Traumatic Brain InjuryPhase 3NCT01068522
Study to Improve Outcomes for Survivors of Traumatic Brain Injury in Latin America
A Phase 3 study testing Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor and Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations in people with Traumatic Brain Injury and Brain Injuries, run by University of Washington at 6 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
People who survive severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) live with profound cognitive impairments that alter their developmental course and define their future possibilities. Worldwide, TBI is the leading cause of death and disability among children and adolescents (Murgio, 2000). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Brain Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor and Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 324 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to Mar 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- admission to study hospital within 24 hours of injury
- closed head trauma
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 8 on admission or if intubated, GCS Motor < 5, within first 48 hours after injury
- No foreign object in brain parenchyma
- Randomized:
- within 24 hours of injury [for patients with GCS < 8 on admission] or
- within 24 hours of deterioration [patients deteriorating to GCS < 8 within 48 hours of injury]
- Age > 12
Who cannot join
- GCS of 3 with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils and/or decision to not actively treat prior to enrolment into study
- No beds available in ICU
- No ICP monitor available
- Pregnancy
- Prisoner
- No consent
Show all 9Show fewer
- Non-survivable injury
- Other (e.g., Pre-injury life expectancy under 1 year)
- Pre-existing neurological disability that would not allow follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 2 countries.
6 sites in 2 countries
Bolivia4 sites
Hospital Viedma
Cochabamba
Hospital Japones
Santa Cruz de la Sierra
Hospital San Juan de Dios
Santa Cruz de la Sierra
Hospital San Juan de Dios
Tarija
Ecuador2 sites
Hospital de Especialidades Eugenio Espejo
El Ángel
Hospital Luis Vernaza
Guayaquil
About this study
Official title: Traumatic Brain Injury in Latin America: Lifespan Analysis
People who survive severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) live with profound cognitive impairments that alter their developmental course and define their future possibilities. Worldwide, TBI is the leading cause of death and disability among children and adolescents (Murgio, 2000). In the United States, the annual incidence of TBI is six times greater than that of multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, spinal cord injury, and breast cancer combined [Centers for Disease Control, American Cancer Society, National Multiple Sclerosis Society]. The burden of TBI may be even greater in developing countries, due to civil unrest and war, and to the absence of mandated prevention such as seat belt laws.
The long-term objective of the investigators' research group is to improve outcomes for survivors of TBI in Latin America. To that end, the investigators have created a structure for professionals and institutions involved in the treatment of TBI to generate research; to facilitate education, standardization, certification, the dissemination of information and resources; and to foster the development of evidence-based guidelines. The structure is the Latin American Brain Injury Consortium (LABIC).
Read the detailed description
The objective of this application is to establish a network of Centers of Excellence within LABIC that will, in collaboration with U.S. partners, conduct research and training programs about TBI. To that end, this project will include scientific investigation and capacity building.
The primary focus for scientific investigation is to conduct a high quality randomized controlled trial addressing a question of critical importance to the management of TBI worldwide:
- Does the use of information provided by intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring to direct treatment of patients with TBI improve medical practice and patient outcomes in a developing country? This trial will be conducted in three trauma centers in Bolivia, in which the infrastructures and practice patterns are optimal for strong internal validity, while at the same time the level of resources is representative of trauma care as practiced in the developing world.
The secondary focus for scientific investigation is to conduct a prospective study of TBI in seven trauma centers in Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Ecuador that represent the variation in access to and use of resources in the developing world. This study will address two questions of vital importance to management of TBI in developing countries:
- To what extent do the findings from the randomized trial about ICP monitoring in particular, and brain injury care in general, generalize to diverse populations of TBI patients in Latin America?
- What is the association between resources and outcomes from TBI in developing countries? To build capacity, we will provide education, equipment, and structure, and will foster the collaborations established during the pilot R21 phase of this project. Our commitment is that LABIC becomes completely independent as a research entity. At the end of the funding period LABIC constituents will be able to identify important research questions, design the research, write successful proposals for funding, carry out strong studies, analyze and interpret the data, submit successful publications to internationally recognized peer reviewed journals, and disseminate information across Latin America.
Our specific aims are:
Specific Aim#1: In a randomized controlled trial in 3 trauma centers in Bolivia, test the effect on outcomes of management of severe TBI guided by information from ICP monitors vs. a standard empiric protocol.
Hypothesis #1: Patients with severe TBI whose acute care treatment is managed using ICP monitors will have significantly lower mortality and better neuropsychological and functional recovery at 6 months post-trauma than those whose treatment is managed with the standard protocol.
Hypothesis #2: The incorporation of ICP monitoring into the care of patients with severe TBI will minimize secondary complications and decrease length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU).
