EpilepsyPhase 4NCT01118455
Trial to Assess Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy vs. Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) Treatment in Children With Refractory Seizures
A Phase 4 study testing Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy and Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) in people with Epilepsy, run by Cyberonics, Inc. at 19 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
This is a randomized study designed to compare long-term treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with refractory seizures treated with VNS (Vagus Nerve Stimulation) Therapy versus anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Seizure reduction, quality of life measures, and side effect profiles will be evaluated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Epilepsy
- What is being tested?
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy and Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 134 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Jan 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Refractory seizures
- Having tried at least two appropriate anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 have been tolerated at normal dose;
- Having at least 3 appropriate AEDs left to try
- Having his/her current AED medication at an optimal dose at baseline
- At least three seizures per month (average over 2 months prior to admission), excluding absences.
- No more than four (4) weeks between seizures (over 2 months prior to admission)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Age 17 years or less
- Having been evaluated for epilepsy surgery and resective surgery not felt indicated or patient/parents/legal guardian declined.
- Patient is a male or patient is a nonpregnant female adequately protected from conception. Females of childbearing potential must use an acceptable method of birth control. Abstinence is an acceptable means of birth control
- Patient or legal guardian understands study procedures and has voluntarily signed an informed consent in accordance with institutional policies.
Who cannot join
- Having tried less then 2 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 have been tolerated at normal doses in the patient's lifetime
- A progressive neurological condition (e.g. brain tumor etc.)
- Inability of the parents or reluctance of the child to comply with the frequency of clinic visits during the treatment phase
- Patient has a history of noncompliance for seizure diary completion.
- Patient has taken an investigational drug within a period of five times the mean elimination half-life of the investigational drug plus two weeks.
- Patient is currently using another investigational device or drug.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patient is likely to require a whole body Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after VNS Therapy device implantation. (Refer to the Physician's Manual for the NCP Generator for additional information on the use of MRI.)
- Patient is currently receiving or likely to receive short-wave diathermy, microwave diathermy, or therapeutic ultrasound diathermy after implantation (Refer to Physician's Manual for the VNS (Vagus Nerve Stimulation) Therapy device for additional information on the contraindicated use of diathermy).
- Patient was previously enrolled in this or any other VNS Therapy device Study.
- Patient has an active peptic ulcer
- Patient has another unstable medical condition likely to precipitate seizures and make it difficult to evaluate to evaluate efficacy (e.g. diabetes)
- Patient has had a unilateral or bilateral cervical vagotomy.
- Patient is pregnant at the time of enrolment.
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 5 countries.
19 sites in 5 countries
United Kingdom12 sites
Birmingham Children's Hospital
Birmingham
Royal Hospital for Sick Children
Bristol
Addenbrookes Hospital
Cambridge
Ninewells Hospital & Medical School
Dundee
Leeds General Infirmary
Leeds
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
London
King's College Hospital
London
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital
Manchester
Sir James Spence Institute - Royal Victoria Infirmary
Newcastle
Queens's Medical Centre Nottingham
Nottingham
Sheffield Children's Hospital
Sheffield
Southampton Hospital
Southampton
Sweden3 sites
University Hospital Lund
Lund
Astrid Lindgrens Barnsjukhus Karolinska
Stockholm
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala
Germany2 sites
Kinderklinik der Justus-Liebig Universität
Giessen
University Children's Hospital
Lübeck
Austria1 site
Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital (AKH)
Vienna
About this study
Official title: An Open Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Versus New Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) Treatment in Children With Refractory Seizures
This is a randomized study designed to compare long-term treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with refractory seizures treated with VNS (Vagus Nerve Stimulation) Therapy versus anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Seizure reduction, quality of life measures, and side effect profiles will be evaluated. The results of this study will provide controlled comparative data to better guide physicians in determining the best overall treatment strategy for patients with seizures who have failed initial AED therapy.
Read the detailed description
This was a randomized, parallel group, multi-center study. Screening Visit (visit 1) Subjects, parents, and the investigator signed and dated the informed consent after which subject eligibility was checked. Eligible subjects were entered in the baseline period.
Baseline Period (between visits 1 and 2) Eligible subjects entered an 8-week baseline period during which a seizure count was done. During this period, subjects and caregivers were contacted on a regular basis to ensure up to date information collection.
