AzTrials
AzTrials

AnginaNCT01086228

XIENCE V/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent System Post-marketing Surveillance Protocol for Japan

An observational study of Angina and Chronic Coronary Occlusion, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 47 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objectives of this post-marketing surveillance, conducted in Japan, is to know the frequency, type and degree of device malfunction, to assure the safety of the medical device, and to collect information on evaluation of the efficacy and safety. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
XIENCE V / PROMUS stent
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
2,010 participants
Where
47 sitesJapan
Study dates
Mar 2010to Aug 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Only patients in Japan, who are eligible to receive treatment for coronary arteries using the XIENCE V / PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent System are to be enrolled.

Who may be able to join

  • Only XIENCE V stent(s)or PROMUS stent(s) is (are) implanted in the coronary vasculature during the index procedure.

Who cannot join

  • Neither XIENCE V stent(s) nor PROMUS stent(s) is (are) implanted in the coronary vasculature during the index procedure.

Trial locations and contacts

47 sites in 1 country.

47 sites in 1 country

Japan47 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104727

    Aichi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 113428

    Aichi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 115745

    Aichi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104424

    Chiba

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 113645

    Chiba

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105015

    Ehime

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105148

    Fukuoka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105177

    Fukuoka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104677

    Gifu

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104365

    Gunma

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105038

    Hiroshima

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105043

    Hiroshima

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104236

    Hokkaido

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105963

    Hyōgo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104326

    Ibaraki

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104606

    Ishikawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104607

    Ishikawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104528

    Kanagawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104536

    Kanagawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator#104563

    Kanagawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104837

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104838

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104843

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104844

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104850

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104658

    Nagano

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104990

    Nara

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105027

    Okayama

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105296

    Okinawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104864

    Osaka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104898

    Osaka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104906

    Osaka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 114863

    Osaka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104407

    Saitama

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 106044

    Saitama

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104697

    Shizuoka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104356

    Tochigi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 105092

    Tokushima

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104448

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104454

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104473

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104497

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104510

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104514

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator#104481

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator # 104285

    Yamagata

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 104294

    Yamagata

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: XIENCE V/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent System Japan Post-marketing Surveillance Protocol

The objectives of this post-marketing surveillance, conducted in Japan, is to know the frequency, type and degree of device malfunction, to assure the safety of the medical device, and to collect information on evaluation of the efficacy and safety.

Read the detailed description

The surveillance is to be conducted in accordance with the Japanese Ministerial Ordinance concerning the Standards for Postmarketing Surveillance and Tests of Medical Devices.

Being tested
XIENCE V / PROMUS stent
Keywords
Drug eluting stents, Stents, Angioplasty
Medical subject headings
Angina Pectoris, Vascular Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia, Coronary Stenosis, Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Restenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • XIENCE V / PROMUS stentDevice

    Patients receiving XIENCE V stent(s) or PROMUS stent(s) during their index procedure.

Study groups in NCT01086228
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
XIENCE V / PROMUS stentOnly the patients treated with the XIENCE V / PROMUS stent during the index procedure will be analyzed.
Receives: Device: XIENCE V / PROMUS stent

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis (ST) as Per ARC Definition

    Definite ST occurred by either angiographic/pathologic confirmation of ST.

    Angiographic confirmation:The presence of a thrombus that originates in the stent/in the segment 5mm proximal/distal to the stent\&presence of at least 1 of the following criteria within 48-hours:

    • Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest
    • New ischemic ECG changes
    • Typical rise\&fall in cardiac biomarkers
    • Non-occlusive \&occlusive thrombus

    Pathological confirmation:Evidence of recent thrombus within the stent determined at autopsy/via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy.

    Probable ST may occur due to:

    • Unexplained death within first 30 days
    • Irrespective of the time after the index procedure,any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of ST\&in the absence of any other obvious cause.

    Possible ST occurred with any unexplained death from 30 days after intracoronary stenting until end of trial follow-up

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  2. Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis (ST) as Per ARC Definition

    Definite ST occurred by either angiographic/pathologic confirmation of ST.

