Chronic Hepatitis BPhase 3NCT01063036
Efficacy and Safety Study of Entecavir Plus Tenofovir in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Failed Previous Treatment
A Phase 3 study testing Entecavir and Tenofovir in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 28 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to show that the combination of entecavir and tenofovir, is effective and well tolerated in chronic hepatitis B patients who have failed previous treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- Entecavir and Tenofovir
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 144 participants
- Where
- 28 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- May 2010to Feb 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; either hepatitis B-e antigen(HBeAg)-negative or HBeAg-positive
- Subjects must have a treatment failure to their current nucleoside/ nucleotide treatment regimen
- Prior entecavir and/or tenofovir monotherapy is allowed
- Subjects must have compensated liver function
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Evidence of decompensated cirrhosis
- Co-infection with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis D virus (HDV)
- Moderate or severe renal impairment
- Recent history of pancreatitis
- Therapy with interferon, thymosin alpha or other immuno-stimulators within 24 weeks of being assigned to study drug into this study
- Prior entecavir/tenofovir combination therapy
Trial locations and contacts
28 sites in 7 countries.
28 sites in 7 countries
Germany8 sites
Local Institution
Berlin, 10969
Local Institution
Berlin, 13353
Local Institution
Hamburg, 20099
Local Institution
Hamburg, 20246
Local Institution
Hanover, 30625
Local Institution
Heindelberg, 69120
Local Institution
München, 81675
Local Institution
Tübingen, 72076
France4 sites
Local Institution
Clichy, 92110
Local Institution
Lyon, 69317
Local Institution
Orléans, 45067
Local Institution
Strasbourg, 67000
Italy4 sites
Local Institution
Bagno A Ripoli (Fi), 50012
Local Institution
Bari, 70124
Local Institution
Foggia, 71100
Local Institution
Milan, 20122
Poland4 sites
Local Institution
Kielce, 25-317
Local Institution
Krakow, 31-531
Local Institution
Lodz, 91-347
Local Institution
Wroclaw, 50-349
Netherlands3 sites
Local Institution
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Local Institution
Arnhem, 6815 AD
Local Institution
Rotterdam, 3015 CE
Romania3 sites
Local Institution
Bucharest, 021105
Local Institution
Burcuresti, 022328
Local Institution
Timișoara, 300 002
Spain2 sites
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08025
Local Institution
Valencia, 46014
About this study
Official title: A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Entecavir Plus Tenofovir in Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection With Previous Nucleoside/Nucleotide Treatment Failure
The purpose of this study is to show that the combination of entecavir and tenofovir, is effective and well tolerated in chronic hepatitis B patients who have failed previous treatment.
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- Entecavir, Tenofovir
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EntecavirDrug
Also called Baraclude®, BMS-200475
Tablets, Oral, 1 mg, once daily, 96 weeks
TenofovirDrug
Also called Viread®
Tablets, Oral, 300 mg, once daily, 96 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Entecavir + Tenofovir | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Entecavir; Drug: Tenofovir |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response at Week 48 - Treated Population
Virologic response was defined as Hepatitis B virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) less than 50 international units per milliliter (IU/mL); approximately 300 copies/mL. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with virologic response at Week 48 divided by the number of treated participants. Treated participants were evaluated using non-completer (NC) = failure (F). The HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was measured using the Roche COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan - High Pure System (HPS) assay, in a central laboratory. The results were reported in IU/mL, with the limit of quantification (LOQ) = 29 IU/mL and lower limit of detection (LLD) = 6 IU/mL. HBV DNA measurements were transformed by the log10 scale when analyzed as a continuous variable, using log10(LOQ-1) for values below LOQ.
Measured: Week 48
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response at Week 24 and at Week 96 - Treated Population
Virologic response was defined as Hepatitis B virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) less than 50 international units per milliliter (IU/mL); approximately 300 copies/mL. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with virologic response at Week 24, Week 96 divided by the number of treated participants. Treated participants were evaluated using non-completer (NC) = failure (F). The HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was measured using the Roche COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan - High Pure System (HPS) assay. The results were reported in IU/mL, with the limit of quantification (LOQ) = 29 IU/mL and lower limit of detection (LLD) = 6 IU/mL. HBV DNA measurements were transformed by the log10 scale when analyzed as a continuous variable, using log10(LOQ-1) for values below LOQ.
