PregnancyNCT01076062
Elective Induction of Nulliparous Labor
A study testing Induction of Labor in people with Pregnancy, run by Madigan Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Primary outcome: to evaluate the effect of elective induction of labor (IOL), at 39 weeks gestation, on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women compared to expectant management (EM). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy
- What is being tested?
- Induction of Labor
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 162 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Oct 2009to 24 Apr 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Nulliparous patients evaluated at 38 weeks gestation without contraindication for induction of labor, and
- Patients who meet dating criteria as outlined above, and
- Patients who have a Bishop score of ≤ 5.
Who cannot join
- Contraindication to induction of labor,
- Scheduled induction of labor for medical indications, and/or
- Failure to meet dating criteria above, Bishop score of > 5.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Madigan Army Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98431
About this study
Official title: Elective Induction of Nulliparous Labor: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Primary outcome: to evaluate the effect of elective induction of labor (IOL), at 39 weeks gestation, on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women compared to expectant management (EM).
Secondary outcomes: to evaluate differences in the mean number of clinic visits/antepartum tests avoided with IOL, to compare the differences in utilization of inpatient resources (mean duration of inpatient stay, mean duration of labor), and to evaluate the effect of IOL on the risk of urinary/anal incontinence and sexual dysfunction as analyzed using previously validated measurements. We will evaluate differences in the rate of cervical change once active labor is diagnosed, and the time from completion of active labor, defined as complete dilation and complete effacement, to the delivery of fetus (definition of second stage of active labor). Furthermore, other secondary outcomes to be evaluated include comparisons between IOL and EM in regards to the occurence of chorioamnionitis, stillbirth, operative vaginal delivery, and meconium stained amniotic fluid. An evaluation of the predictive value of cervical length and Bishop score for vaginal delivery will also be examined.
Read the detailed description
A research nurse will screen patients at the 38 week visit through chart review and potential candidates will be identified. One of the study investigators or research nurse will interface with the patient at the 38 week visit and written informed consent will be obtained after the study protocol is explained and eligibility determined. Since eligibility determination cannot be made without performing a digital cervical examination, the patient will be offered a cervix exam with Bishop score determination. If the Bishop score meets inclusion criteria, the patient will be offered participation in the study. Women who consent to the study will be randomized using a computer-generated list by means of sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes which reveal the allocation of the subject to either induction or expectant management. All subjects will then receive the following evaluation: transvaginal cervical length measurement, and completion of a standard urinary/rectal incontinence/sexual function questionnaire. Patients randomized to induction will be scheduled not earlier than 39 weeks gestation and in coordination with the labor and delivery physician and nursing leadership. The method of induction will be dependant on whether or not a cervical foley bulb can be placed at the time of admission for induction of labor. If cervical foley bulb placement is possible, the foley bulb will remain in place until either spontaneously removed or after 12 hours, whichever is earlier. If placement is not possible, cervical ripening with misoprostol 25 mcg per vagina every 4 hours (maximum of 4 total doses) will be initiated. Cervical examination will occur every 4 hours (coincident with vaginal misoprostol placement). Repeat doses of misoprostol will be given only if foley bulb placement is not possible and/or if palpably firm uterine contractions are less than 6 in 10 minutes in consecutive 10 minute intervals. Once placement of a cervical foley bulb can be performed this will be accomplished and initiation of oxytocin administration will begin at 2 mIU/minute and increasing by 2 mIU/minute every 20 minutes to ensure adequate contractions (maximum oxytocin infusion rate 36 mIU/minute). Adequate contractions will be defined as 7 contractions in 15 minutes in consecutive 15 minute intervals that palpate moderate to firm. Oxytocin infusion will begin not earlier than 4 hours after the last misoprostol dose (if given). Subjects expectantly managed (EM) will be scheduled for routine follow-up appointments and delivered for obstetric indications but not later than 42 weeks gestation.
A routine 6-8 week immediate postpartum and 1 year follow-up examinations will be scheduled for all subjects following delivery. In addition to the routine examinations, all subject evaluations during these visits will include completion of a standard urinary/rectal incontinence/sexual function.
Study data will be entered into a password protected Excel file on a DoD government computer accessible only to study investigators and a clinical research nurse. Withdrawal from the study will be voluntary and results will be analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.
Data analysis will focus on the primary outcome: to evaluate the effect of elective induction of labor, at 39 weeks gestation, on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women compared to expectant (typical) management. Also evaluation of secondary outcomes will include determination of the predictive value of cervical length and Bishop score for successful vaginal delivery; the risk of urinary/anal incontinence and sexual dysfunction with labor induction compared to spontaneous labor; number of clinic visits/antepartum tests avoided with elective induction compared with potential increased utilization of inpatient resources; evaluation of the labor curve with induction compared to spontaneous labor. Other secondary outcomes to be evaluated include comparisons between IOL and EM in regards to the rate of chorioamnionitis, rate of stillbirth, rate of operative vaginal delivery, and rate of meconium stained amniotic fluid. Students t-test will be used to compare continuous variables and the Chi-square test will be used to compare proportions between the groups. Analysis is by intent-to-treat with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered significant.
