AzTrials
AzTrials

MalariaNCT01062386

Malaria Survey in Mbarara District, Uganda 2010

An observational study of Malaria, run by Epicentre at 1 site in Uganda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Malaria is one of the major public health problems in Sub-Saharan Africa. In response to this threat, Roll Back Malaria (RBM) has rolled back a strategy using ACT as first line therapy for malaria episode, a wide distribution of Insecticide Treated Bednet (ITN), intermittent presumptive treatment of pregnant women and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 59 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Malaria
How many people
2,320 participants
Where
1 siteUganda
Study dates
Jan 2010to Jul 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 59 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Children living in Great Mbarara district

Who may be able to join

  • Males and females
  • Ages 1 month to 59 months

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Uganda1 site
  • Greater Mbarara district

    Mbarara, Mbarara

Other trials in Uganda

About this study

Official title: The Epidemiology of Malaria Among Children Under Five in Mbarara District, Uganda - A Cross-sectional Population-based Survey 2010

Malaria is one of the major public health problems in Sub-Saharan Africa. In response to this threat, Roll Back Malaria (RBM) has rolled back a strategy using ACT as first line therapy for malaria episode, a wide distribution of Insecticide Treated Bednet (ITN), intermittent presumptive treatment of pregnant women and indoor residual spraying. Recent epidemiological observations suggested a decline in malaria prevalence in some countries but further evidences are still needed to confirm this evolution. The RBM strategy requires the use of reliable rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for which an operational assessment is necessary. Lastly, home-based management of malaria is also an important compound of this strategy. However, a better understanding of the actual use of antimalarial drugs, of the use of bednet and of the barrier to the use of health care is important to implement good quality strategies for malaria control.

This study is a cross-sectional community based survey made of two rounds (one in January 2010 and the second in June 2010). The general objective is to measure the prevalence of infection with Plasmodium falciparum at two periods of the year (at the moment of lowest and highest transmission based on the seasonal rainfalls) and to compare it with the prevalence estimated in 2004 after the rainy season for the same area. Specific objective are the estimation of the prevalence by age stratum, the analysis of the geographical distribution of the infection, the description of the parasitological characteristics, the assessment of three RDT, the description and the analysis of the prevention and care seek behaviours related to malaria.

The study area is the great Mbarara district located in south-west of Uganda. A three-stage cluster sampling method will be used. Spatial information will be collected with global positioning system and imported to Geographical Information System. Behaviour information will be collected through face to face interview.

Conditions
Malaria
Keywords
prevalence, transmission, knowledge, attitude, practice
Medical subject headings
Malaria, Behavior

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of malaria infections in children under 5 years of age

    Measured: January-February 2010

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Proportion of families with knowledge, attitude and practice regarding malaria prevention

    Measured: January-February 2010

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionFeb 2010
  4. Study completionJul 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
2,320 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01062386
Sponsor's protocol ID
Epicentre/Mba/2010/MalPrev
Status last verified
Aug 2011
First submitted
3 Feb 2010
Last updated
12 Aug 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Malaria, run by Epicentre at 1 site in Uganda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of malaria infections in children under 5 years of age (time frame: January-February 2010). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2011; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 5 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in