AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral SpondyloarthritisPhase 3NCT01064856

Study of Adalimumab in Participants With Peripheral Spondyloarthritis (SpA)

A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab in people with Peripheral Spondyloarthritis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab 40 mg administered every other week (eow) subcutaneously (SC) compared to placebo for 12 weeks followed by open label (OL) safety and efficacy assessments in participants with non-ankylosing spondylitis (AS), non-psoriatic arthritis… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Spondyloarthritis
What is being tested?
Adalimumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
165 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Feb 2010to May 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult participants who had inadequate response to >= 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs)
  • Participants who had arthritis or enthesitis or dactylitis plus: met spondyloarthritis clinical criteria
  • Negative purified protein derivative (PPD) test and Chest X-Ray performed at Baseline Visit were Negative
  • Ability to administer subcutaneous injections
  • General good health

Who cannot join

  • Prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy
  • Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Fulfillment of modified New York criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis
  • Recent infection requiring treatment
  • Significant medical events or conditions that had put patients at risk for participation
  • Female participants who were pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study
  • History of cancer, except successfully treated skin cancer
  • Recent history of drug or alcohol abuse

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Subjects With Peripheral Spondyloarthritis

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab 40 mg administered every other week (eow) subcutaneously (SC) compared to placebo for 12 weeks followed by open label (OL) safety and efficacy assessments in participants with non-ankylosing spondylitis (AS), non-psoriatic arthritis (PsA) active peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) who have had an inadequate response to >= 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or are intolerant to, or have a contraindication for, NSAIDs.

Being tested
Adalimumab, Placebo
Keywords
peripheral spondyloarthritis, adalimumab, humira

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AdalimumabBiological

    Also called ABT-D2E7, Humira

    Study drug was provided as a sterile SC injection solution in 1 mL pre-filled syringes containing adalimumab 40 mg/0.8 mL. Study drug was SC self-administered eow at approximately the same time of day.

  • PlaceboBiological

    Study drug was provided as a sterile SC injection solution in 1 mL pre-filled syringes containing matching placebo for adalimumab. Study drug was SC self-administered eow at approximately the same time of day.

Study groups in NCT01064856
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Double-blind (DB) AdalimumabExperimentalAdalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection every other week (eow) up to Week 12 in double-blind period.
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab
Double-blind PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo subcutaneous (SC) injection every other week (eow) up to Week 12 in the double-blind period.
Receives: Biological: Placebo
Double-blind Adalimumab / Open-label AdalimumabExperimentalAdalimumab 40 mg SC injection eow up to Week 12 in double-blind period and from Week 12 to Week 156 in open-label period.
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab
Double-blind Placebo / Open-label AdalimumabPlacebo comparatorPlacebo SC injection every other week (eow) up to Week 12 in the double-blind period; adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection eow from Week 12 to Week 156 in the open-label period.
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab; Biological: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Responders According to the Composite Peripheral SpA Response Criteria (PSpARC 40) at Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving the following composite response at Week 12: >= 40% improvement (minimum 20 mm absolute improvement) from Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PTGA) of Disease Activity as measured by a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0=no symptoms and 100=maximum symptoms; >= 40% improvement (minimum 20 mm absolute improvement) from Baseline in PTGA - Pain as measured by a 100 mm VAS where 0=no pain and 100=maximum pain; and >= 40% improvement from Baseline in at least 1 of the following 3 criteria: swollen joint count (76 joints) and tender joint count (78 joints); total enthesitis count; or total dactylitis count. Non-responder imputation: missing response was imputed as non-response.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. If an adverse event meets any of the following criteria, it is considered a serious adverse event (SAE): results in death or is life-threatening, results in admission or prolongation of hospitalization, results in congenital anomaly or persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is an important medical event requiring medical or surgical intervention to prevent serious outcome. AEs were categorized by severity (mild, moderate, severe) and relationship to treatment (probably, possibly, probably not, not related). Please see Adverse Events section below for more details.

    Measured: Baseline (day of first study drug administration) through Week 156 plus 70 days

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 12

    A VAS was to be used for the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of disease activity (current status). The left end of the VAS scale (0 mm) signifies the absence of symptoms and the right end (100 mm) signifies maximum disease activity. Last observation carried forward (LOCF): missing values were imputed using the last non-missing post-baseline value prior to the missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 12

    The BASDAI was to be completed at the designated study visits. The participant was to assess his/her disease activity using the BASDAI which consisted of a VAS scale used to answer 6 questions (Q1 through Q6) pertaining to symptoms experienced by the participant for the past week. Each question on the BASDAI was reported in centimeters (0 [none] to 10 [very severe] with one question's possible answers being in time increments [0 hours to ≥ 2 hours]). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10 cm and was calculated as follows: BASDAI Score = 0.2 × (Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4 + Q5/2 + Q6/2). Lower scores indicate less disease activity. LOCF: Missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Modified for the Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S) Total at Week 12

    The HAQ-S is a self-reported measure to assess the physical function and health-related quality of life. The Disability Index (DI) of HAQ-S is calculated as the mean of the following 8 category scores (range: 0 [without any difficulty] to 3 [unable to do]): Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. Five additional items in the functional status measure were included in the HAQ-S, including carrying heavy packages, sitting for long periods, able to work at a flat topped table, and (if the participant had a driver's license or a car) able to look in the rear view mirror and able to turn head to drive in reverse. The overall score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (three very severe, high-dependency disability). Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement. LOCF: Missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Status Survey™ Version 2 (SF-36™V2) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12

