Tracheal Intubation MorbidityMPLITNCT01118533
Impact of Blades Used for Scheduled Orotracheal Intubation on Postoperative Sore Throat
A study testing metal reusable blades MacIntosh and Single use plastic blades HEINE XP® in people with Tracheal Intubation Morbidity and Sore Throat, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Orotracheal intubation following general anesthesia requires blades to be performed. The risk of patients contamination with infectious agents related to reusable metal blades leads to promote single-use blades. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tracheal Intubation Morbidity, Sore Throat
- What is being tested?
- metal reusable blades MacIntosh and Single use plastic blades HEINE XP®
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 712 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Sep 2010to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patient, 18-70 years-old scheduled for surgery planned under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation
- Patient who has underwent a clinical examination before inclusion
- Patient who has carefully read the information notice and is not opposed to participate to the study
- Patient having a assurance policy or a similar regimen
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Difficulty to understand the current language (French)
- Presence of predictive factors of difficult orotracheal intubation
- Previous difficult tracheal intubation Grade IV of the MALLANPETI score Limited mouth opening (inter-incisive distance < 3.5 cm) Limited cervical mobility Thyromental distance < 6 cm History of radiotherapy or surgery for ENT cancer Retrognathism Presence of gastric tube for postoperative purposes Presence of Pharyngeal and Laryngeal signs before surgery
- Type of surgery Surgery performed without orotracheal intubation Thyroid surgery ENT surgery Withdrawal of gastric banding Bariatric surgery Ambulatory surgery (one-day surgery)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
hospital Center of Meaux, department of anesthesiology
Meaux, Meaux, 77104
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized and Single Bind Trial. Influence of Laryngoscope Blade Material on Postoperative PHARYNGEAL AND LARYNGEAL Morbidity Following Scheduled OroTracheal Intubation
Orotracheal intubation following general anesthesia requires blades to be performed. The risk of patients contamination with infectious agents related to reusable metal blades leads to promote single-use blades. Some of these latter are plastic and this material may need more strength to lift the jaw and expose the larynx before orotracheal intubation. Sometimes, change of blade, from plastic to metal, during the procedure is necessary to increase the larynx exposure. This change of blade may increase the frequency of sore throat following orotracheal intubation.
Consequently, the study hypothesis is an increase of both sore throat intensity and frequency with the plastic blades compared with the metal blades.
The primary purpose of the present study is to compare the impact of these two types of blades, metal versus plastic, on sore throat intensity and frequency following scheduled orotracheal intubation for general anesthesia
Read the detailed description
Trial design :
This will be a multicenter, prospective, randomized and single-blind controlled study
Material and Methods :
The obtaining of the Ethic Committee approval allows the enrolment of 712 patients scheduled for surgery performed under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. Adult patients, 18 to 70 years-old, with grade I-II of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) status will be enrolled after clear information and obtaining, at the anesthesia visit, of the non-opposition to be enrolled in the trial.
At the anesthesia visit, the anesthesiologist will explain the purpose and protocol to the patients and then will propose them to participate to the study. The decision to be enrolled will be known at the pre-anesthesia visit, one day before the surgery. Therefore, the patients will have a delay between the anesthesia and pre-anesthesia visits to make a decision. The non-opposition to participate to the trial will be clearly mentioned in the medical file.
A randomization list will be established by a statistician. Informed and non-opposed patients will be allocated both a randomization number and a plastic or metal blade in the operating theatre via the Clean Web software.
The evaluation and measure of the primary outcome will be made in a single-blind way. The patients will evaluate the sore throat intensity being unaware of the type of blade used for the orotracheal intubation. An independent research assistant in each centre will collect data evaluated in both the operating room during the orotracheal intubation procedure and the post-operative period.
The duration of tracheal intubation will be defined as the time elapsing from the mouth insertion of the blade to the passage of the tube throughout the vocal cords announced by the operator. The intra-tracheal position of the tube will be confirmed by three squared cycles of capnography.
Protocol :
Anesthesia and monitoring:
Patients will be premedicated by hydroxyzine 1 mg kg-1 the previous evening and one hour before the transfer to the operating room.
The randomization is performed in the operating room just before the anesthesia induction.
The monitoring will be standard with:
- An electrocardiogram (lookout of cardiac rhythm modifications)
- A pulse oxymetry to lookout arterial oxygen saturation
- A non-invasive blood pressure monitoring
- A capnograph to lookout carbon dioxide elimination in the expired gas and to confirm the intra-tracheal position of the tube
- A gas analyser to control the concentration of administered halogenated volatile agents
- A neuromuscular blockade monitor to lookout the depth of the neuromuscular blockade required to perform tracheal intubation in optimal conditions. The monitoring will consist of stimulating the facial nerve 1 cm near the external eyelid corner by a train of four electric charges (30 mA). The muscular responses will be evaluated on the corrugator Supercilia by counting the number of contractions.
