ObesityLITOENCT01065636
Lifestyle Intervention Trial in Obese Elderly
A study testing Diet + Resistance Training, Diet + Aerobic Training and Diet + Resistance/Aerobic Exercise in people with Obesity, run by Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Obesity causes frailty in obese older adults by exacerbating the age-related decline in physical function. However, appropriate management of obesity in older adults is controversial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity
- What is being tested?
- Diet + Resistance Training, Diet + Aerobic Training and Diet + Resistance/Aerobic Exercise
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to 31 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 65-85 years old
- Obese men and women (BMI > or equal to 30 kg/m2)
- Stable weight (±2 kg) during the last 6 mos.
- Must be sedentary (regular exercise <1 h/wk or <2 x/wk for the last 6 mos.)
- Be judged, during the initial screening, to be well motivated and reliable
Who cannot join
- Any major chronic diseases
- Any condition or unstable diseases that would interfere with exercise or dietary restriction, in which exercise or dietary restriction are contraindicated, or that would interfere with interpretation of results that include but are not limited to:
- Cardiopulmonary disease (e.g., recent MI, unstable angina, stroke etc.)
- Severe orthopedic/musculoskeletal or neuromuscular impairments that would contraindicate participation in exercise
- Visual or hearing impairments that interfere with following directions
- Diagnosis of dementia
Show all 12Show fewer
- History of malignancy during the past 5 yr
- Recent use of bone acting drugs (e.g. use of estrogen, or androgen containing compound, raloxifene, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone during the past year or biphosphonates during the last two years)
- Individuals on insulin or with a fasting blood glucose of > 140mg/dl, and/or a 2 hour post-glucose of >250 mg/dl
- BMD t-scores of <-2.3 of the lumbar spine and proximal femur
- serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dl
- No commitments, life situations or conditions that would interfere with their participation in the study
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
New Mexico VA Medical Center and University of New Mexico School of Medicine
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
About this study
Official title: Exercise Interventions During Voluntary Weight Loss in Obese Older Adults
Obesity causes frailty in obese older adults by exacerbating the age-related decline in physical function. However, appropriate management of obesity in older adults is controversial. Weight loss without exercise could worsen frailty by accelerating the usual age-related decline in muscle and bone mass that leads to sarcopenia and osteopenia, respectively. Because of the important problem of frailty in obese older adults, it is important to determine the most efficacious approach in reducing, or even reversing frailty in this population. The primary objective of this proposal is to evaluate which distinct type of physical exercise (resistance, aerobic, or combined resistance + aerobic) is most efficacious in preventing the weight-loss-induced reduction in muscle and bone mass and reversing frailty in obese older adults.
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Being tested
- Diet + Resistance Training, Diet + Aerobic Training, Diet + Resistance/Aerobic Exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diet + Resistance TrainingBehavioural
Behavioral Therapy through a lifestyle modification program, Diet therapy once weekly through a dietician prescribed diet for 26 weeks, and resistance exercise training 3-days/week for 24 weeks.
Diet + Aerobic TrainingBehavioural
Behavioral Therapy through a lifestyle modification program, Diet therapy once weekly through a dietician prescribed diet for 26 weeks, and aerobic exercise training 3-days/week for 24 weeks
Diet + Resistance/Aerobic ExerciseBehavioural
Behavioral Therapy through a lifestyle modification program, Diet therapy once weekly through a dietician prescribed diet for 26 weeks, and combined resistance/aerobic exercise training 3-days/week for 24 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diet + Resistance Exercise Training | Experimental | Weekly behavioral/diet-induced weight loss plus supervised resistance exercise training three times a week Receives: Behavioral: Diet + Resistance Training |
| Diet + Aerobic Exercise Training | Experimental | Weekly behavioral/diet-induced weight loss plus supervised aerobic exercise training three times a week Receives: Behavioral: Diet + Aerobic Training |
| Diet + Combined Aerobic/Resistance Exercise | Experimental | Weekly behavioral/diet-induced weight loss plus combined supervised resistance exercise training and aerobic exercise training three times a week Receives: Behavioral: Diet + Resistance/Aerobic Exercise |
| Control Group (No Diet/No Exercise) | No intervention | No diet No exercise training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Physical Function
The Physical Performance Test includes seven standardized tasks (walking 15.2 m [50 ft], putting on and removing a coat, picking up a penny, standing up from a chair, lifting a book, climbing one flight of stairs, and performing a progressive Romberg test) plus two additional tasks (going up and down four flights of stairs and making a 360-degree turn). The score for each task ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating better physical performance; a perfect score would be 36.
