AzTrials
AzTrials

Venous ThromboembolismTrousseauNCT01088334

Mortality Due to Malignancy in Patients With Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism

An observational study of Venous Thromboembolism and Malignancy, run by Slotervaart Hospital at 10 sites in Netherlands.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background Patients with an idiopathic venous thromboembolism (IVTE) appear to have a risk of approximately 10% for symptomatic malignancy within 3 years after the IVTE. It is not clear if extensive screening for malignant disease leads to survival benefit in patients with an IVTE. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Venous Thromboembolism, Malignancy
What is being tested?
screening
How many people
630 participants
Where
10 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
Dec 2002to Dec 2008
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Consecutive patients with IVTE diagnosed in academical centres and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands

Who may be able to join

  • Proven first symptomatic deep venous thromboembolic event;
  • No known malignancy
  • Without: trauma of the legs, surgery within the last 2 months, immobilization within the last 2 months, thrombocytosis (> 1000 x 109), clinical severe dehydration, deficiency of anti-thrombin III, protein C/S, Factor V Leiden mutation , Prothrombine mutation or circulating lupus anticoagulants, pregnancy or post-partum period
  • No indication for malignancy at routine investigations(medical history, physical examination, routine blood tests and chest X-ray)

Who cannot join

  • Proven deep venous thromboembolic event in the medical history
  • age under 40 years;

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

Netherlands10 sites
  • Meander Medisch Centrum

    Amersfoort, 3818 ES

  • Slotervaarthospital

    Amsterdam, 1066 EC

  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

    Amsterdam, 1090 HM

  • Academic Medical Center

    Amsterdam, 1101 AZ

  • Maxima Medisch Centrum

    Eindhoven, 5631 BM

  • Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen

    Groningen, 9713 GZ

  • Westfries Gasthuis

    Hoorn, 1624 NP

  • Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht

    Maastricht, 6229 HX

  • Diakonessenhuis Utrecht

    Utrecht, 3582 KE

  • Diakonessenhuis Zeist

    Zeist, 3707 HL

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Trousseau Studie, Mortaliteit Door Maligniteit Bij patiënten Met Idiopatische Veneuze Tromboembolie

Background

Patients with an idiopathic venous thromboembolism (IVTE) appear to have a risk of approximately 10% for symptomatic malignancy within 3 years after the IVTE. It is not clear if extensive screening for malignant disease leads to survival benefit in patients with an IVTE.

Read more

The SOMIT study learned that it is feasible to screen patients with an IVTE for malignancy and screening by means of a computer tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen plus a mammography in women had the potential to be most cost-effective. The SOMIT study could not show a survival benefit due to the design of the study.

Primary objective: cancer related mortality

Methods:

The Trousseau study has been designed as a multicenter, prospective concurrently controlled cohort study.

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Proven first symptomatic deep venous thromboembolic event;
  2. Without: known risk factor for venous thromboembolism.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Proven deep venous thromboembolic event in the medical history, age under 40 years;
  2. Patients without signs of malignancy after routine investigations (medical history, physical examination, laboratory investigations and chest X-ray) were included. Depending on the standard care in the hospital of interest, one group of patients has been screened by means of CT-chest and abdomen plus mammography, the other group had no additional investigations. Follow-up was aimed to be 3 years in both groups (at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the thromboembolic event).

Data like mortality rate, morbidity due to screening procedures, additional investigations, number of cancer patients detected by the extensive screening, number of cancer patients three years after the IVTE, number and kind of investigations performed and information about cancer treatment and hospitalization was collected. If this information indicate a survival benefit these data enable us to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Endpoint: Mortality.

Statistics:

Based on the prevalence of occult malignancy in VTE patients, the nature and stage of malignancies, the expected mortality, the anticipated detection of cancers and the early treatment related decrease in mortality we needed, in order to detect a true difference of this size with a 80 percent power and a two-tailed certainty of five percent, 750 patients for each group. Therefore, a total of 1500 patients is required for this study.

