Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 4COPDVENNCT01116063
Inhaled Iloprost for Disproportionate Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Phase 4 study testing Inhaled iloprost in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Carmel Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Pulmonary hypertension is frequently present in COPD and it is generally limited to a mild increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure. However some COPD patients are characterized by higher levels of mPAP at rest, fulfilling the definition of moderate or severe PH disproportionate PH . Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Inhaled iloprost
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- May 2010to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with COPD and increased SPAP >55 on echocardiogram will be screened for the study.
- Patients with normal wedge pressure ( [PCWP] ≤ 15 mm Hg), mean PAP ≥ 35 mm Hg and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR- 3.0 wood unit)on right heart catheterization.
- Diagnosis of COPD according to GOLD guidelines
- The patient can read, understand and sign the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- 1. Other identified cause for pulmonary hypertension
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Israel1 site
Pulmoanry Division, Carmel Medical Center
Haifa
Yochai Adir, MD, 972-4-8250517, yochaiad@clalit.org.il
Yochai Adir, MD
About this study
Official title: Inhaled Iloprost for Disproportionate Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Pulmonary hypertension is frequently present in COPD and it is generally limited to a mild increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure. However some COPD patients are characterized by higher levels of mPAP at rest, fulfilling the definition of moderate or severe PH disproportionate PH .
In these patients the elevated pulmonary pressures adversely affect the prognosis.At the present time the evidence for the the use of specific pulmonary vasodilators in the management of these patients are scarce and cannot be recommended.the aim of this study is to evaluate the medium term efficacy and safety of the inhaled prostacyclin stable analog, iloprost in patients with COPD and moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension
Read the detailed description
While pulmonary hypertension is frequently present in COPD, particularly in the presence of hypoxemia, it is generally limited to a mild increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure in the face of a normal cardiac output.
Apart from this classical and widely observed profile of PH with modestly elevated mPAP, some COPD patients are characterized by higher levels of mPAP at rest, fulfilling the definition of moderate or severe PH . This kind of PH may be observed in patients presenting with a severe obstructive disease, but sometimes contrasts with a mild or moderate obstruction. In the latter case, the term disproportionate PH has been proposed, but it can be extended to describe all COPD patients with moderate to- severe PH.
Therefore, it is possible that in some patients with COPD, pulmonary hypertension contributes to the clinical picture because of right ventricular output limitation and is responsible for the poor prognosis of these patients, which is similar to that in primary pulmonary arterial hypertension.
The exact incidence of clinically significant pulmonary hypertension, defined as pulmonary hypertension that contributes to symptomatology and prognosis, is difficult to estimate in COPD. A prevalence of 5.8%- 13.5% in patients seems reasonable which would suggest an incidence of 1-3/10,000, which is 100 times the incidence of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.
These patients are characterized by marked effort dyspnea , profound hypoxemia, hypocapnia, moderate airway obstruction and a very low DLCO.
PH in COPD was an independent prognostic factor. Indeed, patients with similar airflow limitation had lower life expectancy when PH was resent. Patients with PH had a significantly lower survival rate at 5 yrs compared with patients without PH (33 versus 66%). Pathologic studies that stemmed from long-term oxygen trials pointed to the fact that pulmonary vascular remodeling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is more than just medial hypertrophy from long-lasting hypoxic vasoconstriction. In these patients, all vessel wall layers appear to be involved, with intimal changes actually being the most prominent. Major remodeling of all pulmonary arterial vessel layers explains why pulmonary hypertension in COPD is often not,or minimally, reversible by supplemental oxygen, acutely or chronically. The pathobiology of pulmonary artery remodeling in advanced COPD remains incompletely explored. There are data supporting an endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor-dilator imbalance, mainly from a decreased endothelial nitric oxide expression. Plasma levels of ET-1 are increased both in patients with severe COPD and there is evidence that ETA and ETB receptor expression is increased in the pulmonary arteries of patients with COPD.
The major unmet medical need is the absence of a simple drug therapy that relieves the breathlessness or muscle fatigue, reduces pulmonary vascular resistance and the overloaded right ventricles that severely limits exercise tolerance in COPD and affects survival.
