AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseFINESTNCT01113892

Study Comparing Synthetic Vascular Grafts in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) Who Require Artery Bypass.

A study testing vascular grafts in people with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease, run by Maquet Cardiovascular at 25 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To demonstrate the patency and safety of vascular grafts: EXXCEL and FUSION Bioline. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
What is being tested?
vascular grafts
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
207 participants
Where
25 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
17 May 2010to 4 Jun 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient required either above-knee or below-knee femoral popliteal bypass;
  • Patient had Category 1, 2, 3 4 or 5 chronic limb ischemia as defined by the Rutherford Categories - chronic limb ischemia severity classification scale.
  • Patient was at least 21 years of age;
  • Patient had postoperative life expectancy of >18 months;
  • Patient was willing and able to have follow-up visits and examinations;
  • Patient would not participate in other clinical trials that would conflict with this protocol
  • Patient was willing and able to provide written, informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patient had a previous history of bypass in the diseased extremity (below the iliacs arteries);
  • Patient had percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting of the target femoral or popliteal artery at the anticipated site of the proximal or distal anastomosis within the previous 30 days;
  • Patient had active infection in the region of graft placement;
  • Patient had an acute arterial occlusion requiring an emergent intervention;
  • Patient needed a cardiac surgical procedure or a different vascular surgical procedure within 30 days of planned lower extremity revascularization. Planned endovascular procedures to address proximal stenotic lesions at the time of the index femoropopliteal bypass did not exclude a patient from the study;
  • Patient required sequential extremity revascularizations or other procedures that require use of additional vascular grafts;
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Patient had known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin;
  • Patient had known coagulation disorders including hypercoagulability;
  • Patient had previous instance of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type 2 or has known hypersensitivity to heparin; Patient was currently treated with Coumadin (warfarin) that had not been stopped within 72 hours of the planned procedure
  • Patient had severe chronic renal insufficiency (plasma/serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dl), is undergoing hemodialysis.
  • Patient had prior renal transplant;
  • Patient had a stroke or myocardial infarction within 6 weeks of the procedure or had evidence of prior massive stroke (Modified Rankin Scale 3 or above);
  • Patient had a myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to the procedure or had unstable angina pectoris;
  • Patient had documented acute or suspected systemic infection;
  • Patient was a woman of reproductive potential.

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 3 countries.

25 sites in 3 countries

United States18 sites
  • Albany Medical Center

    Albany, New York, 12208

  • University of Alabama-Birmingham Medical Center

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Dallas VA Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75216

  • Methodist Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Dartmouth- Hitchcock Medical Center

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • Central Arkansas Veterans Health System

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • NYU School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10016

  • NY Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia Univ Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Norfolk Sentara - Norfolk General Hospital

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

  • VA Palo Alto HCS

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • Swedish Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98122

  • University of South Florida - Tampa General

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • Central Texas Veterans Health System

    Temple, Texas, 76504

  • Scott & White

    Temple, Texas, 76508

  • Montefiore Weiler Hospital

    The Bronx, New York, 10461

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

Other trials in United States

Czechia6 sites
  • Fakulti Nemocnice Brno

    Brno, 625 00

  • Fakultni Nemocnice u sv Anny v Brno

    Brno, 656 91

  • University Hospital Plzen

    Pilsen, 304 60

  • Vseobecna Fakultni Nemocnice (VFN) Praha

    Prague, 128 08

  • IKEM Praha

    Prague, 140 21

  • Nemocnice Na Homolce

    Prague, 150 30

Other trials in Czechia

Germany1 site
  • Klinikum Karlsruhe

    Karlsruhe, 76133

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Safety and Primary Patency Between FUSION Vascular Graft With Bioline and EXXCEL Soft ePTFE (FINEST)

To demonstrate the patency and safety of vascular grafts: EXXCEL and FUSION Bioline.

Read the detailed description

The study is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm, parallel group, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FUSION™ Vascular Graft with Bioline (heparin) coating, compared with EXXCEL Soft ePTFE in a peripheral bypass setting, to support a claim of substantial equivalence.

Being tested
vascular grafts
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • vascular graftsDevice

    All devices will be used to treat patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Study groups in NCT01113892
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EXXCEL SoftActive comparatorA vascular graft comprised of extruded, expanded polytetrafluroethylene (ePTFE), indicated for use as a vascular prosthesis for replacement or bypass of diseased peripheral arteries (510(k) K962433).
Receives: Device: vascular grafts
FUSION BiolineExperimentalA synthetic vascular graft constructed of two layers. The inner layer is comprised of extruded, ePTFE. The outer layer is comprised of knit polyester textile. These two layers are fused together with a proprietary polycarbonate-urethane adhesive. The vascular graft also has a heparin coating on the graft's luminal surface. The Bioline coating is a bioactive surface coating consisting of a covalent Heparin Sodium coupled to immobilized recombinant human albumin.
Receives: Device: vascular grafts

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Primary Patency

    A graft was considered to have primary patency if it had remained continuously patent (i.e., had continued blood flow through it) from the time of implantation and it had uninterrupted patency with no procedure performed on it, nor a procedure to address disease progression in the adjacent native vessel. Stenosis developing within the graft without remediation or occlusion was not considered a loss of primary patency. Assessed by duplex ultrasound imaging and ankle brachial index (ABI).

    Measured: 6 months

  2. The Number of Participants Meeting Composite Endpoint of Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE) and Periprocedural Death (POD)

    The composite endpoint included any of the following:

    • Major amputation - amputation that resulted in limb shortening (e.g., proximal to, but not including transmetatarsal amputations);
    • Major graft reintervention - placement of a new bypass graft at the same anatomic site, a jump/interposition graft, graft thrombectomy, graft excision, or graft thrombolysis;
    • Procedure-related death - any death within 30 days of the index procedure or within 30 days of any remedial procedure performed at the same anatomic site or as a result of the index procedure.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of Participants With Primary Assisted Patency

    Primary assisted patency was defined as continued patency without thrombosis, with or without an endovascular or open surgical intervention to remediate a stenosis or other disorder of the graft.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Number of Participants With Secondary Patency

    Secondary patency was defined as patency after some form of intervention to restore and maintain blood flow after occlusion.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Time to Hemostasis of Suture Hole Bleeding (Min)

    Time from the release of clamps until hemostasis, where hemostasis is defined as the absence of detectable bleeding from any of the suture holes.

    Measured: Post-procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 May 2010
  3. Primary completion18 Dec 2012
  4. Study completion4 Jun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind (subject), parallel group, multicenter study in subjects with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) who were scheduled to undergo femoral popliteal peripheral bypass surgery. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either FUSION Bioline or EXXCEL vascular graft.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
207 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01113892
Sponsor's protocol ID
MCV00001506
Acronym
FINEST
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
28 Apr 2010
Last updated
22 May 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lumsden AB, Morrissey NJ; Comparison of Safety and Primary Patency Between the FUSION BIOLINE Heparin-Coated Vascular Graft and EXXCEL Soft ePTFE (FINEST) Trial Co-investigators. Randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy between the FUSION BIOLINE heparin-coated vascular graft and the standard expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft for femoropopliteal bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):703-12.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.008.

    PubMed 25720929
  • Correia RM, Nakano LC, Vasconcelos V, Cristino MA, Flumignan RL. Prevention of infection in peripheral arterial reconstruction of the lower limb. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 29;10(10):CD015022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015022.pub2.

    PubMed 41159585

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing vascular grafts in people with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease, run by Maquet Cardiovascular at 25 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in United States, Czechia, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 May 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Primary Patency (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01113892, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in