Hepatitis C, ChronicNCT01066793
PROPHESYS 2: An Observational Study on Predictors of Response in Treatment-naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Pegasys (Peginterferon Alfa-2a) or Peginterferon-alfa-2b
An observational study of Hepatitis C, Chronic, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 100 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
This observational study will assess predictors of early on-treatment and sustained virological response in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C initiated on treatment with Pegasys (peginterferon alfa-2a) or peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Peginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys] and Peginterferon alfa-2b [PegIntron®]
- How many people
- 2,343 participants
- Where
- 100 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to May 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients receiving peginterferon alfa treatment at a medical centre
Who may be able to join
- adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- chronic hepatitis C
- informed consent to data collection
Who cannot join
- co-infection with HIV or HBV
- previous treatment with peginterferon and/or ribavirin
Trial locations and contacts
100 sites in 4 countries.
100 sites in 4 countries
Italy69 sites
Study site
Alessandria, Piedmont, 15100
Study site
Arezzo, Tuscany, 52100
Study site
Asti, Piedmont, 14100
Study site
Barra, Campania, 80147
Study site
Basovizza (TS), Friuli Venezia Giulia, 34100
Study site
Benevento, Campania, 82100
Study site
Biella, Piedmont, 13900
Study site
Bisceglie, Apulia, 70052
Study site
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
Study site
Bolzano, Trentino-Alto Adige, 39100
Study site
Brescia, Lombardy, 25125
Study site
Brindisi, Apulia, 72100
Study site
Busto Arsizio, Lombardy, 21052
Study site
Cagliari, Sardinia, 09042
Study site
Casarano, Apulia, 73042
Study site
Castellana Grotte, Apulia, 70013
Study site
Catania, Sicily, 95126
Study site
Catanzaro, Calabria, 88100
Study site
Comiso, Sicily, 97013
Study site
Cremona, Lombardy, 26100
Study site
Fermo, The Marches, 63023
Study site
Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, 44100
Study site
Florence, Tuscany, 50134
Study site
Foggia, Apulia, 71100
Study site
Galatina, Apulia, 73013
Study site
Gragnano, Campania, 80054
Study site
Grosseto, Tuscany, 58100
Study site
Isernia, Molise, 86170
Study site
Lecco, Lombardy, 23900
Study site
Mestre (VE), Veneto, 30172
Study site
Milan, Lombardy, 20121
Study site
Milan, Lombardy, 20122
Study site
Milan, Lombardy, 20132
Study site
Milan, Lombardy, 20142
Study site
Milan, Lombardy, 20153
Study site
Monza, Lombardy, 20052
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80123
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80131
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80136
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80137
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80138
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80141
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80143
Study site
Nola, Campania, 80035
Study site
Novara, Piedmont, 28100
Study site
Padova, Veneto, 35128
Study site
Palermo, Sicily, 90127
Study site
Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43100
Study site
Perugia, Umbria, 06123
Study site
Pescara, Abruzzo, 65124
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00128
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00133
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00149
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00152
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00161
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00165
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00168
Study site
Saronno, Lombardy, 21047
Study site
Savona, Liguria, 17100
Study site
Taranto, Apulia, 74100
Study site
Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige, 38100
Study site
Treviglio, Lombardy, 24047
Study site
Treviso, Veneto, 31100
Study site
Turin, Piedmont, 10126
Study site
Turin, Piedmont, 10128
Study site
Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33100
Study site
Venezia, Veneto, 30122
Study site
Verona, Veneto, 37134
Study site
Vibo Valentia, Calabria, 89900
Belgium27 sites
Study site
Aalst, 9300
Study site
Antwerp, 2018
Study site
Antwerp, 2060
Study site
Bruges, 8000
Study site
Brussels, 1000
Study site
Brussels, 1020
Study site
Brussels, 1070
Study site
Brussels, 1090
Study site
Brussels, 1190
Study site
Brussels, 1200
Study site
Charleroi, 6000
Study site
Edegem, 2650
Study site
Genk, 3600
Study site
Ghent, 9000
Study site
Gilly (Charleroi), 6060
Study site
Godinne, 5530
Study site
Haine-Saint-Paul, 7100
Study site
Kortrijk, 8500
Study site
Leuven, 3000
Study site
Liège, 4000
Study site
Namur, 5000
Study site
Ostend, 8400
Study site
Roeselare, 8800
Study site
Seraing, 4100
Study site
Sijsele, 8340
Study site
Tielt, 8880
Study site
Verviers, 4800
About this study
Official title: Prospective Observational Study on Predictors of Early On-treatment Response and Sustained Virological Response in a Cohort of Treatment naïve HCV-infected Patients Treated With Pegylated Interferons.