    The Short Form-36 Health Status Survey™ Version 2 (SF-36™V2) is a 36-item generic health-related quality of life measure to assess the participant's view of their health consisting of 2 components: physical and mental. For each component, a transformed summary score is calculated using 8 sub-domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) at Week 12

    Assessment of enthesitis was performed in the following 7 domains: 1) 1st costochondral joint left and right, 2) 7th costochondral joint left and right, 3) posterior superior iliac spine left and right, 4) anterior superior iliac spine left and right, 5) iliac crest left and right, 6) 5th lumbar spinous process and 7) proximal insertion of Achilles tendon left and right. Each domain was graded for the presence (1) or absence (0) of tenderness yielding total MASES ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 13 (worst possible score; 13 sites with tenderness). Participants with non-missing Baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-Baseline value were included in post-Baseline visits. LOCF: missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-Baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index at Week 12

    Assessment of enthesitis was performed in the following 6 domains: left and right lateral epicondyle, left and right medial femoral condyle, left and right Achilles tendon insertion. Tenderness at each site was quantified on a dichotomous basis: Each domain was graded for the presence (1) and absence (0) of tenderness yielding total Leeds Enthesitis Index scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness). Participants with non-missing Baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-Baseline value were included in post-Baseline visits. LOCF: missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-Baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score at Week 12

    Assessment of enthesitis was performed in the following 16 domains: left and right (L/R) medial epicondyle; L/R lateral epicondyle; L/R supraspinatus insertion into the greater tuberosity of humerus; L/R greater trochanter; L/R quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella; L/R patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle; L/R Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum; L/R plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum. Tenderness at each site was quantified on a dichotomous basis. Each domain was graded for the presence (1) and absence (0) of tenderness yielding total SPARCC scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 16 (worst possible score; 16 sites with tenderness). Participants with non-missing Baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-Baseline value were included in post-Baseline visits. LOCF: missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-Baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  8. Change From Baseline in Dactylitis at Week 12

    Assessment of the presence or absence of dactylitis as well as grading of tenderness and swelling in all 20 of the participants' digits was performed. Tenderness at each site was quantified from absent to severe. Swelling was quantified from mild to severe. Total Dactylitis Assessment scores ranging from 0 (no digits with dactylitis) to 20 (worst possible score; 20 digits with dactylitis). Participants with non-missing Baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-Baseline value were included in post-Baseline visits. LOCF: missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-Baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  9. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 12

    Seventy-eight joints were assessed for tenderness by physical examination. Tenderness of each joint was classified as present (1) or absent (0), for a total possible TJC score of 0 (0 joints with tenderness) to 78 (worst possible score/78 joints with tenderness). Participants with non-missing Baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-Baseline value were included in post-Baseline visits. LOCF: missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-Baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  10. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12

    Seventy-six joints were assessed for swelling by physical examination. Swelling of each joint was classified as present (1) or absent (0), for a total possible score SJC of 0 (0 joints with swelling) to 76 (worst possible score/76 joints with swelling). Participants with non-missing Baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-Baseline value were included in post-Baseline visits. LOCF: missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-Baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

  11. Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12

    The ASDAS is a continuous disease activity score: low score indicates lower disease activity and higher values indicate higher disease activity. The score ranges from 0 to no defined upper limit. It is categorized into 4 disease activity states based on score: inactive disease (< 1.3), moderate (≥ 1.3 to < 2.1), high (≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5), and very high (> 3.5). Clinically important and major improvements in ASDAS are defined as a reduction from Baseline of ≥ 1.1 and ≥ 2.0 points, respectively. Participants with non-missing Baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-Baseline value were included in post-Baseline visits. LOCF: missing value was imputed using the last non-missing post-Baseline value prior to missing value.

    Measured: Baseline (last measurement prior to first DB dose), Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2010
  3. Primary completionAug 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
165 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01064856
Sponsor's protocol ID
M10-883
Other IDs
2009-014567-39, 2009
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
5 Feb 2010
Last updated
7 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Mease P, Sieper J, Van den Bosch F, Rahman P, Karunaratne PM, Pangan AL. Randomized controlled trial of adalimumab in patients with nonpsoriatic peripheral spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Apr;67(4):914-23. doi: 10.1002/art.39008.

    PubMed 25545240
  • Coates LC, Abraham S, Tillett W, Mease PJ, Ramiro S, Wu T, Wang X, Pangan AL, Song IH. Performance and Predictors of Minimal Disease Activity Response in Patients With Peripheral Spondyloarthritis Treated With Adalimumab. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Feb;74(2):259-267. doi: 10.1002/acr.24442. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

    PubMed 32937016
  • Mease PJ, Van den Bosch F, Sieper J, Xia Y, Pangan AL, Song IH. Performance of 3 Enthesitis Indices in Patients with Peripheral Spondyloarthritis During Treatment with Adalimumab. J Rheumatol. 2017 May;44(5):599-608. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160387. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

    PubMed 28298558
  • Turina MC, Ramiro S, Baeten DL, Mease P, Paramarta JE, Song IH, Pangan AL, Landewe R. A psychometric analysis of outcome measures in peripheral spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1302-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207235. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

    PubMed 26245756

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab in people with Peripheral Spondyloarthritis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Nov 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Responders According to the Composite Peripheral SpA Response Criteria (PSpARC 40) at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01064856, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in