- A bispectral index (BIS) or entropy to monitor the hypnosis depth. The expected values will be 40-60 and 25-35, respectively.
- A manometer to control the tracheal tube cuff pressure Before anesthesia induction, patients will breathe 100% oxygen till expired oxygen concentration reach 90%. Intravenous anesthesia will be then performed with propofol (1.5-2.5 mg kg -1) as hypnotic, sufentanil (0.2 mcg kg-1) and atracurium (0.5 mg kg-1) as muscle relaxant. Cis-atracurium or vecuronium as middle acting muscle relaxant or SUNCCYNILCHOLINE as short acting muscle relaxant will be authorized. According to the randomization, the blade used for orotracheal intubation will be metal or plastic. The metal blade is reusable and the plastic blade is disposable. When the BIS or the entropy will reach 40-60 and 25-35, respectively, with efficient face mask ventilation (good thoracic amplitude following by capnography cycles), no response to the TOF at the corrugator Supercilia, the laryngoscopy will be performed according to the orotracheal intubation algorithm. Tracheal tube sizes will be 7 mm for female and 7.5 for males. Tracheal tube cuff will be standard.
After tracheal intubation, the anesthesia will be maintained with inhaled halogenated gas or intravenously. Inhaled gas will be moistened. Postoperative analgesia will be anticipated in the operating room with paracetamol 1 g, ketoprofen 100 mg and nefopam if necessary. In the absence of contraindication, the three analgesics will be administered during laparotomies. Wound and abdominal holes for laparoscopy will be infiltrated with ropivacaine. At the end of the surgery, the tracheal tube will be withdrawn according to the standard procedure recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society. Mouth secretions will be suctioned delicately. In the PACU, analgesia will be continued with according to a protocol adapted to the type of surgery. Morphine will be administered if pain VAS reaches 4/10. Pharyngeal and laryngeal morbidity evaluation will begin at the discharge of the PACU and will last 48 hours. If signs persist more than 48 hours, an ENT examination will be performed to make a diagnostic.
Statistics :
Sample size: The literature reports a 30% incidence of postoperative sore throat with metal blades. The hypothesis is that this incidence could increase from 30% to 40% if plastic blades are used. Un sample size of 356 patients per group is required to detect this increase of 10% with a Chi2 test, a statistic power (1-beta) of 0.80 and alpha type I error probability of 0.05.
- Conditions
- Tracheal Intubation Morbidity, Sore Throat
- Being tested
- metal reusable blades MacIntosh, Single use plastic blades HEINE XP®
- Keywords
- Intubation, Sore throat, Blades, Laryngoscopy, Morbidity
- Medical subject headings
- Pharyngitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
metal reusable blades MacIntoshDevice
laryngoscope blades
Single use plastic blades HEINE XP®Device
Also called Sign use plastic blades HEINE XP®
laryngoscope blades
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| metallic blades | Experimental | laryngoscope blade material Receives: Device: metal reusable blades MacIntosh |
| plastic laryngoscope blades | Active comparator | Laryngoscope Blade Material Receives: Device: Single use plastic blades HEINE XP® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The frequency of patients presenting a post-operative sore throat whose intensity is above 4 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) graded from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) collected at the discharge of the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Measured: Two years
Secondary outcomes (12)
The frequency of patients presenting a post-operative sore throat whose intensity is different from 0/10 without swallowing
Measured: 2 years
The pain intensity will be measured at the discharge of the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) with a slide ruler displaying a visual analogue scale graded from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) on the blinded face
The pain will be evaluated everyday during two days. If the pain persists, it will be evaluated everyday till the pain disappears or till the end of the patient participation (seven days).
Measured: seven days
the degree of voice modification on a VAS
dysphonia
Measured: Seven days
the sore throat VAS during swallowing.
dysphagia
Measured: seven days
jaw pain
Measured: seven days
lips injuries
Measured: seven days
dental injuries
Measured: seven days
blood on the blade
Measured: seven days
the intubation difficulty score (IDS)
Measured: one day
the frequency of difficult intubation
Measured: Two years
the frequency of change of blade during the tracheal intubation procedure
Measured: two years
the tracheal intubation duration.
