested?
- Sarilumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 301 participants
- Where
- 80 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Jun 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of AS according to the New York modified criteria
- Participants must had an adequate trial of at least 2 different Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) taken for at least 2 weeks in each case and, on a stable dose for ≥2 weeks or be intolerant to NSAIDs
- Participants must had active AS for ≥3 months before screening and active disease must be present at screening and at baseline; Active AS being defined by:
- Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score of ≥4 (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10)
- Total back pain score ≥4 (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10)
- Participants treated with corticosteroid must be on a stable dose for ≥2 weeks prior to baseline
- Participants treated with the Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and methotrexate (MTX) must be on stable dose ≥12 weeks prior to baseline
Who cannot join
- <18 years old or ≥75 years old
- Complete fusion of the spine
- Past history of non response to any anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors (TNFs) treatment or non response to any other biological treatment for AS
- Any past or current treatment with anti-TNF's or any biological agent within 3 months prior to screening
- Treatment with DMARDs except for hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and MTX
- MTX >25 mg/week
Show all 12Show fewer
- hydroxychloroquine >400 mg/day
- Sulfasalazine >3 g/day
- Treatment with oral prednisone or equivalent corticosteroids >10 mg/day within 6 weeks prior to screening
- Use of intramuscular or intra-articular corticosteroids within the last 4 weeks before screening
- Previous treatment with cyclosporine, azathioprine
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
80 sites in 14 countries.
80 sites in 14 countries
United States26 sites
Investigational Site Number 840016
Albany, New York, 12206
Investigational Site Number 840033
Anaheim, California, 92801
Investigational Site Number 840023
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015
Investigational Site Number 840006
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Investigational Site Number 840009
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Investigational Site Number 840015
Boise, Idaho, 83702
Investigational Site Number 840034
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Investigational Site Number 840004
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Investigational Site Number 840014
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Investigational Site Number 840028
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728
Investigational Site Number 840030
Houston, Texas, 77034
Investigational Site Number 840018
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160-7321
Investigational Site Number 840008
Lansing, Michigan, 48823
Investigational Site Number 840027
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Investigational Site Number 840001
Naples, Florida, 34102
Investigational Site Number 840005
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
Investigational Site Number 840032
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Investigational Site Number 840021
Rock Island, Illinois, 61201
Investigational Site Number 840007
San Diego, California, 92108
Investigational Site Number 840013
San Francisco, California, 94143
Investigational Site Number 840002
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Investigational Site Number 840036
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Investigational Site Number 840010
Toledo, Ohio, 43606
Investigational Site Number 840017
Upland, California, 91786
Investigational Site Number 840003
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902
Investigational Site Number 840029
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
Canada10 sites
Investigational Site Number 124007
London, N6A 4V2
Investigational Site Number 124004
Montreal, H2L 1S6
Investigational Site Number 124008
Newmarket, L3Y 3R7
Investigational Site Number 124003
Pointe-Claire, H9R 3Z2
Investigational Site Number 124001
Québec, G1V 4R4
Investigational Site Number 124006
Saskatoon, S7K 0H6
Investigational Site Number 124005
Toronto, M5T 2S8
Investigational Site Number 124009
Trois-Rivières, G8Z 1Y2
Investigational Site Number 124002
Vancouver, V5Z 1L7
Investigational Site Number 124010
Vancouver, V5Z 3Y1
Belgium5 sites
Investigational Site Number 056003
Brussels, 1020
Investigational Site Number 056005
Genk, 3600
Investigational Site Number 056001
Ghent, 9000
Investigational Site Number 056002
Leuven, 3000
Investigational Site Number 056004
Liège, 4000
Czechia5 sites
Investigational Site Number 203003
Brno, 63800
Investigational Site Number 203005
Hlučín, 74801
Investigational Site Number 203002
Hradec Králové, 50005
Investigational Site Number 203001
Prague, 12850
Investigational Site Number 203004
Uherské Hradiště, 68601
Germany5 sites
Investigational Site Number 276002
Berlin, 12200
Investigational Site Number 276004
Erlangen, 91054
Investigational Site Number 276003
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Investigational Site Number 276005
Hamburg, 22081
Investigational Site Number 276001
Herne, 44652
Poland5 sites
Investigational Site Number 616002
Bialystok, 15-354
Investigational Site Number 616001
Krakow, 30-510
Investigational Site Number 616004
Lublin, 20-607
Investigational Site Number 616005
Torun, 87-100
Investigational Site Number 616003
Warsaw, 02-637
Australia4 sites
Investigational Site Number 036003
Hobart, 7001
Investigational Site Number 036001
Malvern East, 3145
Investigational Site Number 036004
Shenton Park, 6008
Investigational Site Number 036002
Woolloongabba, 4102
France4 sites
Investigational Site Number 250001
Besançon, 25030
Investigational Site Number 250005
Bordeaux, 33076
Investigational Site Number 250002
Créteil, 94010