    Angiographic confirmation:The presence of a thrombus that originates in the stent/in the segment 5mm proximal/distal to the stent\&presence of at least 1 of the following criteria within 48-hours:

    • Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest
    • New ischemic ECG changes
    • Typical rise\&fall in cardiac biomarkers
    • Non-occlusive \&occlusive thrombus

    Pathological confirmation:Evidence of recent thrombus within the stent determined at autopsy/via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy.

    Probable ST may occur due to:

    • Unexplained death within first 30 days
    • Irrespective of the time after the index procedure,any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of ST\&in the absence of any other obvious cause.

    Possible ST occurred with any unexplained death from 30 days after intracoronary stenting until end of trial follow-up

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  3. Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis (ST) as Per ARC Definition

    Definite ST occurred by either angiographic/pathologic confirmation of ST.

    Angiographic confirmation:The presence of a thrombus that originates in the stent/in the segment 5mm proximal/distal to the stent\&presence of at least 1 of the following criteria within 48-hours:

    • Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest
    • New ischemic ECG changes
    • Typical rise\&fall in cardiac biomarkers
    • Non-occlusive \&occlusive thrombus

    Pathological confirmation:Evidence of recent thrombus within the stent determined at autopsy/via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy.

    Probable ST may occur due to:

    • Unexplained death within first 30 days
    • Irrespective of the time after the index procedure,any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of ST\&in the absence of any other obvious cause.

    Possible ST occurred with any unexplained death from 30 days after intracoronary stenting until end of trial follow-up

    Measured: From 2 years to 3 years

Secondary outcomes (48)
  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Anti-platelet Medication

    Measured: From post-procedure to 1 year

  2. Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Anti-platelet Medication

    Measured: From 1 year to 2 years

  3. Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Anti-platelet Medication

    Measured: From 2 years to 3 years

  4. Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Anti-platelet Medication

    Measured: From 3 years to 4 years

  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Anti-platelet Medication

    Measured: From 4 years to 5 years

  6. Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)

    Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)

    Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).

    Measured: On day 0 after procedure

  8. Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)

    Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).

    Measured: At 8 months

  9. Acute Gain

    The acute gain was defined as the difference between post- and pre procedural minimal lumen diameter (MLD).

    Measured: On day 0 after procedure

  10. Late Loss

    Proximal and distal late loss was calculated by [post-procedure minimum lumen diameter (MLD)] - [MLD at 8 months].

    Measured: On day 0 after procedure

  11. Net Gain

    Net Gain = Acute Gain - Late Loss, paired analysis only.

    Measured: On day 0 after procedure

  12. Acute Success

    Acute Success: Procedural Success (Subject Level Analysis): Stent implant procedure was considered successful when all of the following criteria were met:

    • Stent was successfully delivered to the intended location
    • Stent was successfully deployed at the intended location
    • Stent delivery system was withdrawn without any issue Stent implantation procedure was considered successful in 99.94% of the stents. There was no stent adjudicated as procedure failure.

    Measured: On day 0 (Immediately post-index procedure)

  13. Number of Participants With Any Death (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, or Non-cardiovascular Death)

    All deaths are considered cardiac unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. Specifically, any unexpected death even in subjects with coexisting potentially fatal non-cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, infection) should be classified as cardiac.

    • Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment.
    • Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause.
    • Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma.

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  14. Number of Participants With Any Death (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, or Non-cardiovascular Death)

    All deaths are considered cardiac unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. Specifically, any unexpected death even in subjects with coexisting potentially fatal non-cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, infection) should be classified as cardiac.

    • Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment.
    • Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause.
    • Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma.

    Measured: From 1 to 2 years

  15. Number of Participants With Any Death (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, or Non-cardiovascular Death)

    All deaths are considered cardiac unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. Specifically, any unexpected death even in subjects with coexisting potentially fatal non-cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, infection) should be classified as cardiac.

    • Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment.
    • Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause.
    • Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma.

    Measured: From 2 years to 3 years

  16. Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarctions (MI)

    Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG.

    -Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  17. Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarctions (MI)

    Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG.

    -Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

    Measured: From 1 year to 2 years

  18. Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarctions (MI)

    Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG.

    -Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

    Measured: From 2 years to 3 years

  19. Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

    Target Lesion Revascularization is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be classified prospectively as clinically indicated [CI] or not clinically indicated by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory should verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement.