Read the detailed description

Study design:

Although a randomized design is ideal for most studies we preferred a multicenter, prospective concurrently controlled cohort study design for our study. This is based on the experiences with the SOMIT study, in which two of the members of the executive committee (MH Prins, JMMB Otten) were involved.

The SOMIT study originally was supposed to have been conducted in eight countries. Medical ethical committees in most countries however considered it unethical to conduct this randomized study. Either because of the fact that the study contained a control arm, or because the screening arm (and thus the study itself) was considered to be unethical.

Patients as well as physicians found it difficult to let fate decide whether or not a patient would be screened for cancer, even though it was not clear if screening was life-saving. Moreover, during the SOMIT study, physicians noticed that patients with IVTE had their cancer detected early if they were in the screening group. This made it even more difficult to withhold additional screening procedures in patients in the routine group.

Many physicians themselves showed a strong preference for one of the arms of the study. Therefore they did not include as many patients as they could.

With a prospective cohort design we expect to avoid these problems. Per hospital that participates in the Trousseau study the physicians in that hospital will treat the patients according to the local preference for screening or no screening. All hospitals are matched regarding their population as much as possible.

Statistics:

The prevalence of occult cancer at the time of the thrombotic episode in patients with IVTE can be estimated to be 10%. Based on the nature and stage of malignancies, it is expected that half of these patients with occult malignant disease will die during the 3 years of follow-up, resulting in a cancer-related mortality of 5%. In addition, in approximately half of the patients with malignant disease who survived for 3 years, residual or recurrent cancer will be present. Therefore, cancer-related mortality or residual or recurrent cancer will be present in 75% of the patients with occult malignant disease at presentation, i.e., in 7-8% of the patients of the study cohort. We anticipate that approximately 80% of the occult malignancies will be detected by extensive screening and that early treatment will result in a 50% to 75% reduction of the 3-year incidence of cancer-related mortality or residual or recurrent malignancy.

Being tested
screening
Keywords
Idiopathic venous thromboembolism, Malignancy, screening
Medical subject headings
Venous Thromboembolism, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • screeningOther

    CT-Chest/abdomen and mammography in women

Study groups in NCT01088334
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IVTE, follow-upno malignancy at basal screening, no extensive screening
IVTE, screeningNo malignancy at basal screening, screening by means of CT-Chest/abdomen and mammography in women
Receives: Other: screening

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality

    The responsible physician inform the investigators when a patient has died. The national registrar was checked at the end of the study for all patients

    Measured: at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months after inclusion and at the end of study

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Residual objectified malignancy

    The responsible physician documented all investigations performed. The malignancy have to be objectified. At the end of the study all living patients were contacted for medical status.

    Measured: at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months after inclusion

  2. Recurrent objectified malignancy

    The responsible physician documented all investigations performed. The malignancy have to be objectified. At the end of the study all living patients were contacted for medical status.

    Measured: at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 after inclusion.

  3. Malignancy detected by extensive screening, without alarm signs in routine examinations

    The responsible physician documented all investigations performed and documented in standardized manner the routine tests (medical history, physical examination, lab tests and Chest X-ray. The malignancy have to be objectified inconnection with and due to screening tests and eventually further investigations.

    Measured: at 3 months after inclusion

  4. Costs of screening, of additional tests after screening

    All costs of routine tests (consult of phycisians, lab tests, X-Chest) are known and documented, as are the costs of the screening tests and, if performed the costs of further evaluation in case of additional tests, admitions etc..

    Measured: at end of study.

  5. Medical complications of screening tests

    The screening tests had no risk of damage other than radiation. The results of these tests however could urge for invasive tests that could potentially harm patients. Therefore the harm done by screening tests or the resulting tests were documented.

    Measured: at 3 + 6 months and end of study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2002
  3. Primary completionMay 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Why it stopped: Terminated because of futility to continue, after planned interim analysis.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
630 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01088334
Sponsor's protocol ID
Trousseau studie
Acronym
Trousseau
Status last verified
Mar 2010
First submitted
25 Feb 2010
Last updated
29 Mar 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Bastounis EA, Karayiannakis AJ, Makri GG, Alexiou D, Papalambros EL. The incidence of occult cancer in patients with deep venous thrombosis: a prospective study. J Intern Med. 1996 Feb;239(2):153-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1996.426000.x.