Specific Aim #2: In a prospective, observational study conducted in trauma centers in Latin America, test the association between resource availability/medical management and outcomes for patients with severe TBI.
Hypothesis #3: The association between treatment and outcomes for patients with severe TBI identified in the randomized trial of ICP monitoring will generalize to the population in the prospective, observational, multi-center, multi-national study.
Hypothesis #4: Variations in resource availability and medical management will be significantly associated with mortality and functional recovery for patients with severe TBI, after controlling for patient and injury characteristics.
Specific Aim #3: Establish a network of research centers with investigators trained and skilled in the design, conduct, and funding of research programs to address TBI and other brain disorders in Latin America.
In fulfilling these aims, we will answer important research questions about patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes from TBI in an environment of limited resources, aspects of which will generalize to other developing countries as well as to the developed world. In a developing country, we will test the effectiveness of technology considered pivotal to brain trauma treatment in the developed world - the ICP monitor. The outcome of this trial may serve to standardize practice, improve outcomes, and mobilize resources worldwide. A randomized controlled trial of ICP monitoring has never been performed. As specifically stated in the Guidelines for the Management of Severe Brain Injury (Bullock et al., 1996), this is a critical gap in the evidence base that supports the role of ICP monitoring in TBI care. As such, the results of the RCT as performed in Bolivia will have global implications regardless of the level of development of the trauma system.
We will also establish sustainable capacity to conduct research about TBI in Latin America. Within the structure of LABIC, we will create a cadre of professionals who are trained in clinical research and equipped to carry out studies that answer questions important to Latin America. These studies will establish a literature base from which Latin American treatment guidelines will be generated. With training in cognitive assessment, we will introduce a new discipline into many of the Latin American medical systems that will provide an understanding of the unique and profound disabilities associated with brain disorders.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Brain Injuries
- Being tested
- Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor, Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations
- Keywords
- Intracranial pressure, Intracranial pressure monitoring, Head injury
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Brain Injuries, Craniocerebral Trauma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitorDevice
Also called Integra Life Sciences Camino Intracranial Monitor
Treatment based on readings from Parenchymal intracranial pressure monitor.
Treatment based on clinical and imaging observationsOther
Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ICP monitoring | Experimental | Care based upon intracranial pressure. Receives: Device: Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor |
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Treatment based on clinical and imaging without intracranial pressure monitoring. Receives: Other: Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In a randomized controlled trial in 3 trauma centers in Bolivia, test the effect on outcomes of management of severe TBI guided by information from ICP monitors vs. a standard empiric protocol.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionApr 2012
- Study completionMar 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 324 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Randall M Chesnut, MD, Principal investigator, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01068522
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 33888-B
- Other IDs
- 1R01NS058302
- Status last verified
- Oct 2012
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, Barber J, Machamer J, Chaddock K, Celix JM, Cherner M, Hendrix T; Global Neurotrauma Research Group. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2471-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207363. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
PubMed 23234472
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Traumatic Brain Injury in Latin America: Lifespan Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01068522
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 33888-B
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Brain Injuries
- Keywords
- Intracranial pressure, Intracranial pressure monitoring, Head injury
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 324 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- Jul 2007
- Primary completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
People who survive severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) live with profound cognitive impairments that alter their developmental course and define their future possibilities. Worldwide, TBI is the leading cause of death and disability among children and adolescents (Murgio, 2000). In the United States, the annual incidence of TBI is six times greater than that of multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, spinal cord injury, and breast cancer combined [Centers for Disease Control, American Cancer Society, National Multiple Sclerosis Society]. The burden of TBI may be even greater in developing countries, due to civil unrest and war, and to the absence of mandated prevention such as seat belt laws.
The long-term objective of the investigators' research group is to improve outcomes for survivors of TBI in Latin America. To that end, the investigators have created a structure for professionals and institutions involved in the treatment of TBI to generate research; to facilitate education, standardization, certification, the dissemination of information and resources; and to foster the development of evidence-based guidelines. The structure is the Latin American Brain Injury Consortium (LABIC).
Detailed description
The objective of this application is to establish a network of Centers of Excellence within LABIC that will, in collaboration with U.S. partners, conduct research and training programs about TBI. To that end, this project will include scientific investigation and capacity building.
The primary focus for scientific investigation is to conduct a high quality randomized controlled trial addressing a question of critical importance to the management of TBI worldwide:
- Does the use of information provided by intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring to direct treatment of patients with TBI improve medical practice and patient outcomes in a developing country? This trial will be conducted in three trauma centers in Bolivia, in which the infrastructures and practice patterns are optimal for strong internal validity, while at the same time the level of resources is representative of trauma care as practiced in the developing world.
