AzTrials
AzTrials

LeukemiaPhase 3NCT01067300

A Study Comparing Single Versus Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in the Young With Acute Leukemia Remission

A Phase 3 study testing Transplantation of unrelated cord blood unit(s) in people with Leukemia, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been used for several years when there is no HLA identical sibling or unrelated donor.Since the recent publication of encouraging results after transplantation of two UCB units, the number of these double-transplantations increases in a very significant way.However… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 35 years
Conditions the study is for
Leukemia
What is being tested?
Transplantation of unrelated cord blood unit(s)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
198 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Feb 2010to Jan 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • age < 35 years
  • acute leukemia in remission which need unrelated transplantation
  • lack of a suitable unrelated donor
  • availability of at least 2 UCB units 4/6, 5.6 or 6/6 HLA identical to the patient and between them, which contain more than 3 x 107 nucleated cells per kilogram of recipient for the first unit and more than de 1.5 x 107 nucleated cells per kilogram of recipient for the second
  • general status compatible with a myéloablative conditioning regimen

Who cannot join

  • availability of an HLA identical sibling
  • availability of an unrelated donor considered to be acceptable by the transplant center
  • History of allogeneic stem cell transplantation
  • History of a total body irradiation
  • Organ failure or patient general status considered to be incompatible with a myeloablative conditioning regimen
  • Active psychiatric disease
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
  • Positive HIV serology
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille

    Marseille

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Study Comparing Single Versus Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Children and Young Adults (<35 Years) With Acute Leukemia Remission

Unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been used for several years when there is no HLA identical sibling or unrelated donor.Since the recent publication of encouraging results after transplantation of two UCB units, the number of these double-transplantations increases in a very significant way.However, there is currently no prospective study comparing in a reliable way the double-transplantation to single-transplantation results.The investigators propose a prospective and randomized study comparing the results of single versus double unit UCBT in children and young adults (< 35 yrs) with acute leukemia in remission. This is an open, multicenter study carried out in the allogeneic transplant centers from the French society for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cell therapy. The primary objective is to compare the incidence of transplantation failure in the two treatment arms. Transplantation failure, the primary endpoint of the study, is defined by the occurrence of one of the following events : transplant-related death, second allogeneic transplantation or autologous backup infusion for primary engraftment failure, autologous recovery. The financial impact of these double-transplantations being to date unknown, the project also includes a cost-effectiveness study, the effectiveness criterion being a decrease in transplantation failure incidence. The secondary clinical endpoints are: overall survival and disease-free survival, relapse incidence, transplant-related mortality, incidence of severe infections and GvHD. The secondary biological endpoints are: hematological and immunological recovery, post transplant chimerism.

Read the detailed description

Background and rationale:

Unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been used for several years when there is no HLA identical sibling or unrelated donor. During the year 2007, 218 of the 783 unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (28%) carried out in France were UCBT. This proportion is 37% in children (58/157). Clinical outcome after UCBT strongly depends on the transplant cell dose. Since the recent publication of encouraging results after transplantation of two UCB units, the number of these double-transplantations increases in a very significant way. Thus 121/218 UCBT performed in France during 2007 were double-transplantations (55%) whereas this proportion was 81/180 (45%) in 2006, 30/144 (21%) in 2005, 5/77 (6%) in 2004 and 0/44 in 2003. However, there is currently no prospective study comparing in a reliable way the double-transplantation to single-transplantation results.

Study design:

The investigators propose a prospective and randomized study comparing the results of single versus double unit UCBT in children and young adults (< 35 yrs) with acute leukemia in remission. This is an open, multicenter study carried out in the allogeneic transplant centers from the French society for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cell therapy (Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire, SFGM-TC).

Objectives:

The primary objective is to compare the incidence of transplantation failure in the two treatment arms. Transplantation failure, the primary endpoint of the study, is defined by the occurrence of one of the following events : transplant-related death, second allogeneic transplantation or autologous backup infusion for primary engraftment failure, autologous recovery. The financial impact of these double-transplantations being to date unknown, the project also includes a cost-effectiveness study, the effectiveness criterion being a decrease in transplantation failure incidence. The secondary clinical endpoints are: overall survival and disease-free survival, relapse incidence, transplant-related mortality, incidence of severe infections and GvHD. The secondary biological endpoints are: hematological and immunological recovery, post transplant chimerism.