Investigational Site Number 250003
Paris, 75014
Hungary4 sites
Investigational Site Number 348001
Budapest, 1023
Investigational Site Number 348003
Debrecen, 4032
Investigational Site Number 348005
Sátoraljaújhely, 3980
Investigational Site Number 348004
Veszprém, 8200
Spain4 sites
Investigational Site Number 724004
A Coruña, 15006
Investigational Site Number 724005
Barcelona, 08907
Investigational Site Number 724002
Madrid, 28007
Investigational Site Number 724001
Seville, 41008
Austria2 sites
Investigational Site Number 040001
Graz, 8036
Investigational Site Number 040002
Vienna, 1100
Lithuania2 sites
Investigational Site Number 440001
Kaunas, LT-50009
Investigational Site Number 440002
Vilnius, LT-08661
Netherlands2 sites
Investigational Site Number 528001
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Investigational Site Number 528002
Nijmegen, 6525 GA
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Investigational Site Number 792002
Ankara, 06100
Investigational Site Number 792001
Izmir, 35340
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Double Blind-placebo Controlled Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAR153191 in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
Primary objective:
- to evaluate the efficacy of Sarilumab in participants with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using the assessment in AS working group criteria (ASAS) 20% response criteria (ASAS20)
Secondary objectives:
- to demonstrate that Sarilumab was effective on:
- assessment of higher level of response [ASAS 40% response criteria (ASAS40)]
- partial remission
- disease activity
- range of motion
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the spine
- to assess the safety and tolerability of Sarilumab in participants with AS as well as the pharmacokinetic profile of Sarilumab in participants with AS
Read the detailed description
The duration of participation in this study for each participant was approximately 22 weeks; including up to 4 weeks screening period, 12-weeks double-blind treatment period and 6-weeks safety follow-up period.
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Being tested
- Sarilumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SarilumabDrug
Also called SAR153191, REGN88
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection
Route of administration: Subcutaneous
PlaceboDrug
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection
Route of administration: Subcutaneous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo (for sarilumab) weekly (qw) for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Sarilumab 100 mg q2w | Experimental | Sarilumab 100 mg Subcutaneous (SC) injection alternating with placebo every other week (q2w) for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Sarilumab 150 mg q2w | Experimental | Sarilumab 150 mg SC injection alternating with placebo q2w for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Sarilumab 100 mg qw | Experimental | Sarilumab 100 mg SC injection qw for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab |
| Sarilumab 200 mg q2w | Experimental | Sarilumab 200 mg SC injection alternating with placebo q2w for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Sarilumab 150 mg qw | Experimental | Sarilumab 150 mg SC injection qw for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 20% Response According to the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS20) at Week 12
Clinical response to treatment for ASAS20 was assessed according to ASAS20 criteria. Treatment response for ASAS20 was defined as an improvement by a decrease of ≥20% and ≥1unit on a 0 (no pain) - 10 (most severe pain) numerical rating scale (NRS) in at least 3 of the 4 ASAS improvement criteria (ASAS-IC) domains: assessment of physical function (measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]), back pain (0-10 NRS), participant global assessment (0-10 NRS) and inflammation (measured as the mean of the last 2 Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] questions) and no worsening (increase in score) of ≥20% and ≥1 unit on a 0-10 NRS in the remaining 4th domain.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
Secondary outcomes (11)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 40% Response According to the Assessment in AS Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS40) at Week 12
Clinical response to treatment for ASAS40 was assessed according to ASAS40 criteria. Treatment response for ASAS40 was defined as an improvement by a decrease of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a 0 (no pain)-10 (most severe pain) NRS in at least 3 of the 4 ASAS-IC domains (participant global assessment, back pain, physical function and inflammation) and no worsening (increase in score) at all in the remaining 4th domain.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission According to the Assessment in AS Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS) at Week 12
Participants were classified as having achieved ASAS partial remission if they had a value ≤ 2 units on a 0 -10 NRS in each of the 4 domains: (participant global assessment, back pain, physical function and inflammation) of the ASAS-IC.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12
ASDAS consists of five components: (Total back pain assessed by BASDAI question 2 on a 0 [no pain] - 10 [most severe pain] NRS, participant global of disease activity on a 0 [none] - 10 [severe] NRS, peripheral pain/swelling assessed by BASDAI question 3 on a 0 [none] - 10 [most severe pain] NRS, duration of morning stiffness assessed by BASDAI question 6 on a NRS from 0 [0 hour] - 10 [2 or more hours] and hs-CRP in mg/L). ASDAS score was calculated as follows: 0.121 x total back pain + 0.110 x participant global of disease activity + 0.073 x peripheral pain/swelling + 0.058 x duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 x ln(CRP + 1). The scores were categorized as: inactive disease (< 1.3), moderate (1.3 - < 2.1), high (2.1 - 3.5) and very high disease activity (> 3.5).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in BASDAI Score at Week 12
