AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 4BATMANNCT01094184

A Study of Bevacizumab With Taxane Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer

A Phase 4 study testing Bevacizumab, Paclitaxel and Docetaxel in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 10 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This open-label, multi-center study will evaluate the safety, tolerability and effect of bevacizumab (Avastin) in combination with taxane (paclitaxel/ docetaxel) monotherapy on disease progression, survival time and Karnofsky performance status in female participants with estrogen-, progesterone- and human epidermal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Bevacizumab, Paclitaxel and Docetaxel
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
10 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2010to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed triple-negative (estrogen, progesterone, and HER-2 receptor negative) adenocarcinoma of the breast in pre- or post-menopausal women with measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease
  • Participant who in the Investigator's opinion requires combination therapy for their disease
  • Life expectancy of greater than or equal to (>/=)12 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
  • Participants currently undergoing radiation therapy for the treatment of metastatic disease (apart from the relief of metastatic bone pain)
  • Major surgery or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to enrollment or anticipation of the need for major surgery during study treatment

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

United Kingdom10 sites
  • Study site

    Bangor, LL57 2PD

  • Study site

    Cottingham, HU16 5JG

  • Study site

    Exeter, EX2 5DW

  • Study site

    Grimsby, DN33 2BA

  • Study site

    Harrogate, HG2 8AY

  • Study site

    Plymouth, PL6 8DH

  • Study site

    Portsmouth, PO6 3LY

  • Study site

    Preston, PR2 9HT

  • Study site

    Somerset, TA1 5DA

  • Study site

    Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Open-Label Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin®) and Taxane Monotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer

This open-label, multi-center study will evaluate the safety, tolerability and effect of bevacizumab (Avastin) in combination with taxane (paclitaxel/ docetaxel) monotherapy on disease progression, survival time and Karnofsky performance status in female participants with estrogen-, progesterone- and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (triple-negative) breast cancer.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BevacizumabDrug

    Also called Avastin

    Bevacizumab will be administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg Q2W or 15 mg/kg Q3W as intravenous infusion.

  • PaclitaxelDrug

    Paclitaxel will be administered as intravenous infusion Q1W as per discretion of the treating physician.

  • DocetaxelDrug

    Docetaxel will be administered as intravenous infusion Q3W as per discretion of the treating physician. Protocol amendment 2 (dated 17-Feb-2011) removed the option to choose docetaxel.

Study groups in NCT01094184
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2WExperimentalParticipants will receive bevacizumab at a dose of 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) every 2 weeks (Q2W) as intravenous infusion along with paclitaxel every week (Q1W) or docetaxel every 3 weeks (Q3W) as per discretion of the treating physician until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent.
Receives: Drug: Bevacizumab; Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Docetaxel
Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg Q3WExperimentalParticipants will receive bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q3W as intravenous infusion along with paclitaxel Q1W or docetaxel Q3W as per discretion of the treating physician until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent.
Receives: Drug: Bevacizumab; Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Docetaxel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Score at Cycle 2

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related quality of life (QoL) in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  2. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 3

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 3 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  3. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 4

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 4 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  4. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 5

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 5 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  5. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 6

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 6 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  6. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 7

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 7 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  7. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 8

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 8 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  8. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score At Cycle 9

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 9 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  9. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 10

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 10 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  10. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 11

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 11 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  11. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 12

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 12 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  12. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 13

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 13 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  13. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 14

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 14 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  14. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 15

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 15 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  15. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 16

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 16 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  16. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 17

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 17 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  17. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 18

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 18 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  18. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 20

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 20 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  19. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 21

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 21 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  20. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 22

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 22 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  21. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 23

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 23 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  22. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 24

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 24 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  23. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 25

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 25 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  24. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 26

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 26 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  25. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 27

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 27 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  26. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 28

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 28 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  27. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 29

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 29 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  28. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 30

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 30 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  29. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 32

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 32 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  30. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 36

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 36 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  31. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 37

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 37 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  32. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 39

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 39 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  33. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 42

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 42 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  34. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 44

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 44 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  35. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at Cycle 46

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 46 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  36. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Score at End of Study

    FACT-B is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, end of study (4-6 weeks after the last bevacizumab infusion) (maximum up to 5 years and 9 months)

  37. Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) - Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 2

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  38. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 3

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 3 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  39. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 4

