Cytomegalovirus InfectionPhase 3CMV-IMPACTNCT01077908
Cytomegalovirus - Immunoprophylactic Adoptive Cellular Therapy Study
A Phase 3 study testing Adoptive Cellular Therapy and Best available antiviral drug therapy in people with Cytomegalovirus Infection, run by Cell Medica Ltd at 14 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of prophylactic cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific adoptive cellular therapy following T cell depleted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for reducing recurrent CMV reactivation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cytomegalovirus Infection
- What is being tested?
- Adoptive Cellular Therapy and Best available antiviral drug therapy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 89 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jul 2008to Oct 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Suitable participants will be selected from patients already scheduled to undergo a T cell depleted sibling donor HSCT. The criteria will include:
- Age 18 years or older
- Negative markers of Infectious Disease screen
- Recipient of allogeneic HSCT (that incorporates T cell depletion with alemtuzumab) who is CMV seropositive with a CMV seropositive sibling donor
- Informed consent from both donor and patient and to be assessed prior to CMV-specific T cell infusion (confirmed prior to product release):
- Donor engraftment (neutrophils > 0.5x109/l)
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Co-existing medical problems that would place the patient at significant risk of death due to GVHD or its sequelae
- HIV infection and to be assessed prior to CMV-specific T cell infusion (confirmed prior to product release):
- Active acute GVHD > Grade I
- Concurrent use of systemic corticosteroids
- Organ dysfunction as measured by
Show all 9Show fewer
- creatinine > 200 uM/l
- bilirubin > 50 uM/l
- ALT > 3x upper limit of normal
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom14 sites
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children
Bristol, BS2 8BJ
Addenbrookes Hospital
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow
St James's University Hospital
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF
Royal Liverpool Hospital
Liverpool
University College Hospital
London, WC1E 6BT
Kings College Hospital
London
Royal Free Hospital
London
Christie Hospital
Manchester
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Manchester
City Hospital
Nottingham
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomised Study to Investigate the Use of Adoptive Cellular Therapy (ACT) in Combination With Conventional Antiviral Drug Therapy for the Treatment of CMV Reactivation Episodes in Patients Following Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of prophylactic cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific adoptive cellular therapy following T cell depleted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for reducing recurrent CMV reactivation.
Read the detailed description
As with other herpes viruses, CMV infection is thought to result most frequently from reactivation of latent virus. Transmission of the virus can also occur from donor marrow infusion or from allogeneic red cell, leukocyte or platelet transfusions. In an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell (bone marrow) transplant patient who is CMV seropositive or receiving a transplant from a donor who is CMV seropositive, CMV frequently reactivates and disease resulting from the progression of infection is a major cause of infectious morbidity and mortality. CMV infection is a consequence both of the immunosuppression these patients receive and may also reflect delayed immune reconstitution in these patients following transplant.
Existing evidence suggests that adoptive cellular therapy can be an effective approach for treating viral reactivation following allo HSCT, with a minimal risk of inducing GVHD. The major advantage to the patient is likely to be avoidance of extended periods of therapy with antiviral medications that have significant associated morbidities, and sometimes require inpatient care. A proof of efficacy in the sibling donor setting would strengthen the case for extending the therapy to the unrelated donor setting, where both potential risks and benefits are greater. From a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint, the avoidance of the costs associated with these treatment episodes could offset the costs of adoptive cellular therapy. A number of issues remain unresolved. These include the relative contributions of transferred CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations (which may have direct relevance to the best approach for selection), the issue of whether adoptive cellular therapy improves outcomes in a randomised setting, and equally importantly, the issue of whether such immunotherapies can be delivered outside of the setting of a few academic institutions on a multicentre basis.
These considerations emphasise the importance of undertaking a randomised phase III study of prophylactic adoptive cellular therapy for CMV following T cell depleted allogeneic HSCT from a sibling donor (CMV~IMPACT). There are multiple methods for T cell depletion available, and differences between them will likely have an effect on immune reconstitution. In order to avoid this confounding influence the study will be restricted to patients receiving alemtuzumab-containing conditioning protocols.
