AzTrials
AzTrials

Otitis Media With EffusionPhase 4NCT01082029

Study of Anti-reflux Medication as a Potential Treatment for Glue Ear in Children

A Phase 4 study testing Lansoprazole in people with Otitis Media With Effusion, run by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The accumulation of fluid behind the ear drum without any acute inflammation is known as otitis media with effusion (OME). It is the most common cause of acquired hearing loss during childhood. Long-term complications of OME include linguistic, developmental, and social development delays due to hearing loss. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Otitis Media With Effusion
What is being tested?
Lansoprazole
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
65 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Mar 2010to Jun 2014
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children between the ages of 1 and 17 years referred to the McMaster Otolaryngology Clinic.
  • Presence of bilateral OME for at least 3 months based on:
  • Clinical history: patient may present with decrease in hearing, aural fullness and/or ear pressure, balance problems, ear tugging/rubbing, they typically do not have otalgia or fever.
  • Pneumatic otoscopy: observations suggestive of OME include presence of a dull tympanic membrane with presence of non purulent effusion (serous or mucoid), presence of a level of effusion, decrease or non motility of the tympanic membrane, retraction of the tympanic membrane.
  • Tympanometry: type B or type C tympanogram with normal air volume of the external auditory canal.
  • Pure tone audiometry: conductive hearing loss that typically varies from slight to moderate.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of acute otitis media as determined by history and physical examination:
  • History of rapid acute onset of significant otalgia, decrease in hearing, fever, irritability.
  • Pneumatic otoscopy revealing purulent effusion, yellowness and/or redness with hypervascularity of the tympanic membrane, bulging of tympanic membrane with decrease of normal landmarks.
  • Presence of craniofacial abnormalities
  • Previous middle ear surgery (excluding myringotomy and tube)
  • Allergic reactions to lansoprazole, and any other adverse drug interactions to lansoprazole.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Mcmaster University Medical Centre 3V1 Clinic

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Role of Empiric Anti-reflux Therapy in Pediatric Otitis Media With Effusion - a Pilot Study

The accumulation of fluid behind the ear drum without any acute inflammation is known as otitis media with effusion (OME). It is the most common cause of acquired hearing loss during childhood. Long-term complications of OME include linguistic, developmental, and social development delays due to hearing loss.

The cause of OME is not known; however, low grade infection of the middle ear, poor function of the eustachian tube between the ear and the throat, and adenoid hypertrophy have all been suggested as possible etiologies. Recent detection of the stomach enzyme pepsin in middle ear fluid has led some to propose that OME is related to the reflux of stomach contents into the ear, via the eustachian tube.

Read more

The purpose of the investigators study is to determine whether anti-reflux medication may have a positive impact by clearing the accumulation of fluid in the middle ear with the aim of preventing or reducing hearing loss in children diagnosed with OME. Empiric anti-reflux therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication is safe, proven and cost-effective. It is used widely as a diagnostic and treatment strategy in the presence of the signs and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The signs and symptoms of GERD include heartburn, recurrent vomiting or regurgitation, acid taste in mouth, throat irritation, voice problems, heartburn, difficult or painful swallowing, asthma and recurrent pneumonia.

This pilot study will be a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that will compare resolution rates for OME in children treated with lansoprazole or placebo for three months. At the end of the study, those patients who have persistent middle ear effusions will be brought to the operating room and have the fluid aspirated and sent for analysis for pepsin.

Read the detailed description

Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a condition characterized by the accumulation of non-purulent fluid in the middle ear space, in the absence of acute inflammation. OME is diagnosed 2.2 million times annually (U.S. Department of Health \& Human Services, 2000). It is a condition in which more then 50% of children will experience in their first year of life (National Institutes of Health, 1993). Although many episodes resolve spontaneously, 30% to 40% persist, and 5% to 10% of episodes last 1 year or longer (Yoshinaga-Itano, 1995). It is particularly more common among children between the ages of one and three years and in seasons where the prevalence of upper respiratory tract infections is high; with an incidence of 10% to 30%. It occurs frequently even up to the age of seven, with a prevalence of 3% to 8%(Fiellau et al, 1997; Fiellau et al, 1983; Lous et al, 1981; Teele et al, 1989).