Methods:

Transplantation methods: Myeloablative conditioning regimen includes, according to the patient age, either total body irradiation, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with a GvHD prophylaxis based on cyclosporine A and mycophenolate, or the association busulfan, cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin with GvHD prophylaxis being cyclosporine A and steroids.

Statistical methods: The experimental schedule is based on a multiple testing procedure, using the method described by O' Brien and Fleming. This offers the possibility of stopping the trial before the end of inclusions if a significant difference between the two arms occurs. In this trial, two sequential analyses are planned: an interim analysis at 18 months and a final analysis at 36 months. Probabilities of survival and DFS are estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. In the presence of one or several competitive risks, the cumulative incidence of an event is estimated according to the method of Gray. Thus, relapse is a competing risk for transplantation failure in the study primary endpoint evaluation. Comparisons between the two treatment arms are carried out by the Log rank test for Kaplan-Meier estimates and by the Gray's test for the cumulated incidences. The intent to treat analysis (according to the random allocation) will be preferred to a per-protocol analysis which will be an additional analysis. An independent committee will be made up in order to control the decisions of study continuation or stopping at time of the interim analysis.

Sample calculation, study feasibility and duration:

In the setting of a sequential trial including one interim analysis, with a cumulated incidence of transplantation failure hypothesis being 40% in the single-transplantation and 20% in the double-transplantation arm (alpha risk, 5%, power, 80%, 5% non evaluable patients), the estimate of sample size is 99 by group, i.e. a total of 198. Taking into account the UCBT activity in France (data from the French biomedicine agency), the enrolment phase of the study is planned to last 30 months. Minimum post-transplant follow-up duration being 6 months, duration of the study is 3 years.

Conditions
Leukemia
Being tested
Transplantation of unrelated cord blood unit(s)
Keywords
young, acute leukemia in remission, Children or young adults (< 35 years) with acute leukemia in remission
Medical subject headings
Leukemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transplantation of unrelated cord blood unit(s)Procedure or surgery

    Also called Infusion of unrelated cord blood unit(s)

    Myeloablative conditioning regimen includes, according to the patient age, either total body irradiation, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with a GvHD prophylaxis based on cyclosporine A and mycophenolate, or the association busulfan, cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin with GvHD prophylaxis being cyclosporine A and steroids.

Study groups in NCT01067300
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Double unit unrelated cord blood transplantationActive comparatorTransplantation of unrelated cord blood units is done at least 24 hours after last chemotherapy and carried out during the same day. The unit presenting the best degree of HLA compatibility with the patient will be transfused in first. If the 2 units have the same degree of HLA compatibility with the recipient, the unit with the higher cell dose will be transfused in first. A 2 hours time interval between the 2 transfusions will be respected.
Receives: Procedure: Transplantation of unrelated cord blood unit(s)
single unit unrelated cord blood transplantationActive comparatorTransplantation of a single unrelated cord blood unit at least 24 hours after last chemotherapy
Receives: Procedure: Transplantation of unrelated cord blood unit(s)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. to compare the incidence of transplantation failure in the two treatment arms.

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. a cost-effectiveness study, the effectiveness criterion being a decrease in transplantation failure incidence.

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
198 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01067300
Sponsor's protocol ID
2009-17
Other IDs
2009-A00792-55
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
10 Feb 2010
Last updated
1 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Michel G, Galambrun C, Sirvent A, Pochon C, Bruno B, Jubert C, Loundou A, Yakoub-Agha I, Milpied N, Lutz P, Marie-Cardine A, Gandemer V, Blaise D, Michallet M, Rialland F, Renard C, Oudin C, Esmiol S, Seux M, Baumstarck K, Mohty M, Rocha V, Dalle JH. Single- vs double-unit cord blood transplantation for children and young adults with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2016 Jun 30;127(26):3450-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-694349. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

    PubMed 27099151

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Transplantation of unrelated cord blood unit(s) in people with Leukemia, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

to compare the incidence of transplantation failure in the two treatment arms. (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01067300, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in