Urogential Chlamydia Trachomatis InfectionPhase 3NCT01113931
Treatment of Chlamydia Infection Comparing WC2031 Tablets With Vibramycin
A Phase 3 study testing Doxycyline Hyclate tablet and Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule in people with Urogential Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, run by Warner Chilcott at 43 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of WC2031 200 mg tablets taken orally once a day for 7 days versus Vibramycin (doxycycline) 100 mg capsules taken orally twice a day for 7 days, for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Urogential Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection
- What is being tested?
- Doxycyline Hyclate tablet and Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 495 participants
- Where
- 43 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to Oct 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 19-45 years of age, male or female
- presumed diagnosis of urogenital C. trachomatis infection
- use condoms during sexual activity during study (enrollment thru day 28)
Who cannot join
- Clinical diagnosis pelvic inflammatory disease or epididymitis at baseline
- Diagnosis of N. gonorrhoea
- HIV infection
- Active Hepatitis B or C infection
- Prior hysterectomy (partial or total)
- Treatment with antimicrobial therapy with known activity against urogenital C. trachomatis within 28 days of enrollment
Trial locations and contacts
43 sites in 1 country.
43 sites in 1 country
United States43 sites
Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92805
Research Site
Arkansas City, Kansas, 67005
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Research Site
Boca Raton, Florida, 33432
Research Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Research Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60613
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43231
Research Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Research Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Research Site
Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720
Research Site
Foley, Alabama, 36535
Research Site
Fresno, California, 93726
Research Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Research Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Research Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39213
Research Site
Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, 15025
Research Site
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, 19046
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90007
Research Site
Margate, Florida, 33063
Research Site
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072
Research Site
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572
Research Site
New Bern, North Carolina, 28562
Research Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Research Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Research Site
Newton, Kansas, 67114
Research Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Research Site
North Las Vegas, Nevada, 89030
Research Site
North Miami, Florida, 33161
Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
Research Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Research Site
San Diego, California, 92108
Research Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Research Site
South Miami, Florida, 33143
Research Site
Spokane, Washington, 99207
Research Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85710
Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Research Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67207
About this study
Official title: Safety and Efficacy of WC2031 Versus Vibramycin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, Multicenter Study
Evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of WC2031 200 mg tablets taken orally once a day for 7 days versus Vibramycin (doxycycline) 100 mg capsules taken orally twice a day for 7 days, for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Primary efficacy endpoint is microbiological cure at Day 28. Safety assessments are adverse events, changes in vital signs and laboratory test results.
- Being tested
- Doxycyline Hyclate tablet, Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule
- Keywords
- Chlamydia
- Medical subject headings
- Chlamydia Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Doxycyline Hyclate tabletDrug
Also called WC2031
200 mg tablet, once daily for 7 days
Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsuleDrug
Also called doxycycline
100 mg capsule, twice daily for 7 days, over-encapsulated
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Doxycycline Hyclate 200 mg tablet | Experimental | Once daily Receives: Drug: Doxycyline Hyclate tablet |
| Vibramycin 100 mg capsule | Active comparator | Twice daily Receives: Drug: Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Microbiological Cure Rate
Percentage of Subjects in mITT Population with Microbiological Cure defined as a negative result for C. trachomatis as determined by GP AC2 NAAT (Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test) at Day 28
Measured: Day 28
Secondary outcomes (3)
Microbiological Cure and Clinical Cure of C. Trachomatis, Day 28, Clinically Evaluable Population, Percentage Participants Cured
Microbiological cure (defined as a negative result for urogenital C. trachomatis, determined by GP AC2 NAAT/Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test and clinical cure (for males defined as resolution of baseline signs/symptoms of dysuria, urethral pruritus and urethral discharge, and resolution of exam finding of urethral discharge; for females resolution of exam finding of endocervical discharge) at Day 28
Measured: End of Study (Day 28)
Microbiological Cure C. Trachomatis and M. Genitalium, M. Genitalium Coinfected Population, Day 28, Percentage Participants Cured