OME is the most common cause of acquired hearing loss in childhood. Long-term hearing complications from OME are associated with linguistic, developmental, and social consequences; especially if the OME is bilateral and of long duration (Fiellau et al, 1983; Golz et al, 1998; Grace et al, 1990; Lous et al, 1995). The etiology of OME is uncertain; however, low-grade infection, poor eustachian tube function, formation of biofilms, and adenoidal infection or hypertrophy have all been suggested as possible etiologies (Faden et al, 1998; Hall-Stoodley et al, 2006).

Recently, there has been good scientific evidence to suggest that OME is a supraesophageal manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and more specifically laryngo-pharyngeal reflux (LPR). Tasker et al (2002) investigated the potential role of gastric reflux in the development of OME in children who underwent myringotomy. Of 65 tested effusion samples, 59 (91%) effusions gave a positive result. The concentrations of pepsin/pepsinogen were roughly estimated to be about 1000 times higher than those found in the serum obtained from a number of controls. They speculated that pepsin found in middle ear effusion (MEE) was most probably due to micro-aspiration of gastric contents passing through the eustachian tube (ET) and reaching the middle ear. Lieu et al (2005) performed a pilot study where they replicated the finding of pepsin/pepsinogen in 17 of 36 (77%) middle ear fluid aspirates, obtained from 22 children who underwent tympanostomy tube placement for chronic or recurrent otitis media (OM).

Based on our literature review, we believe there is sufficient scientific evidence to support the empiric treatment of suspected GERD and LPR in patients with OME. Empiric anti-reflux therapy is a safe, proven, cost-effective diagnostic and treatment strategy used widely in the presence of other signs and symptoms of suspected GERD. This pilot study will be a double-blinded, randomized control trial. It will compare hearing outcomes for children with OME being treated with lansoprazole versus placebo for three months. We believe there is sufficient evidence to support the use of this strategy in patients with suspected GERD and LPR who present with OME.

Being tested
Lansoprazole, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Otitis Media with Effusion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LansoprazoleDrug

    Also called Prevacid

    The dosage of Lansoprazole will be administered based on guidelines set out by the prescription drug information outlined in the official Lansoprazole package insert and will remain the same for each patient during the 3 month period and is as follows: a) 1 to 11 years of age, weight less then or equal to 30 kg, 15 mg orally once daily. b) 1 to 11 years of age, weight greater then 30 kg, 30 mg orally once daily. c) 12 years of age and older, 15 mg orally once daily. The doses of Lansoprazole will be prepared in liquid form by the Inpatient Pharmacy at Hamilton Health Sciences.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Lactose powder in 8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate (Liquid placebo)

Study groups in NCT01082029
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LansoprazoleExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Lansoprazole
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Collect the required data for sample size calculation

    The purpose of this pilot study is to collect required data for a sample size calculation for a larger clinical trial and to determine recruitment rates.

    Measured: Following the recruitment of 100 patients (~1 year)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Resolution of Otitis Media with Effusion

    The secondary objectives are to compare the duration of OME between the placebo and treatment groups, and to compare the duration and degree of hearing loss at initial presentation and at three months. Other outcomes include degree of hearing improvement, complications of OME (i.e. recurrent OME, acute otitis media, surgery), frequency and severity of GERD symptoms, side effects of Lansoprazole use, and presence of pepsin in middle ear effusions collected from patients who received surgical treatment.