The secondary focus for scientific investigation is to conduct a prospective study of TBI in seven trauma centers in Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Ecuador that represent the variation in access to and use of resources in the developing world. This study will address two questions of vital importance to management of TBI in developing countries:
- To what extent do the findings from the randomized trial about ICP monitoring in particular, and brain injury care in general, generalize to diverse populations of TBI patients in Latin America?
- What is the association between resources and outcomes from TBI in developing countries? To build capacity, we will provide education, equipment, and structure, and will foster the collaborations established during the pilot R21 phase of this project. Our commitment is that LABIC becomes completely independent as a research entity. At the end of the funding period LABIC constituents will be able to identify important research questions, design the research, write successful proposals for funding, carry out strong studies, analyze and interpret the data, submit successful publications to internationally recognized peer reviewed journals, and disseminate information across Latin America.
Our specific aims are:
Specific Aim#1: In a randomized controlled trial in 3 trauma centers in Bolivia, test the effect on outcomes of management of severe TBI guided by information from ICP monitors vs. a standard empiric protocol.
Hypothesis #1: Patients with severe TBI whose acute care treatment is managed using ICP monitors will have significantly lower mortality and better neuropsychological and functional recovery at 6 months post-trauma than those whose treatment is managed with the standard protocol.
Hypothesis #2: The incorporation of ICP monitoring into the care of patients with severe TBI will minimize secondary complications and decrease length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU).
Specific Aim #2: In a prospective, observational study conducted in trauma centers in Latin America, test the association between resource availability/medical management and outcomes for patients with severe TBI.
Hypothesis #3: The association between treatment and outcomes for patients with severe TBI identified in the randomized trial of ICP monitoring will generalize to the population in the prospective, observational, multi-center, multi-national study.
Hypothesis #4: Variations in resource availability and medical management will be significantly associated with mortality and functional recovery for patients with severe TBI, after controlling for patient and injury characteristics.
Specific Aim #3: Establish a network of research centers with investigators trained and skilled in the design, conduct, and funding of research programs to address TBI and other brain disorders in Latin America.
In fulfilling these aims, we will answer important research questions about patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes from TBI in an environment of limited resources, aspects of which will generalize to other developing countries as well as to the developed world. In a developing country, we will test the effectiveness of technology considered pivotal to brain trauma treatment in the developed world - the ICP monitor. The outcome of this trial may serve to standardize practice, improve outcomes, and mobilize resources worldwide. A randomized controlled trial of ICP monitoring has never been performed. As specifically stated in the Guidelines for the Management of Severe Brain Injury (Bullock et al., 1996), this is a critical gap in the evidence base that supports the role of ICP monitoring in TBI care. As such, the results of the RCT as performed in Bolivia will have global implications regardless of the level of development of the trauma system.
We will also establish sustainable capacity to conduct research about TBI in Latin America. Within the structure of LABIC, we will create a cadre of professionals who are trained in clinical research and equipped to carry out studies that answer questions important to Latin America. These studies will establish a literature base from which Latin American treatment guidelines will be generated. With training in cognitive assessment, we will introduce a new discipline into many of the Latin American medical systems that will provide an understanding of the unique and profound disabilities associated with brain disorders.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ICP monitoring | Experimental | Device: Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitorCare based upon intracranial pressure. |
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Other: Treatment based on clinical and imaging observationsTreatment based on clinical and imaging without intracranial pressure monitoring. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- admission to study hospital within 24 hours of injury
- closed head trauma
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 8 on admission or if intubated, GCS Motor < 5, within first 48 hours after injury
- No foreign object in brain parenchyma
- Randomized:
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- GCS of 3 with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils and/or decision to not actively treat prior to enrolment into study
- No beds available in ICU
- No ICP monitor available
- Pregnancy
- Prisoner
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitorAlso: Integra Life Sciences Camino Intracranial MonitorTreatment based on readings from Parenchymal intracranial pressure monitor. | Device | ICP monitoring |
| Treatment based on clinical and imaging observationsTreatment based on clinical and imaging observations. | Other | Usual Care |
Primary outcome
In a randomized controlled trial in 3 trauma centers in Bolivia, test the effect on outcomes of management of severe TBI guided by information from ICP monitors vs. a standard empiric protocol.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23234472Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, Barber J, Machamer J, Chaddock K, Celix JM, Cherner M, Hendrix T; Global Neurotrauma Research Group. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2471-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207363. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Randall M Chesnut, MD principal investigator
University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
6 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor and Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations in people with Traumatic Brain Injury and Brain Injuries, run by University of Washington at 6 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Bolivia, Ecuador. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In a randomized controlled trial in 3 trauma centers in Bolivia, test the effect on outcomes of management of severe TBI guided by information from ICP monitors vs. a standard empiric protocol. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01068522, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2012.