Measured: 6 Months
Secondary outcomes (37)
Change in lean mass
Assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Measured: 6 months
Change in fat mass
Assessed using DXA
Measured: 6 months
Change in muscle strength
Assessed using 1-repetition maximum and dynamometry
Measured: 6 months
Change in gait speed
Measured as time to walk a certain distance
Measured: 6 months
Change in areal bone mineral density
Assessed by using DXA
Measured: 6 months
Change in biochemical marker for bone turnover and bone metabolism
Assessed by using enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assay and radioimmunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Change in circulating cytokines
Assessed by using enzyme linked immunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Change in adipocytokines
Assessed by using enzyme linked immunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Change in aerobic capacity
Assessed by using indirect calorimetry during graded exercise stress test
Measured: 6 months
Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Assessed by using sphygmomanometer
Measured: 6 months
Change in serum glucose
Assessed by glucose oxidase method
Measured: 6 months
Change in serum lipids
Assessed by automated enzymatic/colorimetric assays
Measured: 6 months
Change in habitual physical activity assessed by questionnaires
Using the Stanford physical activity questionnaire (score range: 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher physical activity levels)
Measured: 6 months
Change in habitual physical activity measured objectively
Using accelerometers
Measured: 6 months
Change in serum insulin
Assessed by immunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Change in serum estradiol
Assessed by immunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Change in 25 hydroxyvitamin D
Assessed by immunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life_Lite (IWQOL-lite) score
Assessed by IWQO-liteL questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Change in Medical Outcomes 36-Item short form Health survey (SF-36)
Assessed by Physical component summary and mental component summary score (score range 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status)
Measured: 6 months
Change in gene expression of muscle anabolic and catabolic factors
Assessed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and nanostring
Measured: 6 months
Change in protein expression of muscle anabolic and catabolic factors
Assessed by western blotting
Measured: 6 months
Change in concentration of targeted metabolites
Assessed by liquid chromatography hyphenated with mass spectrometry techniques
Measured: 6 months
Change in dynamic balance
Assessed by the obstacle course
Measured: 6 months
Change in static balance
Assessed by one leg stance
Measured: 6 months
Change in modified mini-mental exam
Assessed by using cognitive instrument testing
Measured: 6 months
Change in word fluency
Assessed by using cognitive instrument testing
Measured: 6 months
Change in trail a and trail b
Assessed by using cognitive instrument testing
Measured: 6 months
Change in Ray Auditory verbal learning test
Assessed by using cognitive instrument testing
Measured: 6 months
Change in muscle protein synthesis rate
Assessed by stable isotope methodology
Measured: 6 months
Change in thigh muscle and fat mass
Assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Measured: 6 months
Change in visceral fat mass
Assessed by MRI
Measured: 6 months
Change in mood
Assessed by geriatric depression scale (score range: 0 to 30, where lower scores indicating better mood)
Measured: 6 months
Change in waist circumference
Using a tape measure
Measured: 6 months
Change in serum testosterone
Assessed by immunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Change in subjective ability to function
Assessed by Functional Status Questionnaire (score range: 0 to 36 with higher scores indicating better function)
Measured: 6 months
Change is serum sclerostin
Assessed by immunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Change in parathyroid hormone
Assessed by immunoassay
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completion31 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA), Baylor College of Medicine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dennis Villareal, Baylor College of Medicine
- Investigators
- Dennis T Villareal, MD FACP FACE, Principal investigator, Baylor College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01065636
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01AG031176
- Other IDs
- R01AG031176
- Acronym
- LITOE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Colleluori G, Viola V, Bathina S, Armamento-Villareal R, Qualls C, Giordano A, Villareal DT. Effect of aerobic or resistance exercise, or both on insulin secretion, ciliary neurotrophic factor, and insulin-like growth factor-1 in dieting older adults with obesity. Clin Nutr. 2025 Aug;51:50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2025.05.016. Epub 2025 May 28.
