Rectal CancerPhase 1/2NCT01097239
Examining the Role of Transrectal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in Rectal Pelvic Cancer
A Phase 1/2 study testing Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)) in people with Rectal Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This is a single centre pilot trial to establish the feasibility and role of endoluminal HIFU in patients with locally advanced cancer within the pelvis that is either primary or recurrent and with all available current therapy inappropriate and/or exhausted. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Endometrial Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU))
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Nov 2009to Sep 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Biopsy proven rectal, vaginal, ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer (tumour <15cm from anal/vaginal verge)
- Lymph node(s) accessible by HIFU for which the primary clinical team advise intervention
- Partially fixed/unresectable disease and locally advanced disease (T3/T4)
- Patient considered to be unsuitable for or have exhausted all currently available therapies
- WHO Performance Status 0-2
- Fit for general anaesthetic and HIFU
Show all 9Show fewer
- Not pregnant
- No other serious uncontrolled concomitant illness likely to interfere with treatment or assessment
- Written informed consent for treatment
Who cannot join
- WHO performance status of 3 or more
- Uncontrolled cardiac, respiratory or other disease, or any serious medical or psychiatric disorder that would preclude anaesthetic or informed consent
- Pelvic sepsis
- Currently enrolled in any other treatment trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (Hammersmith Hospital)
London, England, W12 0HS
About this study
Official title: A Phase I/II Feasibility/Efficacy Study of HIFU in Otherwise Untreatable Pelvic Rectal Cancer
This is a single centre pilot trial to establish the feasibility and role of endoluminal HIFU in patients with locally advanced cancer within the pelvis that is either primary or recurrent and with all available current therapy inappropriate and/or exhausted.
The aim is to make a preliminary assessment of efficacy \& dosage for evaluation in a randomised controlled trial. Whilst efficacy data are limited in a small feasibility study; radiological, biochemical and histopathological analysis of the patient and patient specimens, along with quality of life questionnaires (QoL), will be used to provide preliminary measures of efficacy in this patient cohort.
These analyses will allow examination of the biochemical, metabolomic and histological changes associated with HIFU treatment in cancer within the pelvis.
Read the detailed description
CURRENT TREATMENT OF LOCALLY ADVANCED PELVIC CANCER Colorectal cancer This is a common condition with about 40,000 new cases a year in the United Kingdom. The optimal multimodality management of stage III \& IV rectal cancer remains an increasing challenge. There is a high risk of local recurrence and poor survival has been reported for patients treated by surgery alone. About 20% of patients may present with locally advanced tumours, which are partially or totally fixed (T3/T4). Until recently there have been no widely accepted and validated methods of defining preoperatively either locally advanced rectal cancer or unresectable disease. The use of pre-operative pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection (Beets-Tan et al 2001, Brown et al 2003) has resulted in improved selection. Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy can downstage locally advanced tumours, and result in higher resection rates being achieved with reduced risk of local recurrence (Bosset et al 1993, Rich et al 1995).
Gynaecological cancers Treating other advanced pelvic malignancies including vaginal, ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers is similarly challenging. Disease recurrence at the site of surgical resection or adjacent lymph nodes can also preclude further curative options, due to chemotherapy resistance, reaching maximum safe radiotherapy limits or unsuitable surgical options.
It is proposed that High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) may become another modality of treatment in locally advanced or unresectable pelvic disease.
RATIONALE FOR PERFORMING THE STUDY Colorectal cancer This is the third most common cause of cancer and cancer death in both men and women (40,000 cases and just under 16 000 deaths per year in the UK). Worldwide, there are approximately 1 million cases and 500 000 deaths per annum. Primary treatment is usually surgical with, in appropriate cases, adjuvant or neo-adjuvant therapy currently including radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy or a combination. Unfortunately, the overall survival of locally advanced disease is at best 50%. Many patients who have residual, refractory or recurrent rectal cancer experience serious morbidity from local tumour invading and destroying adjacent tissues including bone, nerves (sacrum), bladder and the skin. These interfere severely with normal daily activities, especially bowel function and cause great distress in terms of pain, with many patients requiring permanent palliative colostomies.
