AsthmaPELICANIINCT01109745
Effectiveness of the Pelican Instrument in Medical Care
A study testing PELICAN Primary Care and PELICAN Secondary Care in people with Asthma, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 6 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The objective of this project is to establish the effectiveness of implementation of a self-administered electronic asthma-specific quality of life instrument for childhood asthma in primary care and specialist care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- PELICAN Primary Care and PELICAN Secondary Care
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- age 6 to 12 years
- physician-diagnosed asthma
- use of bronchodilators and / or inhaled corticosteroids for at least six weeks during the previous year
- child is treated for its asthma by the recruiting physician
- signed informed consent by parent (or caretaker)
- child agrees to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- comorbid condition that significantly influences HRQL
- child does not master the Dutch language sufficiently
- not being able to attend a regular school class
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Netherlands6 sites
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, 5223 GZ
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, North Brabant, 4819 EV
Reinier de Graaf Groep
Delft, South Holland, 2625 AD
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623 EJ
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, 6500 HB
Viecuri Medical Centre
Venlo, 5912 BL
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of the Paediatric Electronic Quality of Life Instrument for Childhood Asthma in the Netherlands (Pelican) in Medical Care.
The objective of this project is to establish the effectiveness of implementation of a self-administered electronic asthma-specific quality of life instrument for childhood asthma in primary care and specialist care.
Read the detailed description
Health related quality of life (HRQL) is important to the asthmatic child and if HRQL aspects are taken into account in daily care this could result in improved treatment satisfaction, compliance, asthma control and, ultimately, improved HRQL. The Pelican instrument we have developed has the essential features to be useful in daily care. In this study, the effectiveness of implementing the Pelican instrument in medical care is assessed. An intervention study with 9 months follow-up in primary and secondary care will be carried out.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- PELICAN Primary Care, PELICAN Secondary Care
- Keywords
- Asthma, health-related quality of life, patient-centred care
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PELICAN Primary CareOther
The intervention is the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. The general practitioner can integrate the information of the Pelican instrument in their consultation and disease management decisions. The general practitioner will be trained and supported to negotiate the child's, and physicians' agendas based on the outcome of the instrument, and discuss possible interventions. All participating children of a GP will be allocated to the same treatment group (i.e., hierarchical or nested design).
PELICAN Secondary CareOther
The intervention is the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in secondary care. The nurse can integrate the information of the Pelican instrument in their consultation and disease management decisions. The paediatricians will be trained and supported to negotiate the child's, and nurses' agendas based on the outcome of the instrument, and discuss possible interventions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| usual primary care | No intervention | Number of participating children: 85 |
| PELICAN Primary care | Experimental | Intervention arm: the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument (i.e., individualised HRQL information) in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. Number of participants: 85 children Receives: Other: PELICAN Primary Care |
| usual secondary care | No intervention | number of participating children: 50 |
| PELICAN Secondary Care | Experimental | Intervention arm: the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument (i.e., individualised HRQL information) in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. Number of participants: 50 children Receives: Other: PELICAN Secondary Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
quality of life
Asthma specific health related quality of life measured with the Pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire PAQLQ(S)
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
asthma control
asthma control will be measured with the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT)
Measured: 9 months
Symptoms and medication
asthmatic symptoms (e.g., wheezing, dyspnea) and medication use (e.g., use of inhaled corticosteroids, and short-acting bronchodilators) are assessed with a diary
Measured: 9 months
Lung function
Lung function indices (FEV1 and FVC before and 15 minutes after inhalation of 400 µg salbutamol) are measured by a certified lung function technician specifically trained to coach children using a spirometer with child-incentive. Spirometry tests will be performed according to ERS/ATS spirometry standards and recommendations regarding testing in children. Spirometry is performed at least 8 hrs after the last inhalation of a short-acting bronchodilator, and 12 hrs after a long-acting bronchodilator.
Measured: 9 months
Cost-effectiveness
A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from a societal perspective will be performed and reported according to national and international guidelines. In the CEA an effect is defined as a relevant change in HRQL (i.e., ∆PAQLQ ≥0.5 point) in the denominator and the total of all relevant costs in the nominator. C/E ratios with and without inclusion of the indirect cost will be reported. A sensitivity analysis will be performed in order to estimate the susceptibility of C/E ratio's to variation in prior assumptions and choices, including 'worst case - best case' scenarios.
Measured: 9 months
caregiver quality of life
The quality of life of the parents of the participating children is assessed with the Paediatric asthma caregiver quality of life (PACQoL) instrument.
Measured: 9 months
process-outcomes
The implementation of the Pelican instrument in daily care is an complex intervention. A detailed process evaluation is crucial to evaluate how the intervention works: what are the active ingredients and how are they exerting their effect?