- Conditions
- Pregnancy
- Being tested
- Induction of Labor
- Keywords
- Pregnancy Maintenance, Labor, Induced, spontaneous labor, cesarean delivery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Induction of LaborProcedure or surgery
Also called misoprostol, oxytocin
If cervical foley bulb placement is possible, the foley bulb will remain in place until either spontaneously removed or after 12 hrs, whichever is earlier. If placement is not possible, cervical ripening with misoprostol 25 micrograms (mcg) per vagina every 4 hrs (max of 4 total doses) will be initiated. Cervical examination will occur every 4 hr. Repeat doses of misoprostol will be given only if foley bulb placement is not possible and/or if palpably firm uterine contractions are less than 6 in 10 min in consecutive 10 min intervals. Once placement of a cervical foley bulb can be performed, oxytocin administration will begin at 2 mIU/min and increasing by 2 mIU/min every 20 min to ensure adequate contractions (maximum oxytocin infusion rate 36 mIU/min). Adequate contractions will be defined as 7 contractions in 15 min in consecutive 15 min intervals that palpate moderate to firm. Oxytocin infusion will begin not earlier than 4 hrs after the last misoprostol dose (if given).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Expectant management (EM) arm | No intervention | Standard of care: routine clinic appointments until they deliver, fetal heart rate and contraction monitoring during their 41st week if not delivered. Also if they have not gone into labor the subjects will be scheduled for an induction by 42 weeks. |
| Induction of Labor (IOL) arm | Experimental | Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks. Receives: Procedure: Induction of Labor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cesarean Birth Rate
Measured: 39 weeks gestation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study start27 Oct 2009
- Primary completion24 Apr 2017
- Study completion24 Apr 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PregnancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Madigan Army Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sandra Smith, Madigan Army Medical Center
- Investigators
- Nathaniel R Miller, MD, Principal investigator, Madigan Army Medical CenterPeter Nielsen, MD, Study director, Madigan Army Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01076062
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 210013
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
PubMed 36996264Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5.
PubMed 32666584Miller NR, Cypher RL, Foglia LM, Pates JA, Nielsen PE. Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1258-1264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001154.
PubMed 26551184
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Elective Induction of Nulliparous Labor: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01076062
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 210013
- Conditions
- Pregnancy
- Keywords
- Pregnancy Maintenance, Labor, Induced, spontaneous labor, cesarean delivery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Madigan Army Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Study start
- 27 Oct 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Apr 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary outcome: to evaluate the effect of elective induction of labor (IOL), at 39 weeks gestation, on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women compared to expectant management (EM).
Secondary outcomes: to evaluate differences in the mean number of clinic visits/antepartum tests avoided with IOL, to compare the differences in utilization of inpatient resources (mean duration of inpatient stay, mean duration of labor), and to evaluate the effect of IOL on the risk of urinary/anal incontinence and sexual dysfunction as analyzed using previously validated measurements. We will evaluate differences in the rate of cervical change once active labor is diagnosed, and the time from completion of active labor, defined as complete dilation and complete effacement, to the delivery of fetus (definition of second stage of active labor). Furthermore, other secondary outcomes to be evaluated include comparisons between IOL and EM in regards to the occurence of chorioamnionitis, stillbirth, operative vaginal delivery, and meconium stained amniotic fluid. An evaluation of the predictive value of cervical length and Bishop score for vaginal delivery will also be examined.
Detailed description
A research nurse will screen patients at the 38 week visit through chart review and potential candidates will be identified. One of the study investigators or research nurse will interface with the patient at the 38 week visit and written informed consent will be obtained after the study protocol is explained and eligibility determined. Since eligibility determination cannot be made without performing a digital cervical examination, the patient will be offered a cervix exam with Bishop score determination. If the Bishop score meets inclusion criteria, the patient will be offered participation in the study. Women who consent to the study will be randomized using a computer-generated list by means of sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes which reveal the allocation of the subject to either induction or expectant management. All subjects will then receive the following evaluation: transvaginal cervical length measurement, and completion of a standard urinary/rectal incontinence/sexual function questionnaire. Patients randomized to induction will be scheduled not earlier than 39 weeks gestation and in coordination with the labor and delivery physician and nursing leadership. The method of induction will be dependant on whether or not a cervical foley bulb can be placed at the time of admission for induction of labor. If cervical foley bulb placement is possible, the foley bulb will remain in place until either spontaneously removed or after 12 hours, whichever is earlier. If placement is not possible, cervical ripening with misoprostol 25 mcg per vagina every 4 hours (maximum of 4 total doses) will be initiated. Cervical examination will occur every 4 hours (coincident with vaginal misoprostol placement). Repeat doses of misoprostol will be given only if foley bulb placement is not possible and/or if palpably firm uterine contractions are less than 6 in 10 minutes in consecutive 10 minute intervals. Once placement of a cervical foley bulb can be performed this will be accomplished and initiation of oxytocin administration will begin at 2 mIU/minute and increasing by 2 mIU/minute every 20 minutes to ensure adequate contractions (maximum oxytocin infusion rate 36 mIU/minute). Adequate contractions will be defined as 7 contractions in 15 minutes in consecutive 15 minute intervals that palpate moderate to firm. Oxytocin infusion will begin not earlier than 4 hours after the last misoprostol dose (if given). Subjects expectantly managed (EM) will be scheduled for routine follow-up appointments and delivered for obstetric indications but not later than 42 weeks gestation.
