Colorectal CancerPhase 1/2El-porCEANCT01064375
Safety Study of DNA Vaccine Delivered by Intradermal Electroporation to Treat Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 1/2 study testing tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope), Derma Vax (electroporation device) and GM-CSF in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Maria Liljefors at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a CEA DNA immunisation approach in patients with colorectal cancer. The DNA plasmid, tetwtCEA, encodes wild type human CEA fused to a tetanus toxoid T helper epitope. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope), Derma Vax (electroporation device) and GM-CSF
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Dec 2009to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histological confirmed AJCC stage II or III colorectal cancer
- Resection of the primary tumour without evidence of remaining macroscopic disease
- Allowable standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy in AJCC stage III completed minimum 2 months prior study entry
- Patients recruited from vaccination with CEA66 plasmid DNA must have completed trial at 18 months if immune response is proven or proven to be non-immune responders in two consecutive immunoassays.
- Age >18 years
- Karnofsky performance >80%
Show all 13Show fewer
- Life expectancy of greater than 6 months
- Normal organ and marrow function
- Normal thyroid function as measured by serum T3, T4 and TSH
- Normal echocardiogram regarding arrhythmias (chronic or treated atrial fibrillation allowed)
- No concurrent treatment (chemotherapy or biological) may be planned during protocol treatment
- Women or men of reproductive potential must agree to use adequate contraception prior to study entry and for up to 3 months after the last injection
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an informed consent document
Who cannot join
- Immunotherapy or systemic corticosteroids within 8 weeks prior to entering the study
- Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 2 months prior to entering the study
- Known hypersensitivity to GM-CSF
- Previous splenectomy or radiation therapy of the spleen
- Pregnancy or nursing
- HIV seropositivity
Show all 12Show fewer
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic intracranial disease, congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
- History of severe neurological, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, respiratory, bone marrow dysfunction, organ graft or autoimmune disease (treated or not)
- Concomitant medication with an anticoagulant (acetylsalicylic acid and low-molecular weight heparin in prophylactic dose allowed)
- Other malignancy, except for the following: adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, adequately treated stage I or II cancer from which the patient is currently in complete remission, or any other cancer from which the patient has been disease-free for 5 years
- Cardiac demand pacemakers or surgically implanted defibrillators.
- Patients that has any metal implants in the area of the injection, (e.g. shoulder implant in the upper arm or shoulder girdle)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, 171 76
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Safety and Immunogenicity of Intradermal Electroporation of tetwtCEA DNA in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a CEA DNA immunisation approach in patients with colorectal cancer. The DNA plasmid, tetwtCEA, encodes wild type human CEA fused to a tetanus toxoid T helper epitope. The vaccine will be delivered using an intradermal electroporation device, Derma Vax (Cyto Pulse Sciences). The following will be assessed:
- The efficiency of priming immunological responses to CEA by intradermal administration of CEA DNA in combination with electroporation.
- The efficiency of boosting immunological responses to CEA by intradermal administration of CEA DNA in combination with electroporation in subjects already vaccinated with CEA DNA.
- GM-CSF will be administered to half of the subjects primed with CEA DNA in combination with electroporation and any possible adjuvant effects of GM-CSF will be evaluated.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope), Derma Vax (electroporation device), GM-CSF, Cyclophosphamide
- Keywords
- DNA vaccine, Electroporation
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope)Biological
Also called GM-CSF, cyclophosphamide
Two vaccinations at week 0 and 12. Intradermal administration of 400ug DNA/dose with electroporation
Derma Vax (electroporation device)Device
Also called GM-CSF, cyclophosphamide
Electrical pulses applied to vaccination sites in skin using Derma Vax immediately after DNA administration
GM-CSFBiological
Also called cyclophosphamide
GM-CSF will be given for 4 consecutive days starting the day before the vaccination as an intradermal/subcutaneous administration of 150 ug of GM-CSF
CyclophosphamideDrug
Also called Sendoxan
One intravenous dose of 300 mg/m2 will be given three days before each vaccination with tetwtCEA DNA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CEA DNA prime (cohort I) | Experimental | 5 patients, tetwtCEA DNA intradermal delivery with electroporation, not previously vaccinated with CEA66 DNA. Electrical pulses applied to vaccination sites in skin using Derma Vax immediately after DNA administration. One dose of Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) will be given i.v. three days before each vaccination with tetwtCEA DNA. Receives: Biological: tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope); Device: Derma Vax (electroporation device); Drug: Cyclophosphamide |
| CEA DNA boost (cohort II) | Experimental | 10 patients, tetwtCEA DNA intradermal delivery with electroporation, previously vaccinated with CEA66 DNA.Electrical pulses applied to vaccination sites in skin using Derma Vax immediately after DNA administration.One dose of Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) will be given i.v. three days before each vaccination with tetwtCEA DNA. Receives: Biological: tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope); Device: Derma Vax (electroporation device); Drug: Cyclophosphamide |
| CEA DNA prime + GM-CSF (cohort III) | Experimental | 5 patients, tetwtCEA DNA intradermal delivery with electroporation + GM-CSF, not previously vaccinated with CEA66 DNA.Electrical pulses applied to vaccination sites in skin using Derma Vax immediately after DNA administration.One dose of Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) will be given i.v. three days before each vaccination with tetwtCEA DNA. Receives: Biological: tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope); Device: Derma Vax (electroporation device); Biological: GM-CSF; Drug: Cyclophosphamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a DNA immunisation approach where tetwtCEA DNA will be administered in combination with electroporation.