    The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the scaffold/stent.

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  20. Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

    Target Lesion Revascularization is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be classified prospectively as clinically indicated [CI] or not clinically indicated by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory should verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement.

    The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the scaffold/stent.

    Measured: From 1 year to 2 years

  21. Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

    Target Lesion Revascularization is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be classified prospectively as clinically indicated [CI] or not clinically indicated by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory should verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement.

    The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the scaffold/stent.

    Measured: From 2 years to 3 years

  22. Number of Participants With Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

    Target Vessel Revascularization is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the entire major coronary vessel proximal and distal to the target lesion which includes upstream and downstream branches and the target lesion itself.

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  23. Number of Participants With Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

    Target Vessel Revascularization is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the entire major coronary vessel proximal and distal to the target lesion which includes upstream and downstream branches and the target lesion itself.

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  24. Number of Participants With Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

    Target Vessel Revascularization is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the entire major coronary vessel proximal and distal to the target lesion which includes upstream and downstream branches and the target lesion itself.

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

  25. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death and All MI

    Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality,cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

    Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG.

    -Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  26. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death and All MI

    Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality,cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

    Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG.

    -Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  27. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death and All MI

    Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality,cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

    Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG.

    -Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

  28. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, All MI and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR)

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  29. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, All MI and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR)

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  30. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, All MI and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR)

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

  31. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TVMI) and TLR

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  32. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TVMI) and TLR

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  33. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TVMI) and TLR

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

  34. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, All MI and Clinically-indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (CI-TVR)

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  35. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, All MI and Clinically-indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (CI-TVR)

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  36. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, All MI and Clinically-indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (CI-TVR)

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

  37. Number of Participants With All Deaths and All MI

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  38. Number of Participants With All Deaths and All MI

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  39. Number of Participants With All Deaths and All MI

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

  40. Number of Participants With All Deaths, All MI and All Revascularization

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  41. Number of Participants With All Deaths, All MI and All Revascularization

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  42. Number of Participants With All Deaths, All MI and All Revascularization

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

  43. Number of Participants With All Deaths, TVMI and TLR

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  44. Number of Participants With All Deaths, TVMI and TLR

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  45. Number of Participants With All Deaths, TVMI and TLR

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

  46. Number of Participants With All Deaths, TVMI and CI-TLR

    Measured: Post Procedure to 1 Year

  47. Number of Participants With All Deaths, TVMI and CI-TLR

    Measured: From 1 Year to 2 Years

  48. Number of Participants With All Deaths, TVMI and CI-TLR

    Measured: From 2 Years to 3 Years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Mar 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2,010 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01086228
Sponsor's protocol ID
09-384
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
11 Mar 2010
Last updated
19 Feb 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Aoki J, Kozuma K, Awata M, Nanasato M, Shiode N, Tanabe K, Yamaguchi J, Kusano H, Nie H, Kimura T; XIEVCE V/PROMUS PMS Investigators. Five-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents from the post marketing study of CoCr-EES (XIENCE V/PROMUS) in Japan. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 Jan;34(1):40-46. doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-0515-z. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

    PubMed 29484580
  • Shiode N, Kozuma K, Aoki J, Awata M, Nanasato M, Tanabe K, Yamaguchi J, Kusano H, Nie H, Kimura T; XIEVCE V/Promus PMS Investigators. The impact of coronary calcification on angiographic and 3-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents: results of a XIENCE V/PROMUS post-marketing surveillance study. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018 Oct;33(4):313-320. doi: 10.1007/s12928-017-0484-7. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

    PubMed 28726115
  • Aoki J, Kozuma K, Awata M, Nanasato M, Shiode N, Tanabe K, Yamaguchi J, Kusano H, Nie H, Kimura T; XIEVCE V/PROMUS PMS Investigators. Three-Year Clinical Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Stents From the Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent (XIENCE V/PROMUS) in Japan. Circ J. 2016;80(4):906-12. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1181. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

    PubMed 26821583

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Angina and Chronic Coronary Occlusion, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 47 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 47 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis (ST) as Per ARC Definition (time frame: Post Procedure to 1 Year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01086228, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in