A routine 6-8 week immediate postpartum and 1 year follow-up examinations will be scheduled for all subjects following delivery. In addition to the routine examinations, all subject evaluations during these visits will include completion of a standard urinary/rectal incontinence/sexual function.
Study data will be entered into a password protected Excel file on a DoD government computer accessible only to study investigators and a clinical research nurse. Withdrawal from the study will be voluntary and results will be analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.
Data analysis will focus on the primary outcome: to evaluate the effect of elective induction of labor, at 39 weeks gestation, on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women compared to expectant (typical) management. Also evaluation of secondary outcomes will include determination of the predictive value of cervical length and Bishop score for successful vaginal delivery; the risk of urinary/anal incontinence and sexual dysfunction with labor induction compared to spontaneous labor; number of clinic visits/antepartum tests avoided with elective induction compared with potential increased utilization of inpatient resources; evaluation of the labor curve with induction compared to spontaneous labor. Other secondary outcomes to be evaluated include comparisons between IOL and EM in regards to the rate of chorioamnionitis, rate of stillbirth, rate of operative vaginal delivery, and rate of meconium stained amniotic fluid. Students t-test will be used to compare continuous variables and the Chi-square test will be used to compare proportions between the groups. Analysis is by intent-to-treat with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Expectant management (EM) arm | No intervention | –Standard of care: routine clinic appointments until they deliver, fetal heart rate and contraction monitoring during their 41st week if not delivered. Also if they have not gone into labor the subjects will be scheduled for an induction by 42 weeks. |
| Induction of Labor (IOL) arm | Experimental | Procedure: Induction of LaborElective induction of labor at 39 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Nulliparous patients evaluated at 38 weeks gestation without contraindication for induction of labor, and
- Patients who meet dating criteria as outlined above, and
- Patients who have a Bishop score of ≤ 5.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Contraindication to induction of labor,
- Scheduled induction of labor for medical indications, and/or
- Failure to meet dating criteria above, Bishop score of > 5.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Induction of LaborAlso: misoprostol, oxytocinIf cervical foley bulb placement is possible, the foley bulb will remain in place until either spontaneously removed or after 12 hrs, whichever is earlier. If placement is not possible, cervical ripening with misoprostol 25 micrograms (mcg) per vagina every 4 hrs (max of 4 total doses) will be initiated. Cervical examination will occur every 4 hr. Repeat doses of misoprostol will be given only if foley bulb placement is not possible and/or if palpably firm uterine contractions are less than 6 in 10 min in consecutive 10 min intervals. Once placement of a cervical foley bulb can be performed, oxytocin administration will begin at 2 mIU/min and increasing by 2 mIU/min every 20 min to ensure adequate contractions (maximum oxytocin infusion rate 36 mIU/min). Adequate contractions will be defined as 7 contractions in 15 min in consecutive 15 min intervals that palpate moderate to firm. Oxytocin infusion will begin not earlier than 4 hrs after the last misoprostol dose (if given). | Procedure or surgery | Induction of Labor (IOL) arm |
Primary outcome
Cesarean Birth Rate
Time frame: 39 weeks gestation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36996264de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32666584Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26551184Miller NR, Cypher RL, Foglia LM, Pates JA, Nielsen PE. Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1258-1264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001154.
Related trials for Pregnancy
Recruiting
Role of ERBT Plus Intravesical BCG in Intermediate-Risk or High-Risk NMBC
Bladder Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Behavioral and/or Mirabegron to Treat Urinary Symptoms in Parkinson Disease
Overactive Bladder, Parkinson Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Early Tracking of Childhood Health Determinants (ETCHED) Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Palbociclib Versus Belzutifan Monotherapy in Participants With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-024/LITESPARK-024)
Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Effectiveness of Two Aspirin Doses for Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: ASPIRIN TRIAL
Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nathaniel R Miller, MD principal investigator
Madigan Army Medical Center
Peter Nielsen, MD study director
Madigan Army Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Induction of Labor in people with Pregnancy, run by Madigan Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cesarean Birth Rate (time frame: 39 weeks gestation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01076062, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2025.