    PubMed 8568483
  • Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, Weg JG, Fulkerson WJ, Palevsky HI, Schwartz JS, Thompson BT, Popovich J Jr, Hobbins TE, et al. The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1992 May 7;326(19):1240-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199205073261902.

    PubMed 1560799
  • Griffin MR, Stanson AW, Brown ML, Hauser MF, O'Fallon WM, Anderson HM, Kazmier FJ, Melton LJ 3rd. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms. Arch Intern Med. 1987 Nov;147(11):1907-11.

    PubMed 3675090
  • Goldberg RJ, Seneff M, Gore JM, Anderson FA Jr, Greene HL, Wheeler HB, Dalen JE. Occult malignant neoplasm in patients with deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 1987 Feb;147(2):251-3.

    PubMed 3813741
  • Monreal M, Salvador R, Soriano V, Sabria M. Cancer and deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Feb;148(2):485. No abstract available.

    PubMed 3341848
  • Gore JM, Appelbaum JS, Greene HL, Dexter L, Dalen JE. Occult cancer in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1982 May;96(5):556-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-5-556.

    PubMed 7073147
  • Monreal M, Lafoz E, Casals A, Inaraja L, Montserrat E, Callejas JM, Martorell A. Occult cancer in patients with deep venous thrombosis. A systematic approach. Cancer. 1991 Jan 15;67(2):541-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910115)67:23.0.co;2-j.

    PubMed 1985747
  • Aderka D, Brown A, Zelikovski A, Pinkhas J. Idiopathic deep vein thrombosis in an apparently healthy patient as a premonitory sign of occult cancer. Cancer. 1986 May 1;57(9):1846-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860501)57:93.0.co;2-3.

    PubMed 3955523
  • Hettiarachchi RJ, Lok J, Prins MH, Buller HR, Prandoni P. Undiagnosed malignancy in patients with deep vein thrombosis: incidence, risk indicators, and diagnosis. Cancer. 1998 Jul 1;83(1):180-5. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980701)83:13.0.co;2-s.

    PubMed 9655309
  • Monreal M, Fernandez-Llamazares J, Perandreu J, Urrutia A, Sahuquillo JC, Contel E. Occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism: which patients, which cancers. Thromb Haemost. 1997 Nov;78(5):1316-8.

    PubMed 9408011
  • Rajan R, Levine M, Gent M, Hirsh J, Geerts W, Skingley P, Julian J. The occurrence of subsequent malignancy in patients presenting with deep vein thrombosis: results from a historical cohort study. Thromb Haemost. 1998 Jan;79(1):19-22.

    PubMed 9459315
  • Prins MH, Hettiarachchi RJ, Lensing AW, Hirsh J. Newly diagnosed malignancy in patients with venous thromboembolism. Search or wait and see? Thromb Haemost. 1997 Jul;78(1):121-5.

    PubMed 9198140
  • O'Connor NT, Cederholm-Williams SA, Fletcher EW, Allington M, Sharp AA. Significance of idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. Postgrad Med J. 1984 Apr;60(702):275-7. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.60.702.275.

    PubMed 6539470
  • Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Buller HR, Cogo A, Prins MH, Cattelan AM, Cuppini S, Noventa F, ten Cate JW. Deep-vein thrombosis and the incidence of subsequent symptomatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 15;327(16):1128-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210153271604.

    PubMed 1528208
  • Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Brandjes D, Huisman PM, Vigo M, Tomasella G, Krekt J, Wouter Ten Cate J, Huisman MV, Buller HR. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 1989 Feb 9;320(6):342-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198902093200602.

    PubMed 2643771

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Venous Thromboembolism and Malignancy, run by Slotervaart Hospital at 10 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Terminated because of futility to continue, after planned interim analysis.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality (time frame: at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months after inclusion and at the end of study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01088334, which also lists 38 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in