At the end of the baseline period, subjects who continued to be eligible were stratified based on previous therapy history (Early: previously treated with 2 to 5 AEDs versus Non-early: previously treated with >5 AEDs). Within each stratification, the investigator randomized each subject to receive one of the 2 treatments (VNS Therapy treatment or AED treatment) at the end of visit 2 using a randomization schedule provided by an independent third party (Synergos).
Implantation/AED Treatment Initiation (visit 3) For subjects randomized to the AED arm, a new AED treatment was initiated and gradually increased to an effective dose in accordance with the investigator's discretion and the manufacturer's suggested guidelines.
Subjects randomized to the VNS treatment arm were implanted with the VNS Therapy System and allowed adequate surgical recovery according to usual clinical practice before initiation of treatment. A delay of 2 weeks between the end of the baseline period and surgery was authorized to allow practical organization of the implantation. Extension of this period was approved in advance by the Study Director or his delegate.
Treatment Ramp-up (between visits 3 and 4) This ramp-up period for both AEDs and VNS may have taken up to 9 weeks, ending at visit 4. Additional visits were scheduled outside of the study protocol to adequately accommodate Treatment Ramp-up as needed. Initiation of treatments as well as the ramp-up schedule was documented in the Case Report Forms.
Study Treatment Period The Study Treatment Period was 12 months (52 weeks) following visit 3 and including Treatment Ramp-up. Because this study was designed to compare the natural course of treatment, changes in the study AED dose (for the AED group) or VNS stimulation parameters (for the VNS Therapy group) were allowed as clinically indicated during the Study Treatment Period. The protocol allowed approximately a 10% increase in baseline AED to allow for an increase in growth of the patient in the VNS arm.
Study End At the end of the study, subjects in the AED group who had not had significant improvement after all study assessments were completed were offered a VNS device implantation. Subjects in the VNS arm who had not had adequate improvement were evaluated for AED treatment.
Number of Subjects: Approximately 400 subjects were to be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either AED or VNS treatment strata. Strata were to be according the AED treatment history (Early subjects were previously treated and failed treatment with 2 to 5 AEDs, Non-early subjects were treated and failed treatment with >5 AEDs). At least 15 study sites were to enroll subjects. Initially, only United Kingdom (UK) sites were to be selected. During the course of the trial, an extension was used to add non-UK centers.
A total of 151 subjects underwent screening prior to enrollment. Eight failed screening, and 143 went on to be randomized. Of those randomized, 8 subjects (4 in each of the treatment groups) were not treated. One patient in the VNS arm was explanted prior to initiation of device stimulation, so they were excluded. Therefore, 134 subjects were treated (ITT population): 65 were implanted with the VNS system and 69 were treated with AED. Nineteen investigational sites in the UK, Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Sweden participated in this study and enrolled subjects.
Study Duration: The maximum study follow-up was approximately 14 months from enrollment to study exit. The study was terminated due to insufficient enrollment prior to reaching the 400 subjects as specified in the protocol. After 4.5 years of enrollment, the Sponsor terminated enrollment and followed the remaining subjects out to the 52 week follow-up visit.
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Being tested
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy, Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) TherapyDevice
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control.
Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)Drug
Subject has tried at least 2 appropriate AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 had been tolerated at normal doses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy | Experimental | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control. Receives: Device: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy |
| Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) | Experimental | This arm will supply a comparison between VNS and new AEDs which is necessary to determine an overall treatment regimen for the 30% to 40% of patients who fail to respond to 2 AEDs. Receives: Drug: Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Responders After 1 Year of Follow-up (ITT-population)
Responders are subjects who had no new AEDs added or significant dose changes in baseline AEDs within 1 year of follow-up, along with a reduction in the percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%.
Measured: 52 weeks post baseline
Secondary outcomes (6)
Mean Percent Change in Hague Seizure Severity Scale Score (ITT Population)
The Hague Seizure Severity Assessment (Carpay et al. 1996) is a scale completed by the patient and/or caregiver to assess the severity and post-ictal recovery of seizures. A reduction in the HSSA score reflects less seizure severity experienced.
Measured: 52 weeks post baseline
Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Questionnaire A) in Epilepsy (ITT Population)
Calculate changes in the Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Parker et al. 1999) (Questionnaire A) for patients in both treatment arms (AED and VNS) at 52 weeks after randomization compared to baseline. The higher the quality of life score the better the quality of life experienced.