Measured: Week 24, Week 96
Change From Baseline in Mean log10 HBV DNA at Weeks 12, 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Evaluable Population
HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was measured using the Roche COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan - High Pure System (HPS) assay. The results were reported in log 10 IU/mL, with the limit of quantification (LOQ) = 29 IU/mL and lower limit of detection (LLD) = 6 IU/mL. HBV DNA measurements were transformed by the log10 scale when analyzed as a continuous variable, using log10(LOQ-1) for values below LOQ. Baseline was Day 1, prior to study drug administration.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Less Than the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population
HBV DNA less than (<) LLD (6 IU/mL) was defined/measured by the COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan HPS assay at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with HBV DNA < LLD at Weeks 24, 48, 96 divided by the number of treated participants. Treated participants were evaluated using non-completer (NC) = failure (F).
Measured: Weeks 24, 48, 96
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBeAg Positive at Baseline
Loss of HBeAg was defined as being HBeAg-negative at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 in those participants who had been HBeAg-positive at baseline. Method used for HBeAg was DiaSorin - Anti HBe enzyme immunoassay kit - procedure for qualitative determination of antibodies to HBeAg in human serum or plasma samples. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with HBeAg loss at Weeks 24 and 48 divided by the number of treated participants who were HBeAg-positive at baseline. Treated participants (HBeAg-positive at baseline) were evaluated using NC = F. Baseline was Day 1, before start of study drug.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Percentage of Participants With HBe Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBeAg-positive at Baseline
HBe seroconversion was defined as being both HBeAg-negative and HBeAb-positive at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 in those participants who had been HBeAg-positive at baseline. Method used was DiaSorin - Anti HBe enzyme immunoassay kit - procedure for qualitative determination of antibodies to HBeAg in human serum or plasma samples. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with HBe seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 divided by the number of treated participants who were HBeAg-positive at baseline. Treated participants (HBeAg-positive at baseline) were evaluated using NC = F. Baseline was Day 1, before start of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 24, 48, 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBsAg-Positive at Baseline
Loss of HBsAg was defined as being HBsAg-negative at Weeks 24, 48, 96 in those participants who had been HBsAg-positive at baseline. The method used: Immunoassay - ADVIA CENTAUR from SIEMENS: in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for the qualitative and quantitative determination of HBsAg in human serum and plasma (potassium ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, lithium or sodium heparinized). Percentage calculated as number of participants with a HBsAg loss at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 divided by the number of treated participants who were HBsAg-positive at baseline (participants were not enrolled into the study unless they were positive for HBsAg). Treated participants (HBsAg-positive at baseline) were evaluated using NC=F. Baseline was Day 1, before start of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 96
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBsAg-Positive at Baseline
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as being both HBsAg-negative and HBsAb-positive at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 in those participants who had been HBsAg-positive at baseline. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with HBs seroconversion at Weeks 24 and 48 divided by the number of treated participants who were HBsAg-positive at baseline. Positive result for HBsAg was one of the inclusion criteria. Treated participants (HBsAg positive at baseline) were evaluated using NC=F. The method used was an Immunoassay testing - ADVIA CENTAUR from SIEMENS: in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for the qualitative and quantitative determination of HBsAg in human serum and plasma [potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), lithium or sodium heparinized]. Baseline was Day 1, before start of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) on Treatment, and Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AE) - Treated Population
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Grade (Gr) 1=Mild, Gr 2=Moderate, Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4=Life-threatening or disabling, Gr 5=Death. On-treatment = on Day 1 through last dose of study therapy + 5 days.