In summary, this study is a multicentre, prospective, controlled, open-label 3 arm randomized study comparing 'best-available' standard anti-viral monitoring and therapy alone, with 'best available'anti-viral monitoring and therapy plus prophylactic adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) with cells selected by either the Gamma Catch or Multimer Selection techniques. Patients will be randomised to:
- Standard best available antiviral drug therapy alone B. Immunoprophylactic (Day 27) ACT prepared using Gamma Catch Selection in combination with standard best available antiviral drug therapy C. Immunoprophylactic (Day 27) ACT prepared using Multimer Selection in combination with standard best available antiviral drug therapy
The study will test the hypothesis that CMV-specific ACT based upon a prescribed T-cell dose/kg recipient body weight, can augment the impaired CMV immune function post-transplant and reduce the number of recurrent reactivations in patients following a primary reactivation event (and thereby reduce the requirement for antiviral drug therapy) without causing an increase in GVHD.
Individual groups will be compared for duration of antiviral therapy and number of reactivation episodes, plus GVHD incidence. Similar analyses will be performed for adoptive cellular therapy versus no therapy (i.e. (B+C) versus A)
- Conditions
- Cytomegalovirus Infection
- Being tested
- Adoptive Cellular Therapy, Best available antiviral drug therapy
- Keywords
- Adoptive cellular therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Cytomegalovirus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Adoptive Cellular TherapyBiological
CMV-specific T-cells, single infusion at 27 days post-HSCT
Best available antiviral drug therapyDrug
- Intravenous ganciclovir 5mg/kg twice daily
- Oral valganciclovir 900mg twice daily
- Intravenous foscarnet 90 mg/kg twice daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ACT plus standard therapy | Experimental | Adoptive Cellular Therapy (ACT) prepared using Multimer or Gamma Catch Selection in combination with standard best available antiviral drug therapy Receives: Biological: Adoptive Cellular Therapy; Drug: Best available antiviral drug therapy |
| Best available antiviral drug therapy | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Best available antiviral drug therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CMV reactivations
Measured: Six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2008
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionOct 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cytomegalovirus InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 89 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cell Medica Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Wellcome Trust, EMAS Pharma, Commitum AB, BioAnaLab
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Karl S Peggs, Study chair, University College London Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01077908
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CM-2008-01
- Other IDs
- 08/H0720/15, 74928896
- Acronym
- CMV-IMPACT
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 25 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomised Study to Investigate the Use of Adoptive Cellular Therapy (ACT) in Combination With Conventional Antiviral Drug Therapy for the Treatment of CMV Reactivation Episodes in Patients Following Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01077908
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CMV-IMPACT / CM-2008-01
- Conditions
- Cytomegalovirus Infection
- Keywords
- Adoptive cellular therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 89 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cell Medica LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Wellcome Trust, EMAS Pharma, Commitum AB, BioAnaLab
- Study start
- Jul 2008
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of prophylactic cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific adoptive cellular therapy following T cell depleted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for reducing recurrent CMV reactivation.
Detailed description
As with other herpes viruses, CMV infection is thought to result most frequently from reactivation of latent virus. Transmission of the virus can also occur from donor marrow infusion or from allogeneic red cell, leukocyte or platelet transfusions. In an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell (bone marrow) transplant patient who is CMV seropositive or receiving a transplant from a donor who is CMV seropositive, CMV frequently reactivates and disease resulting from the progression of infection is a major cause of infectious morbidity and mortality. CMV infection is a consequence both of the immunosuppression these patients receive and may also reflect delayed immune reconstitution in these patients following transplant.
Existing evidence suggests that adoptive cellular therapy can be an effective approach for treating viral reactivation following allo HSCT, with a minimal risk of inducing GVHD. The major advantage to the patient is likely to be avoidance of extended periods of therapy with antiviral medications that have significant associated morbidities, and sometimes require inpatient care. A proof of efficacy in the sibling donor setting would strengthen the case for extending the therapy to the unrelated donor setting, where both potential risks and benefits are greater. From a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint, the avoidance of the costs associated with these treatment episodes could offset the costs of adoptive cellular therapy. A number of issues remain unresolved. These include the relative contributions of transferred CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations (which may have direct relevance to the best approach for selection), the issue of whether adoptive cellular therapy improves outcomes in a randomised setting, and equally importantly, the issue of whether such immunotherapies can be delivered outside of the setting of a few academic institutions on a multicentre basis.
