AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal VaricesNCT01079416

Study of Capsule Endoscopy to Determine the Accuracy for Detection of Esophageal Varices

An observational study of Esophageal Varices, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Esophageal capsule endoscopy is sedation-less alternative to upper endoscopy for evaluating esophageal lesions and potentially other upper gastrointestinal lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether esophageal capsule endoscopy is convenient and accurate as upper endoscopy for detection of esophageal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Esophageal Varices
What is being tested?
Capsule endoscopy, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
How many people
65 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2006to Feb 2008
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Cirrhotic patients

Who may be able to join

  • Age at least 18 years and less than 86 years at the time of consent.
  • Clinically evident or biopsy proven cirrhosis.
  • No previous documented UGI bleeding due to peptic ulcers, varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy, angiomas, or watermelon stomach.
  • No previous endoscopic, radiological or surgical treatment for variceal bleeding or ascites.
  • Probable life expectancy of at least 24 months without liver transplantation, as judged by the hepatologist and endoscopist-investigators, and have a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≤ 29.
  • Signed a written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Prior variceal bleeding- esophageal, gastric, or other site.
  • Prior endoscopic (e.g. sclerotherapy, ligation, or combination therapy), radiological (e.g. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt-TIPS) or surgical (e.g. portocaval or splenorenal shunt) treatment of esophagogastric varices or ascites.
  • Patient who was uncooperative or unable to give written consent.
  • Severe co-morbid illness, e.g. end stage chronic renal disease (e.g. dialysis dependence, creatinine greater than 2 times normal) or respiratory failure (e.g. ventilator dependent, oxygen dependent, unstable asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- e.g. 2 or more hospitalizations for exacerbation in 1 year, asthma or obstructive pulmonary disease which required daily bronchodilators and/or oral/inhaled steroids), tense ascites requiring repeated therapeutic paracenteses, severe hepatic encephalopathy, peritonitis, or sepsis.
  • Active cancer with less than a 24 month expected survival and/or cancer on active treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy.
  • Esophageal motility disorder, esophageal stricture or esophageal diverticulum, causing dysphagia or requiring dilatation.
  • GI obstruction or partial obstruction (by history or imaging), symptomatic GI stricture or pseudo-obstruction which may prevent passage of the capsule.
  • Patients with potentially reversible portal hypertension such as alcoholic hepatitis, acute viral hepatitis, untreated autoimmune hepatitis, or chronic hepatitis B or C on viral therapy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UCLA

    Los Angeles, California, 11301

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Is Capsule Endoscopy Accurate and Cost-effective Enough to Screen Cirrhotic Patients for Varices & Other Lesions?

Esophageal capsule endoscopy is sedation-less alternative to upper endoscopy for evaluating esophageal lesions and potentially other upper gastrointestinal lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether esophageal capsule endoscopy is convenient and accurate as upper endoscopy for detection of esophageal varices and related lesions.

Being tested
Capsule endoscopy, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Keywords
Esophageal Capsule Endoscopy, Screening
Medical subject headings
Esophageal and Gastric Varices

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Capsule endoscopy, EsophagogastroduodenoscopyDevice

Study groups in NCT01079416
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Capsule endoscopyStudy device
Receives: Device: Capsule endoscopy, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
EsophagogastroduodenoscopyGold standard
Receives: Device: Capsule endoscopy, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The accuracy of capsule endoscopy for detecting esophageal varices

    Measured: June 2006-February 2008

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Time to perform and interpret capsule endoscopy study

    Measured: June 2006-February 2008

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2006
  3. Primary completionFeb 2008
  4. Study completionFeb 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
65 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01079416
Sponsor's protocol ID
01-11-047-12
Other IDs
K24DK002650
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
1 Mar 2010
Last updated
1 Feb 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Jensen DM. Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhosis: findings, implications, and outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2002 May;122(6):1620-30. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33419.

    PubMed 12016427
  • Jutabha R, Jensen DM, Martin P, Savides T, Han SH, Gornbein J. Randomized study comparing banding and propranolol to prevent initial variceal hemorrhage in cirrhotics with high-risk esophageal varices. Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr;128(4):870-81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.01.047.

    PubMed 15825071

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Esophageal Varices, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The accuracy of capsule endoscopy for detecting esophageal varices (time frame: June 2006-February 2008). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01079416, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in