The only validated therapeutic approach of the 'common' PH in COPD patients is long-term oxygen therapy. A large variety of vasodilators has been tested in numerous studies both after short- and medium-term administration. The early enthusiasm vanished subsequently for several reasons: modesty of the vasodilator effect, inability for some drugs to sustain the acute benefit, no specificity of the vasodilator effect with concomitant systemic vasodilatation, deleterious effect on gas exchange due to a diminution of the ventilation/perfusion ratio and no demonstration of a survival benefit. At the present time vasodilators cannot be recommended in the management of COPD.
Treatments of PAH have shown a dramatic change in the past few years. Synthetic prostacyclin (epoprostenol), prostacyclin analogues, endothelin-1 receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors are in use in group I PAH with improve clinical outcome.
Based on analogy to primary pulmonary hypertension, a specific interventions aiming at the restoration of endothelial vasoconstrictor- dilator imbalance could be undertaken.
Selective pulmonary vasodilatation by inhalation of the vasorelaxant agent is an appealing concept to circumvent some of the hazards inherent in systemic vasodilator therapy in COPD patients with PH. Treatment of these patients with aerosolization of iloprost may reduce pulmonary vascular resistance , increases cardiac output while conserving ventilation-perfusion matching and and shunt preventing worsening of arterial hypoxia and wasting of the small ventilatory reserve of these patients.
In order to resolve these uncertainties we suggest evaluating the effectiveness of an inhaled iloprost in COPD patients with moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension. This evaluation would include monitoring and measurement of all the relevant cardio-respiratory variables as set out in detail below.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- Inhaled iloprost
- Keywords
- COPD, Pulmonary hypertension
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Hypertension, Pulmonary
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Inhaled iloprostDrug
Also called Brand name - Ventavis
Inhalation Initial: 2.5 mcg/dose; if tolerated, increase to 5 mcg/dose; administer 6 times daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single arm open label | Experimental | All patients will receive the study drugs and will be evaluated Receives: Drug: Inhaled iloprost |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pulmonary vascular resistance
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
6 minutes walking test
Measured: 6 months
Borg dyspnea score
Measured: 6 months
NT-BNP
Measured: 6 months
Arterial blood gases
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2010
- Primary completionJan 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carmel Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Yochai Adir, MD, Principal investigator, Pulmoanry Division, Carmel Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01116063
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- COPDVEN 2009
- Acronym
- COPDVEN
- Status last verified
- May 2010
- First submitted
- 3 May 2010
- Last updated
- 4 May 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Inhaled Iloprost for Disproportionate Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01116063
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COPDVEN / COPDVEN 2009
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- COPD, Pulmonary hypertension
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Carmel Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pulmonary hypertension is frequently present in COPD and it is generally limited to a mild increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure. However some COPD patients are characterized by higher levels of mPAP at rest, fulfilling the definition of moderate or severe PH disproportionate PH .
In these patients the elevated pulmonary pressures adversely affect the prognosis.At the present time the evidence for the the use of specific pulmonary vasodilators in the management of these patients are scarce and cannot be recommended.the aim of this study is to evaluate the medium term efficacy and safety of the inhaled prostacyclin stable analog, iloprost in patients with COPD and moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension
Detailed description
While pulmonary hypertension is frequently present in COPD, particularly in the presence of hypoxemia, it is generally limited to a mild increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure in the face of a normal cardiac output.
Apart from this classical and widely observed profile of PH with modestly elevated mPAP, some COPD patients are characterized by higher levels of mPAP at rest, fulfilling the definition of moderate or severe PH . This kind of PH may be observed in patients presenting with a severe obstructive disease, but sometimes contrasts with a mild or moderate obstruction. In the latter case, the term disproportionate PH has been proposed, but it can be extended to describe all COPD patients with moderate to- severe PH.
Therefore, it is possible that in some patients with COPD, pulmonary hypertension contributes to the clinical picture because of right ventricular output limitation and is responsible for the poor prognosis of these patients, which is similar to that in primary pulmonary arterial hypertension.
The exact incidence of clinically significant pulmonary hypertension, defined as pulmonary hypertension that contributes to symptomatology and prognosis, is difficult to estimate in COPD. A prevalence of 5.8%- 13.5% in patients seems reasonable which would suggest an incidence of 1-3/10,000, which is 100 times the incidence of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.