Percentage Subjects Cured of both M. genitalium and C. trachomatis M. genitalium co-infected population: microbiological cure for both at Day 28, defined as negative PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for M. genitalium and negative GP AC2 NAAT (Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification test) for C. trachomatis at Day 28
Measured: End of Study (Day 28)
Microbiological Cure C. Trachomatis, N. Gonorrhoea Negative Population, Day 28, Percentage Participants Cured
Percentage Participants cured in N. gonorrhoea Negative Population: cured defined as both microbiological cure (negative result for urogenital C. trachomatis, determined by GP AC2 NAAT/Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification test) and clinical cure (males defined as resolution of baseline signs/symptoms of dysuria, urethral pruritis and urethral discharge, and resolution of exam finding of urethral discharge; females - resolution of exam finding of endocervical discharge) at Day 28
Measured: Day 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionOct 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urogential Chlamydia Trachomatis InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 495 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Warner Chilcott
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Caminis, MD, Study director, Warner Chilcott
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01113931
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PR-04809
- Status last verified
- Dec 2011
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Geisler WM, Koltun WD, Abdelsayed N, Burigo J, Mena L, Taylor SN, Batteiger BE, Thurman AR, Hook EW 3rd, Vaughn TA, Annett MP, Muenzen RA, Caminis J. Safety and efficacy of WC2031 versus vibramycin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55(1):82-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis291. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
PubMed 22431798
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy of WC2031 Versus Vibramycin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, Multicenter Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01113931
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PR-04809
- Keywords
- Chlamydia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 495 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Warner ChilcottIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jan 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of WC2031 200 mg tablets taken orally once a day for 7 days versus Vibramycin (doxycycline) 100 mg capsules taken orally twice a day for 7 days, for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Primary efficacy endpoint is microbiological cure at Day 28. Safety assessments are adverse events, changes in vital signs and laboratory test results.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Doxycycline Hyclate 200 mg tablet | Experimental | Drug: Doxycyline Hyclate tabletOnce daily |
| Vibramycin 100 mg capsule | Active comparator | Drug: Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsuleTwice daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 19-45 years of age, male or female
- presumed diagnosis of urogenital C. trachomatis infection
- use condoms during sexual activity during study (enrollment thru day 28)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis pelvic inflammatory disease or epididymitis at baseline
- Diagnosis of N. gonorrhoea
- HIV infection
- Active Hepatitis B or C infection
- Prior hysterectomy (partial or total)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Doxycyline Hyclate tabletAlso: WC2031200 mg tablet, once daily for 7 days | Drug | Doxycycline Hyclate 200 mg tablet |
| Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsuleAlso: doxycycline100 mg capsule, twice daily for 7 days, over-encapsulated | Drug | Vibramycin 100 mg capsule |
Primary outcome
Microbiological Cure Rate
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Subjects in mITT Population with Microbiological Cure defined as a negative result for C. trachomatis as determined by GP AC2 NAAT (Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test) at Day 28
3 secondary outcomes
Microbiological Cure and Clinical Cure of C. Trachomatis, Day 28, Clinically Evaluable Population, Percentage Participants Cured
Time frame: End of Study (Day 28)
Microbiological Cure C. Trachomatis and M. Genitalium, M. Genitalium Coinfected Population, Day 28, Percentage Participants Cured
Time frame: End of Study (Day 28)
Microbiological Cure C. Trachomatis, N. Gonorrhoea Negative Population, Day 28, Percentage Participants Cured
Time frame: Day 28
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22431798Geisler WM, Koltun WD, Abdelsayed N, Burigo J, Mena L, Taylor SN, Batteiger BE, Thurman AR, Hook EW 3rd, Vaughn TA, Annett MP, Muenzen RA, Caminis J. Safety and efficacy of WC2031 versus vibramycin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55(1):82-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis291. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Caminis, MD study director
Warner Chilcott
43 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Doxycyline Hyclate tablet and Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule in people with Urogential Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, run by Warner Chilcott at 43 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 43 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jan 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Microbiological Cure Rate (time frame: Day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01113931, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2012.