This observational study will assess predictors of early on-treatment and sustained virological response in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C initiated on treatment with Pegasys (peginterferon alfa-2a) or peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. Data will be collected during the treatment period (24 or 48 weeks) and 12 and 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Target sample size is <2000.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- Being tested
- Peginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys], Peginterferon alfa-2b [PegIntron®]
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Peginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys]Drug
Peginterferon/ribavirin treatment period as prescribed by treating physician (e.g. 24 or 48 weeks) and treatment-free follow-up period of 24 weeks.
Peginterferon alfa-2b [PegIntron®]Drug
Peginterferon/ribavirin treatment period as prescribed by treating physician (e.g. 24 or 48 weeks) and treatment-free follow-up period of 24 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | Participants chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus including genotypes 1 to 6 Receives: Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys]; Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2b [PegIntron®] |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population
Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as virological response (VR) at 24 weeks after end of treatment (EOT). Virological response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) of <15 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) as assessed by COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (CAP/CTM) or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (lower limit of detection [LLOD] 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The SVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected modified all-treated (mTRT) population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population
Sustained virological response was defined as VR at 24 weeks after EOT. Virological response was defined as HCV RNA of <15 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The SVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected per protocol (PP) population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population
Modified sustained virological response (mSVR) was defined as modified virological response (mVR) of HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT. The mSVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population
Modified sustained virological response is defined as mVR of HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT. The mSVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated Population
The probability that a participant who developed VR by Week 4 and 12 and also achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the positive predictive value (PPV) of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the negative predictive value (NPV) of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR are reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol Population
The probability that a participant who developed VR by Week 4 and 12 and also achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR are reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 24 weeks after EOT
Secondary outcomes (16)
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time
Virological response (VR) was defined as HCV RNA <15 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The VR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment
Measured: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and 12 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time
Virological response (VR) was defined as HCV RNA <15 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The VR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment
Measured: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and 12 Weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time
Modified virological response (mVR) was defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The mVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment
Measured: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and 12 Weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time
Modified virological response (mVR) is defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The mVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment
Measured: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and 12 Weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-logarithm10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Participants with 2-logarithm (log) drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values <50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 2 log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 99%. The 2 log drop in HCV RNA is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Measured: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-logarithm10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Participants with 2-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values <50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 2 log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 99%. The 2 log drop in HCV RNA is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Measured: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-logarithm10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Participants with 1-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values <50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 1- log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 90%. The 1- log drop in HCV RNA was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Measured: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-logarithm 10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Participants with 1-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values <50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 1- log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 90%. The 1- log drop in HCV RNA was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Measured: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated Population
The probability that a participant who developed VR by Wk 2 achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive Values of VR was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol Population
The probability that a participant who developed VR by Wk 2 and achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 2 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 2 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: 24 weeks after EOT
Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12
Rapid virological response (RVR) was defined as VR by Wk 4, Modified rapid virological response (mRVR) was defined as mVR by Wk 4, complete early virological response (cEVR) was defined as VR by Wk 12, but no RVR, modified complete early virological response (mcEVR) was defined as mVR by Wk 12, but no mRVR, partial early virological response (pEVR) was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline (including HCV RNA values <50 IU/mL) by, Wk 12, but no RVR and no cEVR, modified partial early virological response (mpEVR) was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline by Wk 12, but no mRVR and no mcEVR. The data is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Measured: At Week 4 and Week 12
Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12
RVR was defined as as VR by Wk 4, mRVR was defined as mVR by Wk 4, cEVR was defined as VR by Wk 12, but no RVR, mcEVR was defined as mVR by Wk 12, but no mRVR, pEVR was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline (including HCV RNA values <50 IU/mL) by Wk 12, but no RVR and no cEVR, mpEVR was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline by Wk 12, but no mRVR and no mcEVR. The data is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Measured: At Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment
Participants whose last test result in their respective follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. The number of participants with relapse was reported in treatment naive mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 12 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment
Participants whose last test result in their respective follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their mEOT-R. Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. The number of participants with relapse was reported in treatment naive PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 12 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment
Participants whose last test result in the follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their mEOT-R. Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. The number of participants with relapse was reported in treatment naive mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment
Participants whose last test result in their respective follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their mEOT-R. Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. The number of participants with relapse was reported in treatment naive PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Measured: At 24 weeks after EOT
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionMar 2011
- Study completionMay 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatitis C, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,343 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01066793
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MV21020
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 9 May 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Ascione A, Bruno S, Coppola C, Mangia A, Orlandini A, Schmitz M, Deodato B, Puoti M. Treatment Outcomes and Predictors of Response in Treatment-Naive HCV Patients Treated with Peginterferon Alfa/Ribavirin in Real-World Italian Clinics: Sub-Analysis from the PROPHESYS Cohort. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jun;61(132):1094-106.