Gynaecological cancers Other advanced pelvic malignancies can be equally problematic to manage successfully. Annually in the UK, approximately 250 vaginal cancer, 7000 ovarian cancer, 8000 endometrial cancer and 3000 cervical cancer diagnoses are made, with some being incurable at the time of presentation. Treatment options include surgery, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination, although palliative patients can often be left with debilitating symptoms including severe pain and fistula formation, compromising their quality of life.
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is a method of accurately delivering ablative ultrasound (US) generated high temperatures non-invasively or endo-luminally focused to specific areas in the body using imaging (ultrasound or MR) guidance. Intracavitary or endo-luminal (also called transrectal) HIFU has been appraised by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the treatment of prostate cancer. It is currently used for primary prostate cancer; there is also evidence it may be effective in treating post-radiotherapy prostate cancer recurrence. Short and medium term data demonstrate that HIFU may be equivalent to some current prostate cancer therapies but with reduced morbidity and length of stay. As the prostate and rectum are adjacent there is now a natural evolution to translate the success in prostate to the adjacent rectum/other pelvic structures.
There is a large unmet clinical need for new treatments for patients with residual or progressing local pelvic cancer (such as rectal in origin as well as other pelvic malignancies) in whom all current therapies are exhausted. Intracavitary HIFU offers such a therapy.
An initial cohort of 20 patients will be offered intracavitary HIFU using the Sonablate 500 (Sonacare Medical, Charlotte, NC, USA) intra-luminal device (at different, escalating energy doses) under general anaesthetic with monitoring for toxicity and ablative efficacy using pre and post-treatment Imaging.
As none of the intracavitary devices have yet been used in rectal, vaginal, ovarian, endometrial, cervical or pelvic lymph node tumours directly (but have been used in the rectum to treat prostate cancer), it is important that to gauge the levels of energy and resultant cancer tissue destruction from a variety of different treatment energies. In this manner, the first phase of this trial is equivalent to the 'dose escalation' phase of a drug trial.
Once the optimum energy levels, safety and treatment protocol are known, a further 30 patients will be treated in Phase II. Patients will undergo MR Imaging pre- and post-treatment to objectively assess the tumour and will complete quality of life questionnaires, pain scores, and functional questionnaires. Survival data will be documented. Post-treatment imaging will be performed at between 3-4 weeks, as within this time frame the ablative effect (a necrotic area) as seen in prostate cancer treated by HIFU, will become clearer providing useful data for the Phase I element.
The trial will run in two stages: the end of the first phase (for regulatory requirements) is defined as 30 days from the date that the last patient has completed trial therapy. The non-interventional follow-up stage will then commence in which patients are followed up for a minimum of 6 months or death.
- Being tested
- Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU))
- Keywords
- High Intensity Focused Ultrasound, HIFU, Rectal Cancer, Sonablate 500, Transrectal
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms, Vaginal Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU))Device
Also called Sonablate 500, HIFU
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Delivered by the Sonablate 500 Transrectal Device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity Focused Ultrasound | Experimental | Transrectal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of the PelvicTumour Receives: Device: Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30 and/or EORTC QLQ-CR38, EORTC QLQ-CX24, EORTC QLQ-EN24 or EORTC QLQ-OV24)
Validated Quality of Life Questionnaire
Measured: Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU
Secondary outcomes (2)
Pain relief visual analogue scale
Measured: Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU
Tumour marker changes (CEA and CA19.9)
Measured: Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2009
- Primary completionSep 2018
- Study completionSep 2018
Why it stopped: Failure to recruit.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paul D Abel, ChM FRCS(Lon) FRCS(Ed), Principal investigator, Imperial College LondonLeonardo Monzon, BSc MBBS MRCS(Eng), Study chair, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01097239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 09/H0808/43
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2010
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Thuroff S, Chaussy C, Vallancien G, Wieland W, Kiel HJ, Le Duc A, Desgrandchamps F, De La Rosette JJ, Gelet A. High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. J Endourol. 2003 Oct;17(8):673-7. doi: 10.1089/089277903322518699.