PubMed 40527119Armamento-Villareal R, Aguirre L, Waters DL, Napoli N, Qualls C, Villareal DT. Effect of Aerobic or Resistance Exercise, or Both, on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Metabolism in Obese Older Adults While Dieting: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2020 Mar;35(3):430-439. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3905. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
PubMed 31797417Colleluori G, Aguirre L, Phadnis U, Fowler K, Armamento-Villareal R, Sun Z, Brunetti L, Hyoung Park J, Kaipparettu BA, Putluri N, Auetumrongsawat V, Yarasheski K, Qualls C, Villareal DT. Aerobic Plus Resistance Exercise in Obese Older Adults Improves Muscle Protein Synthesis and Preserves Myocellular Quality Despite Weight Loss. Cell Metab. 2019 Aug 6;30(2):261-273.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
PubMed 31279675Villareal DT, Aguirre L, Gurney AB, Waters DL, Sinacore DR, Colombo E, Armamento-Villareal R, Qualls C. Aerobic or Resistance Exercise, or Both, in Dieting Obese Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1943-1955. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616338.
PubMed 28514618
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exercise Interventions During Voluntary Weight Loss in Obese Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01065636
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LITOE / R01AG031176
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biomedical Research Institute of New MexicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA), Baylor College of Medicine
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Obesity causes frailty in obese older adults by exacerbating the age-related decline in physical function. However, appropriate management of obesity in older adults is controversial. Weight loss without exercise could worsen frailty by accelerating the usual age-related decline in muscle and bone mass that leads to sarcopenia and osteopenia, respectively. Because of the important problem of frailty in obese older adults, it is important to determine the most efficacious approach in reducing, or even reversing frailty in this population. The primary objective of this proposal is to evaluate which distinct type of physical exercise (resistance, aerobic, or combined resistance + aerobic) is most efficacious in preventing the weight-loss-induced reduction in muscle and bone mass and reversing frailty in obese older adults.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diet + Resistance Exercise Training | Experimental | Behavioral: Diet + Resistance TrainingWeekly behavioral/diet-induced weight loss plus supervised resistance exercise training three times a week |
| Diet + Aerobic Exercise Training | Experimental | Behavioral: Diet + Aerobic TrainingWeekly behavioral/diet-induced weight loss plus supervised aerobic exercise training three times a week |
| Diet + Combined Aerobic/Resistance Exercise | Experimental | Behavioral: Diet + Resistance/Aerobic ExerciseWeekly behavioral/diet-induced weight loss plus combined supervised resistance exercise training and aerobic exercise training three times a week |
| Control Group (No Diet/No Exercise) | No intervention | –No diet No exercise training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 65-85 years old
- Obese men and women (BMI > or equal to 30 kg/m2)
- Stable weight (±2 kg) during the last 6 mos.
- Must be sedentary (regular exercise <1 h/wk or <2 x/wk for the last 6 mos.)
- Be judged, during the initial screening, to be well motivated and reliable
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Any major chronic diseases
- Any condition or unstable diseases that would interfere with exercise or dietary restriction, in which exercise or dietary restriction are contraindicated, or that would interfere with interpretation of results that include but are not limited to:
- Cardiopulmonary disease (e.g., recent MI, unstable angina, stroke etc.)
- Severe orthopedic/musculoskeletal or neuromuscular impairments that would contraindicate participation in exercise
- Visual or hearing impairments that interfere with following directions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diet + Resistance TrainingBehavioral Therapy through a lifestyle modification program, Diet therapy once weekly through a dietician prescribed diet for 26 weeks, and resistance exercise training 3-days/week for 24 weeks. | Behavioural | Diet + Resistance Exercise Training |
| Diet + Aerobic TrainingBehavioral Therapy through a lifestyle modification program, Diet therapy once weekly through a dietician prescribed diet for 26 weeks, and aerobic exercise training 3-days/week for 24 weeks | Behavioural | Diet + Aerobic Exercise Training |
| Diet + Resistance/Aerobic ExerciseBehavioral Therapy through a lifestyle modification program, Diet therapy once weekly through a dietician prescribed diet for 26 weeks, and combined resistance/aerobic exercise training 3-days/week for 24 weeks | Behavioural | Diet + Combined Aerobic/Resistance Exercise |
Primary outcome
Change in Physical Function
Time frame: 6 Months
The Physical Performance Test includes seven standardized tasks (walking 15.2 m [50 ft], putting on and removing a coat, picking up a penny, standing up from a chair, lifting a book, climbing one flight of stairs, and performing a progressive Romberg test) plus two additional tasks (going up and down four flights of stairs and making a 360-degree turn). The score for each task ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating better physical performance; a perfect score would be 36.