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 4 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  40. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 5

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 5 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  41. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 6

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 6 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  42. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 7

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 7 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  43. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 8

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 8 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  44. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 9

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 9 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  45. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 10

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 10 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  46. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 11

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 11 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  47. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 12

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 12 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  48. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 13

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 13 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  49. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 14

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 14 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  50. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 15

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 15 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  51. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 16

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 16 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  52. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 17

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 17 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  53. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 18

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 18 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  54. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 20

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 20 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  55. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 21

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 21 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  56. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 22

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 22 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  57. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 23

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 23 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  58. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 24

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 24 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  59. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 25

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 25 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  60. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 26

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 26 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  61. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 27

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 27 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  62. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 28

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 28 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  63. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 29

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 29 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  64. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 30

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 30 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  65. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 32

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 32 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  66. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 36

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 36 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  67. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 37

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 37 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  68. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 39

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 39 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  69. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 40

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 40 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  70. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 42

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 42 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  71. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 44

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 44 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  72. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at Cycle 46

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 46 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  73. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Questionnaire Score at End of Study

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, end of study (4-6 weeks after the last bevacizumab infusion) (maximum up to 5 years and 9 months)

  74. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Cycle 2

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  75. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 3

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 3 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  76. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 4

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 4 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  77. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 5

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 5 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  78. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 6

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 6 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  79. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 7

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 7 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  80. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 8

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 8 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  81. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 9

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 9 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  82. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 10

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 10 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  83. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 11

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 11 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  84. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 12

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 12 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  85. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 13

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 13 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  86. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 14

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 14 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  87. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 15

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 15 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  88. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 16

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 16 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  89. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 17

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 17 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  90. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 18

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 18 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  91. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 20

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 20 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  92. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 21

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 21 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  93. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 22

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 22 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  94. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 23

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 23 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  95. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 24

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 24 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  96. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 25

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 25 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  97. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 26

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 26 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  98. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 27

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 27 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  99. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 28

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 28 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  100. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 29

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 29 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  101. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 30

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 30 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  102. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 32

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 32 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  103. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 36

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 36 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  104. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 37

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 37 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  105. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 39

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 39 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  106. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 40

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 40 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  107. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 42

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 42 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  108. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 44

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 44 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  109. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Cycle 46

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 46 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)

  110. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at End of Study

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, end of study (4-6 weeks after the last bevacizumab infusion) (maximum up to 5 years and 9 months)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause

    Measured: Baseline up to death (overall approximately 5 years and 9 months)

  2. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the time from start of taxane plus bevacizumab therapy to death due to any cause. Overall survival was calculated in months as (date of death from any cause - date of first administration of taxane or bevacizumab + 1) / 30.4375 and rounded to 1 decimal place. Participants for whom no death was captured on the clinical database were censored at the last date they were known to be alive.

    Measured: Baseline up to death (overall approximately 5 years and 9 months)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression

    Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (>/=) 20 percent (%) relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the sum of diameters (SD) of target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest SD recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

    Measured: Baseline up to disease progression (overall approximately 5 years and 9 months)

  4. Time to Disease Progression

    Time to disease progression was defined as the time from the start of taxane plus bevacizumab therapy to investigator assessed disease progression and was calculated in months as (date of Investigator assessed disease progression - date of first administration of taxane or bevacizumab + 1) / 30.4375 and rounded to 1 decimal place. Participants who had not progressed at the time of study completion (including participants who had died before progressive disease) or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the last bevacizumab administration date. Disease progression was defined as >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SD recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

    Measured: Baseline up to disease progression (overall approximately 5 years and 9 months)

  5. Percentage of Participants By Karnofsky Performance Status Scale Scores

    Karnofsky performance score is used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants are classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score is 11 level score which range between 0% (death) to 100% (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks.

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 1 thereafter every cycle up to Cycle 47 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks), end of study (4-6 weeks after the last bevacizumab infusion) (maximum up to 5 years and 9 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01094184
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML22780
Other IDs
2009-014279-37, 2009
Acronym
BATMAN
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
16 Mar 2010
Last updated
22 Mar 2018

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Bevacizumab, Paclitaxel and Docetaxel in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 10 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Mar 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Score at Cycle 2 (time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 (Cycle length=2 and 3 weeks)). The study lists 110 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in