PubMed 14622488Hill CR, ter Haar GR. Review article: high intensity focused ultrasound--potential for cancer treatment. Br J Radiol. 1995 Dec;68(816):1296-1303. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-816-1296.
PubMed 8777589Thuroff S, Chaussy C. High-intensity focused ultrasound: complications and adverse events. Mol Urol. 2000 Fall;4(3):183-7;discussion 189.
PubMed 11062373Visioli AG, Rivens IH, ter Haar GR, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Moskovic E, Padhani A, Glees J. Preliminary results of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using focused ultrasound in the treatment of localised tumours. Eur J Ultrasound. 1999 Mar;9(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/s0929-8266(99)00009-9.
PubMed 10099162Wu F, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Wang ZL, Zhu H, Wang ZB. Pathological changes in human malignant carcinoma treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001 Aug;27(8):1099-106. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00389-1.
PubMed 11527596Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zhu H, Qiao TY. Preliminary experience using high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of patients with advanced stage renal malignancy. J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 1):2237-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000097123.34790.70.
PubMed 14634387Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, Shushan A, Hindley JT, Goldin RD, David M, Sklair M, Rabinovici J. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.345.
PubMed 12861137Blana A, Walter B, Rogenhofer S, Wieland WF. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.020.
PubMed 14972475Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Poissonnier L, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Curiel L, Janier M, Vallancien G. Local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy: early experience of salvage therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasonography. Urology. 2004 Apr;63(4):625-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.002.
PubMed 15072864Wu F, Wang ZB, Cao YD, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Zhu H. A randomised clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for the treatment of patients with localised breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003 Dec 15;89(12):2227-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601411.
PubMed 14676799Moore WE, Lopez RM, Matthews DE, Sheets PW, Etchison MR, Hurwitz AS, Chalian AA, Fry FJ, Vane DW, Grosfeld JL. Evaluation of high-intensity therapeutic ultrasound irradiation in the treatment of experimental hepatoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1989 Jan;24(1):30-3; discussion 33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(89)80295-7.
PubMed 2723989Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Mar;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9.
PubMed 2702835Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, Kessels AG, Van Boven H, De Bruine A, von Meyenfeldt MF, Baeten CG, van Engelshoven JM. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet. 2001 Feb 17;357(9255):497-504. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04040-x.
PubMed 11229667Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986 Nov 1;2(8514):996-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92612-7.
PubMed 2430152Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC. Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2015-24. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0704-y.
PubMed 15657649
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I/II Feasibility/Efficacy Study of HIFU in Otherwise Untreatable Pelvic Rectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01097239
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 09/H0808/43
- Keywords
- High Intensity Focused Ultrasound, HIFU, Rectal Cancer, Sonablate 500, Transrectal
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Failure to recruit.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Study start
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a single centre pilot trial to establish the feasibility and role of endoluminal HIFU in patients with locally advanced cancer within the pelvis that is either primary or recurrent and with all available current therapy inappropriate and/or exhausted.
The aim is to make a preliminary assessment of efficacy \& dosage for evaluation in a randomised controlled trial. Whilst efficacy data are limited in a small feasibility study; radiological, biochemical and histopathological analysis of the patient and patient specimens, along with quality of life questionnaires (QoL), will be used to provide preliminary measures of efficacy in this patient cohort.
These analyses will allow examination of the biochemical, metabolomic and histological changes associated with HIFU treatment in cancer within the pelvis.
Detailed description
CURRENT TREATMENT OF LOCALLY ADVANCED PELVIC CANCER Colorectal cancer This is a common condition with about 40,000 new cases a year in the United Kingdom. The optimal multimodality management of stage III \& IV rectal cancer remains an increasing challenge. There is a high risk of local recurrence and poor survival has been reported for patients treated by surgery alone. About 20% of patients may present with locally advanced tumours, which are partially or totally fixed (T3/T4). Until recently there have been no widely accepted and validated methods of defining preoperatively either locally advanced rectal cancer or unresectable disease. The use of pre-operative pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection (Beets-Tan et al 2001, Brown et al 2003) has resulted in improved selection. Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy can downstage locally advanced tumours, and result in higher resection rates being achieved with reduced risk of local recurrence (Bosset et al 1993, Rich et al 1995).
