AzTrials
AzTrials

ColonoscopyNCT01115010

Effectiveness of Stiffening Wire in Colonoscopy With Pre-Owned Colonoscopes

A study testing Colonoscope stiffening device in people with Colonoscopy, run by Cornwall Regional Hospital at 1 site in Jamaica.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aims to determine whether a proprietary, FDA approved stiffening wire improves the efficiency of colonoscopy (that is, decreases the duration of the procedure) and/or enables complete visualization of the colon in a greater proportion of cases (than when the procedure is performed without it) with old, used… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colonoscopy
What is being tested?
Colonoscope stiffening device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
112 participants
Where
1 siteJamaica
Study dates
Dec 2009to Jan 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults 18 years and older having screening or diagnostic colonoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Previous hysterectomy
  • Previous radical prostatectomy
  • Clinical presentation or imaging study suggesting presence of lesion that could obstruct passage of colonoscope

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jamaica1 site
  • Mobay Hope Medical Center

    Montego Bay, Saint James Parish

Other trials in Jamaica

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of a Proprietary Intraluminal Stiffening Wire in Decreasing Procedure Time and Improving Cecal Intubation Rate With Pre-owned Colonoscopes; a Randomized, Controlled Trial

The study aims to determine whether a proprietary, FDA approved stiffening wire improves the efficiency of colonoscopy (that is, decreases the duration of the procedure) and/or enables complete visualization of the colon in a greater proportion of cases (than when the procedure is performed without it) with old, used colonoscopes.

Colonoscopes are designed with a delicate balance between stiffness and flexibility. Stiffness helps to prevent curling (looping) of the colonoscope in those sections of the colon that are not fixed to the wall of the abdominal cavity and flexibility enables successful negotiation of bends or flexures in the colon. As colonoscopes age, they lose stiffness and this makes it very challenging to advance the colonoscope all the way to the cecum (the upper end of the colon). Even when the cecum is successfully reached, it may take an inordinately long time.

Read more

In Jamaica, most endoscopists (General Surgeons and Gastroenterologists) use older, pre-owned colonoscopes imported from the USA, because the average patient and local health insurance companies cannot bear the level of fees that would enable cost recovery for new equipment.

The stiffening wires (in two grades of stiffness) used in this study are passed through the biopsy channel of the colonoscope only after its tip has passed the upper end of the descending colon and entered the transverse colon. The device is safe when used as recommended by the manufacturers (and approved by the FDA), and does not appear to increase risk over and above the risk of colonoscopy with the unassisted colonoscope. Although the device clearly improves the stiffness of the colonoscope, there is no research evidence that it actually works in practice, either to improve cecal intubation rate or to decrease procedure time. It is therefore also unclear whether the possible benefit of using the device is achieved if introduced at the first opportunity allowed by the manufacturers or only after difficulty is encountered with the unassisted colonoscope.

In this study, patients are randomly assigned to one of 3 "interventions". One group has colonoscopy performed with the colonoscope alone and the wires are only introduced if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope after it has passed into the transverse colon ("difficulty" defined as failure to advance the tip of the colonoscope after 5 minutes). In the 2nd and 3rd groups, the assigned wire will be introduced as soon as the colonoscope enters the transverse colon and is removed if "difficulty" is encountered, as defined above. The different phases of colonoscopy will be timed with a stop watch and when a sufficient number of patients has been accrued, the investigator will be able to compare the time it takes to complete the procedure with and without the wires as well as the proportion of cases in which the cecum was reached with and without the assistance of the wires.

Conditions
Colonoscopy
Being tested
Colonoscope stiffening device
Keywords
intubation rate, intubation time, stiffening device, stiffening wire

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Colonoscope stiffening deviceDevice

    Also called ZUTR-141700 (Standard) and ZUTR-161700 (Firm) by Zutron Medical

    Colonoscopy is performed with the unassisted colonoscope (Olympus CF-100TL). The "standard" stiffening wire is introduced only if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope and only after the tip has passed the splenic flexure. Difficulty is defined as failure to advance the tip of the scope after 5 minutes of trying. If difficulty is again encountered, the "firm" wire replaces the "standard" wire. Further difficulty requires removal of the firm wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

  • Colonoscope stiffening deviceDevice

    Also called ZUTR-141700 (Standard) and ZUTR-161700 (Firm) by Zutron Medical

    "Standard" stiffening wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. If difficulty is encountered (as defined previously), the "standard" wire is removed and attempts made to advance the colonoscope without it. Further difficulty requires introduction of the "firm" wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

  • Colonoscope stiffening deviceDevice

    Also called ZUTR-141700 (Standard) and ZUTR-161700 (Firm) by Zutron Medical

    "Firm" stiffening wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. If difficulty is encountered (as defined previously), the wire is removed and attempts made to advance the colonoscope without it. Further difficulty requires introduction of the "standard" wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

Study groups in NCT01115010
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stiffening wire only if difficultyExperimentalColonoscopy is performed with the unassisted colonoscope. The stiffening wire is introduced only if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope and only after the tip has passed the splenic flexure. Difficulty is defined as failure to advance the tip of the scope after 5 minutes of trying.
Receives: Device: Colonoscope stiffening device
Stiffening wire #1 transverse colonExperimentalColonoscopy is started with the unassisted colonoscope. Stiffening wire #1 is introduced on entry of the tip of the colonoscope into the transverse colon.
Receives: Device: Colonoscope stiffening device
Stiffening wire #2 transverse colonExperimentalColonoscopy is started with the unassisted colonoscope. Stiffening wire #2 is introduced on entry of the tip of the colonoscope into the transverse colon.
Receives: Device: Colonoscope stiffening device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cecal intubation

    Measured: 10 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Time to cecal intubation

    Measured: 10 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionJan 2011
  4. Study completionJan 2011

Why it stopped: Colonoscope being used in study not repairable at economic cost.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
112 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01115010
Sponsor's protocol ID
JE-1
Status last verified
Jul 2011
First submitted
29 Apr 2010
Last updated
3 Aug 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Odori T, Goto H, Arisawa T, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N, Hayakawa T. Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes. Endoscopy. 2001 Jan;33(1):65-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-11174.

    PubMed 11204990
  • Shah SG, Saunders BP. Aids to insertion: magnetic imaging, variable stiffness, and overtubes. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;15(4):673-86. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2005.08.011.

    PubMed 16278132
  • Sivak MV. Gastroenterologic Endoscopy. Second Edition. W.B. Saunders, 1999.

  • Zutron Medical. Colonoscope stiffening device. http://zutronmedical.storesecured.com/items/Endoscope-Stiffening-System/list.htm . 2009. Ref Type: Electronic Citation

  • Smith PG, Morrow RH. Field Trials of Health Interventions in Developing Countries: A Toolbox. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan Education, 1996.

  • Othman MO, Bradley AG, Choudhary A, Hoffman RM, Roy PK. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2009 Jan;41(1):17-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103488. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

    PubMed 19160154
  • Baron TH. The variable stiffness colonoscope: a scope for all seasons? Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;97(12):2942-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07091.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12492173
  • East JM. Effect of a proprietary intraluminal stiffening wire device on cecal intubation time and rate with used colonoscopes; a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Feb 4;6:48. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-48.

    PubMed 23379922

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Colonoscope stiffening device in people with Colonoscopy, run by Cornwall Regional Hospital at 1 site in Jamaica.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Jamaica. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Colonoscope being used in study not repairable at economic cost.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cecal intubation (time frame: 10 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01115010, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in