Carcinoma, HepatocellularNCT01078415
Pilot Study of Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) to Treat Early-Stage Primary Liver Cancer (HCC)
A study testing Ablation with the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by Angiodynamics, Inc. at 6 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the NanoKnife LEDC System for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- What is being tested?
- Ablation with the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HCC diagnosed by positive biopsy or non-invasive criteria,
- not suitable for surgical resection or transplantation,
- have at least one, but less than or equal to 3 tumors,
- of the tumour(s) identified, each tumor must be ≤ 3 cm in diameter,
- Child-Pugh class A,
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0,
Show all 12Show fewer
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ 3,
- a prothrombin time ratio > 50%,
- platelet count > 50x109/L,
- ability of patient to stop anticoagulant and anti-platelet therapy for seven days prior to and seven days post NanoKnife procedure,
- are able to comprehend and willing to sign the written informed consent form (ICF),
- have a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
Who cannot join
- eligible for surgical treatment or transplantation for HCC,
- presence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases,
- received previous treatment for HCC,
- HCC developed on an already transplanted liver,
- cardiac insufficiency, ongoing coronary artery disease or arrhythmia,
- any active implanted device (eg Pacemaker),
Show all 9Show fewer
- women who are pregnant or women of child-bearing potential who are not using an acceptable method of contraception,
- have received treatment with an investigational agent/ procedure within 30 days prior to treatment with the NanoKnife™ LEDC System,
- are in the opinion of the Investigator unable to comply with the visit schedule and protocol evaluations.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 4 countries.
6 sites in 4 countries
France2 sites
Hopital Beaujon
Paris, 92110
L'institut de cancerologie Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, Île-de-France Region, 94805
Italy2 sites
Istituto Nazionale Tumori - Fondazione Pascale
Naples, 80131
University of Pisa School of Medicine
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124
Germany1 site
Universitatsklinikum Magdeburg AoR, Klinik fur Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin
Magdeburg, D-39120
Spain1 site
Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Group, Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Clinical Trial Using Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) for the Treatment of Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the NanoKnife LEDC System for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Being tested
- Ablation with the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System
- Keywords
- HCC, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Early Stage, Prospective, Multicenter, Irreversible Electroporation (IRE), Electroporation, Low Energy Direct Current, LEDC, Nonthermal ablation, NTIRE (nonthermal IRE), Ablation, Soft Tissue
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ablation with the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) SystemDevice
Also called System also known as:, * Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System, * HVP01 Electroporation System, * NanoKnife LEDC System
90 pulses of 70 microseconds each in duration will be administered per electrode pair.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment efficacy as measured by modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria by Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging.
Measured: 30 days (+/- 3 days) post treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Safety using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 criteria.
Measured: Immediately post treatment to 2 years post treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionJan 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, HepatocellularStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Angiodynamics, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Angiodynamics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Riccardo Lencioni, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pisa School of MedicineJordi Bruix, MD, Principal investigator, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group of the University of Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01078415
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ONC-205
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1907-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14964-1.
PubMed 14667750Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.
PubMed 15761078Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK, Christensen E, Pagliaro L, Colombo M, Rodes J; EASL Panel of Experts on HCC. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol. 2001 Sep;35(3):421-30. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(01)00130-1. No abstract available.
PubMed 11592607Bruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36. doi: 10.1002/hep.20933. No abstract available.
PubMed 16250051Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J, Kramer BS, Lencioni R, Zhu AX, Sherman M, Schwartz M, Lotze M, Talwalkar J, Gores GJ; Panel of Experts in HCC-Design Clinical Trials. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 21;100(10):698-711. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn134. Epub 2008 May 13.
PubMed 18477802Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Steinmuller T, Herrmann M, Radke C, Berg T, Settmacher U, Neuhaus P. Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2001 May;33(5):1080-6. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.23561.
PubMed 11343235Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, Watson JJ, Bacchetti P, Venook A, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival. Hepatology. 2001 Jun;33(6):1394-403. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.24563.
PubMed 11391528Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L, Franchini C, Pina CD, Lera J, Bartolozzi C. Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: long-term results of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):961-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2343040350. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
PubMed 15665226Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology. 1999 Dec;30(6):1434-40. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300629.
PubMed 10573522Yao FY, Bass NM, Nikolai B, Davern TJ, Kerlan R, Wu V, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list. Liver Transpl. 2002 Oct;8(10):873-83. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2002.34923.
PubMed 12360427
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multi-Center, Clinical Trial Using Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) for the Treatment of Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01078415
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ONC-205
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Keywords
- HCC, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Early Stage, Prospective, Multicenter, Irreversible Electroporation (IRE), Electroporation, Low Energy Direct Current
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Angiodynamics, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the NanoKnife LEDC System for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- HCC diagnosed by positive biopsy or non-invasive criteria,
- not suitable for surgical resection or transplantation,
- have at least one, but less than or equal to 3 tumors,
- of the tumour(s) identified, each tumor must be ≤ 3 cm in diameter,
- Child-Pugh class A,
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- eligible for surgical treatment or transplantation for HCC,
- presence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases,
- received previous treatment for HCC,
- HCC developed on an already transplanted liver,
- cardiac insufficiency, ongoing coronary artery disease or arrhythmia,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ablation with the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) SystemAlso: System also known as:, * Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System, * HVP01 Electroporation System, * NanoKnife LEDC System90 pulses of 70 microseconds each in duration will be administered per electrode pair. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Treatment efficacy as measured by modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria by Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging.
Time frame: 30 days (+/- 3 days) post treatment
1 secondary outcome
Safety using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 criteria.
Time frame: Immediately post treatment to 2 years post treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2016.
- Background: PubMed 14667750Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1907-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14964-1.
- Background: PubMed 15761078Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.
- Background: PubMed 11592607Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK, Christensen E, Pagliaro L, Colombo M, Rodes J; EASL Panel of Experts on HCC. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol. 2001 Sep;35(3):421-30. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(01)00130-1. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16250051Bruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36. doi: 10.1002/hep.20933. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18477802Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J, Kramer BS, Lencioni R, Zhu AX, Sherman M, Schwartz M, Lotze M, Talwalkar J, Gores GJ; Panel of Experts in HCC-Design Clinical Trials. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 21;100(10):698-711. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn134. Epub 2008 May 13.
- Background: PubMed 11343235Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Steinmuller T, Herrmann M, Radke C, Berg T, Settmacher U, Neuhaus P. Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2001 May;33(5):1080-6. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.23561.
- Background: PubMed 11391528Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, Watson JJ, Bacchetti P, Venook A, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival. Hepatology. 2001 Jun;33(6):1394-403. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.24563.
- Background: PubMed 15665226Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L, Franchini C, Pina CD, Lera J, Bartolozzi C. Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: long-term results of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):961-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2343040350. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 10573522Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology. 1999 Dec;30(6):1434-40. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300629.
- Background: PubMed 12360427Yao FY, Bass NM, Nikolai B, Davern TJ, Kerlan R, Wu V, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list. Liver Transpl. 2002 Oct;8(10):873-83. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2002.34923.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Riccardo Lencioni, MD principal investigator
University of Pisa School of Medicine
Jordi Bruix, MD principal investigator
Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group of the University of Barcelona
6 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ablation with the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by Angiodynamics, Inc. at 6 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in France, Italy, Germany, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment efficacy as measured by modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria by Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging. (time frame: 30 days (+/- 3 days) post treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01078415, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2016.