AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPhase 2ACCLAIMNCT01116427

A Cooperative Clinical Study of Abatacept in Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 2 study testing abatacept in people with Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 21 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The ACCLAIM study is testing whether the medication "abatacept" can be of benefit to patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Although abatacept is an investigational medication for MS, it is not a new drug. Abatacept has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
What is being tested?
abatacept
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
65 participants
Where
21 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Sep 2010to Feb 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinically definite Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) meeting McDonald's criteria
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores between 0 and 5
  • Active disease as defined by at least one of the following criteria:
  • One or more documented clinical exacerbations in the past year prior to visit -2
  • One or more gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced MRI lesions in the past year
  • Willingness to forego available MS therapies
  • Ability and willingness to provide informed consent and comply with study requirements and procedures

Who cannot join

  • Normal brain MRI at week -5 scan
  • Females who are pregnant, intending pregnancy, or lactating, and unwilling to undergo pregnancy testing
  • Females who are unwilling to use approved methods of contraception for the duration of the study
  • Any chronic medical disease, other than MS, that compromises organ function
  • Active infection
  • Diagnosis of secondary or primary progressive MS
Show all 26Show fewer
  • Previous treatment with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, cladribine, or rituximab at any time
  • Previous treatment with abatacept within the last 52 weeks prior to visit -2
  • Previous treatment with systemic steroids, interferon, Copaxone, mycophenolate, or other immunosuppressive medications within the last 4 weeks prior to visit -2
  • Previous treatment with Natalizumab within the last 26 weeks prior to visit -2
  • Previous vaccination with live vaccine, or previous treatment with fingolimod, within the last 8 weeks prior to visit-2
  • Diagnosis of malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ
  • Claustrophobia or other contraindications to Gd-enhanced MRI
  • Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serology
  • Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
  • Positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) serology
  • Purified protein derivative (PPD)-tuberculin skin test result greater than 5 mm induration
  • Hemoglobin less than 10.5 gm/dL
  • Platelets less than 100K/µL
  • Absolute lymphocyte count less than 700 cells/μL
  • Serum creatinine greater than 1.20 mg/dL
  • eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2
  • IgG anti-cardiolipin antibody greater than 15 GPL U/mL
  • Previous participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 4 weeks prior to visit -2
  • Allergy or sensitivity to any component of abatacept
  • The presence of any medical condition that the investigator deems incompatible with participation in the trial

Trial locations and contacts

21 sites in 2 countries.

21 sites in 2 countries

United States20 sites
  • University of Maryland

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

  • Jordan Research and Education Institute (REDI): Alta Bates Summit Medical Center

    Berkeley, California, 94705

  • Brigham & Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • University of North Carolina

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514

  • Neurology Specialists, Inc.

    Dayton, Ohio, 45417

  • South Suburban Neurology

    Flossmoor, Illinois, 60422

  • Advanced Neurosciences Institute

    Franklin, Tennessee, 37064

  • University of Southern California - Keck School of Medicine

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Norton Neuroscience Institute - Norton Neurology Services MS Center

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40207

  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55414

  • Judith Jaffe Multiple Sclerosis Center: Weill Cornell Medical College

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Newport Beach Clinical Research Associates, Inc.

    Newport Beach, California, 92663

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • St. Josephs Hospital and Medical Center - Barrow Neurology

    Phonix, Arizona, 85013

  • Providence St. Vincent Medical Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97225

  • The Neurology Foundation, Inc.

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02905

  • University of California, Davis

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason

    Seattle, Washington, 98101

  • Louisiana State University

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Abatacept in Adults With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis

The ACCLAIM study is testing whether the medication "abatacept" can be of benefit to patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Although abatacept is an investigational medication for MS, it is not a new drug. Abatacept has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis.

Read the detailed description

MS is a chronic autoimmune disease in which blood cells that are supposed to protect the body from infection mistakenly attack the body's own tissue. In MS, the target of this attack is a protein called myelin that coats nerves throughout the body. Damage to this protective layer can lead to loss of neurologic function.

There are a number of treatments available to MS patients. Interferon beta, Copaxone, and other drugs can delay the worsening of the disease in some patients. For other patients, more aggressive treatment with chemotherapy drugs such as cyclophosphamide or azathioprine are needed. These drugs attempt to slow the disease by limiting the activity of the entire immune system. Because of this, they can often have serious side effects.

This study evaluates the efficacy of abatacept in the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. In the first phase of the study, all participants will receive 8 intravenous treatments over a period of 24 weeks. Then, if a participant remains eligible, they will enter the second phase of the study and will receive another 8 treatments over the following 24 weeks. Two-thirds (2 out of 3) of participants will receive the study drug abatacept in the first phase, and then an inactive form (placebo) of the drug in the second phase. The remaining one-third (1 in 3) will get the placebo first, then the study drug in the second phase if they remain eligible. Therefore, all participants in the ACCLAIM trial will have the opportunity to receive the study drug abatacept if they remain healthy during the study. Participants will be asked to return for a follow-up visit 12 weeks after all treatments have been completed.