Measured: one day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2010
- Primary completionSep 2015
- Study completionSep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Tracheal Intubation MorbidityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 712 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Serge Ndoko, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Center of Meaux
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01118533
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- K080902
- Acronym
- MPLIT
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2010
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Amour J, Marmion F, Birenbaum A, Nicolas-Robin A, Coriat P, Riou B, Langeron O. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jan;104(1):60-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200601000-00011.
PubMed 16394691Maktabi MA, Smith RB, Todd MM. Is routine endotracheal intubation as safe as we think or wish? Anesthesiology. 2003 Aug;99(2):247-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00002. No abstract available.
PubMed 12883393
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized and Single Bind Trial. Influence of Laryngoscope Blade Material on Postoperative PHARYNGEAL AND LARYNGEAL Morbidity Following Scheduled OroTracheal Intubation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01118533
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MPLIT / K080902
- Conditions
- Tracheal Intubation Morbidity, Sore Throat
- Keywords
- Intubation, Sore throat, Blades, Laryngoscopy, Morbidity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 712 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2010
- Primary completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Orotracheal intubation following general anesthesia requires blades to be performed. The risk of patients contamination with infectious agents related to reusable metal blades leads to promote single-use blades. Some of these latter are plastic and this material may need more strength to lift the jaw and expose the larynx before orotracheal intubation. Sometimes, change of blade, from plastic to metal, during the procedure is necessary to increase the larynx exposure. This change of blade may increase the frequency of sore throat following orotracheal intubation.
Consequently, the study hypothesis is an increase of both sore throat intensity and frequency with the plastic blades compared with the metal blades.
The primary purpose of the present study is to compare the impact of these two types of blades, metal versus plastic, on sore throat intensity and frequency following scheduled orotracheal intubation for general anesthesia
Detailed description
Trial design :
This will be a multicenter, prospective, randomized and single-blind controlled study
Material and Methods :
The obtaining of the Ethic Committee approval allows the enrolment of 712 patients scheduled for surgery performed under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. Adult patients, 18 to 70 years-old, with grade I-II of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) status will be enrolled after clear information and obtaining, at the anesthesia visit, of the non-opposition to be enrolled in the trial.
At the anesthesia visit, the anesthesiologist will explain the purpose and protocol to the patients and then will propose them to participate to the study. The decision to be enrolled will be known at the pre-anesthesia visit, one day before the surgery. Therefore, the patients will have a delay between the anesthesia and pre-anesthesia visits to make a decision. The non-opposition to participate to the trial will be clearly mentioned in the medical file.
A randomization list will be established by a statistician. Informed and non-opposed patients will be allocated both a randomization number and a plastic or metal blade in the operating theatre via the Clean Web software.
The evaluation and measure of the primary outcome will be made in a single-blind way. The patients will evaluate the sore throat intensity being unaware of the type of blade used for the orotracheal intubation. An independent research assistant in each centre will collect data evaluated in both the operating room during the orotracheal intubation procedure and the post-operative period.
The duration of tracheal intubation will be defined as the time elapsing from the mouth insertion of the blade to the passage of the tube throughout the vocal cords announced by the operator. The intra-tracheal position of the tube will be confirmed by three squared cycles of capnography.
Protocol :
Anesthesia and monitoring:
Patients will be premedicated by hydroxyzine 1 mg kg-1 the previous evening and one hour before the transfer to the operating room.
The randomization is performed in the operating room just before the anesthesia induction.
The monitoring will be standard with:
- An electrocardiogram (lookout of cardiac rhythm modifications)
- A pulse oxymetry to lookout arterial oxygen saturation
- A non-invasive blood pressure monitoring
- A capnograph to lookout carbon dioxide elimination in the expired gas and to confirm the intra-tracheal position of the tube
- A gas analyser to control the concentration of administered halogenated volatile agents
- A neuromuscular blockade monitor to lookout the depth of the neuromuscular blockade required to perform tracheal intubation in optimal conditions. The monitoring will consist of stimulating the facial nerve 1 cm near the external eyelid corner by a train of four electric charges (30 mA). The muscular responses will be evaluated on the corrugator Supercilia by counting the number of contractions.
- A bispectral index (BIS) or entropy to monitor the hypnosis depth. The expected values will be 40-60 and 25-35, respectively.
- A manometer to control the tracheal tube cuff pressure Before anesthesia induction, patients will breathe 100% oxygen till expired oxygen concentration reach 90%. Intravenous anesthesia will be then performed with propofol (1.5-2.5 mg kg -1) as hypnotic, sufentanil (0.2 mcg kg-1) and atracurium (0.5 mg kg-1) as muscle relaxant. Cis-atracurium or vecuronium as middle acting muscle relaxant or SUNCCYNILCHOLINE as short acting muscle relaxant will be authorized. According to the randomization, the blade used for orotracheal intubation will be metal or plastic. The metal blade is reusable and the plastic blade is disposable. When the BIS or the entropy will reach 40-60 and 25-35, respectively, with efficient face mask ventilation (good thoracic amplitude following by capnography cycles), no response to the TOF at the corrugator Supercilia, the laryngoscopy will be performed according to the orotracheal intubation algorithm. Tracheal tube sizes will be 7 mm for female and 7.5 for males. Tracheal tube cuff will be standard.
