HIVRICH-3NCT01066169
Vaccination Response in ImmunoCompromised Host. Immune Response After Vaccination Against Pandemic A/H1N1 Influenza
An observational study of HIV, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
As recommended by the Dutch Health Council, certain risk groups and health care workers in The Netherlands were vaccinated to prevent morbidity due to pandemic influenza A/H1N1. Adults were vaccinated twice with the monovalent influenza A/California/2009(H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted surface-antigen vaccine Focetria®… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV
- What is being tested?
- Foceteria® (Novartis)
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- How many people
- 104 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Nov 2009to Feb 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: HIV patients at the department 'Infectious Diseases' of the Leiden University Medical Centre and healthy volunteers (hospital employees of the Leiden University Medical Centre)
Who may be able to join
- Above 18 years of age
- Stable antiretroviral regimen or not yet in need of treatment (in case of HIV-infected patients)
Who cannot join
- Use of systemic immunosuppressive medication
- An ongoing infection
- Recent flu-like symptoms and pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Leiden University Medical Centre
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA
About this study
Official title: Immune Response After Vaccination Against Pandemic A/H1N1 Influenza in the Immunocompromised Host. Vaccination Response in ImmunoCompromised Host
As recommended by the Dutch Health Council, certain risk groups and health care workers in The Netherlands were vaccinated to prevent morbidity due to pandemic influenza A/H1N1. Adults were vaccinated twice with the monovalent influenza A/California/2009(H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted surface-antigen vaccine Focetria® (Novartis). The vaccination campaign was executed by general practitioners.
The aim of the study is to verify whether HIV-infected individuals generate an adequate immune response after the first and after the second vaccination.
Read the detailed description
AIM OF THIS STUDY:
Primary objective: Do HIV-infected individuals mount a protective humoral response following vaccination for pandemic influenza A/H1N1 with the monovalent influenza A/California/2009(H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted surface-antigen vaccine Focetria® (Novartis).
Secondary objective: 1) To evaluate the strength of the immune response in HIV-infected individuals compared to healthy volunteers. 2) To evaluate whether a second dose, administered at least 21 days after the first increases the proportion of HIV-infected individuals that have a titer above the threshold associated with protection. 3) To assess whether vaccination is associated with an increases in HIV-replication. 4) To assess whether very early antibody responses occur, which may may indicate immunological memory, for example due to cross reactivity from past influenza infection or vaccination.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is not an interventional study. In this single-centre observational study we will monitor the immune response in a cohort of people who are to be vaccinated during the national vaccination campaign.
Population: The population base for this study consists of HIV-infected adult outpatients at our hospital and of healthy hospital employees. All Dutch and English speaking HIV-infected LUMC outpatients above 18 years of age, on a stable antiretroviral regimen or not yet in need of treatment, are sent a letter inviting them to take part. Healthy hospital employees are invited to take part with a letter, which is handed out upon vaccination. Inclusion is possible until three days after the first vaccination. Exclusion criteria are: use of systemic immunosuppressive medication, an ongoing infection, recent flu-like symptoms and pregnancy. The following characteristics are documented at baseline: age, gender, co-morbidity, medication, year of prior influenza vaccinations and year of diagnosis of HIV infection. All participants are requested to fill out standardized diary assessing flu-like symptoms and use of new medication during the 60 day follow-up.
Laboratory analysis: Lymphocyte counts are determined at baseline, prior to vaccination. A serum sample is taken prior to the first vaccination (day -30 to day 0), prior to the second vaccination (day 17-20) and after the second vaccination (day 60). Viral load is determined at baseline (day -30 to day 0) and after the second vaccination (day 5-7) in a subgroup of 10 persons with undetectable viral load at the preceding outpatient visit. Antibody responses are detected in duplicate for each sample by means of hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays according to standard methods at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam.
Statistical analysis: No formal sample-size calculation was performed. We intend to include a maximum of 100 subjects with HIV and 50 healthy hospital employees. The crude outcome estimates will be adjusted for variables that may influence the outcome (age, CD4 lymphocyte count, use of HAART, viral load).
- Conditions
- HIV
- Being tested
- Foceteria® (Novartis)
- Keywords
- Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1, HIV, Antibodies, Replicaton
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Foceteria® (Novartis)Biological
This is not an interventional study. In this observational study we monitored the immune response in a cohort of people who were vaccinated during the national vaccination campaign. The vaccine that was used in The Netherlands is the monovalent influenza A/California/2009(H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted surface-antigen vaccine. It contains 7,5 µg hemagglutinine and the MF59C.1 adjuvant, which is an oil-in-water emulsion, composed of Squalene 9.75 mg, Polysorbate 80 1.175 mg and Sorbitan trioleate 1.175 mg. This vaccine has been approved for use according to a two dose schedule.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy volunteers | Healthy subjects without HIV, vaccinated with Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 Receives: Biological: Foceteria® (Novartis) | |
| HIV-infected patients | HIV-infected patients, vaccinated with Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 Receives: Biological: Foceteria® (Novartis) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Antibody titer after second vaccination
Measured: day 55-60
Secondary outcomes (3)
Antibody titer after second vaccination
Measured: day 17-20
Antibody titer shortly after first vaccination (day 5-7)
Measured: day 5-7
HIV replication after vaccination
Measured: day 5-7
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2009
- Primary completionFeb 2010
- Study completionFeb 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Leiden University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Investigators
- Frank P Kroon, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Leiden University Medical CentreLeo G Visser, MD PhD, Study chair, Leiden University Medical CentreLuc BS Gelinck, MD, Study chair, Leiden University Medical CentreA F Rimmelzwaan, Prof PhD, Study chair, Leiden University Medical CentreDarius Soonawala, MD, Study director, Leiden University Medical Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01066169
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P09.187
- Acronym
- RICH-3
- Status last verified
- Feb 2010
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Soonawala D, Rimmelzwaan GF, Gelinck LB, Visser LG, Kroon FP. Response to 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in HIV-infected patients and the influence of prior seasonal influenza vaccination. PLoS One. 2011 Jan 31;6(1):e16496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016496.