BASDAI comprises of a 0 (no pain) -10 (very severe pain) NRS, used to answer 6 questions (Q) related to symptoms of AS (fatigue/tiredness, neck, back or hip pain, pain / swelling in joints, discomfort in tender areas, morning stiffness duration and morning stiffness severity). The BASDAI total score was calculated by computing the mean of Q5 and Q6 and adding it to the sum of Q1 to Q4. This score was then divided by 5. BASDAI total score=Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+[Q5+Q6/2]/5. The total BASDAI score ranges from 0=none to 10=severe, where lower score indicated less disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Range of Motion Assessed by the Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 12
The range of motion was measured by the BASMI (11-point scale) including chest expansion in cm. It composed of 5 clinical measurements associated with a score: tragus to wall distance, modified schober's test, lateral spinal flexion, intermalleolar distance and cervical rotation. BASMI score was calculated by dividing the total of the score by 5, and the score ranges from 0-10. Higher BASMI score indicates more severe limitation of movement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Score of the Spine Assessed by the Berlin Modification of the AS Spine MRI-active (ASspiMRI-a) Score at Week 12
ASspiMRI-a scoring system was used on all MRIs to score the level of the disease. MRIs were obtained using 1.0 or 1.5 Tesla scanners and phased array coils. Sagittal images of the upper (C2 to T10) and lower (T8 to S1) spine were used using both T1 weighted spin echo and fat saturated Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequences. Each vertebral body unit was given an activity score based on the amount of bone marrow edema or erosion. Both T1 and STIR sequences were analyzed for change. Total spine ASspiMRI-a score in the Berlin modification range from 0 to 69 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. A negative value in total spine ASspiMRI-a score change from baseline indicates an improvement from baseline. The higher the negative value the higher the reduction of inflammation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 5/6 Improvement Criteria at Week 12
ASAS 5/6 responder had an improvement of 20% in 5 of 6 domains (physical function, back pain, participant global assessment, inflammation, spinal mobility and acute phase reactants) of ASAS-IC without deterioration in the 6th domain. Spinal mobility was assessed by the mean of the 5 BASMI scores on the 11-point scale (score ranges from 0-10) and the hs-CRP for the acute phase reactant.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Week 12
The difference between maximal inspiration and expiration to the nearest 0.1 cm was recorded. The best of 2 tries were recorded.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Index at Week 12
44 swollen joints were examined including sternal, clavicular, elbow, shoulder, wrist, knee, metacarpophalangian, interphalangian, metatarpophalangian and metatarsophalangeal joints.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Hs-CRP at Week 12
Participant's blood samples were collected at screening, baseline before dosing and at every visit to evaluate the level of hs-CRP. The hs-CRP is a protein marker in the blood associated with inflammation with higher values indicating a greater degree of inflammation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in ASAS Individual Components at Week 12
ASAS consists of 4 individual components: Participant global assessment to assess the disease activity over the last week on a 0 (no pain) - 10 (severe pain) NRS; back pain which consist of the mean of the nocturnal back pain and the total back pain at every visit on a 0 (no pain) - 10 (most severe pain) NRS; inflammation measured as the mean of the last 2 BASDAI questions (intensity and duration of morning stiffness) and physical function measured as mean of 10 scores of BASFI at every visit on 0 (easy) -10 (impossible) NRS. Lower score corresponds to a better functioning.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionJun 2011
- Study completionJun 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ankylosing SpondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 301 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01061723
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DRI11073
- Other IDs
- 2009-016068-35, 2009
- Acronym
- ALIGN
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 8 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Sieper J, Braun J, Kay J, Badalamenti S, Radin AR, Jiao L, Fiore S, Momtahen T, Yancopoulos GD, Stahl N, Inman RD. Sarilumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: results of a Phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ALIGN). Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):1051-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204963. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
PubMed 24550171
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Double Blind-placebo Controlled Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAR153191 in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01061723
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALIGN / DRI11073
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 301 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Aug 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary objective:
- to evaluate the efficacy of Sarilumab in participants with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using the assessment in AS working group criteria (ASAS) 20% response criteria (ASAS20)
Secondary objectives:
- to demonstrate that Sarilumab was effective on:
- assessment of higher level of response [ASAS 40% response criteria (ASAS40)]
- partial remission
- disease activity
- range of motion
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the spine
