AzTrials
AzTrials

EpilepsyPhase 2NCT01118949

Open-Label Study to Assess Lacosamide Safety as Add-on Therapy for Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Epilepsy

A Phase 2 study testing Lacosamide in people with Epilepsy, run by UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc. at 25 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose is to assess the safety of Lacosamide in subjects with uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) seizures with Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Epilepsy
What is being tested?
Lacosamide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
25 sitesUnited States
Study dates
May 2010to Aug 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject has a diagnosis of uncontrolled epilepsy with primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures and idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Diagnosis should have been established by an electroencephalogram (EEG) with generalized spike-wave discharges within 5 years of the screening visit
  • Subject has ≥1 PGTC seizure within the 12 weeks prior to the screening visit
  • Subject has a stable dose regimen of 1 to 3 marketed antiepileptic drug(s) (AEDs) with or without additional concurrent stable Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS). The VNS must have been in place for at least 6 months prior to study entry with constant settings for at least 28 days prior to the screening visit and during the Baseline Phase. Benzodiazepines will be counted as an AED

Who cannot join

  • Subject has a history of partial-onset seizures or EEG findings consistent with partial onset seizures
  • Subject has a history of status epilepticus within the 5-year Period prior to Visit 1
  • Subject has a current or previous diagnosis of pseudoseizures, conversion disorders, or other non-epileptic ictal events
  • Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition
  • Subject has any history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Subject is currently taking felbamate
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Subject has ever taken vigabatrin and has no visual fields examination report available or if results of the examination are abnormal
  • Subject is on a ketogenic diet
  • Subject has a known sodium channelopathy

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 1 country.

25 sites in 1 country

United States25 sites
  • Study site

    Alabaster, Alabama

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Study site

    Aurora, Colorado

  • Study site

    Bethesda, Maryland

  • Study site

    Boise, Idaho

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Charlottesville, Virginia

  • Study site

    Chesterfield, Missouri

  • Study site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Fort Wayne, Indiana

  • Study site

    Hershey, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Lexington, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Louisville, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Madison, Wisconsin

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Norfolk, Virginia

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona

  • Study site

    Renton, Washington

  • Study site

    Rome, Georgia

  • Study site

    San Francisco, California

  • Study site

    Scarborough, Maine

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label Pilot Study to Assess the Safety of Oral Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy for Uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy

The purpose is to assess the safety of Lacosamide in subjects with uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) seizures with Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.

Conditions
Epilepsy
Being tested
Lacosamide
Keywords
Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) Seizures, Absence Seizures, Myoclonic Seizures, Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy (IGE)
Medical subject headings
Epilepsy, Seizures, Epilepsy, Idiopathic Generalized

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LacosamideDrug

    Also called Vimpat®

    Lacosamide is supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg tablets. Subjects will begin a Dose-Titration Phase of Lacosamide at 100 mg/day (50 mg bid, approx. 12 hours apart, once in the morning and once in the evening) for 1 week. Three (3) weekly increases will follow until the subject reaches a dosage of 200 mg/day, 300 mg/day, or 400 mg/day, as deemed clinically appropriate. The final titration will be followed by a 6-week Maintenance Phase. Subjects who complete the Maintenance Phase have the opportunity to enroll in an open-label extension study; those who do not enroll will begin a 3-week End-of-Study Phase when Lacosamide will be tapered off gradually at a recommended rate of 200 mg/day/week.

Study groups in NCT01118949
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LacosamideExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Lacosamide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Absence Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase

    During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded:

    • Seizure type
    • Seizure frequency

    A negative value in change of seizure days with absence seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with absence seizures.

    Measured: From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)

  2. Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Myoclonic Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase

    During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded:

    • Seizure type
    • Seizure frequency

    A negative value in change of seizure days with myoclonic seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with myoclonic seizures.

    Measured: From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Changes in Count of Generalized Spike-wave Discharges on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)

    Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with > 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The general spike-wave discharges are calculated per interpretable hours.

    Measured: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)

  2. Changes in Count of 3 Hertz (Hz) Spike-wave Discharges (During Waking Hours) on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)

    Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with > 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The 3 Hertz (Hz) spike-wave discharges are calculated per awake hours.

    Measured: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)

  3. Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    Measured: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)

  4. Number of Subjects Withdrawn From the Study Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    Measured: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2010
  3. Primary completionAug 2011
  4. Study completionAug 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01118949
Sponsor's protocol ID
SP0961
Other IDs
2014-004379-22, 2014
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
5 May 2010
Last updated
17 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Wechsler RT, Yates SL, Messenheimer J, Leroy R, Beller C, Doty P. Lacosamide for uncontrolled primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures: An open-label pilot study with 59-week extension. Epilepsy Res. 2017 Feb;130:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

    PubMed 28086164

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Lacosamide in people with Epilepsy, run by UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc. at 25 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Sep 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Absence Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase (time frame: From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01118949, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in