PubMed 26158171Ferenci P, Aires R, Ancuta I, Arohnson A, Cheinquer H, Delic D, Gschwantler M, Larrey D, Tallarico L, Schmitz M, Tatsch F, Ouzan D. A tool for selecting patients with a high probability of sustained virological response to peginterferon alfa-2a (40kD)/ribavirin. Liver Int. 2014 Nov;34(10):1550-9. doi: 10.1111/liv.12439. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
PubMed 24329937
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Observational Study on Predictors of Early On-treatment Response and Sustained Virological Response in a Cohort of Treatment naïve HCV-infected Patients Treated With Pegylated Interferons.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01066793
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MV21020
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,343 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 May 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This observational study will assess predictors of early on-treatment and sustained virological response in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C initiated on treatment with Pegasys (peginterferon alfa-2a) or peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. Data will be collected during the treatment period (24 or 48 weeks) and 12 and 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Target sample size is <2000.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | – | Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys], Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2b [PegIntron®]Participants chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus including genotypes 1 to 6 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients receiving peginterferon alfa treatment at a medical centre
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- chronic hepatitis C
- informed consent to data collection
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- co-infection with HIV or HBV
- previous treatment with peginterferon and/or ribavirin
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Peginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys]Peginterferon/ribavirin treatment period as prescribed by treating physician (e.g. 24 or 48 weeks) and treatment-free follow-up period of 24 weeks. | Drug | Cohort |
| Peginterferon alfa-2b [PegIntron®]Peginterferon/ribavirin treatment period as prescribed by treating physician (e.g. 24 or 48 weeks) and treatment-free follow-up period of 24 weeks. | Drug | Cohort |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population
Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT
Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as virological response (VR) at 24 weeks after end of treatment (EOT). Virological response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) of <15 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) as assessed by COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (CAP/CTM) or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (lower limit of detection [LLOD] 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The SVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected modified all-treated (mTRT) population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population
Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT
Sustained virological response was defined as VR at 24 weeks after EOT. Virological response was defined as HCV RNA of <15 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The SVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected per protocol (PP) population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population
Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT
Modified sustained virological response (mSVR) was defined as modified virological response (mVR) of HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT. The mSVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population
Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT
Modified sustained virological response is defined as mVR of HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT. The mSVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated Population
Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT
The probability that a participant who developed VR by Week 4 and 12 and also achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the positive predictive value (PPV) of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the negative predictive value (NPV) of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR are reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol Population
Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT
The probability that a participant who developed VR by Week 4 and 12 and also achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR are reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
16 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time
Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and 12 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time
Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and 12 Weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time
Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and 12 Weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time
Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and 12 Weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-logarithm10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-logarithm10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-logarithm10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-logarithm 10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated Population
Time frame: 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol Population
Time frame: 24 weeks after EOT
Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12
Time frame: At Week 4 and Week 12
Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12
Time frame: At Week 4 and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment
Time frame: At 12 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment
Time frame: At 12 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment
Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment
Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 May 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26158171Ascione A, Bruno S, Coppola C, Mangia A, Orlandini A, Schmitz M, Deodato B, Puoti M. Treatment Outcomes and Predictors of Response in Treatment-Naive HCV Patients Treated with Peginterferon Alfa/Ribavirin in Real-World Italian Clinics: Sub-Analysis from the PROPHESYS Cohort. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jun;61(132):1094-106.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24329937Ferenci P, Aires R, Ancuta I, Arohnson A, Cheinquer H, Delic D, Gschwantler M, Larrey D, Tallarico L, Schmitz M, Tatsch F, Ouzan D. A tool for selecting patients with a high probability of sustained virological response to peginterferon alfa-2a (40kD)/ribavirin. Liver Int. 2014 Nov;34(10):1550-9. doi: 10.1111/liv.12439. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
Related trials for Hepatitis C, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
"Constitution of a Biological Collection to Establish Preclinical Translational Models for the Study of Tumors and Chronic Liver Diseases".
Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis, Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C During Pregnancy
Hepatitis C, Chronic, Pregnancy; Infection
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparative Autoantibody and Immunologic Cell Marker Study
Autoimmune Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
100 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hepatitis C, Chronic, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 100 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 100 sites in Italy, Belgium, Ireland, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 May 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population (time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01066793, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2016.