Regular appointments scheduled during the trial will be used to monitor participants' health and progress in the study. These appointments will include: physical and neurological exams, blood tests and motor function assessments. A total of 11 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures are scheduled during the study. The study medication and procedures related to the study will be provided at no expense to the participant.

Being tested
abatacept, Placebo
Keywords
MS, multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, RRMS
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • abataceptBiological

    Also called Orencia®, CTLA4-Ig

    In core/extension phase: administered IV at weeks 0/28, 2/30, and 4/32, and then every 4 weeks until week 24/52; Dosing: less than 60 kg, 500 mg; 60-100 kg, 750 mg; or greater than 100 kg, 1 gram

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called placebo abatacept

    In core/extension phase: administered IV at weeks 0/28, 2/30, and 4/32, and then every 4 weeks until week 24/52

Study groups in NCT01116427
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AbataceptExperimentalReceives abatacept during first course of treatment, switching to placebo during extension phase.
Receives: Biological: abatacept; Drug: Placebo
Placebo, followed by abataceptPlacebo comparatorReceives a placebo for first course of treatment, switching to abatacept in the extension phase.
Receives: Biological: abatacept; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Number of New Inflammatory MRI Lesions Per Monthly Scans

    The mean number of new inflammatory MRI lesions obtained on scans every 4 weeks from Week 8 to Week 24, adjusted for differences between subjects before treatment by subtracting the number of new inflammatory lesions observed from the week -1 MRI scan . An inflammatory lesion is defined as a gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion that shows hyperintensity on postcontrast but no hyperintensity on noncontrast T1 images. A new inflammatory lesion is one that was not present on the previously scheduled MRI scan. If the previously scheduled MRI scan was missing, the scan was compared to the last available MRI.

    Measured: Weeks 8-24

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Absolute Number of New Inflammatory MRI Lesions on Monthly Scans

    The absolute number of new inflammatory MRI lesions obtained on scans every 4 weeks from Week 8 to Week 24. An inflammatory lesion is defined as a gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion that shows hyperintensity on postcontrast but no hyperintensity on noncontrast T1 images. A new inflammatory lesion is one that was not present on the previously scheduled MRI scan. If the previously scheduled MRI scan was missing, the scan was compared to the last available MRI.

    Measured: Weeks 4-24

  2. Lesion Volume Accumulation on T2-weighted MRI Scans Over 24 Weeks

    Difference in total volume of all T2 lesions detected at Week 24 MRI scan compared to Week -1 MRI scan. A T2 lesion is defined as an abnormal, hyperintense white-matter area visible on T2 weighted images. A higher score indicates more severe multiple sclerosis.

    Measured: Week -1 to Week 24

  3. Percent Brain Volume Change

    Percent Brain Volume Change is a measure of brain atrophy. Brain volume was calculated from a MRI scan at Week -1 and a MRI scan at Week 24 then the percent change from Week -1 to Week 24 was calculated. A negative change score means volume decreased. A decrease in volume indicates progression of multiple sclerosis severity.

    Measured: Week -1 to Week 24

  4. Mean Number of New Inflammatory Lesions in 8-week Intervals

    The mean number of new inflammatory MRI lesions obtained on scans every 8 weeks from Week 8 to Week 24. An inflammatory lesion is defined as a gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion that shows hyperintensity on postcontrast but no hyperintensity on noncontrast T1 images. A new inflammatory lesion is one that was not present on the previously scheduled MRI scan. If the previously scheduled MRI scan was missing, the scan was compared to the last available MRI.

    Measured: Week 8 to Week 24

  5. Number of Participants Progressing on the EDSS Scale by at Least 1 Point

    The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is an assessment for severity of multiple sclerosis. The EDSS an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis) in half-point increments. Baseline EDSS score was the lowest score observed at either visit -2 (Wk -5) or visit -1 (Wk -1). EDSS progression is defined as an increase of at least 1 point on the EDSS compared to baseline if the baseline was greater than 1.0, or 1.5 points on EDSS if baseline was less than or equal to 1.0, which persisted for a minimum of 12 weeks or was found on three consecutive EDSS assessments starting at Visit 3 (Wk 8).

    Measured: Week -1 to Week 24

  6. Annualized Relapse Rate

    The rate of multiple sclerosis relapse by year. Annualized relapse rate is calculated by dividing the total number of relapse events in the core phase in each treatment group by the total number of days participants participated in the study during the core phase. This number is then multiplied by 365.25 to get an annualized rate.

    Measured: Week -1 to Week 24

  7. Mean Change in the MSFC Over 24 Weeks of Treatment

    The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is a three-part, standardized, quantitative assessment instrument to measure severity of multiple sclerosis. The MSFC combines three component measures to create a composite measure. The three component measures of the MSFC include the 1) Time 25-foot Walk (a measure of lower extremity function), 2) 9-hole Peg Test (a measure of upper extremity function), and 3) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (a measure of cognitive function). Mean change in MSFC scores from baseline to Week 24 were assessed. Scores from all three components are combined then are converted into a Z-score for analyses, with a range from -1 to 1. A positive score indicates improvement in the severity of multiple sclerosis symptoms while negative scores indicate decline in multiple sclerosis symptoms.

