AzTrials
AzTrials

ImplantNCT01066780

ClearVoice Sound-processing Strategy for AB HiRes 120 Cochlear Implant Users

A study testing ClearVoice in people with Implant, run by Advanced Bionics at 11 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to collect information about how the new sound-processing affects the ability to hear in everyday listening situations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Implant
What is being tested?
ClearVoice
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
11 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Mar 2010to Sep 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Post-lingually deafened,
  • experienced (6 months device use),
  • adult users of the Harmony HiResolution Bionic Ear System and HiRes Fidelity 120 sound processing.
  • English language proficiency

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 2 countries.

11 sites in 2 countries

United States9 sites
  • The Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Midwest Ear Institute

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64111

  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40506-9983

  • House Ear Clinic

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Medical College of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Washington University Medical Center

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Carle Clinic Association

    Urbana, Illinois, 61801

Other trials in United States

Canada2 sites
  • Nova Scotia Hearing and Speech Centres

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 3R4

  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    Toronto, M4N 3M5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the ClearVoice™ Strategy in Adults Using HiResolution® Fidelity 120® Sound Processing

The purpose of this study is to collect information about how the new sound-processing affects the ability to hear in everyday listening situations.

Conditions
Implant
Being tested
ClearVoice
Keywords
cochlear implant, adults, HiResolution, Fidelity 120, listening benefits, noise, cochlear implant benefit

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ClearVoiceDevice

    ClearVoice is a sound processing strategy designed to improve listening ability in some challenging everyday listening environments for users of the Harmony® HiResolution® Bionic Ear System (Harmony®)

Study groups in NCT01066780
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: ClearVoice MediumExperimentalChronic use of ClearVoice MEDIUM for two weeks followed by chronic use of ClearVoice HIGH for two weeks.
Receives: Device: ClearVoice
Group B: ClearVoice HighExperimentalChronic use of ClearVoice HIGH for two weeks followed by chronic use of ClearVoice MEDIUM for two weeks.
Receives: Device: ClearVoice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Speech Perception of Standardized Sentences Presented From Recorded Format in Speech-spectrum Noise

    This was a within subjects design where scores on the AzBio sentence test in speech spectrum noise were compared against quiet scores at the 2-Week and 4-Week Follow-up Visit. The AzBio corpus of sentences consists of 33 lists of 20 sentences each (6 to 10 words per sentence) that have been equated for intelligibility. Two AzBio sentence lists were scored at each follow-up visit (2-Week and 4-Week) with either ClearVoice MEDIUM or ClearVoice HIGH enabled and averaged together. Two AzBio sentence lists were also administered in quiet at each visit. The ClearVoice score minus the quiet score provided the difference in score for the analysis.

    Measured: 4 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The AzBio Sentences Will be Administered in Recorded Format in Multi-talker Babble.

    Measured: 2-4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01066780
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR0309
Status last verified
Oct 2012
First submitted
9 Feb 2010
Last updated
22 Jul 2020
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ClearVoice in people with Implant, run by Advanced Bionics at 11 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Speech Perception of Standardized Sentences Presented From Recorded Format in Speech-spectrum Noise (time frame: 4 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in