After tracheal intubation, the anesthesia will be maintained with inhaled halogenated gas or intravenously. Inhaled gas will be moistened. Postoperative analgesia will be anticipated in the operating room with paracetamol 1 g, ketoprofen 100 mg and nefopam if necessary. In the absence of contraindication, the three analgesics will be administered during laparotomies. Wound and abdominal holes for laparoscopy will be infiltrated with ropivacaine. At the end of the surgery, the tracheal tube will be withdrawn according to the standard procedure recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society. Mouth secretions will be suctioned delicately. In the PACU, analgesia will be continued with according to a protocol adapted to the type of surgery. Morphine will be administered if pain VAS reaches 4/10. Pharyngeal and laryngeal morbidity evaluation will begin at the discharge of the PACU and will last 48 hours. If signs persist more than 48 hours, an ENT examination will be performed to make a diagnostic.
Statistics :
Sample size: The literature reports a 30% incidence of postoperative sore throat with metal blades. The hypothesis is that this incidence could increase from 30% to 40% if plastic blades are used. Un sample size of 356 patients per group is required to detect this increase of 10% with a Chi2 test, a statistic power (1-beta) of 0.80 and alpha type I error probability of 0.05.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| metallic blades | Experimental | Device: metal reusable blades MacIntoshlaryngoscope blade material |
| plastic laryngoscope blades | Active comparator | Device: Single use plastic blades HEINE XP®Laryngoscope Blade Material |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patient, 18-70 years-old scheduled for surgery planned under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation
- Patient who has underwent a clinical examination before inclusion
- Patient who has carefully read the information notice and is not opposed to participate to the study
- Patient having a assurance policy or a similar regimen
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Difficulty to understand the current language (French)
- Presence of predictive factors of difficult orotracheal intubation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| metal reusable blades MacIntoshlaryngoscope blades | Device | metallic blades |
| Single use plastic blades HEINE XP®Also: Sign use plastic blades HEINE XP®laryngoscope blades | Device | plastic laryngoscope blades |
Primary outcome
The frequency of patients presenting a post-operative sore throat whose intensity is above 4 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) graded from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) collected at the discharge of the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Time frame: Two years
12 secondary outcomes
The frequency of patients presenting a post-operative sore throat whose intensity is different from 0/10 without swallowing
Time frame: 2 years
The pain intensity will be measured at the discharge of the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) with a slide ruler displaying a visual analogue scale graded from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) on the blinded face
Time frame: seven days
the degree of voice modification on a VAS
Time frame: Seven days
the sore throat VAS during swallowing.
Time frame: seven days
jaw pain
Time frame: seven days
lips injuries
Time frame: seven days
dental injuries
Time frame: seven days
blood on the blade
Time frame: seven days
the intubation difficulty score (IDS)
Time frame: one day
the frequency of difficult intubation
Time frame: Two years
the frequency of change of blade during the tracheal intubation procedure
Time frame: two years
the tracheal intubation duration.
Time frame: one day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2016.
- Background: PubMed 16394691Amour J, Marmion F, Birenbaum A, Nicolas-Robin A, Coriat P, Riou B, Langeron O. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jan;104(1):60-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200601000-00011.
- Background: PubMed 12883393Maktabi MA, Smith RB, Todd MM. Is routine endotracheal intubation as safe as we think or wish? Anesthesiology. 2003 Aug;99(2):247-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00002. No abstract available.
Related trials for Tracheal Intubation Morbidity
Recruiting
Optimisation Strategy for Emergency Tracheal Intubation
Emergencies, Out-of-hospital Setting
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Oral Melatonin VS Nebulized Dexmedetomidine Premedication on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Direct Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Hypertensive Patients
Tracheal Intubation Morbidity, Laryngoscopy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Serge Ndoko, MD principal investigator
Hospital Center of Meaux
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing metal reusable blades MacIntosh and Single use plastic blades HEINE XP® in people with Tracheal Intubation Morbidity and Sore Throat, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The frequency of patients presenting a post-operative sore throat whose intensity is above 4 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) graded from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) collected at the discharge of the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). (time frame: Two years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01118533, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2016.