PubMed 21304982
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immune Response After Vaccination Against Pandemic A/H1N1 Influenza in the Immunocompromised Host. Vaccination Response in ImmunoCompromised Host
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01066169
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RICH-3 / P09.187
- Conditions
- HIV
- Keywords
- Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1, HIV, Antibodies, Replicaton
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Study start
- Nov 2009
- Primary completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
As recommended by the Dutch Health Council, certain risk groups and health care workers in The Netherlands were vaccinated to prevent morbidity due to pandemic influenza A/H1N1. Adults were vaccinated twice with the monovalent influenza A/California/2009(H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted surface-antigen vaccine Focetria® (Novartis). The vaccination campaign was executed by general practitioners.
The aim of the study is to verify whether HIV-infected individuals generate an adequate immune response after the first and after the second vaccination.
Detailed description
AIM OF THIS STUDY:
Primary objective: Do HIV-infected individuals mount a protective humoral response following vaccination for pandemic influenza A/H1N1 with the monovalent influenza A/California/2009(H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted surface-antigen vaccine Focetria® (Novartis).
Secondary objective: 1) To evaluate the strength of the immune response in HIV-infected individuals compared to healthy volunteers. 2) To evaluate whether a second dose, administered at least 21 days after the first increases the proportion of HIV-infected individuals that have a titer above the threshold associated with protection. 3) To assess whether vaccination is associated with an increases in HIV-replication. 4) To assess whether very early antibody responses occur, which may may indicate immunological memory, for example due to cross reactivity from past influenza infection or vaccination.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is not an interventional study. In this single-centre observational study we will monitor the immune response in a cohort of people who are to be vaccinated during the national vaccination campaign.
Population: The population base for this study consists of HIV-infected adult outpatients at our hospital and of healthy hospital employees. All Dutch and English speaking HIV-infected LUMC outpatients above 18 years of age, on a stable antiretroviral regimen or not yet in need of treatment, are sent a letter inviting them to take part. Healthy hospital employees are invited to take part with a letter, which is handed out upon vaccination. Inclusion is possible until three days after the first vaccination. Exclusion criteria are: use of systemic immunosuppressive medication, an ongoing infection, recent flu-like symptoms and pregnancy. The following characteristics are documented at baseline: age, gender, co-morbidity, medication, year of prior influenza vaccinations and year of diagnosis of HIV infection. All participants are requested to fill out standardized diary assessing flu-like symptoms and use of new medication during the 60 day follow-up.
Laboratory analysis: Lymphocyte counts are determined at baseline, prior to vaccination. A serum sample is taken prior to the first vaccination (day -30 to day 0), prior to the second vaccination (day 17-20) and after the second vaccination (day 60). Viral load is determined at baseline (day -30 to day 0) and after the second vaccination (day 5-7) in a subgroup of 10 persons with undetectable viral load at the preceding outpatient visit. Antibody responses are detected in duplicate for each sample by means of hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays according to standard methods at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam.
Statistical analysis: No formal sample-size calculation was performed. We intend to include a maximum of 100 subjects with HIV and 50 healthy hospital employees. The crude outcome estimates will be adjusted for variables that may influence the outcome (age, CD4 lymphocyte count, use of HAART, viral load).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy volunteers | – | Biological: Foceteria® (Novartis)Healthy subjects without HIV, vaccinated with Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 |
| HIV-infected patients | – | Biological: Foceteria® (Novartis)HIV-infected patients, vaccinated with Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- HIV patients at the department 'Infectious Diseases' of the Leiden University Medical Centre and healthy volunteers (hospital employees of the Leiden University Medical Centre)
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Above 18 years of age
- Stable antiretroviral regimen or not yet in need of treatment (in case of HIV-infected patients)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Use of systemic immunosuppressive medication
- An ongoing infection
- Recent flu-like symptoms and pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Foceteria® (Novartis)This is not an interventional study. In this observational study we monitored the immune response in a cohort of people who were vaccinated during the national vaccination campaign. The vaccine that was used in The Netherlands is the monovalent influenza A/California/2009(H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted surface-antigen vaccine. It contains 7,5 µg hemagglutinine and the MF59C.1 adjuvant, which is an oil-in-water emulsion, composed of Squalene 9.75 mg, Polysorbate 80 1.175 mg and Sorbitan trioleate 1.175 mg. This vaccine has been approved for use according to a two dose schedule. | Biological | HIV-infected patients, Healthy volunteers |
Primary outcome
Antibody titer after second vaccination
Time frame: day 55-60
3 secondary outcomes
Antibody titer after second vaccination
Time frame: day 17-20
Antibody titer shortly after first vaccination (day 5-7)
Time frame: day 5-7
HIV replication after vaccination
Time frame: day 5-7
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21304982Soonawala D, Rimmelzwaan GF, Gelinck LB, Visser LG, Kroon FP. Response to 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in HIV-infected patients and the influence of prior seasonal influenza vaccination. PLoS One. 2011 Jan 31;6(1):e16496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016496.
- Publication of resultsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for HIV
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frank P Kroon, MD PhD principal investigator
Leiden University Medical Centre
Leo G Visser, MD PhD study chair
Leiden University Medical Centre
Luc BS Gelinck, MD study chair
Leiden University Medical Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of HIV, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Antibody titer after second vaccination (time frame: day 55-60). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01066169, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2012.