    Measured: At presentation and at 1 month, 2months and 3 months post initiation of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
65 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01082029
Sponsor's protocol ID
07-435
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
4 Mar 2010
Last updated
14 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bluestone CD, Beery QC, Andrus WS. Mechanics of the Eustachian tube as it influences susceptibility to and persistence of middle ear effusions in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1974 Mar-Apr;83:Suppl 11:27-34. doi: 10.1177/0003489474083s1103. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4819098
  • Charbel S, Khandwala F, Vaezi MF. The role of esophageal pH monitoring in symptomatic patients on PPI therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Feb;100(2):283-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41210.x.

    PubMed 15667483
  • Crapko M, Kerschner JE, Syring M, Johnston N. Role of extra-esophageal reflux in chronic otitis media with effusion. Laryngoscope. 2007 Aug;117(8):1419-23. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318064f177.

    PubMed 17585281
  • Deal L, Gold BD, Gremse DA, Winter HS, Peters SB, Fraga PD, Mack ME, Gaylord SM, Tolia V, Fitzgerald JF. Age-specific questionnaires distinguish GERD symptom frequency and severity in infants and young children: development and initial validation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 Aug;41(2):178-85. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000172885.77795.0f.

    PubMed 16056096
  • Fass R, Ofman JJ, Gralnek IM, Johnson C, Camargo E, Sampliner RE, Fennerty MB. Clinical and economic assessment of the omeprazole test in patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Oct 11;159(18):2161-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.18.2161.

    PubMed 10527293
  • Fiellau-Nikolajsen M, Lous J, Vang Pedersen S, Schousboe HH. Tympanometry in three-year-old children. I. A regional prevalence study on the distribution of tympanometric results in a non-selected population of 3-year-old children. Scand Audiol. 1977;6(4):199-204. doi: 10.3109/01050397709043121.

    PubMed 609889
  • Fiellau-Nikolajsen M, Lous J. Prospective tympanometry in 3-year-old children. A study of the spontaneous course of tympanometry types in a nonselected population. Arch Otolaryngol. 1979 Aug;105(8):461-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1979.00790200023005.

    PubMed 464883
  • Fiellau-Nikolajsen M. Tympanometry and secretory otitis media. Observations on diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment, and prevention in prospective cohort studies of three-year-old children. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1983;394:1-73. No abstract available.

    PubMed 6314732
  • Gerson LB, Robbins AS, Garber A, Hornberger J, Triadafilopoulos G. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prescribing strategies in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Feb;95(2):395-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01759.x.

    PubMed 10685741
  • Golz A, Netzer A, Angel-Yeger B, Westerman ST, Gilbert LM, Joachims HZ. Effects of middle ear effusion on the vestibular system in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Dec;119(6):695-9. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70039-7.

    PubMed 9852553
  • Grace AR, Pfleiderer AG. Dysequilibrium and otitis media with effusion: what is the association? J Laryngol Otol. 1990 Sep;104(9):682-4. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100113611.

    PubMed 2230572
  • Heavner SB, Hardy SM, White DR, Prazma J, Pillsbury HC 3rd. Transient inflammation and dysfunction of the eustachian tube secondary to multiple exposures of simulated gastroesophageal refluxant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001 Oct;110(10):928-34. doi: 10.1177/000348940111001007.

    PubMed 11642425
  • Hicks DM, Ours TM, Abelson TI, Vaezi MF, Richter JE. The prevalence of hypopharynx findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers. J Voice. 2002 Dec;16(4):564-79. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00132-7.

    PubMed 12512644
  • Jonaitis L, Pribuisiene R, Kupcinskas L, Uloza V. Laryngeal examination is superior to endoscopy in the diagnosis of the laryngopharyngeal form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;41(2):131-7. doi: 10.1080/00365520600577940.

    PubMed 16484116
  • Keles B, Ozturk K, Gunel E, Arbag H, Ozer B. Pharyngeal reflux in children with chronic otitis media with effusion. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Dec;124(10):1178-81. doi: 10.1080/00016480410017134.

    PubMed 15768814

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Lansoprazole in people with Otitis Media With Effusion, run by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Collect the required data for sample size calculation (time frame: Following the recruitment of 100 patients (~1 year)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01082029, which also lists 27 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in