AzTrials
AzTrials

Urogential Chlamydia Trachomatis InfectionPhase 3NCT01113931

Treatment of Chlamydia Infection Comparing WC2031 Tablets With Vibramycin

A Phase 3 study testing Doxycyline Hyclate tablet and Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule in people with Urogential Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, run by Warner Chilcott at 43 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of WC2031 200 mg tablets taken orally once a day for 7 days versus Vibramycin (doxycycline) 100 mg capsules taken orally twice a day for 7 days, for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 45 years
What is being tested?
Doxycyline Hyclate tablet and Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
495 participants
Where
43 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2010to Oct 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 19-45 years of age, male or female
  • presumed diagnosis of urogenital C. trachomatis infection
  • use condoms during sexual activity during study (enrollment thru day 28)

Who cannot join

  • Clinical diagnosis pelvic inflammatory disease or epididymitis at baseline
  • Diagnosis of N. gonorrhoea
  • HIV infection
  • Active Hepatitis B or C infection
  • Prior hysterectomy (partial or total)
  • Treatment with antimicrobial therapy with known activity against urogenital C. trachomatis within 28 days of enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

43 sites in 1 country.

43 sites in 1 country

United States43 sites
  • Research Site

    Anaheim, California, 92805

  • Research Site

    Arkansas City, Kansas, 67005

  • Research Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Research Site

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33432

  • Research Site

    Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472

  • Research Site

    Brooklyn, New York, 11203

  • Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60613

  • Research Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43231

  • Research Site

    Decatur, Georgia, 30033

  • Research Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Research Site

    Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720

  • Research Site

    Foley, Alabama, 36535

  • Research Site

    Fresno, California, 93726

  • Research Site

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405

  • Research Site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Research Site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Research Site

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39213

  • Research Site

    Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, 15025

  • Research Site

    Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, 19046

  • Research Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106

  • Research Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90007

  • Research Site

    Margate, Florida, 33063

  • Research Site

    Marrero, Louisiana, 70072

  • Research Site

    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572

  • Research Site

    New Bern, North Carolina, 28562

  • Research Site

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • Research Site

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115

  • Research Site

    Newton, Kansas, 67114

  • Research Site

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

  • Research Site

    North Las Vegas, Nevada, 89030

  • Research Site

    North Miami, Florida, 33161

  • Research Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120

  • Research Site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612

  • Research Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Research Site

    San Diego, California, 92108

  • Research Site

    Savannah, Georgia, 31406

  • Research Site

    South Miami, Florida, 33143

  • Research Site

    Spokane, Washington, 99207

  • Research Site

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Research Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85710

  • Research Site

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401

  • Research Site

    Wichita, Kansas, 67207

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Safety and Efficacy of WC2031 Versus Vibramycin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, Multicenter Study

Evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of WC2031 200 mg tablets taken orally once a day for 7 days versus Vibramycin (doxycycline) 100 mg capsules taken orally twice a day for 7 days, for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Primary efficacy endpoint is microbiological cure at Day 28. Safety assessments are adverse events, changes in vital signs and laboratory test results.

Being tested
Doxycyline Hyclate tablet, Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule
Keywords
Chlamydia
Medical subject headings
Chlamydia Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Doxycyline Hyclate tabletDrug

    Also called WC2031

    200 mg tablet, once daily for 7 days

  • Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsuleDrug

    Also called doxycycline

    100 mg capsule, twice daily for 7 days, over-encapsulated

Study groups in NCT01113931
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Doxycycline Hyclate 200 mg tabletExperimentalOnce daily
Receives: Drug: Doxycyline Hyclate tablet
Vibramycin 100 mg capsuleActive comparatorTwice daily
Receives: Drug: Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Microbiological Cure Rate

    Percentage of Subjects in mITT Population with Microbiological Cure defined as a negative result for C. trachomatis as determined by GP AC2 NAAT (Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test) at Day 28

    Measured: Day 28

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Microbiological Cure and Clinical Cure of C. Trachomatis, Day 28, Clinically Evaluable Population, Percentage Participants Cured

    Microbiological cure (defined as a negative result for urogenital C. trachomatis, determined by GP AC2 NAAT/Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test and clinical cure (for males defined as resolution of baseline signs/symptoms of dysuria, urethral pruritus and urethral discharge, and resolution of exam finding of urethral discharge; for females resolution of exam finding of endocervical discharge) at Day 28

    Measured: End of Study (Day 28)

  2. Microbiological Cure C. Trachomatis and M. Genitalium, M. Genitalium Coinfected Population, Day 28, Percentage Participants Cured

    Percentage Subjects Cured of both M. genitalium and C. trachomatis M. genitalium co-infected population: microbiological cure for both at Day 28, defined as negative PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for M. genitalium and negative GP AC2 NAAT (Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification test) for C. trachomatis at Day 28

    Measured: End of Study (Day 28)

  3. Microbiological Cure C. Trachomatis, N. Gonorrhoea Negative Population, Day 28, Percentage Participants Cured

    Percentage Participants cured in N. gonorrhoea Negative Population: cured defined as both microbiological cure (negative result for urogenital C. trachomatis, determined by GP AC2 NAAT/Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 Nucleic Acid Amplification test) and clinical cure (males defined as resolution of baseline signs/symptoms of dysuria, urethral pruritis and urethral discharge, and resolution of exam finding of urethral discharge; females - resolution of exam finding of endocervical discharge) at Day 28

    Measured: Day 28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
495 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01113931
Sponsor's protocol ID
PR-04809
Status last verified
Dec 2011
First submitted
28 Apr 2010
Last updated
27 Jan 2012
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Geisler WM, Koltun WD, Abdelsayed N, Burigo J, Mena L, Taylor SN, Batteiger BE, Thurman AR, Hook EW 3rd, Vaughn TA, Annett MP, Muenzen RA, Caminis J. Safety and efficacy of WC2031 versus vibramycin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55(1):82-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis291. Epub 2012 Mar 19.

    PubMed 22431798

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Doxycyline Hyclate tablet and Vibramycin (doxycyline hyclate) capsule in people with Urogential Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, run by Warner Chilcott at 43 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 43 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jan 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Microbiological Cure Rate (time frame: Day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01113931, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in