These patients are characterized by marked effort dyspnea , profound hypoxemia, hypocapnia, moderate airway obstruction and a very low DLCO.
PH in COPD was an independent prognostic factor. Indeed, patients with similar airflow limitation had lower life expectancy when PH was resent. Patients with PH had a significantly lower survival rate at 5 yrs compared with patients without PH (33 versus 66%). Pathologic studies that stemmed from long-term oxygen trials pointed to the fact that pulmonary vascular remodeling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is more than just medial hypertrophy from long-lasting hypoxic vasoconstriction. In these patients, all vessel wall layers appear to be involved, with intimal changes actually being the most prominent. Major remodeling of all pulmonary arterial vessel layers explains why pulmonary hypertension in COPD is often not,or minimally, reversible by supplemental oxygen, acutely or chronically. The pathobiology of pulmonary artery remodeling in advanced COPD remains incompletely explored. There are data supporting an endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor-dilator imbalance, mainly from a decreased endothelial nitric oxide expression. Plasma levels of ET-1 are increased both in patients with severe COPD and there is evidence that ETA and ETB receptor expression is increased in the pulmonary arteries of patients with COPD.
The major unmet medical need is the absence of a simple drug therapy that relieves the breathlessness or muscle fatigue, reduces pulmonary vascular resistance and the overloaded right ventricles that severely limits exercise tolerance in COPD and affects survival.
The only validated therapeutic approach of the 'common' PH in COPD patients is long-term oxygen therapy. A large variety of vasodilators has been tested in numerous studies both after short- and medium-term administration. The early enthusiasm vanished subsequently for several reasons: modesty of the vasodilator effect, inability for some drugs to sustain the acute benefit, no specificity of the vasodilator effect with concomitant systemic vasodilatation, deleterious effect on gas exchange due to a diminution of the ventilation/perfusion ratio and no demonstration of a survival benefit. At the present time vasodilators cannot be recommended in the management of COPD.
Treatments of PAH have shown a dramatic change in the past few years. Synthetic prostacyclin (epoprostenol), prostacyclin analogues, endothelin-1 receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors are in use in group I PAH with improve clinical outcome.
Based on analogy to primary pulmonary hypertension, a specific interventions aiming at the restoration of endothelial vasoconstrictor- dilator imbalance could be undertaken.
Selective pulmonary vasodilatation by inhalation of the vasorelaxant agent is an appealing concept to circumvent some of the hazards inherent in systemic vasodilator therapy in COPD patients with PH. Treatment of these patients with aerosolization of iloprost may reduce pulmonary vascular resistance , increases cardiac output while conserving ventilation-perfusion matching and and shunt preventing worsening of arterial hypoxia and wasting of the small ventilatory reserve of these patients.
In order to resolve these uncertainties we suggest evaluating the effectiveness of an inhaled iloprost in COPD patients with moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension. This evaluation would include monitoring and measurement of all the relevant cardio-respiratory variables as set out in detail below.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single arm open label | Experimental | Drug: Inhaled iloprostAll patients will receive the study drugs and will be evaluated |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient with COPD and increased SPAP >55 on echocardiogram will be screened for the study.
- Patients with normal wedge pressure ( [PCWP] ≤ 15 mm Hg), mean PAP ≥ 35 mm Hg and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR- 3.0 wood unit)on right heart catheterization.
- Diagnosis of COPD according to GOLD guidelines
- The patient can read, understand and sign the informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Other identified cause for pulmonary hypertension
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Inhaled iloprostAlso: Brand name - VentavisInhalation Initial: 2.5 mcg/dose; if tolerated, increase to 5 mcg/dose; administer 6 times daily | Drug | Single arm open label |
Primary outcome
Pulmonary vascular resistance
Time frame: 6 months
4 secondary outcomes
6 minutes walking test
Time frame: 6 months
Borg dyspnea score
Time frame: 6 months
NT-BNP
Time frame: 6 months
Arterial blood gases
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2010.
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yochai Adir, MD principal investigator
Pulmoanry Division, Carmel Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Inhaled iloprost in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Carmel Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yochai aDIR, MD (972-4-8250517, yochaiad@clalit.org.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pulmonary vascular resistance (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2010.