Gynaecological cancers Treating other advanced pelvic malignancies including vaginal, ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers is similarly challenging. Disease recurrence at the site of surgical resection or adjacent lymph nodes can also preclude further curative options, due to chemotherapy resistance, reaching maximum safe radiotherapy limits or unsuitable surgical options.
It is proposed that High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) may become another modality of treatment in locally advanced or unresectable pelvic disease.
RATIONALE FOR PERFORMING THE STUDY Colorectal cancer This is the third most common cause of cancer and cancer death in both men and women (40,000 cases and just under 16 000 deaths per year in the UK). Worldwide, there are approximately 1 million cases and 500 000 deaths per annum. Primary treatment is usually surgical with, in appropriate cases, adjuvant or neo-adjuvant therapy currently including radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy or a combination. Unfortunately, the overall survival of locally advanced disease is at best 50%. Many patients who have residual, refractory or recurrent rectal cancer experience serious morbidity from local tumour invading and destroying adjacent tissues including bone, nerves (sacrum), bladder and the skin. These interfere severely with normal daily activities, especially bowel function and cause great distress in terms of pain, with many patients requiring permanent palliative colostomies.
Gynaecological cancers Other advanced pelvic malignancies can be equally problematic to manage successfully. Annually in the UK, approximately 250 vaginal cancer, 7000 ovarian cancer, 8000 endometrial cancer and 3000 cervical cancer diagnoses are made, with some being incurable at the time of presentation. Treatment options include surgery, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination, although palliative patients can often be left with debilitating symptoms including severe pain and fistula formation, compromising their quality of life.
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is a method of accurately delivering ablative ultrasound (US) generated high temperatures non-invasively or endo-luminally focused to specific areas in the body using imaging (ultrasound or MR) guidance. Intracavitary or endo-luminal (also called transrectal) HIFU has been appraised by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the treatment of prostate cancer. It is currently used for primary prostate cancer; there is also evidence it may be effective in treating post-radiotherapy prostate cancer recurrence. Short and medium term data demonstrate that HIFU may be equivalent to some current prostate cancer therapies but with reduced morbidity and length of stay. As the prostate and rectum are adjacent there is now a natural evolution to translate the success in prostate to the adjacent rectum/other pelvic structures.
There is a large unmet clinical need for new treatments for patients with residual or progressing local pelvic cancer (such as rectal in origin as well as other pelvic malignancies) in whom all current therapies are exhausted. Intracavitary HIFU offers such a therapy.
An initial cohort of 20 patients will be offered intracavitary HIFU using the Sonablate 500 (Sonacare Medical, Charlotte, NC, USA) intra-luminal device (at different, escalating energy doses) under general anaesthetic with monitoring for toxicity and ablative efficacy using pre and post-treatment Imaging.
As none of the intracavitary devices have yet been used in rectal, vaginal, ovarian, endometrial, cervical or pelvic lymph node tumours directly (but have been used in the rectum to treat prostate cancer), it is important that to gauge the levels of energy and resultant cancer tissue destruction from a variety of different treatment energies. In this manner, the first phase of this trial is equivalent to the 'dose escalation' phase of a drug trial.
Once the optimum energy levels, safety and treatment protocol are known, a further 30 patients will be treated in Phase II. Patients will undergo MR Imaging pre- and post-treatment to objectively assess the tumour and will complete quality of life questionnaires, pain scores, and functional questionnaires. Survival data will be documented. Post-treatment imaging will be performed at between 3-4 weeks, as within this time frame the ablative effect (a necrotic area) as seen in prostate cancer treated by HIFU, will become clearer providing useful data for the Phase I element.