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, T. Schermer, Radboud University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Lisette van den Bemt, PhD, Principal investigator, Radboud University Medical CenterTjard RJ Schermer, PhD, Study director, Radboud University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01109745
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL29895.091.09
- Other IDs
- 3.4.07.043, 0802-74
- Acronym
- PELICANII
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
van den Bemt L, Kooijman S, Linssen V, Lucassen P, Muris J, Slabbers G, Schermer T. How does asthma influence the daily life of children? Results of focus group interviews. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 14;8:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-5.
PubMed 20074334van Bragt S, van den Bemt L, Cretier R, van Weel C, Merkus P, Schermer T. PELICAN: Content evaluation of patient-centered care for children with asthma based on an online tool. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Oct;51(10):993-1003. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23397. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PubMed 27128738van Bragt S, van den Bemt L, Thoonen B, van Weel C, Merkus P, Schermer T. PELICAN: A quality of life instrument for childhood asthma: study protocol of two randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care in the Netherlands. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 30;12:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-137.
PubMed 22935133
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of the Paediatric Electronic Quality of Life Instrument for Childhood Asthma in the Netherlands (Pelican) in Medical Care.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01109745
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PELICANII / NL29895.091.09
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- Asthma, health-related quality of life, patient-centred care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this project is to establish the effectiveness of implementation of a self-administered electronic asthma-specific quality of life instrument for childhood asthma in primary care and specialist care.
Detailed description
Health related quality of life (HRQL) is important to the asthmatic child and if HRQL aspects are taken into account in daily care this could result in improved treatment satisfaction, compliance, asthma control and, ultimately, improved HRQL. The Pelican instrument we have developed has the essential features to be useful in daily care. In this study, the effectiveness of implementing the Pelican instrument in medical care is assessed. An intervention study with 9 months follow-up in primary and secondary care will be carried out.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| usual primary care | No intervention | –Number of participating children: 85 |
| PELICAN Primary care | Experimental | Other: PELICAN Primary CareIntervention arm: the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument (i.e., individualised HRQL information) in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. Number of participants: 85 children |
| usual secondary care | No intervention | –number of participating children: 50 |
| PELICAN Secondary Care | Experimental | Other: PELICAN Secondary CareIntervention arm: the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument (i.e., individualised HRQL information) in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. Number of participants: 50 children |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- age 6 to 12 years
- physician-diagnosed asthma
- use of bronchodilators and / or inhaled corticosteroids for at least six weeks during the previous year
- child is treated for its asthma by the recruiting physician
- signed informed consent by parent (or caretaker)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- comorbid condition that significantly influences HRQL
- child does not master the Dutch language sufficiently
- not being able to attend a regular school class
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PELICAN Primary CareThe intervention is the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in primary care. The general practitioner can integrate the information of the Pelican instrument in their consultation and disease management decisions. The general practitioner will be trained and supported to negotiate the child's, and physicians' agendas based on the outcome of the instrument, and discuss possible interventions. All participating children of a GP will be allocated to the same treatment group (i.e., hierarchical or nested design). | Other | PELICAN Primary care |
| PELICAN Secondary CareThe intervention is the integration of the output of the Pelican instrument in daily care to guide disease management for children with asthma treated in secondary care. The nurse can integrate the information of the Pelican instrument in their consultation and disease management decisions. The paediatricians will be trained and supported to negotiate the child's, and nurses' agendas based on the outcome of the instrument, and discuss possible interventions. | Other | PELICAN Secondary Care |
Primary outcome
quality of life
Time frame: 9 months
Asthma specific health related quality of life measured with the Pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire PAQLQ(S)
6 secondary outcomes
asthma control
Time frame: 9 months
Symptoms and medication
Time frame: 9 months
Lung function
Time frame: 9 months
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 9 months
caregiver quality of life
Time frame: 9 months
process-outcomes
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2014.
- Background: PubMed 20074334van den Bemt L, Kooijman S, Linssen V, Lucassen P, Muris J, Slabbers G, Schermer T. How does asthma influence the daily life of children? Results of focus group interviews. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 14;8:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27128738van Bragt S, van den Bemt L, Cretier R, van Weel C, Merkus P, Schermer T. PELICAN: Content evaluation of patient-centered care for children with asthma based on an online tool. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Oct;51(10):993-1003. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23397. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22935133van Bragt S, van den Bemt L, Thoonen B, van Weel C, Merkus P, Schermer T. PELICAN: A quality of life instrument for childhood asthma: study protocol of two randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care in the Netherlands. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 30;12:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-137.
- Website Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (in Dutch)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Website of the project for participants (in Dutch)Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisette van den Bemt, PhD principal investigator
Radboud University Medical Center
Tjard RJ Schermer, PhD study director
Radboud University Medical Center
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PELICAN Primary Care and PELICAN Secondary Care in people with Asthma, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 6 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
quality of life (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01109745, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2014.