Measured: Day 1 to last dose of study drug plus 5 days; up to Week 96
Number of Participants With Emergence of Genotypic Resistance to Study Drugs at Weeks 48 and 96- Treated Population
Testing of HBV genotype was performed at baseline for all treated patients and for participants at Weeks 48 and 96 with primary non-response or virologic breakthrough. Emergent genotypic resistance to study drugs was defined as follows: Emergent = not detected at baseline; entecavir (ETV) resistance (ETVr): participant's sample was to have rtM204V/I/S and any substitution at rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250; tenofovir (TDF) resistance (TDFr) which was based on adefovir (ADV)-mutations: participant's sample was to have rtA181T/V, rtN236T, or (rtA194T and rtM204V/I/S). Primary non-response was defined as < 1 log10 decrease in HBV DNA from baseline on treatment at or after Week 12. Virologic breakthrough was defined as ≥ 1 log10 increase in HBV DNA over nadir on treatment, either confirmed or last on-treatment followed by discontinuation of study therapy.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 48, 96
Number of Participants on Treatment With Study Drug With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Meeting Selected Criteria on Treatment - Treated Population
Selected criteria presented in each category. Upper limit of normal among all laboratory ranges (ULN); Baseline (BL); alanine transaminase (ALT); milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); milliliters per minute (mL/min); greater than (>);greater than, equal to (>=); less than (<). Creatinine data presented below were confirmed, ie, at least 2 consecutive values. On-treatment = after Day 1 through last dose of study therapy + 5 days.
Measured: Day 1 to last dose of study drug plus 5 days; up to Week 96
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2010
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionFeb 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01063036
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AI463-203
- Other IDs
- 2009-015705-40, 2009
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 3 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Entecavir Plus Tenofovir in Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection With Previous Nucleoside/Nucleotide Treatment Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01063036
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AI463-203
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2010
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Feb 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to show that the combination of entecavir and tenofovir, is effective and well tolerated in chronic hepatitis B patients who have failed previous treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Entecavir + Tenofovir | Experimental | Drug: Entecavir, Drug: Tenofovir |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; either hepatitis B-e antigen(HBeAg)-negative or HBeAg-positive
- Subjects must have a treatment failure to their current nucleoside/ nucleotide treatment regimen
- Prior entecavir and/or tenofovir monotherapy is allowed
- Subjects must have compensated liver function
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Evidence of decompensated cirrhosis
- Co-infection with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis D virus (HDV)
- Moderate or severe renal impairment
- Recent history of pancreatitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EntecavirAlso: Baraclude®, BMS-200475Tablets, Oral, 1 mg, once daily, 96 weeks | Drug | Entecavir + Tenofovir |
| TenofovirAlso: Viread®Tablets, Oral, 300 mg, once daily, 96 weeks | Drug | Entecavir + Tenofovir |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response at Week 48 - Treated Population
Time frame: Week 48
Virologic response was defined as Hepatitis B virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) less than 50 international units per milliliter (IU/mL); approximately 300 copies/mL. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with virologic response at Week 48 divided by the number of treated participants. Treated participants were evaluated using non-completer (NC) = failure (F). The HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was measured using the Roche COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan - High Pure System (HPS) assay, in a central laboratory. The results were reported in IU/mL, with the limit of quantification (LOQ) = 29 IU/mL and lower limit of detection (LLD) = 6 IU/mL. HBV DNA measurements were transformed by the log10 scale when analyzed as a continuous variable, using log10(LOQ-1) for values below LOQ.
10 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response at Week 24 and at Week 96 - Treated Population
Time frame: Week 24, Week 96
Change From Baseline in Mean log10 HBV DNA at Weeks 12, 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Evaluable Population
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Less Than the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population
Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, 96
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBeAg Positive at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Percentage of Participants With HBe Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBeAg-positive at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 24, 48, 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBsAg-Positive at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 96
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBsAg-Positive at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) on Treatment, and Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AE) - Treated Population
Time frame: Day 1 to last dose of study drug plus 5 days; up to Week 96
Number of Participants With Emergence of Genotypic Resistance to Study Drugs at Weeks 48 and 96- Treated Population
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 48, 96
Number of Participants on Treatment With Study Drug With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Meeting Selected Criteria on Treatment - Treated Population
Time frame: Day 1 to last dose of study drug plus 5 days; up to Week 96
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Chronic Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
28 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Entecavir and Tenofovir in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 28 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 28 sites in Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Netherlands and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Feb 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response at Week 48 - Treated Population (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2014.