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model will be used to adjust for baseline variables (including QoL score) when comparing the two treatment groups. A two-sample t-test will be used for simple comparison QoL change from baseline.
Total range for this scale is a minimum score of 81 to a maximum score of 336. There are no applicable subscales.
Measured: 52 weeks post baseline
Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy Scale (Questionnaire B) (ITT Population)
Calculate changes in the Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy scale (Carpay et al. 1997) (Questionnaire B) for patients in both treatment arms (AED and VNS) at 52 weeks after randomization compared to baseline. The higher the quality of life score the better the quality of life experienced.
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model will be used to adjust for baseline variables (including QoL score) when comparing the two treatment groups. A two-sample t-test will be used for simple comparison QoL change from baseline.
Total range for this scale is a minimum score of 10 to a maximum score of 40. There are no applicable subscales.
Measured: 52 weeks post baseline
Mean Percent Change in Seizure Frequency (ITT Population)
The mean percent change in seizure frequency for the VNS and AED treatment groups at 52 weeks post baseline.
Both AED and VNS treatment groups were stratified according to the patients' number of previous AED treatments ("early group" had 2 to 5 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of target range; "non-early group" had more than 5 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of target range). Seizure frequency was calculated based on number of patient/caregiver reported seizures at 52-week post baseline (percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%). All seizures were counted.
The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm.
Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population.
Measured: 52 weeks post baseline
Number of Subjects With Any Non-Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Population)
To compare the safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) treatment using the VNS Therapy device to anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy in treating patients with seizures.
The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm.
Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Number of Subjects With Any Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class & Preferred Term (Safety Population)
To compare the safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) treatment using the VNS Therapy device to anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy in treating patients with seizures.
The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm.
Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionJan 2010
Why it stopped: Insufficient enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for EpilepsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cyberonics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mark Bunker, PharmD, Study director, Cyberonics, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01118455
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Epilepsy (E)-06
- Status last verified
- Jun 2014
- First submitted
- 5 May 2010
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Versus New Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) Treatment in Children With Refractory Seizures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01118455
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Epilepsy (E)-06
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Insufficient enrollment
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cyberonics, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jun 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized study designed to compare long-term treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with refractory seizures treated with VNS (Vagus Nerve Stimulation) Therapy versus anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Seizure reduction, quality of life measures, and side effect profiles will be evaluated. The results of this study will provide controlled comparative data to better guide physicians in determining the best overall treatment strategy for patients with seizures who have failed initial AED therapy.
Detailed description
This was a randomized, parallel group, multi-center study. Screening Visit (visit 1) Subjects, parents, and the investigator signed and dated the informed consent after which subject eligibility was checked. Eligible subjects were entered in the baseline period.
Baseline Period (between visits 1 and 2) Eligible subjects entered an 8-week baseline period during which a seizure count was done. During this period, subjects and caregivers were contacted on a regular basis to ensure up to date information collection.
At the end of the baseline period, subjects who continued to be eligible were stratified based on previous therapy history (Early: previously treated with 2 to 5 AEDs versus Non-early: previously treated with >5 AEDs). Within each stratification, the investigator randomized each subject to receive one of the 2 treatments (VNS Therapy treatment or AED treatment) at the end of visit 2 using a randomization schedule provided by an independent third party (Synergos).
Implantation/AED Treatment Initiation (visit 3) For subjects randomized to the AED arm, a new AED treatment was initiated and gradually increased to an effective dose in accordance with the investigator's discretion and the manufacturer's suggested guidelines.
Subjects randomized to the VNS treatment arm were implanted with the VNS Therapy System and allowed adequate surgical recovery according to usual clinical practice before initiation of treatment. A delay of 2 weeks between the end of the baseline period and surgery was authorized to allow practical organization of the implantation. Extension of this period was approved in advance by the Study Director or his delegate.
Treatment Ramp-up (between visits 3 and 4) This ramp-up period for both AEDs and VNS may have taken up to 9 weeks, ending at visit 4. Additional visits were scheduled outside of the study protocol to adequately accommodate Treatment Ramp-up as needed. Initiation of treatments as well as the ramp-up schedule was documented in the Case Report Forms.