These considerations emphasise the importance of undertaking a randomised phase III study of prophylactic adoptive cellular therapy for CMV following T cell depleted allogeneic HSCT from a sibling donor (CMV~IMPACT). There are multiple methods for T cell depletion available, and differences between them will likely have an effect on immune reconstitution. In order to avoid this confounding influence the study will be restricted to patients receiving alemtuzumab-containing conditioning protocols.
In summary, this study is a multicentre, prospective, controlled, open-label 3 arm randomized study comparing 'best-available' standard anti-viral monitoring and therapy alone, with 'best available'anti-viral monitoring and therapy plus prophylactic adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) with cells selected by either the Gamma Catch or Multimer Selection techniques. Patients will be randomised to:
- Standard best available antiviral drug therapy alone B. Immunoprophylactic (Day 27) ACT prepared using Gamma Catch Selection in combination with standard best available antiviral drug therapy C. Immunoprophylactic (Day 27) ACT prepared using Multimer Selection in combination with standard best available antiviral drug therapy
The study will test the hypothesis that CMV-specific ACT based upon a prescribed T-cell dose/kg recipient body weight, can augment the impaired CMV immune function post-transplant and reduce the number of recurrent reactivations in patients following a primary reactivation event (and thereby reduce the requirement for antiviral drug therapy) without causing an increase in GVHD.
Individual groups will be compared for duration of antiviral therapy and number of reactivation episodes, plus GVHD incidence. Similar analyses will be performed for adoptive cellular therapy versus no therapy (i.e. (B+C) versus A)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ACT plus standard therapy | Experimental | Biological: Adoptive Cellular Therapy, Drug: Best available antiviral drug therapyAdoptive Cellular Therapy (ACT) prepared using Multimer or Gamma Catch Selection in combination with standard best available antiviral drug therapy |
| Best available antiviral drug therapy | Active comparator | Drug: Best available antiviral drug therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Suitable participants will be selected from patients already scheduled to undergo a T cell depleted sibling donor HSCT. The criteria will include:
- Age 18 years or older
- Negative markers of Infectious Disease screen
- Recipient of allogeneic HSCT (that incorporates T cell depletion with alemtuzumab) who is CMV seropositive with a CMV seropositive sibling donor
- Informed consent from both donor and patient and to be assessed prior to CMV-specific T cell infusion (confirmed prior to product release):
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Co-existing medical problems that would place the patient at significant risk of death due to GVHD or its sequelae
- HIV infection and to be assessed prior to CMV-specific T cell infusion (confirmed prior to product release):
- Active acute GVHD > Grade I
- Concurrent use of systemic corticosteroids
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Adoptive Cellular TherapyCMV-specific T-cells, single infusion at 27 days post-HSCT | Biological | ACT plus standard therapy |
| Best available antiviral drug therapy1. Intravenous ganciclovir 5mg/kg twice daily 2. Oral valganciclovir 900mg twice daily 3. Intravenous foscarnet 90 mg/kg twice daily | Drug | ACT plus standard therapy, Best available antiviral drug therapy |
Primary outcome
CMV reactivations
Time frame: Six months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jan 2018.
Related trials for Cytomegalovirus Infection
RecruitingPhase 2
Virus Specific Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes (CTLs) for Refractory Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
Cytomegalovirus Infections, Primary Immune Deficiency Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Infection Prophylaxis and Management in Treating Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Previously Treated With Donor Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic/Lymphoid Cancer, Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
25BT056: Basket Study of Viral Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes
EBV Viremia, CMV Viremia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Multi-antigen CMV-Modified Vaccinia Ankara Vaccine in Treating Pediatric Patients With Positive Cytomegalovirus Undergoing Donor Stem Cell Transplant
Cytomegaloviral Infection, Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipient
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Donor Virus-Specific CMV or AdV CTL to Treat CMV or AdV Reactivation or Disease After Solid Organ or HCT
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipient, Cytomegalovirus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karl S Peggs study chair
University College London Hospitals
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Adoptive Cellular Therapy and Best available antiviral drug therapy in people with Cytomegalovirus Infection, run by Cell Medica Ltd at 14 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CMV reactivations (time frame: Six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.