37 secondary outcomes
Change in lean mass
Time frame: 6 months
Change in fat mass
Time frame: 6 months
Change in muscle strength
Time frame: 6 months
Change in gait speed
Time frame: 6 months
Change in areal bone mineral density
Time frame: 6 months
Change in biochemical marker for bone turnover and bone metabolism
Time frame: 6 months
Change in circulating cytokines
Time frame: 6 months
Change in adipocytokines
Time frame: 6 months
Change in aerobic capacity
Time frame: 6 months
Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time frame: 6 months
Change in serum glucose
Time frame: 6 months
Change in serum lipids
Time frame: 6 months
Change in habitual physical activity assessed by questionnaires
Time frame: 6 months
Change in habitual physical activity measured objectively
Time frame: 6 months
Change in serum insulin
Time frame: 6 months
Change in serum estradiol
Time frame: 6 months
Change in 25 hydroxyvitamin D
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life_Lite (IWQOL-lite) score
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Medical Outcomes 36-Item short form Health survey (SF-36)
Time frame: 6 months
Change in gene expression of muscle anabolic and catabolic factors
Time frame: 6 months
Change in protein expression of muscle anabolic and catabolic factors
Time frame: 6 months
Change in concentration of targeted metabolites
Time frame: 6 months
Change in dynamic balance
Time frame: 6 months
Change in static balance
Time frame: 6 months
Change in modified mini-mental exam
Time frame: 6 months
Change in word fluency
Time frame: 6 months
Change in trail a and trail b
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Ray Auditory verbal learning test
Time frame: 6 months
Change in muscle protein synthesis rate
Time frame: 6 months
Change in thigh muscle and fat mass
Time frame: 6 months
Change in visceral fat mass
Time frame: 6 months
Change in mood
Time frame: 6 months
Change in waist circumference
Time frame: 6 months
Change in serum testosterone
Time frame: 6 months
Change in subjective ability to function
Time frame: 6 months
Change is serum sclerostin
Time frame: 6 months
Change in parathyroid hormone
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40527119Colleluori G, Viola V, Bathina S, Armamento-Villareal R, Qualls C, Giordano A, Villareal DT. Effect of aerobic or resistance exercise, or both on insulin secretion, ciliary neurotrophic factor, and insulin-like growth factor-1 in dieting older adults with obesity. Clin Nutr. 2025 Aug;51:50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2025.05.016. Epub 2025 May 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31797417Armamento-Villareal R, Aguirre L, Waters DL, Napoli N, Qualls C, Villareal DT. Effect of Aerobic or Resistance Exercise, or Both, on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Metabolism in Obese Older Adults While Dieting: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2020 Mar;35(3):430-439. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3905. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31279675Colleluori G, Aguirre L, Phadnis U, Fowler K, Armamento-Villareal R, Sun Z, Brunetti L, Hyoung Park J, Kaipparettu BA, Putluri N, Auetumrongsawat V, Yarasheski K, Qualls C, Villareal DT. Aerobic Plus Resistance Exercise in Obese Older Adults Improves Muscle Protein Synthesis and Preserves Myocellular Quality Despite Weight Loss. Cell Metab. 2019 Aug 6;30(2):261-273.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28514618Villareal DT, Aguirre L, Gurney AB, Waters DL, Sinacore DR, Colombo E, Armamento-Villareal R, Qualls C. Aerobic or Resistance Exercise, or Both, in Dieting Obese Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1943-1955. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616338.
Related trials for Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Brain Stimulation on Food Intake and Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment
Electric Stimulation Therapy, Obesity
Not yet recruiting
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen-Assisted Deep Extubation Versus Awake Extubation in Morbidly Obese Patients
Deep Tracheal Extubation
Active, not recruiting
Adipocyte-Derived Extracellular Vesicles, Weight Loss, and Endothelial Function
Obesity, Weight Loss
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Trial of the Combination of Alpha-Lipoic Acid and Mirabegron in Women and in Men With Obesity
Insulin Resistance, Obesity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Natural History of Genetic and Environmental Predictors of Pubertal Timing Among Youth With Obesity
Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dennis T Villareal, MD FACP FACE principal investigator
Baylor College of Medicine
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diet + Resistance Training, Diet + Aerobic Training and Diet + Resistance/Aerobic Exercise in people with Obesity, run by Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Physical Function (time frame: 6 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01065636, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2020.