Study Treatment Period The Study Treatment Period was 12 months (52 weeks) following visit 3 and including Treatment Ramp-up. Because this study was designed to compare the natural course of treatment, changes in the study AED dose (for the AED group) or VNS stimulation parameters (for the VNS Therapy group) were allowed as clinically indicated during the Study Treatment Period. The protocol allowed approximately a 10% increase in baseline AED to allow for an increase in growth of the patient in the VNS arm.
Study End At the end of the study, subjects in the AED group who had not had significant improvement after all study assessments were completed were offered a VNS device implantation. Subjects in the VNS arm who had not had adequate improvement were evaluated for AED treatment.
Number of Subjects: Approximately 400 subjects were to be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either AED or VNS treatment strata. Strata were to be according the AED treatment history (Early subjects were previously treated and failed treatment with 2 to 5 AEDs, Non-early subjects were treated and failed treatment with >5 AEDs). At least 15 study sites were to enroll subjects. Initially, only United Kingdom (UK) sites were to be selected. During the course of the trial, an extension was used to add non-UK centers.
A total of 151 subjects underwent screening prior to enrollment. Eight failed screening, and 143 went on to be randomized. Of those randomized, 8 subjects (4 in each of the treatment groups) were not treated. One patient in the VNS arm was explanted prior to initiation of device stimulation, so they were excluded. Therefore, 134 subjects were treated (ITT population): 65 were implanted with the VNS system and 69 were treated with AED. Nineteen investigational sites in the UK, Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Sweden participated in this study and enrolled subjects.
Study Duration: The maximum study follow-up was approximately 14 months from enrollment to study exit. The study was terminated due to insufficient enrollment prior to reaching the 400 subjects as specified in the protocol. After 4.5 years of enrollment, the Sponsor terminated enrollment and followed the remaining subjects out to the 52 week follow-up visit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy | Experimental | Device: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) TherapyVagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control. |
| Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) | Experimental | Drug: Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)This arm will supply a comparison between VNS and new AEDs which is necessary to determine an overall treatment regimen for the 30% to 40% of patients who fail to respond to 2 AEDs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Refractory seizures
- Having tried at least two appropriate anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 have been tolerated at normal dose;
- Having at least 3 appropriate AEDs left to try
- Having his/her current AED medication at an optimal dose at baseline
- At least three seizures per month (average over 2 months prior to admission), excluding absences.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Having tried less then 2 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 have been tolerated at normal doses in the patient's lifetime
- A progressive neurological condition (e.g. brain tumor etc.)
- Inability of the parents or reluctance of the child to comply with the frequency of clinic visits during the treatment phase
- Patient has a history of noncompliance for seizure diary completion.
- Patient has taken an investigational drug within a period of five times the mean elimination half-life of the investigational drug plus two weeks.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) TherapyVagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control. | Device | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy |
| Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)Subject has tried at least 2 appropriate AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 had been tolerated at normal doses. | Drug | Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Responders After 1 Year of Follow-up (ITT-population)
Time frame: 52 weeks post baseline
Responders are subjects who had no new AEDs added or significant dose changes in baseline AEDs within 1 year of follow-up, along with a reduction in the percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%.
6 secondary outcomes
Mean Percent Change in Hague Seizure Severity Scale Score (ITT Population)
Time frame: 52 weeks post baseline
Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Questionnaire A) in Epilepsy (ITT Population)
Time frame: 52 weeks post baseline
Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy Scale (Questionnaire B) (ITT Population)
Time frame: 52 weeks post baseline
Mean Percent Change in Seizure Frequency (ITT Population)
Time frame: 52 weeks post baseline
Number of Subjects With Any Non-Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Population)
Time frame: 0-52 weeks
Number of Subjects With Any Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class & Preferred Term (Safety Population)
Time frame: 0-52 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trial of SEEG for Drug-resistant Epilepsy
Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Carisbamate as Adjunctive Treatment for Seizures Associated With LGS in Children and Adults
Seizures, Lennox Gastaut Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures FOCUS-1
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark Bunker, PharmD study director
Cyberonics, Inc.
19 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy and Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) in people with Epilepsy, run by Cyberonics, Inc. at 19 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Austria, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jun 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Responders After 1 Year of Follow-up (ITT-population) (time frame: 52 weeks post baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2014.