Measured: Within 72 weeks after immunisation
Secondary outcomes (2)
To assess the efficiency of boosting immunological responses to CEA by intradermal administration of tetwtCEA DNA in combination with electroporation in subjects already vaccinated with CEA DNA
Measured: Within 72 weeks after immunisation
To compare effects (safety and immunogenicity) of additional adjuvance with GM-CSF
Measured: Within 72 weeks after immunsation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2009
- Primary completionMar 2012
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maria Liljefors
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutet, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Cyto Pulse Sciences, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Maria Liljefors, Karolinska University Hospital
- Investigators
- Maria Liljefors, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital/Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01064375
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- El-porCEA
- Other IDs
- 2009-009863-75, 2009
- Acronym
- El-porCEA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Safety and Immunogenicity of Intradermal Electroporation of tetwtCEA DNA in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01064375
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- El-porCEA / El-porCEA
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- DNA vaccine, Electroporation
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Maria LiljeforsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutet, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Cyto Pulse Sciences, Inc.
- Study start
- Dec 2009
- Primary completion
- Mar 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a CEA DNA immunisation approach in patients with colorectal cancer. The DNA plasmid, tetwtCEA, encodes wild type human CEA fused to a tetanus toxoid T helper epitope. The vaccine will be delivered using an intradermal electroporation device, Derma Vax (Cyto Pulse Sciences). The following will be assessed:
- The efficiency of priming immunological responses to CEA by intradermal administration of CEA DNA in combination with electroporation.
- The efficiency of boosting immunological responses to CEA by intradermal administration of CEA DNA in combination with electroporation in subjects already vaccinated with CEA DNA.
- GM-CSF will be administered to half of the subjects primed with CEA DNA in combination with electroporation and any possible adjuvant effects of GM-CSF will be evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CEA DNA prime (cohort I) | Experimental | Biological: tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope), Device: Derma Vax (electroporation device), Drug: Cyclophosphamide5 patients, tetwtCEA DNA intradermal delivery with electroporation, not previously vaccinated with CEA66 DNA. Electrical pulses applied to vaccination sites in skin using Derma Vax immediately after DNA administration. One dose of Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) will be given i.v. three days before each vaccination with tetwtCEA DNA. |
| CEA DNA boost (cohort II) | Experimental | Biological: tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope), Device: Derma Vax (electroporation device), Drug: Cyclophosphamide10 patients, tetwtCEA DNA intradermal delivery with electroporation, previously vaccinated with CEA66 DNA.Electrical pulses applied to vaccination sites in skin using Derma Vax immediately after DNA administration.One dose of Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) will be given i.v. three days before each vaccination with tetwtCEA DNA. |
| CEA DNA prime + GM-CSF (cohort III) | Experimental | Biological: tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope), Device: Derma Vax (electroporation device), Biological: GM-CSF, Drug: Cyclophosphamide5 patients, tetwtCEA DNA intradermal delivery with electroporation + GM-CSF, not previously vaccinated with CEA66 DNA.Electrical pulses applied to vaccination sites in skin using Derma Vax immediately after DNA administration.One dose of Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) will be given i.v. three days before each vaccination with tetwtCEA DNA. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Histological confirmed AJCC stage II or III colorectal cancer
- Resection of the primary tumour without evidence of remaining macroscopic disease
- Allowable standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy in AJCC stage III completed minimum 2 months prior study entry
- Patients recruited from vaccination with CEA66 plasmid DNA must have completed trial at 18 months if immune response is proven or proven to be non-immune responders in two consecutive immunoassays.
- Age >18 years
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Immunotherapy or systemic corticosteroids within 8 weeks prior to entering the study
- Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 2 months prior to entering the study
- Known hypersensitivity to GM-CSF
- Previous splenectomy or radiation therapy of the spleen
- Pregnancy or nursing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope)Also: GM-CSF, cyclophosphamideTwo vaccinations at week 0 and 12. Intradermal administration of 400ug DNA/dose with electroporation | Biological | CEA DNA boost (cohort II), CEA DNA prime (cohort I), CEA DNA prime + GM-CSF (cohort III) |
| Derma Vax (electroporation device)Also: GM-CSF, cyclophosphamideElectrical pulses applied to vaccination sites in skin using Derma Vax immediately after DNA administration | Device | CEA DNA boost (cohort II), CEA DNA prime (cohort I), CEA DNA prime + GM-CSF (cohort III) |
| GM-CSFAlso: cyclophosphamideGM-CSF will be given for 4 consecutive days starting the day before the vaccination as an intradermal/subcutaneous administration of 150 ug of GM-CSF | Biological | CEA DNA prime + GM-CSF (cohort III) |
| CyclophosphamideAlso: SendoxanOne intravenous dose of 300 mg/m2 will be given three days before each vaccination with tetwtCEA DNA | Drug | CEA DNA boost (cohort II), CEA DNA prime (cohort I), CEA DNA prime + GM-CSF (cohort III) |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a DNA immunisation approach where tetwtCEA DNA will be administered in combination with electroporation.
Time frame: Within 72 weeks after immunisation
2 secondary outcomes
To assess the efficiency of boosting immunological responses to CEA by intradermal administration of tetwtCEA DNA in combination with electroporation in subjects already vaccinated with CEA DNA
Time frame: Within 72 weeks after immunisation
To compare effects (safety and immunogenicity) of additional adjuvance with GM-CSF
Time frame: Within 72 weeks after immunsation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2022.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maria Liljefors, MD, PhD principal investigator
Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital/Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing tetwtCEA DNA (wt CEA with tetanus toxoid Th epitope), Derma Vax (electroporation device) and GM-CSF in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Maria Liljefors at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a DNA immunisation approach where tetwtCEA DNA will be administered in combination with electroporation. (time frame: Within 72 weeks after immunisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2022.