    Measured: Week -1 to Week 24

  8. Mean Number of New Inflammatory MRI Lesions Per Scan During the Extension Phase

    The mean number of new inflammatory MRI lesions obtained on scans at Weeks 36 and 52, adjusted for differences between subjects before treatment by subtracting the number of new inflammatory lesions observed from the week 24 MRI scan. An inflammatory lesion is defined as a gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion that shows hyperintensity on postcontrast but no hyperintensity on noncontrast T1 images. A new inflammatory lesion is one that was not present on the previously scheduled MRI scan. If the previously scheduled MRI scan was missing, the scan was compared to the last available MRI.

    Measured: Weeks 36 and 52

  9. Lesion Volume Accumulation on T2-Weighted MRI Scans Between 24 Weeks and 52 Weeks

    Difference in total volume of all T2 lesions detected at Week 52 MRI scan compared to Week 24 MRI scan. A T2 lesion is defined as an abnormal, hyperintense white-matter area visible on T2 weighted images. A higher score indicates more severe multiple sclerosis.

    Measured: Week 24 to Week 52

  10. Percent Brain Volume Change Between 24 Weeks and 52 Weeks

    Percent Brain Volume Change is a measure of brain atrophy. Brain volume was calculated from a MRI scan at Week 24 and a MRI scan at Week 25 then the percent change from Week 24 to Week 52 was calculated. A negative change score means volume decreased. A decrease in volume indicates progression of multiple sclerosis severity.

    Measured: Week 24 to Week 52

  11. Number of Participants Progressing on the EDSS Scale by at Least 1 Point

    The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is an assessment for severity of multiple sclerosis. The EDSS an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis) in half-point increments. Extension baseline EDSS score was the most recent non-missing value on or before Week 28. Only participants who scored between a 0 and a 5 at baseline were analyzed for this outcome measure. EDSS progression is defined as an increase of at least 1 point on the EDSS compared to baseline if the baseline was greater than 1.0, or 1.5 points on EDSS if baseline was less than or equal to 1.0, which persisted for a minimum of 12 weeks or was found on three consecutive EDSS assessments starting at Visit 3 (Wk 8).

    Measured: Week 24 to Week 64

  12. Annualized Relapse in Extension Phase

    The rate of multiple sclerosis relapse by year. Annualized relapse rate is calculated by dividing the total number of relapse events in the extension and follow-up phases in each treatment group by the total number of days participants participated in the study during the extension and follow-up phases. This number is then multiplied by 365.25 to get an annualized rate.

    Measured: Week 24 to Week 64

  13. Mean Change in the MSFC in Extension Phase

    The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is a three-part, standardized, quantitative assessment instrument to measure severity of multiple sclerosis. The MSFC combines three component measures to create a composite measure. The three component measures of the MSFC include the 1) Time 25-foot Walk (a measure of lower extremity function), 2) 9-hole Peg Test (a measure of upper extremity function), and 3) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (a measure of cognitive function). Mean change in MSFC scores from Week 24 to Week 52 were assessed. Scores from all three components are combined then are converted into a Z-score for analyses, with a range from -1 to 1. A positive score indicates improvement in the severity of multiple sclerosis symptoms while negative scores indicate decline in multiple sclerosis symptoms.

    Measured: Week 24 to Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 May 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
65 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01116427
Sponsor's protocol ID
DAIT ITN035AI
Acronym
ACCLAIM
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
3 May 2010
Last updated
15 Sep 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: The plan is to share data in: 1.)ImmPort, a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts that also provides data analysis tools that are available to researchers who register online and subsequently receive DAIT approval; and 2.)TrialShare, a clinical trials research portal developed by the Immune Tolerance Network that makes data from the consortium's clinical trials publicly available without charge.

Publications

  • Viglietta V, Bourcier K, Buckle GJ, Healy B, Weiner HL, Hafler DA, Egorova S, Guttmann CR, Rusche JR, Khoury SJ. CTLA4Ig treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis: an open-label, phase 1 clinical trial. Neurology. 2008 Sep 16;71(12):917-24. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000325915.00112.61.

    PubMed 18794494
  • Khoury SJ, Rochon J, Ding L, Byron M, Ryker K, Tosta P, Gao W, Freedman MS, Arnold DL, Sayre PH, Smilek DE; ACCLAIM Study Group. ACCLAIM: A randomized trial of abatacept (CTLA4-Ig) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):686-695. doi: 10.1177/1352458516662727. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

    PubMed 27481207

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing abatacept in people with Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 21 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 21 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Apr 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Number of New Inflammatory MRI Lesions Per Monthly Scans (time frame: Weeks 8-24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01116427, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in