The trial will run in two stages: the end of the first phase (for regulatory requirements) is defined as 30 days from the date that the last patient has completed trial therapy. The non-interventional follow-up stage will then commence in which patients are followed up for a minimum of 6 months or death.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity Focused Ultrasound | Experimental | Device: Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU))Transrectal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of the PelvicTumour |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Biopsy proven rectal, vaginal, ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer (tumour <15cm from anal/vaginal verge)
- Lymph node(s) accessible by HIFU for which the primary clinical team advise intervention
- Partially fixed/unresectable disease and locally advanced disease (T3/T4)
- Patient considered to be unsuitable for or have exhausted all currently available therapies
- WHO Performance Status 0-2
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- WHO performance status of 3 or more
- Uncontrolled cardiac, respiratory or other disease, or any serious medical or psychiatric disorder that would preclude anaesthetic or informed consent
- Pelvic sepsis
- Currently enrolled in any other treatment trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU))Also: Sonablate 500, HIFUHigh Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Delivered by the Sonablate 500 Transrectal Device | Device | High Intensity Focused Ultrasound |
Primary outcome
Quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30 and/or EORTC QLQ-CR38, EORTC QLQ-CX24, EORTC QLQ-EN24 or EORTC QLQ-OV24)
Time frame: Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU
Validated Quality of Life Questionnaire
2 secondary outcomes
Pain relief visual analogue scale
Time frame: Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU
Tumour marker changes (CEA and CA19.9)
Time frame: Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 14622488Thuroff S, Chaussy C, Vallancien G, Wieland W, Kiel HJ, Le Duc A, Desgrandchamps F, De La Rosette JJ, Gelet A. High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. J Endourol. 2003 Oct;17(8):673-7. doi: 10.1089/089277903322518699.
- Background: PubMed 8777589Hill CR, ter Haar GR. Review article: high intensity focused ultrasound--potential for cancer treatment. Br J Radiol. 1995 Dec;68(816):1296-1303. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-816-1296.
- Background: PubMed 11062373Thuroff S, Chaussy C. High-intensity focused ultrasound: complications and adverse events. Mol Urol. 2000 Fall;4(3):183-7;discussion 189.
- Background: PubMed 10099162Visioli AG, Rivens IH, ter Haar GR, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Moskovic E, Padhani A, Glees J. Preliminary results of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using focused ultrasound in the treatment of localised tumours. Eur J Ultrasound. 1999 Mar;9(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/s0929-8266(99)00009-9.
- Background: PubMed 11527596Wu F, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Wang ZL, Zhu H, Wang ZB. Pathological changes in human malignant carcinoma treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001 Aug;27(8):1099-106. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00389-1.
- Background: PubMed 14634387Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zhu H, Qiao TY. Preliminary experience using high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of patients with advanced stage renal malignancy. J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 1):2237-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000097123.34790.70.
- Background: PubMed 12861137Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, Shushan A, Hindley JT, Goldin RD, David M, Sklair M, Rabinovici J. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.345.
- Background: PubMed 14972475Blana A, Walter B, Rogenhofer S, Wieland WF. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.020.
- Background: PubMed 15072864Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Poissonnier L, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Curiel L, Janier M, Vallancien G. Local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy: early experience of salvage therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasonography. Urology. 2004 Apr;63(4):625-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.002.
- Background: PubMed 14676799Wu F, Wang ZB, Cao YD, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Zhu H. A randomised clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for the treatment of patients with localised breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003 Dec 15;89(12):2227-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601411.
- Background: PubMed 2723989Moore WE, Lopez RM, Matthews DE, Sheets PW, Etchison MR, Hurwitz AS, Chalian AA, Fry FJ, Vane DW, Grosfeld JL. Evaluation of high-intensity therapeutic ultrasound irradiation in the treatment of experimental hepatoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1989 Jan;24(1):30-3; discussion 33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(89)80295-7.
- Background: PubMed 2702835Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Mar;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul D Abel, ChM FRCS(Lon) FRCS(Ed) principal investigator
Imperial College London
Leonardo Monzon, BSc MBBS MRCS(Eng) study chair
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)) in people with Rectal Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30 and/or EORTC QLQ-CR38, EORTC QLQ-CX24, EORTC QLQ-EN24 or EORTC QLQ-OV24) (time frame: Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01097239, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2020.