- to assess the safety and tolerability of Sarilumab in participants with AS as well as the pharmacokinetic profile of Sarilumab in participants with AS
Detailed description
The duration of participation in this study for each participant was approximately 22 weeks; including up to 4 weeks screening period, 12-weeks double-blind treatment period and 6-weeks safety follow-up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo (for sarilumab) weekly (qw) for 12 weeks. |
| Sarilumab 100 mg q2w | Experimental | Drug: Sarilumab, Drug: PlaceboSarilumab 100 mg Subcutaneous (SC) injection alternating with placebo every other week (q2w) for 12 weeks. |
| Sarilumab 150 mg q2w | Experimental | Drug: Sarilumab, Drug: PlaceboSarilumab 150 mg SC injection alternating with placebo q2w for 12 weeks. |
| Sarilumab 100 mg qw | Experimental | Drug: SarilumabSarilumab 100 mg SC injection qw for 12 weeks. |
| Sarilumab 200 mg q2w | Experimental | Drug: Sarilumab, Drug: PlaceboSarilumab 200 mg SC injection alternating with placebo q2w for 12 weeks. |
| Sarilumab 150 mg qw | Experimental | Drug: SarilumabSarilumab 150 mg SC injection qw for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosis of AS according to the New York modified criteria
- Participants must had an adequate trial of at least 2 different Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) taken for at least 2 weeks in each case and, on a stable dose for ≥2 weeks or be intolerant to NSAIDs
- Participants must had active AS for ≥3 months before screening and active disease must be present at screening and at baseline; Active AS being defined by:
- Participants treated with corticosteroid must be on a stable dose for ≥2 weeks prior to baseline
- Participants treated with the Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and methotrexate (MTX) must be on stable dose ≥12 weeks prior to baseline
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- <18 years old or ≥75 years old
- Complete fusion of the spine
- Past history of non response to any anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors (TNFs) treatment or non response to any other biological treatment for AS
- Any past or current treatment with anti-TNF's or any biological agent within 3 months prior to screening
- Treatment with DMARDs except for hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and MTX
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SarilumabAlso: SAR153191, REGN88Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Subcutaneous | Drug | Sarilumab 100 mg q2w, Sarilumab 100 mg qw, Sarilumab 150 mg q2w, Sarilumab 150 mg qw, Sarilumab 200 mg q2w |
| PlaceboPharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Subcutaneous | Drug | Placebo, Sarilumab 100 mg q2w, Sarilumab 150 mg q2w, Sarilumab 200 mg q2w |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 20% Response According to the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS20) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])
Clinical response to treatment for ASAS20 was assessed according to ASAS20 criteria. Treatment response for ASAS20 was defined as an improvement by a decrease of ≥20% and ≥1unit on a 0 (no pain) - 10 (most severe pain) numerical rating scale (NRS) in at least 3 of the 4 ASAS improvement criteria (ASAS-IC) domains: assessment of physical function (measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]), back pain (0-10 NRS), participant global assessment (0-10 NRS) and inflammation (measured as the mean of the last 2 Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] questions) and no worsening (increase in score) of ≥20% and ≥1 unit on a 0-10 NRS in the remaining 4th domain.
11 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 40% Response According to the Assessment in AS Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS40) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Partial Remission According to the Assessment in AS Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in BASDAI Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Range of Motion Assessed by the Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Score of the Spine Assessed by the Berlin Modification of the AS Spine MRI-active (ASspiMRI-a) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 5/6 Improvement Criteria at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Index at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in Hs-CRP at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Change From Baseline in ASAS Individual Components at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Aug 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 24550171Sieper J, Braun J, Kay J, Badalamenti S, Radin AR, Jiao L, Fiore S, Momtahen T, Yancopoulos GD, Stahl N, Inman RD. Sarilumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: results of a Phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ALIGN). Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):1051-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204963. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
Related trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SLAMF1 Gene Expression in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History and Development of Spondyloarthritis
Arthritis, Spondylitis, Ankylosing
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase Ia Study of MST-931 in Healthy Adult Subjects
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Frequency and Complications of Major Orthopedic Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
80 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Sarilumab in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Sanofi at 80 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 80 sites in United States, Canada, Belgium, Czechia, Germany and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 20% Response According to the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Working Group Criteria for Response (ASAS20) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01061723, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2017.